RBA Injects $8.8 Billion Bank Liquidity

The AFR is reporting that the RBA is supporting liquidity in the banking system in Australia.

The Reserve Bank of Australia is pumping $8.8 billion into short-term commercial bank funding to ease a squeeze in global credit markets.

The emergency move follows a similar intevention by the New York Federal Reserve overnight.

The US Treasury market seized up after debt investors were spooked by US President Donald Trump closing the American border to European travellers and his broader handling of the coronavirus crisis.

Local bond market sources reported an evaporation of liquidity, heavy selling pressure, clogged dealer balance sheets and upward pressure on government bond yields in global government bond markets, including the US and Australia.

“There’s heavy selling of bank bill futures, a bit like the GFC,” a trader said.

Another Crack In The Property Market Wall

The AFR is reporting that Deposit Power, which which provided interim finance to property buyers, has closed its doors leaving an estimated 10,000 residential, commercial and property investors in the lurch about the fate of nearly $300 million worth of deposits.

This is after the collapse of New Zealand’s CBL’s insurance, which was an issuer and guarantor of deposit bonds.which provided interim finance to property buyers, has closed its doors after the collapse of New Zealand’s CBL’s insurance, which was an issuer and guarantor of deposit bonds.

Deposit Power had links with most of the major property broker networks, including Mortgage Choice and Connective, and major banks through their broker networks.

There are fears that the status of existing deals – which used the deposit bonds as a form of bridging finance for up to 48 months – could be jeopardised by the collapse of the insurance company.

Worried mortgage brokers, who recommended the products to clients, are seeking advice on whether clients need to buy other cover, or secure additional or replacement financial risk bonds.

It could mean unspecified risks, uncertainty and deal delays for tens of thousands of counter parties, financiers and their representatives, including lawyers and other brokers.

Will Your Interest Only Loan Get Refinanced?

The Australian Financial Review featured some of our recent research on the problem of refinancing interest only loans (IO).  Many IO loan holders simply assume they can roll their loan on the same terms when it comes up for periodic review.  Many will get a nasty surprise thanks to now tighter lending standards, and higher interest rates.  Others may not even realise they have an IO loan!

Thousands of home owners face a looming financial crunch as $60 billion of interest-only loans written at the height of the property boom reset at higher rates and terms, over the next four years.

Monthly repayments on a typical $1 million mortgage could increase by more than 50 per cent as borrowers start repaying the principal on their loans, stretching budgets and increasing the risk of financial distress.

DFA analysis shows that over the next few years a considerable number of interest only loans (IO) which come up for review, will fail current underwriting standards.  So households will be forced to switch to more expensive P&I loans, assuming they find a lender, or even sell. The same drama played out in the UK a couple of years ago when they brought in tighter restrictions on IO loans.  The value of loans is significant. And may be understated.

A few observations. ASIC in 2015, released a report that found lenders providing interest-only mortgages needed to lift their standards to meet important consumer protection laws. They identified a number of issues relating to bank underwriting practices. We would also make the point that despite the low losses on interest-only loans to date in Australia, in a downturn they are more vulnerable to credit loss.

In April this year we addressed the problem of IO loans.

Lenders need to throttle back new interest only loans. But this raises an important question. What happens when existing IO loans are refinanced?

Less than half of current borrowers have complete plans as to how to repay the principle amount.

Interest-only loans may seem like a convenient way to reduce monthly repayments, (and keep the interest charges as high as possible as a tax hedge), but at some time the chickens have to come home to roost, and the capital amount will need to be repaid.

Many loans are set on an interest-only basis for a set 5-year or 10-year  term, at which point the lender is required to reassess the loan and to determine whether it should be rolled on the same basis. Indeed, the recent APRA guidelines contained some explicit guidance:

For interest-only loans, APRA expects ADIs to assess the ability of the borrower to meet future repayments on a principal and interest basis for the specific term over which the principal and interest repayments apply, excluding the interest-only period

There is a strong correlation between interest-only and investment mortgages, so they tend to grow together. Worth reading the recent ASIC commentary on broker originated interest-only loans.

But if households are not aware they have IO loans in the first place, then this raises the systemic risks to a whole new level. The findings from the follow-up study by UBS, after their “Liar-Loans” report (using their online survey of 907 Australians who recently took out a mortgage – they claim a sampling error of just +/-3.18% at a 95% confidence level) are significant.

They say their survey showed that only 23.9% of respondents (by value) took out an interest only loan in the last twelve months. This compares to APRA statistics which showed that 35.3% of loan approvals in the year to June were interest only.

They believe the most likely explanation for the lack of respondents indicating they have IO mortgages is that many customers may be unaware that they have taken out an interest only mortgage. In fact, around 1/3 of interest only borrowers do not know that they have this style of mortgage.

 

More than 30,000 of the nation’s ‘richest’ households in financial distress

From The Australian Financial Review.

More than 30,000 households in the nation’s wealthiest suburbs are facing financial stress, with hundreds risking default over the next 12 months because of soaring debts and static incomes, according to analysis of the nation’s household financial hotspots.

Hundreds of households in Sydney’s harbourside Vaucluse, where the median property price is $4.5 million, or Melbourne’s bayside Brighton, where a median priced house is $2.6 million, are being severely squeezed as costs continue to stretch incomes, the Digital Finance Analytics research finds.

“A lot of people making seriously good money have borrowed serious amounts of money. The one thing that sorts them out is when interest rates begin to rise,” said Christopher Koren, a buyers’ agent for Morrell and Koren, which specialises in top-end real estate.

“When it comes to top-end household cash flow – ‘Houston, we have a problem’,” said Martin North, principal of Digital Finance Analytics, who claims lenders are making incorrect assumptions about household incomes rising to meet increasing costs.

The analysis reveals that nearly 1000 households in Brighton, where a beachbox without electricity sells for more than ...The analysis reveals that nearly 1000 households in Brighton, where a beachbox without electricity sells for more than $320,000, are under distress, or could face default in the next 12 months. Joe Armao, Fairfax Media.

The Reserve Bank of Australia this week warned property buyers stretching to enter the property market when interest rates are at record lows could be “vulnerable” to economic shocks, such as rate rises or a change in personal circumstances.

The bank’s research shows that debt for the nation’s top 20 per cent of households is at least 190 per cent of income, an increase of more than 50 per cent in the 12 years to 2014, the latest Reserve Bank of Australia numbers.

Brendan Coates, Australian Perspective Fellow for the Grattan Institute, said top-end debt is likely to have risen even higher during the past three years.

By contrast, debt for the bottom 20 per cent has remained at 60 per cent of total income.

Mr North said: “The banks have been very free in their lending to affluent households.”

Higher end is more exposed

It is based on traditional lending models that indicate lower income earners and the mortgage belt property buyers are the most vulnerable if rates rise, or the economy slows.

“But they have missed the point that massive leverage at the top end, static incomes and the high proportion of affluent households with interest-only loans means the higher end are significantly more exposed,” he said.

“A lot also have multiple households. Because rents are based on incomes, are lot of these investments are under water, which means they are losing money,” he said.

According to SQM Research, which monitors rents and house prices, the national average rental income for apartments is about 1.4 per cent and 2 per cent for houses, compared to 2 per cent inflation and interest rates typically about 4.5 per cent for investor loans.

Some investors, particularly from Sydney, are selling up, releasing capital and buying cheaper investment properties, in places like Adelaide, according to market analysts.

A median property in Sydney’s metropolitan area, which sells for about $1 million, will buy two inner suburban properties in Adelaide.

Households are ‘stressed’ when income does not cover ongoing costs, rather than identifying a percentage of income committed to mortgage repayments, such as 30 per cent of after-tax income.

Those in “severe distress” are unable to meet repayments from current income, which means they have to cut back on spending, or rely on credit, refinancing, loan restructuring, or selling their house.

Mortgage holders under “severe distress” are more likely to seek hardship assistance and are often forced to sell.

The analysis reveals that nearly 1000 households in Brighton, where a beachbox without electricity sells for more than $320,000, are under distress, or could face default in the next 12 months.

More than 600 households in Vaucluse and Watsons Bay are under similar pressure.

RBA assistant governor Michele Bullock said regulators remain concerned about the high level of household debt, which is a result of low interest rates and rising house prices.

“High levels of debt do leave households vulnerable to shocks,” she said.

Mr Coates said rich households having the most debt provided some comfort for regulators comparing Australia’s potential vulnerability to an economic shock with the US, where those most exposed were poorer, sub-prime borrowers.

“The RBA is less worried because people who hold the debt are relatively well off,” Mr Coates said.

Anecdotal evidence suggests top-end earners are increasing their spending at the same pace as rising property prices.

“Many in Melbourne and Sydney think they are bullet proof,” said Mr Koren. “They’ve bought property in premium suburbs in the best performing markets in the world and they suddenly think they are always making money, despite earning the same amount of pay”.

Across the nation, more than 860,000 households are estimated to be in mortgage stress, with more than 20,000 in severe stress, or a rise of about 1 per cent to about 26 per cent to the end of August, the analysis finds.

About 46,000 are estimated to risk default, it finds.

Heat on RBA as residential property borrowing hits a record

From The AFR.

Residential property borrowing continues to grow despite repeated attempts by regulators to jawbone banks and borrowers into cutting back, according to official statistics.

The nation’s bill for house borrowing has hit a record $1.69 trillion, which is bigger than the country’s gross domestic product and nearly equivalent to superannuation savings, the latest numbers from the Reserve Bank of Australia reveal.

Borrowers and mortgage brokers, which act as intermediaries between property buyers and lenders, claim that overall demand and loan growth remains strong, despite more subdued investor demand in some markets.

Investors continue to dominate total property borrowing, despite efforts by banks and regulators to encourage owner-occupiers and reduce speculative demand in the overheating sector.

Westpac Group is growing its loan book the most aggressively. Commonwealth Bank of Australia is pulling back hard on interest-only investors, while non-bank lenders, which recently came under the regulatory aegis of APRA, are making big gains.

John Flavell, chief executive of listed brokerage Mortgage Choice, said overall demand is robust and any slowing was probably due to seasonal factors, such as colder weather.

Buyer demand is expected to be boosted by first-time home buyer incentives due to be introduced in the immediate future.

About $55 billion worth of interest-only investor loans, or about 10 per cent of the category’s loan book, have been switched to owner-occupiers in response to a sustained campaign by regulators and lenders during the past 12 months, according to the RBA.

Speed and growth limits have been imposed on lenders to reduce interest-only repayments because of regulatory concerns that lower rates were driving up prices and increasing financial distress, according to the RBA.

But investors continue to dominate the property market, with investor loans rising by 7.4 per cent in the 12 months to the end of June, compared to 6.2 per cent growth in owner-occupiers, the RBA numbers reveal.

Banking analysts described the message as “mixed” because consumer credit growth exceeded their estimates and business credit was below.

But strong weekend auction clearance results of more than 70 per cent and record prices for development sites and prestige properties continue to defy regulatory attempts to lower demand for property.

“This is nuts,” said Martin North, principal of Digital Finance Analytics, an independent consultancy. “Either the regulators are not serious about slowing household debt growth and recent language is simply lip service, or they are hoping their interventions so far will work through, given time.”

All the major lenders are below the 10 per cent speed limit imposed by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, with Macquarie Bank and Bank of Queensland well under the cap. Those over the cap include ME Bank and Bank of Australia.

Investment interest-only loans are typically about 31 basis points higher than 12 months ago, according to analysis by Canstar, which compares interest rates.

That more than doubles the average increase for investment principal and interest loans. Owner-occupied principal and interest loans have fallen on average by about seven basis points.

Non-bank lenders, which have been offering much more competitive rates than main street authorised deposit-taking institutions, have posed a $5 billion increase in their loan books to $115 billion.

The four majors grew their residential property books by about 5.4 per cent during the 12 months to June with Westpac up by 6.5 per cent, NAB 6.2 per cent CBA 6.2 per cent and ANZ 4.4 per cent.

Why a small rise in interest rates will hurt like the 1980s

From The AFR.

Costs for many homebuyers have jumped by up to 150 basis points over the past 12 months and are expected to continue rising even if low inflation means an official rate hike from the Reserve Bank of Australia is unlikely in the near term.

Owner-occupier borrowers are paying between 30 and 40 basis points more and rates on interest-only and investor loans are up by 70 to 150 basis points, according to consultancy Digital Finance Analytics (DFA).

There has been a small decrease in average principal and interest, owner-occupier loans because of regulatory pressure on lenders to encourage borrowers to reduce debt.

If anything, this week’s inflation data gives households a breathing space in which to pay off debt before rates do rise. Financial and mortgage advisers recommend borrowers review their finances so they’re ready for when rates turn.

“Paying more of your debt off while interest rates are at near record lows is a great way to take control of your debt,” says Tim Mackay, an independent financial adviser with Quantum Financial. “Interest rates will eventually start to rise and every time it happens, it’s a little more out of your pocket. The faster you pay your debt off, the less overall interest you will have to pay over the term of your loan.

Other strategies include locking in a fixed rate loan, ramping up extra payments and reducing other debt.

Wealthy feel the pinch

Affluent households – with two incomes and combined annual salaries totalling more than $150,000 – are increasingly facing financial distress because they have taken out large loans with small deposits to pay huge asking prices for real estate hotspots like Melbourne and Sydney, says DFA.

Debt of more than half the households in NSW is 4.5 times income, says Martin North, DFA principal. The national average is just under half households financing similar debt amounts.

“This is a big deal,” North says. “Especially in a rising interest rate environment. It means households have little wriggle room. Granted, many will be holding paper profits in property which has risen significantly in recent years but this does not help with servicing ongoing debt.”

Financial distress among property buyers has increased by 10 per cent over the last 12 months despite the lowest cash rates on record, according to Consumer Action, a federal government-sponsored financial counselling centre.

Property buyers say rising mortgage payments are the chief reason the family budget can’t cover all expenses.

Consumer Action claims the numbers being counselled are an “iceberg tip” of families around the nation struggling with high costs of living, underemployment, flat incomes and rising mortgage costs. The RBA estimates household debt has blown out to nearly twice annual incomes.

Questionable loans

An estimated $50 billion worth of mortgages, equivalent to about 5 per cent of home loans, would fail the latest round of underwriting criteria introduced in response to regulatory pressure and growing household debt, says DFA.

Many younger buyers, typically aged 25-34 , believe home ownership has slipped beyond their reach and plan to become life-long renters, says the Grattan Institute. This is a big shift in national aspirations and retirement planning, which has traditionally assumed retirees own their homes.

Economists warn about static incomes, the highest underemployment since records began in 1978, rising out-of-cycle mortgage increases and rising property prices in the nation’s most populous states.

For example, house price growth during the past 12 months in Melbourne is nearly 22 per cent, or more than 10 times the official rate of inflation. In Canberra it is more than six times the rate of inflation and Sydney five times.

Prices are falling in Darwin and Perth but the national average is 10 per cent. The wide divergence in prices makes it harder for regulators to impose a single, national strategy.

Mortgage payments required to service the growing debt are rising as lenders respond to regulatory pressure to slow buyer demand with out-of-cycle rate rises.

Mistaken criteria

Lenders are comfortably within the 2.5 per cent buffer between the mortgage rate offered and the rate they use for affordability assessment.

But they are reviewing their assessment of household debt and capacity to repay using more sophisticated analysis of household expenditure and borrowers’ reported expenses.

Regulator the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) discovered an improbable correlation between the regulatory standard required by lenders and mortgage brokers and tens of thousands of loan applications, suggesting household expenses were being assessed to qualify for a loan, rather than meet standards.

It revealed lenders were often too generous in their assessment of borrowers’ capacity to pay because original assessments understated spending before deducting mortgage payments.

Unsurprisingly, expenses of more affluent households are significantly higher. “This helps to explain why we are seeing more affluent households getting into mortgage stress territory,” says North.

Toughest conditions in 30 years

Households are on notice that they could face some of the toughest borrowing conditions in nearly 30 years if interest rates rise 200 basis points, or eight typical rate hikes, as floated by the Reserve Bank of Australia earlier this month.

“Record low interest rates have made it possible for households to service much larger mortgages as they’ve chased rising house prices,” says Brendan Coates, a research fellow with the Grattan Institute, an independent think tank.
“Even a relatively small rise in interest rates paid by households would crimp their spending. Our research shows that if interest rates rise by just two percentage points, mortgage payments on a new home will take up more of a household’s income than at any time since the late 1980s.”

A 200 basis point rise would push the headline rate for interest rates to about 7.25 per cent.

The impact on family budgets would be equivalent to a rate of 17 per cent, the highest since Bob Hawke was prime minister.

In 1989 the Australian economy was turning from boom to bust in the wake of a global turndown and local lending excesses after deregulation of the financial sector. It was immortalised by then-Treasurer Paul Keating’s quip about a “recession we had to have” and subsequent mortgage defaults, bankruptcies and a stalled property market.

Median house price in Sydney were about $170,000 and average weekly wages around $500. Since then house prices have increased by more than six times as salaries rose by 2.5 times.

The Grattan Institute’s warning follows the RBA’s signal that the cash rate (at which it lends to commercial banks) could rise by 200 basis points to 3.5 per cent.

“With interest rates across the globe at historic lows, the risk of an interest rate rise is real,” says Coates. “And because wages are not rising fast, households are burdened by big interest payments for much longer.

“While the RBA would lift interest rates cautiously, another disruption to international financial markets like 2008 could sharply increase banks’ funding costs, raising mortgage rates.”

The top 100 postcodes at risk of mortgage default

The AFR has done a nice piece on the post code level analysis we completed, and a nice interactive map.  Here is the guts of the article, citing DFA.

It’s not just households in Western Sydney and the outer suburbs of Melbourne and Brisbane who are feeling the pressure of paying their monthly mortgage.

A compilation of the top 100 postcodes most at risk of mortgage default by consultancy firm Digital Finance Analytics found a wide geographic spread of suburbs across the country where people could face financial collapse when interest rates start to rise.

The outer suburbs of Canberra, southern Tasmania, Darwin and southern Gippsland in Victoria are some of the regional areas that have been hit by mix of industrial closure, high unemployment and low wages growth, which leaves resident vulnerable to financial collapse.

Digital Finance Analytics principal Martin North said residents of Western Sydney were used to flying close to the wind when it came to household finances.

“There are clearly some western Sydney suburbs and inner-Sydney in the top 200 or 300 postcodes but this is about the probability of default,” Mr North told The Australian Financial Review.

“The probability of default is a complex matrix. It’s not just the lower socio-economic areas [like Western Sydney] because they don’t have big loans and already have more conservative loan criterias.”

Mr North said the postcodes where households are at risk are quite often in regional areas with increasing unemployment – and where they may struggle to find another job.

“The most difficult thing for a mortgage holder is suddenly losing your job because income goes from a certain level to a lower level and it’s quite hard to manage,” he said.

“Events across Australia impacting on employment are probably the best leading indicator of the probability of default.”

Many of those in regional areas are also geographically isolated if they lose their jobs – and don’t have the same employment alternatives that may be on offer for those living in bigger cities such as Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane.

Two per cent increase poses high risk

In a breakdown of the top 100 postcodes, almost a quarter were in Tasmania (23), followed by Victoria (19), NSW (18), Queensland (16), South Australia (14) and Western Australia (5).

The closure of manufacturing industries in northern Adelaide, the mining downturn in Western Australia, Queensland and in NSW’s Hunter Valley and the public service heartland of Canberra are all mortgage stress hotspots, according to the modelling.

There was also an intergenerational element with most of the households at risk of default including those under 35-years-old who have been lured by record low interest rates.

“My view is these are households that are maxed-up because of the debt they’ve got and with current low interest rates they are just getting by,” Mr North said.

“But if interest rates go up this is where you’ll see the first impact. If interest rates are 2 per cent higher it would create significant pain for households.

“And the risks seem to be higher amongst younger households. I think people have been lured into the market probably sooner than they should have by lower interest rates and rising property values.”

The Canberra postcodes of 2902 (Kambah), 2900 (Tuggeranong, Greenway) and 2903 (Oxley, Wanniassa) top the mortgage stress list, with Tasmanian postcodes in the state’s north and south rounding out the top 10.

Queensland’s mining belt of Mackay (postcode 4721), Brisbane’s outer suburbs (4131), and the outer-suburbs of Melbourne (Essendon, Tullamarine) as well as Hunter Valley’s 2343 scrape into the top 50.

The top 100 postcodes are rounded out by more mining towns (Fitzroy and Blackwater in Queensland), the suburban battlers in south-east Queensland’s Logan (4128), NSW’s Macquarie Fields (2564) and The Ponds (2769).

The typical assumptions about mortgage stress is where more than 30 per cent of household income is spent on home repayments.

But Mr North said this was too simplistic. He also overlays industry employment data as well as information from credit rating agencies about actual defaults.

The National Australia Bank has red-flagged 40 postcodes across the country where business and personal loans are at a higher risk of default, especially when mixed with the stressful combination of rising interest rates and higher unemployment.

In its 40 hotspots, NAB is conducting a more stringent assessment of loan applications, including increasing the amount of equity that borrowers require.

Reserve Bank of Australia assistant governor Christopher Kent last week said the central bank predicted unemployment would remain high until 2017.

Australia Becoming a Nation of Landlords – AFR

The AFR report cited research provided by DFA from our household surveys.

Australia is becoming a nation of landlords as record-high real estate prices force house-hunters into buying and renting investment properties rather than becoming owner-occupiers, analysis of purchases reveals.

Property investors are also becoming younger and more likely to own several rental properties, with the number of investors with more than five properties having increased by 35 per cent in the past 12 months, from 175,000 to 272,000, according to research by Digital Financial Analytics.

For the first time since records began, more first-time buyers are expected to be investors rather than owner-occupiers by the end of this year, heralding a major change in the nation’s home-owning culture, the research reveals.

The big increase in property investment is “a tower of dominoes”, said Martin North, principal of Digital Financial Analytics, a research firm that works for big banks and financial services companies.

“The question is whether fundamentals like a shortage of supply being soaked up by tenant demand will get us out of jail,” he said. “I think we probably have enough disequilibrium between supply and demand to support the market for the next couple of years.”

Mr North’s research highlights the number of first-time property buyers who rent the property and then remain at home with their parents or live in a communal arrangement with friends.

During the same period, the number of want-to-buys, first-time buyers, refinancers, up-traders and down-traders remained about the same.

The number of loans to first-time buyers fell in all states and territories except Tasmania during the March quarter, according to government statistics.

Loan spruiking widespread

Financial advisers are routinely being offered commissions of between 5 per cent and 10 per cent, or fees of $25,000, to encourage investors to take out limited-recourse loans to buy apartments.

Alternatively, finance brokers, who often work with developers, have been encouraging the widespread use of non-bank interest-only loans using the equity in the investor’s home as security and borrowing about 20 per cent of the value of the investment property to cover the deposit and purchase.

Rental income from the investment property is expected to cover all costs and any capital growth is then leveraged to buy the next property.

Interest-only loans only require repayment of the interest on the loan over the rolling five-year borrowing term.

Mario Borg ​, a finance strategist at Melbourne-based Strategic Finance who owns 10 properties and estimates his worth at more than $10 million, disagrees that portfolio investors are exposed to excessive risk.

Borg believes attractive properties where people want to live will always find a tenant and is confident the right financing structures will protect portfolios from market corrections. He never allows the loan-to-value ratio to drift above 50 per cent of the portfolio’s value and maintains a credit limit of 80 per cent of the portfolio value to cover any unforseen events.

Christopher Foster-Ramsay, owner of Foster Ramsay Finance, says investors need to be aware of the risks, particularly if prices begin to fall.

“Many want to live the dream without understanding what they are potentially getting into,” he said.

By any international standard, such as loan-to-income ratio or gross domestic product-to-house prices, the nation’s bill for house buying is about 30 per cent above the long-term trend.

RBA Caused The Bubble – AFR

Strong piece from Chris Joye in the AFR today.

There’s only one party to blame for Australia’s unprecedented house price bubble. And it’s not buyers, vendors, developers, immigrants or local councils restricting new approvals. While they have all contributed to the underlying demand and supply dynamics, the unsustainable price growth across Sydney and Melbourne since January 2013 is squarely the responsibility of the monetary policy mandarins residing in the Reserve Bank of Australia’s Martin Place headquarters.

It is these folks who dismissed our repeated warnings that they were blowing the mother of all bubbles and instead decided that the cheapest mortgage rates in history—enabled by cutting the cash rate a full 100 basis points below its global financial crisis nadir – is the elixir required to maintain “trend” growth. Never mind that this might actually be bad, productivity-destroying growth based on distorted savings and investment decisions that will have to be reversed when the price of money normalises.

And let there be no doubt this bubble is without peer. The dollar value of our homes, mortgage debt and house prices measured relative to incomes, and the share of speculative investors purchasing properties, have never been higher. So as far as valuations and interest rates are concerned, we might as well be exploring the surface of the Sun.

Slashing the cash rate to 2 per cent in May – or about 50 basis points below Australia’s core inflation rate – in the name of centrally planning economic activity is having other deleterious consequences. Setting aside the adverse effects of the absurdly cheap 3.49 per cent fixed and 3.98 per cent variable loan rates now offered, we have banks like Macquarie claiming that the 1.9 per cent interest paid on its market-leading at-call deposit product is “healthy”. Every day I meet retail and institutional savers struggling to figure out how to earn a decent return without assuming unacceptable risks that could decimate their wealth. With the Australian sharemarket down more than 8 per cent from its April highs  and major bank stocks off more than 16 per cent, chasing dividend yields is patently not the answer for the defensive part of your portfolio.