Super Now Worth $1.93 Trillion

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) today released its December 2014 Quarterly Superannuation Performance publication and December 2014 Quarterly MySuper Statistics report. At 31 December 2014, total assets, which include the assets of self-managed superannuation funds and the balance of life office statutory funds, rose to $1.93 trillion, an increase of 9.3 per cent from the December 2013 quarter.

Contributions to funds with more than four members over the December 2014 quarter were $26.1 billion, up 15.3 per cent from the December 2013 quarter ($22.7 billion).  Total contributions for the year ending December 2014 were $100.6 billion.

There were $15.2 billion in total benefit payments in the December 2014 quarter, an increase of 9.4 per cent from the December 2013 quarter ($13.9 billion).  Total benefit payments for the year ending December 2014 were $56.4 billion.

Net contribution flows (contributions plus net rollovers less benefit payments) totalled $10 billion in the December 2014 quarter, an increase of 14.9 per cent from the December 2013 quarter ($8.7 billion).  Net contribution flows for the year ending December 2014 were $39.4 billion.

APRA has revised the method of segmentation it uses for these reports.  The segments that APRA most commonly uses for superannuation are fund types. These fund types comprise corporate funds, industry funds, public sector funds, retail funds and small superannuation funds. These segments, based on RSE licensee profit status and the membership base of the funds. These segments, based on RSE licensee profit status and the membership base of the funds, are shown below.

APRA-SuperFund-Segmentation-Dec-2014Corporate funds are RSEs with more than four members under the trusteeship of a ‘not for profit’ RSE licensee and with a corporate membership basis.
Industry funds are RSEs with more than four members under the trusteeship of a ‘not for profit’ RSE licensee and with either an industry or general membership base.
Public sector funds are RSEs with more than four members under the trusteeship of a ‘not for profit’ RSE licensee and with a government base membership base. Public sector funds also include superannuation schemes established by a Commonwealth, State or Territory law (known as exempt public sector superannuation schemes).
Retail funds are RSEs with more than four members under the trusteeship of a ‘for profit’ RSE licensee with a corporate, industry or general membership basis.
Small funds are superannuation entities with fewer than five members and include small APRA funds (SAFs), single-member approved deposit funds and self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs). SMSFs are regulated by the ATO and have different legislative requirements than APRA regulated funds.

Of the 258 entities in existence at 31 December 2014, there are 45 cases where the fund type is different under the new segmentation methodology. In these cases, APRA analysed the information reported to APRA, the structure of the fund and composition of the RSE licensee as well as other prudential information. APRA also drew on publicly available information and consulted RSE licensees in the cases where the information reported on SRF 001.0 was inconsistent. Following this further analysis, of the 45 entities:

  • 38 entities were re-classified from corporate to retail;
  • four entities were re-classified from industry to retail;
  • one entity was re-classified from retail to industry;
  • one entity was re-classified from corporate to public sector; and
  • one entity was re-classified from industry to public sector.

After the review of fund types, retail funds’ assets increased from $502 billion to $516 billion and account for 39 per cent of total superannuation assets as at 31 December 2014. Industry funds’ assets decreased by $15 billion from $418 billion to $403 billion and account for 31 per cent of total superannuation assets as at 31 December 2014. Public sector funds’ assets increased by $15 billion to $335 billion (to 26 per cent of total superannuation assets), while corporate funds’ assets decreased from $63 billion to $58 billion (to four per cent of total superannuation assets).

 

Residential Land Prices Rise Again

The latest HIA-RP Data Residential Land Report provided by the Housing Industry Association, and CoreLogic RP Data, show that acute supply bottlenecks continue to affect Australia’s residential land market. Land prices reached an all-time high in both the capital city and regional markets.

Turnover in the national land market declined by some 16.7 per cent during the September 2014 quarter. At the same time, price growth accelerated to 3.3 per cent over the quarter.

During the September 2014 quarter the weighted median price of residential land rose by 3.3 per cent to $212,727 per lot. This represents an all-time high for land prices nationally. Capital city land prices saw growth of 4.7 per cent during the quarter, and were 10.0 per cent higher than twelve months earlier, however some of this was due to an increase in the size of land lots transacted. In regional Australia, land prices rose by 0.7 per cent during the quarter and were 3.5 per cent higher compared with a year earlier.

The supply and price issues flow directly into helping to drive house prices higher.

What’s Up With Economic Growth?

What’s up with Economic growth? According to Andrew G Haldane, Chief Economist, Bank of England in  a recent speech, since the financial crisis, global growth has under-performed. In the decade prior to it, advanced economy growth averaged 3% per year. In the period since, it has averaged just 1%. The world has grown fast, then slow. That has led some to fear “secular stagnation” – a lengthy period of sub-par growth. The self-same concerns were voiced at the time of the Great Depression in the 1930s. The economic jury is still out on whether recent rates of growth are a temporary post-crisis dip or a longer-lasting valley in our economic fortunes. Pessimists point to high levels of debt and inequality, worsening demographics and stagnating levels of educational attainment. Optimists appeal to a new industrial revolution in digital technology. Given its importance to living standards, this debate is one of the key issues of our time.

“Today’s great debate is where next for growth. The sunny uplands of innovation-led growth, as after the Industrial Revolution? Or the foggy lowlands of stagnant growth, as before it? Which of the secular forces – innovation versus stagnation – will dominate? And if growth is going back to the future, on which side of the Industrial Revolution will it land?

The balance of these arguments matters greatly for future well-being and public policy. Indeed, it is hard to think of anything that matters much more. More parochially, for central banks setting monetary policy one of the key judgements is the appropriate “neutral” level of interest rates. You can think of this as the interest rate that would align desired saving and investment over the medium term.

But what is the “neutral” level of interest rates today? Secular innovation might imply a level at or above its historical average of 2-3%, in line with historical growth rates. But secular stagnation may imply a level much lower than in the past, possibly even negative. In monetary policy, this is the difference between chalk and cheese, success and failure.

One interpretation is society having become significantly more patient, as in the lead up to the Industrial Revolution: higher global saving relative to investment would lower global real interest rates. If that is the cause, bring out the bunting. By lowering the cost, and raising the return to innovation, investment and growth would be stimulated. Falls in real rates would signal secular innovation. The optimists would have it.

But an alternative reading is possible. Low real rates may instead reflect a dearth of profitable investment opportunities relative to desired savings. If that is the cause, bring out the bodies. For this would imply low returns to innovation and low future growth. Falling real rates would instead signal secular stagnation. The pessimists would have it.

And looking ahead, it is possible that sociological headwind could strengthen. One of the causes of rising inequality in advanced economies is believed to be the loss of middle-skill jobs, at least relative to high and low-skill jobs. There has been a “hollowing out” in employment. Technological advance – the mechanisation of middle-skill tasks – is believed to have contributed importantly to these trends.

A second secular headwind, closely related to rising inequality, concerns human capital. Inequality may retard growth because it damps investment in education, in particular by poorer households. Studies show parental income is crucial in determining children’s educational performance. If inequality is generational and self-perpetuating, so too will be its impact on growth.

Growth is a gift. Yet contrary to popular perceptions, it has not always kept on giving. Despite centuries of experience, the raw ingredients of growth remain something of a mystery. As best we can tell historically, they have been a complex mix of the sociological and the technological, typically acting in harmony. All three of the industrial revolutions since 1750 bear these hallmarks.

Today, the growth picture is foggier. We have fear about secular stagnation at the same time as cheer about secular innovation. The technological tailwinds to growth are strong, but so too are the sociological headwinds. Buffeted by these cross-winds, future growth risks becoming suspended between the mundane and the miraculous.

 

RBA Outsources Macroprudential to APRA

In the Monetary Policy Meeting of the Reserve Bank Board minutes, released today, there is significant emphasis on the role of APRA to regulate the housing market. The economic data suggested continued easing in momentum, and the rate reduction was line ball, between cutting straight away or leaving it a month. Nothing about future intentions.

Financial Markets

Members commenced their discussion of financial markets with the observation that central bank policy actions, along with developments in Greece, had been the main focus of markets over the past two months.

Members were briefed about the announcement by the European Central Bank (ECB) of a large sovereign bond purchase program in January, following its assessment that its existing measures would not be sufficient to prevent inflation from remaining well below 2 per cent for a prolonged period. Starting in March, the ECB plans to purchase €60 billion of securities each month, well above the current rate of purchases of private securities; sovereign bonds would be bought in proportion to member countries’ contributions to the ECB’s capital. Debt purchases would continue until there was a sustained increase in inflation, but they would end no earlier than September 2016. This would increase the size of the ECB’s balance sheet past its 2012 peak of €3.1 trillion. While less than the US Federal Reserve’s maximum purchases of US$85 billion a month, on an annualised basis the ECB’s purchases would be equivalent to around 7½ per cent of the euro area’s annual GDP, compared with 6 per cent of US GDP for purchases by the Federal Reserve (and 16 per cent of Japanese GDP for purchases by the Bank of Japan).

Members noted that the Federal Reserve continued to indicate that it expected to start increasing its policy rate around the middle of this year, but financial markets had pushed back expectations for the first rate rise in the United States to around the end of the year. A number of central banks had eased policy in recent months in response to the effect of lower oil prices, including the Reserve Bank of India and the Bank of Canada. Markets had also pushed back expectations for policy tightening by a number of other central banks. In contrast, the central banks of Russia and Brazil had increased their policy rates.

The Swiss National Bank (SNB) abandoned its exchange rate ceiling against the euro, which had been in place since September 2011, and lowered the rate on bank deposits at the SNB by 50 basis points to −0.75 per cent. The SNB’s announcement noted that divergences between the monetary policies of the major currency areas had increased significantly. The move surprised markets, resulting in considerable market volatility and the bankruptcy of several foreign exchange brokers.

Members noted that sovereign bond yields in the major markets had fallen significantly since the December meeting. The falls had occurred across the yield curve but were particularly pronounced at longer maturities, with yields on 10-year bonds in the United States falling back to around 1.6 per cent and those in Germany and Japan reaching historic lows of 30 and 20 basis points, respectively. At these levels there was very little, if any, compensation for term risk. For maturities up to five years, yields on bonds issued by Japan, Germany and most of the core euro area economies, as well as Sweden and Switzerland, had fallen below zero. Yields on Australian government bonds had mostly tracked global developments and had also fallen considerably, with the 10-year yield declining to a historical low below 2½ per cent.

The declines in global bond yields reflected a number of factors but the extent of the decline in yields was difficult to explain. The large bond purchases by major central banks had clearly contributed but so too had a reduction in bond supply, reflecting a narrowing of fiscal deficits in a number of countries. Concerns about the global growth outlook and the risk of sustained low inflation following falls in the oil price had also played a role.

Members noted that the Greek authorities had indicated that they planned to restructure the country’s debt, most of which was owed to official sector institutions. Greece had nonetheless also indicated a desire to remain part of the euro area. The current European assistance program expired at the end of February and markets had been closed to Greece since the recent election. Members also noted that the critical issue in the near term was not so much the obligations of the Greek Government but rather the funding of Greek banks. To date, there had been minimal spillover from developments in Greece to other markets.

There had been sizeable movements in exchange rates since the December meeting, reflecting the increasingly divergent paths of monetary policy among the major advanced economies. Most notably, the Swiss franc had appreciated by around 15 per cent against the euro since mid January. While the US dollar had depreciated against the Swiss franc, it had also appreciated further against most other currencies since the December meeting (including by around 10 per cent against the euro). The renminbi had been little changed against the US dollar over much of 2014, but had depreciated somewhat since the December meeting.

The Australian dollar had depreciated by around 9 per cent against the US dollar since the December meeting. On a trade-weighted basis, the Australian dollar was around 4 per cent below its early 2014 levels, notwithstanding significant falls in commodity prices over the intervening period. The depreciation of the Australian dollar against the US dollar and renminbi had been partly offset by its appreciation against the yen and euro.

Equity prices in advanced economies had been broadly unchanged since early December, notwithstanding a strong rally in European share prices following the announcement of the expansion of the ECB asset purchase program. Global equity prices had risen moderately over 2014, led by an 11 per cent increase in US equity prices, while Chinese equities had significantly outperformed other emerging markets since mid 2014.

In Australia, equity prices recorded a smaller rise over 2014 than that recorded in most global markets, primarily reflecting the decline in equity prices of resource companies. Equity prices had increased by 4 per cent since the start of 2015 even though prices of resource companies had fallen further.

Members noted that Australian lending rates on the outstanding stock of housing and business loans had continued to edge down since the December meeting. At the time of the December meeting, financial market pricing had suggested some chance of an easing in policy during 2015. This expectation strengthened somewhat during January, and by the time of the February meeting pricing reflected a two-thirds probability of a 25 basis point reduction in the cash rate at that meeting, with the cash rate expected to be 2 per cent by the end of the year.

International Economic Conditions

Members noted that growth of Australia’s major trading partners had been around its long-run average in 2014 and that early indications suggested this pace had continued into 2015. Prices of a range of commodities, notably oil and iron ore, had fallen further in recent months, reflecting a combination of both lower growth in global demand for commodities and, more importantly, significant increases in supply. Members also noted that the lower oil prices, if sustained, would be positive for the growth of Australia’s trading partners, which are net importers of energy, and would continue to put downward pressure on global prices of goods and services. Very accommodative global financial conditions were also expected to support global growth in 2015. These positive effects on trading partner growth, however, were expected to be largely offset in 2015 by a gradual decline in the pace of growth in China.

In China, economic growth had eased a little but was close to the authorities’ target for 2014. Growth of household consumption had held up over 2014, while growth of investment and industrial production – which contribute significantly to the demand for commodities – had trended lower over the past year or so. Conditions in the residential property market had remained weak, and measures introduced to support the market appear to have had only a modest effect so far.

In Japan, economic activity had been weaker than expected since the increase in the consumption tax in April 2014, but growth appeared to have resumed in the December quarter and the labour market remained tight. However, inflation had declined in recent months and remained well below the Bank of Japan’s target. The pace of growth had slowed a little in the rest of east Asia over 2014; as the region as a whole is a net importer of oil, activity was likely to have been supported by the decline in oil prices.

Members observed that the US economy had continued to strengthen, resulting in output growing at an above-trend pace over the second half of 2014. Employment growth had picked up further and the unemployment rate had continued to decline. Ongoing strength in the labour market and lower gasoline prices had contributed to a sharp rise in consumer sentiment. On the other hand, growth in the euro area remained modest. Inflation had remained well below the ECB’s target and inflation expectations had declined further, prompting the ECB to implement additional stimulus measures.

Domestic Economic Conditions

Members noted that the data released since the December meeting suggested that the domestic economy had continued to grow at a below-trend pace over the second half of 2014. Resource exports appeared to have continued growing in the December quarter and growth was expected to remain strong, particularly as liquefied natural gas (LNG) production came on line over the next year or so. The lower exchange rate was expected to support growth of exports, particularly service exports such as education and tourism.

Activity and prices in the housing market had continued to be bolstered by the low level of lending rates and strong population growth. A range of indicators, including residential building approvals, suggested further growth of dwelling investment in the near term. Housing price inflation had moderated from the rapid rates seen in late 2013, but remained high and in Sydney and Melbourne had been well above the growth rate of household income. Growth of owner-occupier housing credit had remained around 6 per cent in year-ended terms, while investor credit had continued to grow at a noticeably faster rate.

Members were briefed on the main regulatory actions taken recently to address housing risks in the domestic economy. In particular, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) had announced several policy measures in early December to reinforce sound residential mortgage lending practices. These policies included clarification of prudential expectations on what constituted acceptable growth in housing lending to investors and the possible steps that would be considered if APRA’s expectations were not met, such as increased capital requirements.

Turning to the business sector, members noted that mining investment had continued to decline in the second half of 2014, and larger declines were expected over 2015 as existing projects were completed and very few new projects were likely to proceed. Non-mining business investment had remained subdued and recent data pointed to this continuing into the first half of 2015. Growth in public demand was expected to be subdued over the next year or so.

Members observed that household consumption growth had picked up since its lows in early 2013, supported by low interest rates and rising housing wealth. However, consumption growth had remained below average. The recent decline in fuel prices was expected to provide some offset for overall household incomes from weak growth in labour incomes.

Members noted that the most recent data on the labour market had been a little more positive than early in 2014. However, while employment growth had strengthened somewhat over the past year, the unemployment rate had increased further over 2014 and average hours worked had remained below the levels of a few years ago. Leading indicators of labour demand had changed little in recent months and pointed to only modest employment growth in the months ahead.

Consumer price inflation had declined in year-ended terms, partly as a result of a large fall in fuel prices in the December quarter and the effect of the repeal of the carbon price on utility prices in the September quarter. Various measures of underlying inflation, which largely abstract from these and other temporary factors, had declined in year-ended terms to around 2¼ per cent. Non-tradables inflation (excluding utility prices) had declined further in year-ended terms to relatively low levels, consistent with subdued domestic cost pressures. Prices of tradable items (excluding volatile items and tobacco) were little changed in the December quarter, but were expected to face upward pressure over time from the pass-through of the depreciation of the Australian dollar since early 2013.

Turning their discussion to the economic outlook, members noted that staff forecasts for output, which were conditioned on an assumption of no change in the cash rate, had been revised lower in the near term. Recent data indicated that the expected pick-up in consumption and non-mining business investment was likely to occur later than had been previously anticipated, while the pick-up in LNG exports over coming quarters was now likely to be less rapid. At the same time, it was anticipated that the net effect of commodity price changes and the exchange rate depreciation over the past three months would provide a positive impetus to domestic growth over the next year or so. Overall, the underlying forces driving growth remained much as they had been for some time and GDP growth was still expected to pick up gradually to an above-trend pace in the latter part of the forecast period.

The revisions to GDP growth implied that the unemployment rate would peak at a higher rate and later than had been previously forecast, before declining gradually. The inflation forecast had also been revised lower, reflecting the softer outlook for labour and product markets as well as the recent fall in oil prices. Headline inflation was expected to remain low for a time, before picking up at the end of the forecast period. Underlying inflation was expected to remain well contained and consistent with the target throughout the forecast period.

Members discussed a number of uncertainties around the forecasts. They noted that developments in commodity markets, particularly the price of oil, would affect future global growth and inflation outcomes. One area of uncertainty continued to be the outlook for the Chinese property market and its implications for Chinese demand for commodities. Members also noted that developments in commodity markets were likely to be affected by supply factors; for instance, the response of ‘unconventional’ oil producers in North America to lower oil prices.

As usual, the path of the exchange rate remained a key area of uncertainty. Members noted that the exchange rate had remained above most estimates of its fundamental value, given the decline in commodity prices over the past year, and that future exchange rate movements would be affected by market expectations for monetary policy, both domestically and abroad. They noted that, all else being equal, a sustained further depreciation would, if it occurred, stimulate growth in the domestic economy and put some temporary upward pressure on inflation.

Members noted that there was considerable uncertainty around the timing and extent of the expected increase in household consumption growth and non-mining business investment. Although fundamental factors such as low interest rates and strong population growth remained in place, they had not been sufficient to see a significant pick-up in the growth of these variables or a decline in the degree of spare capacity in the labour market. In addition, recent data suggested that the expected improvement in economic conditions would occur later than had been previously expected. Members commented that a strengthening in non-mining investment was a necessary element for growth to pick up to an above-trend pace, and noted the importance of confidence in underpinning such an outcome. Indeed, an improvement in the appetite for businesses to take on risk had the potential, should it occur, to lead to much stronger growth in non-mining business investment than currently forecast.

Considerations for Monetary Policy

In assessing the appropriate stance for monetary policy in Australia, members noted that the outlook for global economic growth was little changed, with Australia’s major trading partners still forecast to grow by around the pace of recent years in 2015. Commodity prices, particularly those for iron ore and oil, had declined over the past year largely in response to expansions in global supply, though members judged that demand-side factors, such as the weakness in Chinese property markets, had also played some role. Conditions in global financial markets had remained very accommodative.

Domestically, over recent months there had been fewer indications of a near-term strengthening in growth than previous forecasts would have implied. This included survey measures of household and business confidence, which remained around or even a bit below average. As a result, the revised staff forecasts – which were based on an unchanged cash rate – suggested that GDP growth would remain below trend over the course of this year, before gradually picking up to an above-trend pace in 2016, somewhat later than had been previously expected. The unemployment rate was therefore expected to peak a little higher (and later) than in the previous forecast. The net effect of declining commodity prices and the depreciation of the exchange rate was expected to boost growth over the forecast period. Nonetheless, the higher degree of spare capacity now in prospect and lower oil prices had led to a lowering of the forecast for inflation, offset somewhat by the effects of the recent exchange rate depreciation. The restrained pace of wage increases over the past year or so and accompanying growth in productivity, which had dampened growth in unit labour costs, suggested that low rates of inflation were likely to be sustained. In other respects, the forces underpinning the outlook for domestic activity and inflation were much as they had been for some time.

Members noted the current accommodative setting of monetary policy, which had been providing support to domestic demand. They noted that the Australian dollar had depreciated noticeably against a rising US dollar over recent months, although less so against a basket of currencies, and that it remained above most estimates of its fundamental value, particularly given the significant declines in key commodity prices. Members agreed that a lower exchange rate was likely to be needed to achieve balanced growth in the economy.

Given the large increases in housing prices in some cities and ongoing strength in lending to investors in housing assets, members also agreed that developments in the housing market would bear careful monitoring. They noted that it would be important to assess the effects of the measures designed to reinforce sound residential mortgage lending practices announced by APRA in December.

On the basis of their assessment of current conditions and taking into account the revised forecasts, the Board judged that a further reduction in the cash rate would be appropriate to provide additional support to demand, while inflation outcomes were expected to remain consistent with the 2 to 3 per cent target. In deciding the timing of such a change, members assessed arguments for acting at this meeting or at the following meeting. On balance, they judged that moving at this meeting, which offered the opportunity of early additional communication in the forthcoming Statement on Monetary Policy, was the preferred course.

The Decision

The Board decided to lower the cash rate by 25 basis points to 2.25 per cent, effective 4 February 2015.

Macquarie Group Operational Briefing

Macquarie Group Limited (Macquarie) today provided an update on business activity in the third quarter of the financial year ending 31 March 2015 (December 2014 quarter) and updated the outlook for the financial year ending 31 March 2015 (FY15). It was a solid story, and the changes in business mix are likely to support momentum together with positive movements in exchange rates.

  • Trading conditions across the Group have continued to improve during the Dec 14 quarter and there has been a continued weakening of the Australian dollar
  • Annuity-style businesses’ combined Dec 14 quarter net profit contribution down on both a strong Dec 13 quarter (prior corresponding period) and Sep 14 quarter (prior period) which benefited from significant performance fees in Macquarie Asset Management (formerly Macquarie Funds Group) and the sale of OzForex
  • Capital markets facing businesses experienced improved trading conditions with combined Dec 14 quarter net profit contribution1 up significantly on both the prior corresponding period and the prior period
  • APRA Basel III Group capital of $A14.3 billion, $A1.4 billion surplus to minimum regulatory capital requirements from 1 January 20163, $A2.6 billion surplus to existing requirements
  • Macquarie Funds Group has changed its name to Macquarie Asset Management, and Fixed Income, Currencies and Commodities has changed its name to Commodities and Financial Markets to better align the group names to their business activities

Looking at the segmentals:

  • Macquarie Asset Management (MAM), Australia’s largest global asset manager, saw assets under management increase to $A453.3 billion at 31 December 2014 from $A423.3 billion at 30 September 2014. Since 1H15, Macquarie Infrastructure and Real Assets raised $A2.2 billion in new equity, largely in Pan-Asia infrastructure. Macquarie Investment Management was awarded $A2.1 billion in new, funded institutional mandates across 14 strategies from clients in six countries. Macquarie Specialised Investment Solutions reached first close on the UK Inflation-linked Infrastructure Debt Fund.
  • Corporate and Asset Finance (CAF) experienced continued growth in the lending and asset portfolios, increasing to $A29.0 billion at 31 December 2014 from $A27.5 billion at 30 September 2014. CAF continued to grow its corporate and real estate lending portfolios across all geographies, and the Energy Leasing business continued its key funding role in the rollout of smart meters throughout the UK.
  • Banking and Financial Services (BFS) increased its Australian mortgage portfolio to $A22.3 billion at 31 December 2014 from $A19.8 billion at 30 September 2014, which represents 1.6 per cent of the Australian mortgage market. Macquarie platform assets under administration increased by four per cent during the December 2014 quarter to $A43.2 billion while retail deposits increased by one per cent during the same period to $A35.7 billion.
  • Macquarie Securities Group (MSG) held the No.1 market share position for Australia/New Zealand Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) by number and value of deals5. In October 2014, MSG launched its Malaysia Structured Warrants product gaining No.1 market share6, establishing Macquarie as a leading issuer in Asia by coverage.
  • Macquarie Capital completed a number of transactions in the December 2014 quarter including: Joint Lead Manager on the $A5.7 billion IPO of Medibank Private, the largest Australian IPO in 2014 and the second largest Australian IPO ever; Adviser to Freeport LNG on its landmark $US11 billion equity and debt raising to project finance its LNG export facility in Texas; and Adviser to State Grid Corporation of China on the €2.1 billion acquisition of a 35 per cent interest in CDP RETI in Italy.
  • Commodities and Financial Markets (CFM) experienced increased volatility in oil and gas prices which generated increased customer activity across the energy platform. The business also experienced stronger client flows in foreign exchange due to increased market volatility. CFM is ranked the No.3 US physical gas marketer in North America

Looking further at the Australian mortgage business, we see significant growth in the book, a fall in the mix of high LVR loans, and a slightly higher concentration in NSW and Investment loans than system. The Australian mortgage portfolio includes $1.5 billion portfolio of non-branded mortgages they purchased from ING in September.

MBLDec20143 MBLDec20142 MBLDec20141

 

ANZ Trading Update – Solid In Tough Environment

ANZ today announced an unaudited cash profit of $1.79 billion and an unaudited statutory net profit of $1.65 billion for the 3 months to 31 December 2014, declaring it was a “solid result in a tough environment”. We say, “below expectations, in an increasingly complex and competitive market!”  Profit before Provisions grew 5.2% versus the prior comparable period and rose 3.6% on a constant Foreign Exchange (FX) basis. This result was below consensus estimates, with margins squeezed, institutional banking revenue down, and provisions lower than expected. The share price fell on the day.

Revenue was above the quarterly average for FY14 with benefits from the decline in the Australian dollar exchange rate partially offset by lower Global Markets trading income. Expenses were also higher than the FY14 quarterly average reflecting exchange rate impacts along with several key business enhancement projects becoming operational. This included a new digital platform for the Australian business which provides better product speed to market and customer interface. ANZ continues to invest in growth opportunities and enablement capability.

Customer deposits grew 9% with net loans and advances up 8%. Deposit growth was strong across all geographies with lending demand varied across the Group and customer pay-down levels remaining elevated.

Group Net Interest Margin declined 6bps compared with the end of the second half FY14, 2bps of which related to foreign exchange translation impacts. The remainder was largely attributable to Global Markets and the impact of higher liquidity requirements.

Portfolio quality improvement, with further reductions in impaired assets. The provision charge of $232m was slightly lower than the FY14 quarterly average with no reduction in the management overlay balance during the period.

Excluding the impact of the FY14 final dividend payment, CET1 capital improved by around 20 bps. At 31 December the capital ratio on an APRA CET1 basis was 8.4% (11.9% Basel 3 Internationally Comparable basis). Risk Weighted Assets in creased $17.4 billion of which $8.2 billion was attributable to FX translation which has a negligible impact on Group CET1.

Looking at the segmentals,

The Australia Division is performing strongly, with all core segments contributing. Home lending has continued to grow at above system rates, with the fastest growth occurring in New South Wales. Targeted campaigns, leveraging our digital sales capabilities, have seen the Credit Cards business rebound, posting the highest market share gains of the major banks in the past 6 months. Commercial lending momentum has been maintained following the trend in the second half of FY14, particularly in Small Business Banking. Deposit growth trends were also positive, especially in Commercial, and ANZ has  maintained market share in Household Deposits.

The New Zealand Division is also performing strongly delivering balance sheet growth with market share steady in the competitive mortgages market and deposit growth also strong. Ongoing benefits from the brand and systems merge continue to contribute to positive income expense jaws and the credit environment remains benign.

Global Wealth continues to build momentum, delivering strong in-force premiums growth, stable claims and lapse experience together with further growth in Funds under Management. Innovations including ANZ Smart Choice Super, the GROW by ANZ digital platform and the ANZ Grow Centre are driving greater adoption of Wealth products by both new to bank and existing ANZ customers.

International and Institutional Banking had a mixed start to the year. Trade volumes have been consistent; however significant reductions in commodity prices are impacting the value of shipments and providing a revenue headwind. Cash Management saw significant growth in volumes, particularly in Asia, with margins slightly improved. The Global Markets business delivered its strongest quarterly customer sales result in two years; however total Markets revenues (1Q15 $555 million) were down on the quarterly average for last year reflecting lower trading income. The business settings remain cons ervative with the value at risk (VaR) tracking below 2014 levels.

Risky Lending In A Low Interest Rate Competitive Environment

Regulators have been concerned about the quality of lending, and have been increasing their supervision, conscious of the potential impact on financial stability. However, a paper from the Bank for International Settlements  – Bank Competition and Credit Booms highlight that especially when interest rates are low, and competition intense, banks will naturally and logically drop underwriting standards. This observation is highly relevant to the Australian context, where competition for home loans in particular is leading to heavy discounting from already low rates, and potential lax underwriting. It suggests that lowering rates further will exacerbate the effect.

Greater bank competition and a lower risk-free rate raise the screening costs of lending, which can result in sharp increases in credit supply and deteriorations in average loan quality, which are inefficient for banks. Banks’ incentives to make risky loans can vary despite unchanged capital structure, thus highlighting the role of a risk-taking mechanism. This approach helps explain the existing mixed empirical results on the relationship between bank competition and financial stability. The model can be used to define a neutral interest rate in the context of financial cycles.

There is a growing recognition that the relationship between finance and growth may be unstable in practice. Past financial crises serve as painful reminders that increasing financial access by too much too fast is subject to diminishing returns at best, and can even lead to severe output losses when the financial sector is in disarray. Despite ample evidence for this perverse nonlinearity, there is less understanding about the exact mechanism by which excessive finance that is harmful for stability can arise as an equilibrium phenomenon. Similarly, the role of policy in navigating the trade-o between growth and financial stability, unlike that between growth and inflation, remains a relatively uncharted territory.

This paper proposes a simple model of bank lending decision, where a`credit boom’ could emerge as an equilibrium phenomenon. Two key forces interact to determine the equilibrium. First, banks have an incentive to screen out bad clients by restricting the amount of lending per contract, as riskier firms are known to seek larger loans despite a lower chance of success. Such screening entails costs to both banks and good firms, given that credits are being rationed to meet incentive compatibility conditions. This feature is essentially classic credit rationing.

The second force comes into play when banks enjoy some monopolistic power over their loan market, but can attempt to poach clients from another bank by offering cheaper loan contracts. Lowering prices of loans raises the screening costs, because it necessitates even greater credit rationing if banks were to screen out risky fi rms. When the degree of bank competition for borrowers is suciently intense, it becomes optimal for banks to stop screening and rush to dominate the market by off ering contracts with larger loans to all firms. This new pooling equilibrium is characterised by a low lending interest rate (relative to the average productivity of underlying projects), a larger loan size, and a higher probability of loan defaults.

A lower risk-free rate increases the banks’ incentives to lend by lowering the opportunity cost of funds. But how the credit market equilibrium responds to changes in the risk-free rate also depends on the market structure in which banks operate. In particular, when a bank can gain more market share for a given cut in lending rate, the degree of competiton tends to be higher in equilibrium for any level of risk-free rate. Credit booms are therefore more likely to occur when banks compete more aggressively and/or the risk-free rate is low. In this context, the notion of `fi nancial stability neutral’ monetary policy can be given an explicit de nition, namely that which will prevent a pooling equilibrium from occuring. At the same time, the presence of intense bank competition can limit the effectiveness of monetary policy in containing a credit boom and achieving the financial stability objective.

Why A Larger Finance Sector Is Killing The Economy

The Bank for International Settlements released a paper “Why does financial sector growth crowd out real economic growth?” The paper suggests that rather than encouraging a bigger banking sector, we should be careful because a larger finance sector actually kills growth in the real economy. That is an important insight, given that in Australia, the ratio of bank assets to GDP is higher than its ever been, and growing, at a time when economic growth in anemic.

GDP-to-Bank-Assets-Sept-2014Other countries have significantly higher ratios. The mythology that a bigger banking sector is good for Australia should be questioned. At a time when banks are growing in Australia, thanks to high house prices and lending, inflating their size, we should be looking hard at these findings, because if true, we are on the wrong track.

The purpose of this paper is to examine why financial sector growth harms real growth. We begin by constructing a model in which financial and real growth interact, and then turn to empirical evidence. In our model, we first show how an exogenous increase in financial sector growth can reduce total factor productivity growth. This is a consequence of the fact that financial sector growth benefits disproportionately high collateral/low productivity projects. This mechanism reflects the fact that periods of high financial sector growth often coincide with the strong development in sectors like construction,  where returns on projects are relatively easy to pledge as collateral but productivity (growth) is relatively low.

Next, we introduce skilled workers who can be hired either by financiers to improve their ability to lend, increasing financial sector growth, or by entrepreneurs to improve their returns (albeit at the cost of lower pledgeability). We then show that when skilled workers work in one sector it generates a negative externality on the other sector. The externality works as follows: financiers who hire skilled workers can lend more to entrepreneurs than those who do not. With more abundant and cheaper funding, entrepreneurs have an incentive to invest in projects with higher pledgeability but lower productivity, reducing their demand for skilled labour. Conversely, entrepreneurs who hire skilled workers invest in high return/low pledgeability projects. As a result, financiers have no incentive to hire skilled workers because the benefit in terms of increased ability to lend is limited since entrepreneurs’ projects feature low pledgeability. This negative externality can lead to multiple equilibria. In the equilibrium where financiers employ the skilled workers, so that the financial sector grows more rapidly, total factor productivity growth is lower than it would be had agents coordinated on the equilibrium where entrepreneurs attract the skilled labour. Looking at welfare, we are able to show that, relative to the social optimum, financial booms in which skilled labour work for the financial sector, are sub-optimalwhen the bargaining power of financiers is sufficiently large.

Turning to the empirical results, we move beyond the aggregate results and examine industry-level data. Here we focus on manufacturing industries and find that industries that are in competition for resources with finance are particularly damaged by financial booms. Specifically, we find that manufacturing sectors that are either R&D-intensive or dependent on external finance suffer disproportionate reductions in productivity growth when finance booms. That is, we confirm the results in the model: by draining resources from the real economy, financial sector growth becomes a drag on real growth.

Their conclusions are important.

First, the growth of a country’s financial system is a drag on productivity growth. That is, higher growth in the financial sector reduces real growth. In other words, financial booms are not, in general, growth-enhancing, likely because the financial sector competes with the rest of the economy for resources. Second, using sectoral data, we examine the distributional nature of this effect and find that credit booms harm what we normally think of as the engines for growth – those that are more R&D intensive. This evidence, together with recent experience during the financial crisis, leads us to conclude that there is a pressing need to reassess the relationship of finance and real growth in modern economic systems.

 

Motor Vehicle Sales Fell In January

The ABS just released their statistics to January 2015.  In line with DFA policy, we focus on the trend estimates. The January 2015 trend estimate (92 219) has decreased by 0.1% when compared with December 2014.

When comparing national trend estimates for January 2015 with December 2014, sales of Sports utility and Other vehicles increased by 0.1% and 1.0% respectively. Over the same period, Passenger vehicles decreased by 0.7%.

Six of the eight states and territories experienced a decrease in new motor vehicle sales when comparing January 2015 with December 2014. Western Australia recorded the largest percentage decrease (0.9%), followed by both South Australia and the Australian Capital Territory (0.6%). Over the same period, Tasmania recorded the largest increase in sales of 2.2%.

Bendigo Bank Results Show Signs Of Home Loan Competition

Bendigo and Adelaide Bank (BEN), Australia’s fifth largest bank, today announced an after-tax statutory profit of $227.3 million for the six months ending 31 December 2014. The results were in line with the consensus expectations. Underlying cash earnings were $217.9 million, a 10.9 per cent increase on the prior half year result. Bad and doubtful debts expense was $30.1 million, down 29.5% on the prior corresponding period. NIM was maintained at 2.24%. Cash earnings per share were 48.1 cents, an increase of 3.4 per cent.

The interim fully franked dividend of 33 cents per share is up 2 cents on the 2014 interim dividend.

Basel III CET1 ratio increased by 12bps half on half to8.14% and an $292m additional Tier 1 capital issued in October. $600m RMBS was issued in December 2014. Total capital increased 80bps half on half to 12.19%.

Looking at the segmentals, Retail banking was up 14.2% from Jun 2014 ($128m to $146m), Third party banking was down 4.6% from Jun 2014 ($95.8m) to $91.4m, Wealth fell 37.5% from $19.5m to $12.0m and Rural rose 73.3% from $24.3m to $42.1m including the Rural Finance acquisition – in In July 2014, Bendigo finalised its $1.78 billion acquisition of Rural Finance Corp. from Victoria’s state government which has grown its agricultural lending. Overall, home lending grew at just 3.2% compared with system growth of 7.1%, whilst arrears were around 0.5%. There was strong competition through the broker originated channel.

BendigoHomeLendingDec2104They grew business lending by 19.7% compared with system of 7.4%. Business loan arrears were around 1.4%. Deposit growth was 1.5%, compared with system of 9.1%. Bendigo had an 8 basis point squeeze on lending margins thanks to competitive pressures and as a result they reduced term deposit pricing to help partly offset this so the net interest margin remained unchanged. Customer satisfaction remains higher than the majors, highlighting their unique position in the market.

The market reacted negatively to the results, because the growing business lending sector may imply higher loss rates, pressure on home lending margin and share, and reduced provisioning.