Social Trends – Page 22 – Digital Finance Analytics (DFA) Blog

The MYEFO Magic Pudding…

The Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook (MYEFO) update released on Wednesday estimates the Australian economy is expected to expand by a low 1.75% in 2023–24 before regaining momentum in 2024-25, when improved real incomes are expected to support a recovery in household consumption. It also notes inflation – although moderating – is still too high.

The outlook attributes that mainly to global oil prices and Treasury has not changed its forecast timetable for inflation’s return to the 2-3% target band, with 2.5% hit in mid 2025, so the Government is more optimistic than the RBA when it comes to expected progress on inflation. The RBA expects inflation to be at 3.0% by mid-2025.

Treasury’s analysis of the structural budget position suggests that the budget in 2023-24 is neutral with respect to inflation – it is neither adding nor reducing inflationary pressures.

Treasury continues to expect the economy will slow over the next few years to grow below trend with the unemployment rate drifting higher to 4.5% in 2025-26.

The migration intake has been a hot topic recently. As expected, the MYEFO forecasts upgrade the outlook for net overseas migration (NOM) in 2023-24 by 60k to 375k. We suspect that this will likely undershoot the eventual outcome. In 2024-25, forecasts for NOM have been marked down slightly to 250k, likely reflecting the expected impact of the Government’s recently announced migration strategy.

Gross debt is expected to peak at 35.4% of GDP in 2027-28, this is 0.2 percentage points lower than projected in the May Budget. While debt is expected to be lower, the expected cost of capital has also increased since the May Budget, reflecting the rise in government bond yields. Overall, these counteracting forces net out to a slight increase in interest payments as a share of GDP over the medium term.

Sadly, in a blow for budget transparency, there is still a line for decisions taken but not yet announced. We don’t know what decisions these are, but they are significant – the estimates start at $270 million in 2023-24 and rise to $1.8 billion in 2026-27. It is impossible to tell what this spending is for. If the government were to reverse those decisions between now and the next budget update, we will never know.

http://www.martinnorth.com/

Go to the Walk The World Universe at https://walktheworld.com.au/

Household Financial Pressures And RBA Propaganda…

Next Tuesday I will be running my live show on Household Financial Stress, which continues to worsen. However, what constitutes “stress” is being debated widely – its a matter of definition.

The RBA has joined the debate, but I will argue in today’s show they conveniently presented a lop-sided story, which understates the true picture.

Andrea Brischetto, Head of Financial Stability gave a speech at the Sydney Banking and Financial Stability Conference, University of Sydney, titled Financial Stability and the Financial Health of Australian Mortgagors.

There has understandably been a lot of focus on this issue of late, with many households facing substantial financial pressures from high inflation and higher interest rates. Some of the households feeling these pressures most acutely are those with lower incomes, including many renters.

But the focus was on households with mortgages and how their financial health relates to financial stability.

There has been a lot said and written about the issue of household financial stress in recent times, using a multitude of data sources and reporting on many different individual experiences. Wednesday’s national accounts showed how inflation, tax and interest rates have weighed on real household disposable income. And as RBA Governor Michele Bullock said when discussing the challenge of inflation following the RBA Board meeting this week: High inflation makes life difficult for everyone and damages the functioning of the economy. It erodes the value of savings, hurts household budgets, makes it harder for businesses to plan and invest, and worsens income inequality. The Governor emphasised that the effect of all of this is that many households are experiencing a painful squeeze on their finances.

So she presented an overall picture of the situation, drawing on the RBA’s extensive work in this area, which is published in detail in our regular Financial Stability Review.

You What? The Use Of Cash Is Up!!

An average of more than 50 UK bank branches have closed each month since 2015 and campaigners fear some retailers could stop accepting cash if it becomes too burdensome to process. That said, under government rules, free withdrawals and deposits will need to be available within one mile for people living in urban areas. In rural areas, where there are concerns over “cash deserts”, where the maximum distance is three miles.

This is important because cash remains a necessity for millions of people, research has found, with the elderly and those with disabilities among those likely to struggle. Branches have been more likely to close in disadvantaged areas.

Of course, Banks have pointed to the large reduction in branch use – a trend accelerated by the Covid pandemic – and the popularity of managing money via smartphones, as good reason for diluting their branch network.

But a recent survey by Age UK suggested that, among those who were uncomfortable about digital banking, the key concerns were fraud and scams, a lack of trust in online banking services, and a lack of computer skills.

And now, The British Retail Consortium says cash use has grown for the first time in 10 years as shoppers keep a close eye on their budgets while prices rise, retailers have said. They said 19% of purchases were made with notes and coins last year, echoing a report by banks showing a slight rebound. That’s up from 15% the previous year. Until 2015, notes and coins were used in more than half of transactions and, while card use now dominated, cash still had its benefits. Consumers made smaller but more frequent payments, the survey found.

The consortium said consumers were budgeting carefully to try to cope with cost of living pressures, and there was also a “natural return” for cash after it slumped during the pandemic.

It is essential use of cash is protected, you cannot leave it to the market, where banks are making a killing from extra fees on card transaction costs as a result of removing access to cash.

Paying Tax And Interest Through The Nose In A Deep Per Capita Recession!

The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) has released the June quarter National Accounts, which were an unmitigated disaster and confirmed that Australia is in a deep per capita recession.

The economy as measured by real GDP grew by only 0.2% in the September quarter, driven by increased government consumption and capital investment over the quarter and badly missing economists’ expectations of a 0.4% print: Growth over the year was 2.1%, less than population growth over the same period. While the population surge earlier in the year has supported demand overall, it is now rolling over and will not provide the same support in 2024. Or as Luci Ellis, at Westpac put it The Australian economy limped along in the September quarter.

Real per capita GDP has fallen for three of the past five quarters, with the March quarter revised up to flat. Accordingly, GDP per capita fell 0.3% over the year. Expenditure by households was dead flat over the September quarter and would have fallen by around 0.7% per capita. By contrast, growth in both household consumption and GDP over 2023 slowed due to sustained cost of living pressures and higher interest rates. Household consumption would have fallen even further had the savings rate not fallen to just 1.1%, which is the lowest level since December 2007.

The savings rate is now well below the ‘par’ of 6.5% and notionally implies a draw-down on the ‘additional savings’ accumulated during the pandemic – estimated at around $260bn – running at about $12bn a quarter. In total, about $43bn, or 16.5% of this reserve now looks to have been drawn down. Of course these are not equally spread across households, with many now having no buffers at all.

As Westpac put it. the policy drag on Australian households is clearly biting.