What Our Bank Leaders Can Learn From Amazon’s Jeff Bezos

From theBankDoctor.

Amazon is well on the way to its goal of conquering the modern commercial world. The e-commerce, logistics, media and food titan is now the second biggest company in the world and Morgan Stanley predicts it will overtake Apple by the end of next year to become the globe’s first USD1 trillion company. Australian institutions, particularly the banks, are yet to feel the full force of Jeff Bezos’ global colossus but with Amazon’s arrival in Australia, that is all about to change.

 THREE LESSONS FROM JEFF BEZOS

1. CUSTOMER OBESESSION.
At the core of Jeff Bezos’s leadership philosophy is the primacy of the customer. “Everything we’ve done, all the success we have, is at its root primarily due to the fact that we have put customers first” he says.

Amazon customers believe this as reflected in various metrics including its Net Promoter Score (NPS is a globally used and respected measure of the loyalty of an organisation’s customer relationships) of 61.

Further, Amazon is the second most admired company in the world, just behind Apple.

Our bank leaders also talk about the importance of putting the customer first but the key difference is that bank customers don’t believe the rhetoric. The average Net Promoter Score for the big four banks is -10 with the best (CBA) at -3 and the poorest (Westpac) at -15.

And not one of the big four Australian banks appears in BRW/Hays Group top ten admired companies.

It says a lot when the Treasurer of an unpopular government can gain easy political points by berating bank CEOs with the put-down that “your customers don’t like you very much”. It seems bank CEOs are even less popular than politicians.

Banks seem to be obsessively focussed on each other – witness the recent move by CBA to remove ATM fees which was followed within 24 hours by the other three.

 “If you’re competitor-focused, you have to wait until there is a competitor doing something. Being customer-focused allows you to be more pioneering” says Bezos.

Here are four examples of where the banks wait for competitors or regulators to do something before they act.

1. Loyal existing home loan customers who don’t shop around. According to a recent report by Fairfax Media, this is costing customers nearly $5b a year.

2. Customers who have funds on deposit but don’t get paid any interest.

3. Open data. Customers believe that data about their banking records belongs to them and they want banks to embrace not frustrate open data.

4. Unfair terms in standard form contracts. Banks have taken advantage of their dominant bargaining position to impose unreasonable restrictions on customers who have little bargaining power.

Globalisation and technology are re-weighting this power imbalance. According to Bezos “the balance of power is shifting toward consumers and away from companies..… The right way to respond is to put the vast majority of your energy, attention and dollars into building a great product or service and put a smaller amount into shouting about it, marketing it.”

2. GROW, GROW, GROW.

Amazon is obsessed with driving growth from new customers, products and markets. Last quarter it had revenue of USD43b and this quarter it is expected to exceed USD55b.

The Amazon approach to growing customers is a simple cycle – cut prices to attract customers, which increases sales and attracts more customers, which allows the company to benefit from economies of scale until, ultimately, the company can cut prices again.

As an example, as soon as Amazon spent USD13.7b to acquire Whole Foods it cut some prices by around 40 per cent. Whole Foods is now selling a range of Amazon products and services through its 431 stores.

In recent times banks have used strategies like increasing fees and cutting costs in order to maintain profits and dividends. Bezos says “there are two kinds of companies, those that work to try to charge more and those that work to charge less. We will be the second.”

Invention is another key plank of Bezos’s philosophy. Amazon uses the internet to get maximum leverage from its fixed assets, and once it achieves enough volume of sales, the sum total of profits from all those sales exceed its fixed cost base, and it turns a profit.

Amazon is the ultimate scalable business. Amazon Web Services is the biggest cloud computing company in the world. The internet enables Amazon to quickly and successfully expand around the globe. It is now in 13 countries and employs more than 300,000 people and 45,000 robots to ship 1.6m packages a day.

Amazon dominates US online retail sales with a market share of 45 per cent. Given that 90 per cent of US retail sales are still made via bricks and mortar stores, the upside is enormous. Amazon has invested heavily in infrastructure too and now 44 per cent of Americans live within 32 km of an Amazon warehouse or delivery station hence their ability to offer fast delivery times.

Half of the households in the US subscribe to Amazon Prime which for USD5.99/month gives them services including steaming, video, music, e-books, free shipping & other deals.

Meanwhile our banks are getting smaller. They have retreated from failed off-shore operations and they’re offloading peripheral businesses like wealth management and insurance. A former CEO NAB was fond of remarking  “I have never seen an organisation shrink to greatness” but that appears to be exactly what the big four banks are now trying to achieve.

3. LONG TERM VISION WITH EXECUTIVE REMUNERATION ALIGNED

Of course, its easier call the shots when you are the Executive Chairman, the founder and major shareholder but Bezos’ priorities have always been upfront – if we take care of customers, the stock will take care of itself in the long term.”

Amazon has never been about profits, its all about growth. “If you’re very clear to the outside world that you’re taking a long-term approach, then people can self-select in” he says.

Clearly analysts and investors are buying this story. Wall Street analysts are almost unanimous in their “strong buy” recommendations notwithstanding traditional metrics which show:

  • PE Ratio is 230 and based on 2019 forecast it is still 75
  • ROE is 9 per cent and average over last 5 years is 5.5 per cent
  • Yield is 0 per cent – Amazon doesn’t pay dividends

Last year Bezos was not Amazon’s highest-paid employee. He received USD1.681m in total compensation of which USD81k was salary. Yet because he still owns 17 per cent, he is now the richest man in the world with a net worth of USD93b.  Bill Gates is worth USD89b and Warren Buffett USD74b.

That’s a pretty good alignment of interest. Contrast this to ANZ’s former CEO Mike Smith who was paid $88m over 8 years when the share price actually fell during that period and his major strategy of expanding into Asia was immediately undone by his successor.

Australian bank bosses are paid huge sums regardless of shareholder return and their focus is excessively skewed to the short term. None have ever stood up to the markets like Bezos has and remember Bezos has talked like this from the onset.

AMAZON HAS THE BANKS’ ATTENTION & WITH GOOD REASON!

It’s only a matter of time before Amazon takes on Australia’s banks. Any market structure in which a small number of firms has the large majority of market share is at risk of being disrupted.

The four big banks are a similar size, they are cumbersome and are weighed down by antiquated ways of doing business. Despite or perhaps because they have shared the spoils of the banking market for over 25 years, their offerings are indistinguishable.

Australian banks still generate very acceptable ROEs around 14 per cent. Meanwhile, globally the banking industry’s ROE remains around 8 per cent to 10 per cent. This makes Australia’s banks even more attractive and as Bezos says “your margin is our opportunity.”

But Amazon wont tackle the banks head on, it will take them on where they are most vulnerable and where it can leverage its strengths including customer relationships, technology and data.

We only have to look at Amazon’s US banking activities to see where this is likely to be. It has a small-business lending arm that has already lent more than USD3b to more than 20,000 of the merchants on its e-commerce platform.

And it has a Visa credit card which rewards customers with benefits including 2 per cent discounts at restaurants, gas stations and drugstores. Meanwhile, Australian banks are winding back rewards from credit cards.

The banks are friendless. The Government’s popularity continues to decline and a banking inquiry or a Royal Commission now seems inevitable. No-one is going in to bat for the banks and repeated advertising campaigns are unlikely to shift public opinion.

It is worth noting the pronouncement by Keith Noreika, Acting Comptroller of the Currency (the agency that oversees US national banks) that “if a commercial company can deliver banking services better than existing banks, we hurt consumers by making it hard for them to do so.

For the politicians and bureaucrats it is sinking in that the quickest and easiest way to increase competition in banking is not to try to get the banks to change but rather to make it easier for new entrants. And the big players like Amazon have a head start over the fintech start-ups because they have deep pockets, customers and data.

WHERE TO FROM HERE?
The Amazon lesson is that in this new age, customers are ultimately the ones who will make or break any business. If the overseas experience is anything to go by, Australian consumers will embrace Amazon and Australian businesses also have the opportunity to grow as Amazon grows.

But Amazon itself faces several risks including its reliance on Bezos. There is also the risk of competition from other goliaths like Alibaba, Apple, Alphabet, Microsoft and Facebook as well as the prospect of an entirely new player disrupting the disruptors.

If Amazon does end up conquering the modern commercial world, would that be a good thing? At what stage might the regulators form the view that Amazon has gained too much power? Will it be too late then to unwind this behemoth?

The banks know what they are up against and are already responding. They still have customers, strong balance sheets and track records and they employ lots of very smart people but they are going to have to move more adroitly than they have done in the past.

We can expect the banks to push for the unwinding of the Four Pillars Policy to enable them to merge thereby reducing costs to better compete with the likes of Amazon.

One thing is for sure Jeff Bezos and Amazon have shown us all just how quickly the world of commerce is changing and the banking market is no exception.

Re-posted with permission.

Amazon should bring Whole Foods to Australia

From The New Daily.

A leading economist has welcomed Amazon’s shock $US13.7 billion takeover of Whole Foods, saying it could be very good news for Australian grocery shoppers.

UNSW Professor Richard Holden, who spent a decade teaching and researching at top US universities, said he hoped Amazon would open Whole Foods supermarkets in Australia, as the sector is ripe for a new premium competitor.

“As someone who lived in the US for 10 years and shopped at Whole Foods every second day, it would be great for the consumer if they came to Australia,” he told The New Daily.

Amazon announced on Saturday it had signed a binding $US42-a-share merger contract with Whole Foods, which has 460 supermarket outlets across the US, Canada and the UK.

This was a radical shift in strategy for Amazon. Almost overnight, it went from an almost entirely online retailer to an enormous bricks-and-mortar grocery powerhouse.

With last year’s launch of AmazonFresh, an online grocery delivery service, it’s clear CEO Jeff Bezos wants Amazon to change grocery shopping forever.

“Millions of people love Whole Foods Market because they offer the best natural and organic foods, and they make it fun to eat healthy,” Mr Bezos said in a statement.

“Whole Foods Market has been satisfying, delighting and nourishing customers for nearly four decades – they’re doing an amazing job and we want that to continue.”

All physical stores will continue to operate under the Whole Foods brand, Amazon confirmed.

Professor Holden said the premium supermarket chain, which specialises in healthy, vegan and eco-products, could be expanded to Australia after AmazonFresh officially launches here in 2018.

“Coles and Woolworths seem to charge fairly high prices, so if someone was to come in with a premium offering like Whole Foods, then they’re not trying to battle into a market where people are used to paying extremely competitive prices,” he said.

“It’s certainly a market where a premium offering like Whole Foods might appeal, and where prices are already, shall we say, not low.”

Professor Holden said his experience of shopping at Whole Foods regularly while living in the US was overwhelmingly positive.

“They have a lot of organic food, really high-quality produce, a lot of incredibly good prepared meals as well. It’s like shopping at David Jones food hall, basically, but for everything,” he said.

“If you had to pay incredibly high prices, that would be one thing. But they’re really not that bad, compared to Australian prices.”

Whole Foods will join AmazonFresh for groceries, Amazon Prime for TV shows and movies, Kindle for e-books, Audible for podcasts and audiobooks, Echo to rival smart assistants like Apple’s Siri, and IMDb for movie reviews, among many other subsidiary companies.

Maria Prados, vice-president at online payments platform Worldpay, said in a statement that Amazon’s purchase was a “clear sign of its intention to disrupt the grocery industry globally”.

“From the ‘Dash’ buy button, to the launch of the AmazonFresh service last year, the eCommerce giant has been taking clear steps to build its position in the grocery sector. And investing in a physical presence could be the key to Amazon’s success in this space,” Ms Prados said.

Amazon Has Secretly Become a Giant Bank

From The Street.

Amazon.com said Thursday that its Amazon Lending service has surpassed $3 billion in loans to small businesses since it was launched in 2011.

In the last 12 months alone the eCommerce giant has loaned over $1 billion to small businesses. Hiking up the sales for third party merchants is a plus for Amazon, as the company gets a piece of the transaction.

 “We created Amazon Lending to make it simple for up-and-coming small businesses to efficiently get a business loan, because we know that an infusion of capital at the right moment can put a small business on the path to even greater success,” Amazon Marketplace VP Peeyush Nahar said.

Over 20,000 small businesses have received a loan from Amazon and more than 50% of the businesses Amazon loans to end up taking a second loan.

Amazon’s stock were unchanged by Thursday’s close at $1,010.31.

Understanding the Amazonian workplace – it’s the law of the jungle

From The Conversation.

In virtually every science fiction novel or film, there is an evil corporation which dominates the world – from LexCorp in the Superman franchise to Weyland-Yutani in Alien. Their masterminds tend to hide their ambitions behind stretched smiles and a language of care. That is, until the story’s protagonist exposes their plans and saves the world by exposing the evil afoot.

Compare this to the real world. We have corporations with huge influence which do bad things, we are well aware of it and yet we continue to let it happen. Why?

The recent New York Times exposé of life working for Amazon used old-fashioned investigative journalism to reveal the harsh reality of working in the company’s head office in Seattle. It documents a culture of relentless criticism, with a reliance on continual measuring of performance and long working hours. Unsurprisingly, this results in high labour turnover, as those who refuse to become “Amabots” (a term used to describe someone who has become part of the system) get spat out like returned parcels.

Nothing new to see here

There has been predictable criticism of Amazon following these revelations – rightly so. But consider what we already know about the company. We have known for some time that it has a tax structure which ensures that it minimises its responsibilities in paying for the roads which allows it to transport its goods and the education that allows its employees to be able to read and write (Amazon’s British business paid just £4.2m in tax in 2014, despite selling goods worth £4.3 billion).

We know, following the work done by Spencer Soper in the US and Carole Cadwalladr in the UK that the conditions in its warehouses are punishing. Long hours, low wages and continual monitoring by technology result in high labour turnover. Oh, and (surprise surprise) Amazon doesn’t like trade unions.

Amazon factory workers in Germany striking last year for better pay and conditions. EPA/Roland Weihrauch

What else do we already know? That Amazon is a company which seeks to dominate markets through cost efficiencies, putting competitors out of business, or ensuring that they have to do their business through Amazon. There are well-documented accounts of its attempts to ensure that publishers offer the same discounts that it does, or that all print on demand has to go through its own company.

And, if that fails, it simply buys the competition with the huge piles of cash it has built from doing what it does, as it did with AbeBooks, LoveFilm, Goodreads, Internet Movie Database, The Book Depository, BookFinder, to name a few. And this isn’t even to mention its domination of the e-reader market through Kindle. Even if it doesn’t say so on the website, you might well be doing business through an Amazon subsidiary. If this isn’t a strategy for world domination, what is it?

In 21 years, Amazon has grown to become a company with almost US$89 billion in turnover every year. To put this in context, that’s greater than the GDP of countries such as Cuba, Oman and Belarus. And it has made Jeff Bezos, its driven founder, a personal fortune of around US$47 billion, which is about the same as the GDP of Costa Rica or Slovenia.

As one of his many plaudits, he was named “World’s Worst Boss” by the International Trade Union Confederation at their World Congress in May 2014. He also now owns the Washington Post.

All this, and much much more, is known about Amazon, but it continues to grow, recently suggesting a move into delivery by drones and beginning a food delivery service in a few US cities.

In his recent novel, The Circle, Dave Eggers describes a US internet company (a cipher for Google) that gradually moves towards world domination, using relentless monitoring of its employees and a continual rhetoric about exceeding customer needs. In the novel, when the customers or employees are confronted by criticisms of what the company does, they don’t see it, instead pointing to all the ways in which the company is making their lives easier. Criticism is seen as negative, practised by people who want to turn the clock back.

Results driven: Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos. EPA/Michael Nelson

Talk to most people about why Amazon is a problem and you will get similar responses. “But it makes things so easy.” “They are cheaper than anyone else.” “What’s wrong with efficiency?”

The law of the jungle

But this isn’t just a debate about Amazon, as if it is a bad company surrounded by lots of good ones. It raises much broader questions about what corporations do. Essentially, they are machines which are designed to grow, to externalise their costs and privatise their profits. The fact that this produces a management culture of extreme bullying, or anti-union practices in its workplaces, or anti-competitive strategies in its marketplaces shouldn’t really amaze us.

It’s the law of the jungle, right? What should amaze us is the extent to which we know that this happens and yet – unlike the heroes in the sci-fi films – we continue to do nothing about it.

Behind the reflective surfaces of its buildings and website, Amazon is selling us something else. It’s a vision of a different world of work and consumption. This is a privatised, measured and monetised world, in which every social value is for sale. You can even buy books which tell you what’s wrong with corporations through the website, because the content doesn’t really matter that much.

All that matters is that the company makes money, dominates markets, keeps customers happy. That is what Amazon sells, and we continue to keep buying it.

Author: Martin Parker, Professor of Organisation and Culture at University of Leicester