ASIC has commenced proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia against Westpac Banking Corporation in relation to alleged poor financial advice provided by one of its former financial planners, Mr Sudhir Sinha.
In Court documents filed yesterday, ASIC alleges that, in four sample client files selected by ASIC, Mr Sinha breached the ‘best interests’ duty under the Corporations Act (‘the Act’), provided inappropriate financial advice, and failed to prioritise the interests of his clients.
Mr Sinha provided financial advice in the Perth area as an employee of Westpac from 2001 to November 2014. In June 2017, Mr Sinha was banned by ASIC from providing financial services for a period of five years as a result of his failure to meet his ongoing advice service obligations (refer 17-178MR).
ASIC contends, as Mr Sinha’s responsible licensee during that period, Westpac is liable for the alleged breaches of the ‘best interests’ obligations by Mr Sinha under section 961K of the Act. ASIC also alleges that Westpac contravened sections 912A(1)(a) and (c) of the Act, which requires Westpac to do all things necessary to ensure that the financial services covered by its licence are provided efficiently, honestly and fairly, and to comply with financial services laws.
Section 961K of the Act is a civil penalty provision, and attracts a maximum penalty of $1 million per contravention.
Separately, Westpac has a significant remediation programme underway in respect of Mr Sinha’s conduct. Westpac has reported to ASIC that, as at 14 June 2018, it has paid approximately $12 million in compensation to clients impacted by Mr Sinha’s poor advice and ongoing advice service failures.
