Disappointing US Inflation Data Will Keep The Fed Hawkish…

The last mile of the journey in getting inflation back into its box, is the hardest and most intractable. So while US inflation is much lower than it was the latest release yesterday, ahead of the FED rate decision today shows it’s not declining quickly and remains above the Federal Reserve’s targets.

In summary, core inflation matched market expectations in November, increasing at a marginally faster rate of 0.3%. In annualised trend terms, core inflation is running at 3¼%, with rapid core goods disinflation of 3¾% broadly offsetting faster core services inflation of 5½%. But core services excluding housing inflation has picked up to 6% in annualised trend terms, while the trimmed mean CPI – which gives a sense of the breadth of price rises – has picked back up to 3¾%.

The initial spike in 2021 was driven by goods prices, which had been stable for years. That was mainly thanks to the pandemic’s effect on supply chains. That shock is over. At this point, inflation is almost entirely about core services, which include shelter.

The FOMC won’t change rates this week, but it does get to revise the “dot plot” which shows its projected course of interest rates ahead. That would be a way to assure the market that rates are coming down swiftly, but for now the Fed could be reluctant to do anything that encourages more speculation.

http://www.martinnorth.com/

Go to the Walk The World Universe at https://walktheworld.com.au/

The Uncertainty Principle: The DFA Daily 14th July 2021 [Podcast]

The latest edition of our finance and property news digest with a distinctively Australian flavour.

In today’s show we unpick the latest US CPI numbers, check in on New Zealand Home prices in June, and also ask whether we are in a tech bubble 2.0 and whether NAB will acquire Citi’s Australian Banking Business.

Today’s post is brought to you by Ribbon Property Consultants.

If you are buying your home in Sydney’s contentious market, you do not need to stand alone. This is the time you need to have Edwin from Ribbon Property Consultants standing along side you.

Buying property, is both challenging and adversarial. The vendor has a professional on their side.

Emotions run high – price discovery and price transparency are hard to find – then there is the wasted time and financial investment you make.

Edwin understands your needs. So why not engage a licensed professional to stand alongside you. With RPC you know you have: experience, knowledge, and master negotiators, looking after your best interest.

Shoot Ribbon an email on info@ribbonproperty.com.au & use promo code: DFA-WTW/MARTIN to receive your 10% DISCOUNT OFFER.

Go to the Walk The World Universe at https://walktheworld.com.au/

Digital Finance Analytics (DFA) Blog
Digital Finance Analytics (DFA) Blog
The Uncertainty Principle: The DFA Daily 14th July 2021 [Podcast]
Loading
/

APRA On The Changing Landscape (And What We Don’t Know…) [Podcast]

We discuss the latest outing from APRA, and look at the FED’s bail-out of Westpac and NAB a decade ago.

Digital Finance Analytics (DFA) Blog
Digital Finance Analytics (DFA) Blog
APRA On The Changing Landscape (And What We Don't Know...) [Podcast]
Loading
/

Maybe The FED Won’t Cut

President Trump has declared the FED should cut by 1%. But according to Bloomberg, three Federal Reserve policy makers voiced their resistance to the notion that the U.S. economy needs lower interest rates, and a fourth said he wanted to avoid taking further action “unless we have to,” foreshadowing a sharp debate with officials who want to cut again.

Investors have fully priced a quarter percentage-point reduction at the Fed’s Sept. 17-18 policy meeting, but dissenting Fed voices may limit the prospects for the larger move that some have advocated, including President Donald Trump.

Chairman Jerome Powell could provide more guidance when he speaks on Friday at the annual central banker retreat in Jackson Hole, Wyoming.

“As I look at where the economy is, it’s not yet time, I’m not ready, to provide more accommodation to the economy without seeing an outlook that suggests the economy is getting weaker,” conference host and Kansas City Fed President Esther George told Bloomberg Television.

Fed Lifts As Expected

As expected the FED lifted the targets rate today. No real indication of future changes, suggesting a pause perhaps? Here is their statement:

Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in November indicates that the labor market has continued to strengthen and that economic activity has been rising at a strong rate. Job gains have been strong, on average, in recent months, and the unemployment rate has remained low. Household spending has continued to grow strongly, while growth of business fixed investment has moderated from its rapid pace earlier in the year. On a 12-month basis, both overall inflation and inflation for items other than food and energy remain near 2 percent. Indicators of longer-term inflation expectations are little changed, on balance.

Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability. The Committee judges that some further gradual increases in the target range for the federal funds rate will be consistent with sustained expansion of economic activity, strong labor market conditions, and inflation near the Committee’s symmetric 2 percent objective over the medium term. The Committee judges that risks to the economic outlook are roughly balanced, but will continue to monitor global economic and financial developments and assess their implications for the economic outlook.

In view of realized and expected labor market conditions and inflation, the Committee decided to raise the target range for the federal funds rate to 2-1/4 to 2‑1/2 percent.

In determining the timing and size of future adjustments to the target range for the federal funds rate, the Committee will assess realized and expected economic conditions relative to its maximum employment objective and its symmetric 2 percent inflation objective. This assessment will take into account a wide range of information, including measures of labor market conditions, indicators of inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and readings on financial and international developments.

The Dow is currently down significantly, having been higher in the day.

Fed Minutes Underscores Higher Rates Ahead

The Federal Reserve released the minutes relating to the 26th September decision to lift rates.  The impression from the more detailed disclosures is that more hikes are likely, and perhaps quicker than originally expected.  Members agreed to remove the sentence indicating that “the stance of monetary policy remains accommodative.”

US Mortgage Rates continue higher.

This is what the FED said:

In their discussion of monetary policy for the period ahead, members judged that information received since the Committee met in August indicated that the labor market had continued to strengthen and that economic activity had been rising at a strong rate. Job gains had been strong, on average, in recent months, and the unemployment rate had stayed low. Household spending and business fixed investment had grown strongly. On a 12-month basis, both overall inflation and inflation for
items other than food and energy remained near 2 percent.

Indicators of longer-term inflation expectations were little changed on balance.

Members viewed the recent data as consistent with an economy that was evolving about as they had expected. Consequently, members expected that further gradual increases in the target range for the federal funds rate would be consistent with sustained expansion of economic activity, strong labor market conditions, and inflation near the Committee’s symmetric 2 percent objective over the medium term. Members continued to judge that the risks to the economic outlook remained roughly balanced.

After assessing current conditions and the outlook for economic activity, the labor market, and inflation, members voted to raise the target range for the federal funds rate to 2 to 2¼ percent. Members agreed that the timing
and size of future adjustments to the target range for the federal funds rate would depend on their assessment of realized and expected economic conditions relative to the Committee’s maximum-employment objective and symmetric 2 percent inflation objective. They reiterated that this assessment would take into account a wide range of information, including measures of labor market conditions, indicators of inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and readings on financial and international developments.

With regard to the postmeeting statement, members agreed to remove the sentence indicating that “the stance of monetary policy remains accommodative.” Members made various points regarding the removal of the sentence from the statement. These points included that the characterization of the stance of policy as “accommodative” had provided useful forward guidance in the early stages of the policy normalization process, that this characterization was no longer providing meaningful information in light of uncertainty surrounding the level of the neutral policy rate, that it was appropriate to remove the characterization of the stance from the Committee’s statement before the target range for the federal funds rate moved closer to the range of estimates of the neutral policy rate, and that the Committee’s earlier communications had helped prepare the public for this change.

In choppy trading in the US on Wednesday, it appears the markets are coming to accept higher rates ahead. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 91.74 points, or 0.36 percent, to 25,706.68.

The Fear Index eased a little to 17.40, down 1.25%, but volatility still stalks the halls.

The S&P 500 lost 0.71 points, or 0.03 percent, to 2,809.21.

The Nasdaq Composite dropped 2.79 points, or 0.04 percent, to 7,642.70.

The 10-Year Bond rate continued higher ending at 3.207, up 0.88%.

What Does A Yield Curve Inversion Really Signal?

We look at the latest US data, and check the history of yield curve inversions and their link to recessions.

Please consider supporting our work via Patreon

FRED

Economics and Markets
Economics and Markets
What Does A Yield Curve Inversion Really Signal?



Loading





/

You Ain’t Seen Nothing Yet

We look at the FED QT and its potential impact.

Please consider supporting our work via Patreon

Please share this post to help to spread the word about the state of things….

Economics and Markets
Economics and Markets
You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet



Loading





/

So, How Much Pressure On Bank Margins Now?

The US 10-year bond rate is moving higher again, with the expectation of more FED rate rises ahead.

US mortgage rates have resumed an upward trend that began last week after political turmoil in Italy began to die down. More simply put, rates had been rising in mid May.

Locally, I continue to track the BBSW (the critical benchmark)..

… and rates are still elevated, if off their highs.   This is an indication of the influence of overseas funding, and the question of trust in the local markets following the Royal Commission revelations, recent court cases and now the latest suggestions of cartel behaviour.

But the question is, to what extent are these movements in short term rates hitting Australian bank margins, and will they react by repricing their back books?

There is first the “optics”, given the current focus on their poor behaviour as laid bare in the recent rounds of hearings. Banks who hike rates risk more reputational damage (can it go lower?), although some, such as Suncorp and MyState have already reacted by lifting rates. And if you look carefully average mortgage rates are already a little higher, and deposit rates continue to be cut. But all done quietly, and not enough to repair margins.

Second, the current behaviour we are seeing is the offer of significant discounts for some new and refinanced mortgage loans, especially principal and interest loans with lower LVRs, because banks need to grow their mortgage books to sustain shareholder returns. And mortgage growth is slowing.

Third, its worth understanding what proportion of bank funding is based on short term, and overseas funding.  Perfectly timed was a speech – Some Features of the Australian Fixed Income Market, by Christopher Kent, RBA Assistant Governor (Financial Markets) in Tokyo.

The reduced use of offshore funding by the banks has been offset by much greater use of domestic deposits . The big shift away from short-term debt towards deposits started around the time of the global financial crisis. These changes were in response to the demands of the market and those of regulators for banks to make greater use of more stable sources of funding.

Graph 5: Funding Composition of Banks in Australia

While the use of short-term debt (i.e. less than one year) is less than it was, it still accounts for around 20 per cent of banks’ funding. And about 60 per cent of that debt (on a residual maturity basis) is raised offshore. Global money markets, in the United States and elsewhere, provide the Australian banks with a much deeper market with a wider investor base than the relatively small domestic market. This short-term debt is issued in foreign currency terms, but the banks fully hedge their exchange rate (and interest rate) exposures at relatively low cost.

Graph 6: Short-term Debt of Australian Banks

Because Australian banks raise a portion of their funding in US money markets to finance their domestic assets, they responded to higher US rates earlier this year by marginally shifting towards domestic markets to meet their needs. Hence, the rise in the US 3-month LIBOR rate (relative to the Overnight Index Swap (OIS) rate) was closely matched by a rise in the equivalent 3-month bank bill swap rate (BBSW) spread to OIS in Australia; similarly, the two spreads have declined of late by similar orders of magnitude (relative to their respective OIS rates). Equivalent spreads in some other money markets around the world also moved higher, though to a lesser extent than spreads in Australia. In contrast, rates in the euro area and Japan were not affected by the tightness in the US markets. That difference appears to reflect the fact that although European and Japanese banks tap into US money markets, they do so largely to fund US dollar assets.

Graph 7: International Money Markets

Changes in BBSW rates in Australia feed through to banks’ funding costs in a number of ways. First, they flow through to rates that banks pay on their short- and long-term floating rate wholesale debt. Second, BBSW rates affect the costs associated with hedging the risks on banks’ fixed-rate debt, with the banks typically paying BBSW rates on their hedged liabilities. Third, interest rates on wholesale deposits tend to be closely linked to BBSW rates.

In short, the costs of a range of different types of funding have risen a bit for Australian banks in the past few months. But they remain relatively low and pressures in short-term money markets have eased, with BBSW about 10 basis points lower than its recent peak (relative to OIS). While some business lending rates are closely linked to BBSW rates – and so have increased a little – there have been few signs to date of changes to rates on loans for housing or small businesses.

Yeh, right…

In summary, banks are exposed to short term funding cost moves, 20% of the funding is short term, and 60% of that off-shore. As for the pressure on rates, well Credit Suisse just put out an interesting note highlighting the state of money markets.

Interbank credit spreads are back at financial crisis highs. And our modelling suggests that we should expect to see both sharp tightening of bank lending standards, and out of cycle rate hikes. Therefore, even without doing anything, the RBA will find that financial conditions are getting tighter.

A quick bit of modelling suggests that banks will need to lift rates, and soon to address the profit compression suggested in the money market movements (yet alone paying the various agreed settlement costs and fees in some banks’ operations).  We discussed this a week or so back.

More mortgage stress to come then.

Australia is facing an interest rates dilemma

From The Conversation.

This week the US Federal Reserve, as expected, raised its benchmark interest rate by 25 basis points, to a range of 1-1.25%. This was the third such hike in the last six months.

Fed Chair Janet Yellen said:

Our decision reflects the progress the economy has made and is expected to make.

Yet not everyone was so jazzed about the decision. In a terrific piece former US Treasury Secretary Larry Summers articulated “5 reasons why the Fed may be making a mistake”.

And whether the Fed view or the Summers view is the better one has tremendously important implications for what the Reserve Bank should do here in Australia.

The nub of Summers’s concern revolves around the implicit model of the economy that the Fed is using – and whether it still works in the economic world in which we find ourselves.

The general worry with keeping rates too low, for too long, is that inflation will take off. In the past, policymakers have worried – with good reason – that waiting to raise rates until inflation starts rising much is dangerous because it can get out of control.

If one is not going to wait to see what happens to inflation, then one needs a way to predict the path of it. The traditional approach that policymakers have taken is to look at the relationship between unemployment and inflation – the so-called Phillips Curve – and predict future inflation based on unemployment.

Summers prefers what he calls the “shoot only when you see the whites of the eyes of inflation” paradigm. This – as the imagery suggests – involves waiting until the last possible point before raising rates. In other words, be really sure that the inflation is happening.

This makes sense if the old model is broken, and Summers makes a persuasive case that it is.

First, he points out that the Phillips Curve (the allegedly stable relationship) may not even exist. And even if it did, scholars have pointed out that it would be very hard to estimate statistically the Goldilocks point where unemployment is such that the rate of inflation is stable (the so-called Non-Accelerating Inflation Rate of Unemployment or NAIRU).

Second, Summers offers a different model of the world – at least in part. That model is one where advanced economies – like the US and Australia – are suffering from “secular stagnation”.

According to Summers, the implication for monetary policy of this are as follows:

there is good reason to believe that a given level of rates is much less expansionary than it used to be given the structural forces operating to raise saving propensities and reduce investment propensities.

I am not sure that a 2 percent funds rate is especially expansionary in the current environment.

Moreover, he sees asymmetric risk with getting it wrong, going on to say:

And I am confident that if the Fed errs and tips the economy into recession the consequences will be very serious given that the zero lower bound on interest rates or perhaps a slightly negative rate will not allow the normal countercyclical response.

Maybe the combination of a fire hose of global savings chasing too few productive investment opportunities has changed what level of interest rate can provide a serious boost to economic activity.

Which bring us to Australia. We, too, have relatively low unemployment by historical standards (the ABS just announced a drop in May to 5.5%), yet wage growth is remarkably low. Those two things happening together suggests that our old understanding of the labour market is off the mark. That low wage growth is a major driver of the low inflation we are also experiencing.

If Summers is right, and there isn’t some big point of difference between Australia and the US in this regard, then the unmistakable implication is that the RBA should probably cut rates – perhaps twice – later this year.

But there is that whole housing price thing in Australia. A rate cut could fuel further price rises which, as bad as that is for affordability, is also deeply problematic for financial stability.

Yet, if the Australian economy really does need a rate cut, and governor Philip Lowe holds steady because of housing price fears, then that could trigger a further slowing of GDP growth, put wages under even more pressure, and trigger a recession itself. And that would be bad news for financial stability, too.

Let’s see how the RBA handles that Gordian Knot.