Housing is in crisis in Australia, its too expensive and relative to population there is not enough of it. As I discuss with independent Journalist Tarric Brooker last week, though shockingly, we have built more homes per 100,000 people than Canada, The US and the UK. In other words, we have a greater proportion of our economy dedicated already to housing construction, with perhaps 1.35 million people working in the sector. And we also know completion times are blowing out now, thanks to poor supply chains, lack of available labour, and poor-quality construction. In NSW half of high-rise projects have severe defects.
But the Government wants to push the supply-side levers some more, as exemplified in their Attachment to the budget papers: Statement 4, Meeting Australia’s Housing Challenge from the Treasury.
It starts out “Australia has a housing shortage. There are not enough homes being built in the right areas to meet the needs of our communities. This statement focuses on the reasons for the current undersupply of housing, how it affects affordability, and the changes required to more quickly unlock supply to meet the housing needs of all Australians. It also sets out how the Government’s policy responds to these drivers of undersupply”.
This undersupply they say accounts for the increases in rents, mortgage repayments and house prices.
Talk of course is cheap, but will this translate into real actions? And what about the elephant in the room because of course, the focus should be to curtail migration from is very high current levels, and bring demand back closer to long term averages, and over the budget period both sides of politics have to a degree been talking about this, though, as I discussed in my recent show The Migration Question Amplified; But Not Tackled… By Anyone!, it’s a battle of announcables, with numbers being banded about.
But my take is that neither side of politics are really wanting to take this on seriously, despite the direct link to higher inflation. The net result will be higher inflation for longer, requiring higher interest rates than otherwise needed.
