Macroprudential Policy: from Tiberius to Crockett and beyond

In a speech to TheCityUK Jon Cunliffe charts the development of macroprudential policy and the establishment of the macroprudential policy framework in the UK by the Bank of England’s Financial Policy Committee (FPC) since the Committee’s inception in 2011. He also looks ahead at some of the policy questions facing the FPC.

A key outcome of the financial crisis was the recognition that international standards were needed not just to ensure that individual banks were safe but also to ensure that the financial system as a whole was safe. The crisis showed that there are powerful dynamics in the financial system itself which drive booms in good times and busts in bad times. Seven years on from the crisis and four years from the establishment of the FPC, Jon says it is fair to ask how well regulators have done in putting in place the machinery to manage those risks and whether these have come at the expense of economic growth.

The contours of the new regulatory framework are clear and agreed and implementation is well underway, Jon notes, citing rules on bank capital and liquidity, resolution and work on addressing risks from outside the banking system, for instance from derivatives.

But he argues that this “standing framework” can only go so far in addressing risk. The role of macro-prudential authorities like the FPC is not just to ensure that regulations address the risk that financial firms and banks can pose to the financial system as a whole. It is also to monitor the build-up of risk and the development of new types of risk and to take action to address them.

In this area, macroprudential policy is at a much earlier stage of development, partly because the focus has so far been on creating the framework for policy, partly because there are still differing views internationally as to what time-varying, countercyclical macroprudential policy should and could do. Nonetheless, the FPC has taken some important steps here.

First, using macroprudential policy to address changing risks depends upon a clear assessment of risks and of the action necessary to address them. This is why the FPC has changed the structure and content of the Financial Stability Report. “The intention is that such a shorter, more focussed report will create a discipline for the FPC’s thinking, aid its communication and make it easier for others to hold us to account.”

Second, the Committee is developing the use of stress testing to assess macroprudential as well as microprudential risk. “At present we are using stress testing to help us judge how resilient the banking system is to different, severely adverse, but plausible, scenarios. A development of this approach would be to use stress testing more countercyclically. Rather than testing every year against a scenario of constant severity, the severity of
the test and the resilience banks need to pass it would be greater in boom times when credit and risk is building up in the financial system and it has further to fall, and then reduced in weaker periods when there is less risk in the system and the economy needs the banking system to maintain lending.”

Thirdly, the FPC has been looking at macroprudential risks beyond the banking system. Its recommendation on portfolio limits for high loan-to-income mortgages is an example of the committee taking a broad view of financial stability that goes wider than direct risks to the banking system.
On the question of whether financial regulation has gone too far, Jon says only now that reforms are being implemented is it possible for policymakers to see the whole picture of how they work together in practice and that some adjustments will be needed. “Given the depth and complexity of the financial crisis and the corresponding depth and complexity of the reforms, we should expect rather than be surprised that we will need to refine and adjust some of the regulatory reforms.”

However, while some adjustments may be necessary as we see how the reforms work in practice, Jon warns against seeking more generally to trade-off between financial stability and growth and notes that the post-crisis world requires a major adjustment in bank business models.
Jon also points out that in the long build-up of the credit cycle ahead of the crisis, while lending nearly doubled this did not lead to a very large increase in the financing of companies. Instead, lending was mainly directed to other financial institutions, mortgages and real estate.
“While we have relearned some familiar lessons in recent years, we have also learned some new ones. We have had to develop a new regulatory framework, macroprudential institutions like the FPC, and new policy approaches. Over the next few years we will certainly need to refine all of these. The implementation of the detailed reforms will inevitably throw up unforeseen effects in particular places, and where it is justified, we
will need to revisit issues. But we should be careful about talking about turning back the overall regulatory dial or trying to trade off the risk of financial instability for short-term growth.”

Is 50% of all income tax in Australia paid by 10% of the working population?

From The Conversation Fact Check:

According to the 2015-16 Federal Budget, Australians paid around A$176 billion in personal income taxation in the 2014-15 financial year (Table 5 of Budget Paper 1). The Treasurer, Joe Hockey, claims that around 50% of this taxation is paid by the top 10% of the working age population as ranked by their income.

NATSEM’s STINMOD model of the Australian tax and transfer system can be used to evaluate the accuracy of such a claim.

STINMOD, which stands for Static Incomes Model, is NATSEM’s model of taxation and government benefits. It simulates the taxation and government benefits system and allows us to evaluate current and alternative policies and how they would affect different family types on various income levels.

STINMOD is based on ABS survey data (Survey of Income and Housing) which provides a statistically reliable and representative snapshot of household and personal incomes and demographics.

Since the survey is a few years old, NATSEM adjusts the population in accordance with population and economic changes since the survey.

STINMOD is not publicly available, but as a NATSEM researcher, I was able to use the model to check Hockey’s claim against the evidence. STINMOD is benchmarked to taxable incomes data from the latest Australian Tax Office taxation statistics on the distribution of tax payments by income.

When I restricted the STINMOD base population to the working age population only (aged 18 to 65) and rank these people by their taxable income, I found that the top 10% (those with taxable incomes beyond $102,000 per annum) do pay around 52% of all personal income taxation.

Tax1July2015

Different measures, similar result

Since high income earners usually have greater scope for minimising tax through deductions, such as negative gearing, we can use an alternative income measure called “total income from all sources” to rank personal incomes. On this ranking, the share of personal income taxation paid by the top 10% drops to 50.5%.

Australia’s personal income taxation system is strongly progressive, with higher income earners paying both a higher marginal tax rate and average tax rate compared to lower income earners. According to STINMOD, the 90th percentile of working age taxable income is $102,000 per year, while the median taxable income is $39,000 per year. The average tax rate of the 90th percentile is 26.7% while that of the median tax payer is less than half that at 12.3%.

This analysis does include a large number of people who are of a working age but not in the labour force – around 21% of this population (2.9 million persons). These people are not in the labour market for a range of reasons such as disabilities, students, young parents or through personal choice or a range of other reasons. Removing these people from the analysis reduces the tax share to 46% paid by the top 10%.

Tax2July2015

In 2014-15, personal income taxation made up around 47% of all tax received by the federal government. Other taxes are paid to state and local government. While personal income taxation is highly progressive, the incidence of these other taxes tend to be less progressive, or indeed mildly regressive. One example is the GST, which makes up around 14.4% of federal taxation receipts.

Verdict

The Treasurer’s statement that the top 10% of incomes from working age persons pay 50% of personal income tax is correct. This reflects the progressive nature of Australia’s personal income tax system, which is applied to a society that features significant income inequality.

The progressive nature of income taxation in Australia plays a very significant role in altering the distribution of disposable income (after-tax) and provides Australia with a more equal distribution of disposable income.


Review

The FactCheck seems reasonable and correct. It benchmarks the ABS household income and expenditure survey against the official ATO Taxation Statistics, and then confines to working age (18 to 65), to test the Treasurer’s claim.

There were about 12.8 million individuals filing tax returns in 2012-13. The ATO Statistics in its “100 persons” picture of Australian taxpayers, explains that the top three taxable incomes paid 27% of all net tax and the top nine taxable incomes paid 47% in total – pretty close to the working age estimate.

I agree with the author that the FactCheck demonstrates Australia’s progressive income tax system, which has long been considered fair.

Australia has a high tax-free threshold of $18,200 so many working age low earners pay very little income tax. In contrast, New Zealand taxes from the first dollar of income.

And many working age people pay no tax simply because they are unable to find a job – as Australia has an adjusted 6% unemployment rate.

Do Systems Limitations Hamper Mortgage Repricing?

Westpac, the bank with the largest share of Investment Home Loans will be the last of the big four to tweak their rates, following recent changes at NAB, ANZ and CBA. However, systems limitations may cramp their style according to reports today.

According to SMH Business Day,

“Westpac Banking Corp is missing out on $1 million a day that its competitors are now creaming from landlords because its computer systems will not allow it to charge differing interest rates.

Westpac, which is the largest lender to landlords, is the only one of the big four banks not to have increased interest rates for property investors in recent days.

National Australia Bank on Monday said it would raise rates by 0.29 percentage points on all interest-only loans following Commonwealth Bank of Australia and ANZ Banking Group, which last week raised rates for investors only.

Sources said NAB is constrained from charging different rates to investors and owner-occupiers because of technical problems. The bank declined to comment.

Westpac too is finding it challenging to distinguish between investors and owner-occupiers, sources said.

Westpac and NAB use a single “reference rate” for owner-occupier and investor borrowers, which means they cannot increase the standard variable rate for property investors without also hitting owner-occupiers.
Banking sources said it might take Westpac several months to work through systems issues to enable it to charge different rates. This could involve senior members of the IT team re-coding some of the banking systems to allow different reference rates even though the bank has created different home loan products for investors and owner-occupiers.

The pressure on Westpac to resolve its systems issues to enable it to charge different rates is growing because senior bankers tip a bifurcation of the home loan interest rate market, with owner-occupiers and investors expected to pay different rates in coming years.

Up to 1998, it was common for banks to offer owner-occupiers lower interest rates compared to property investors. The interest rate differential was around 1 percentage point”.

NAB Repricing Mortgage Strategy Has Different Tenor

NAB is the latest player to announce mortgage repricing changes, but with a focus in interest-only loans (whether owner-occupied or investment loans).

“National Australia Bank today announced it will increase variable interest rates on interest-only home loans and line of credit facilities by 29 basis points.

The changes are in response to industry concerns about the pace of investor growth, and NAB’s focus on delivering responsible lending practices into the Australian housing market.

Over the past three years, total housing loans have grown by 27 per cent across the industry.

During the same period, growth in housing investment loans and interest only loans has been 34 per cent and 44 per cent respectively. Interest only loans are the predominant structure for investors.

NAB Group Executive Personal Banking, Gavin Slater, said that the higher growth rates in investment and interest only loans had implications from a regulatory, industry and banking perspective.

In December last year, APRA announced a range of measures to reinforce sound lending practices across the industry. NAB has been working closely with the regulator to support these measures, including actions to restrict investor lending growth to no more than 10% p.a..

“In considering these and a range of other factors, NAB is confident the steps we are taking are the right approach to further support responsible lending practices,” Mr Slater said.

“In an environment of record low interest rates, NAB believes it is important to encourage our customers to pay down their home loan.”

NAB continually reviews its lending practices and remains committed to maintaining prudent lending standards and fulfilling its regulatory obligations.

For new loans, NAB’s interest only variable rate changes will be effective 10 August 2015.The change for existing interest only variable rate loans will be effective 10 September 2015. Additionally, changes to NAB’s fixed rate interest only loans will be effective 10 August 2015. Changes to NAB’s line of credit loans will be effective 10 September 2015.

Customers who want to know more about these changes and the impact on their circumstances are encouraged to talk to their banker about what works best for them”.

Our modelling suggests up to 35% of NAB mortgages may be impacted by these changes, creating a broader base of re-pricing than ANZ and CBA have announced. The quantum of the interest rise at 29 basis points is similar.  The net yield from this approach could well provide a higher return for NAB in terms of margins, unless owner-occupied interest-only borrowers decide to refinance to a competitor with a lower rate. Also NAB’s headline investor loan rate (not interest-only) will be more competitive than others, though of course headline rates are often discounted. We are noting some reduction in net average discounts on new loans being written across the industry.

In APRA’s recent reviews, they noted that some lenders were not adequately considering borrower repayment strategies on interest-only loans beyond the initial interest-only term. NAB’s repricing will reduce the relative attractiveness of interest-only loans.

Of note is the fact that Basel IV will likely lift the capital required for interest-only lending, so NAB’s move could be seen as preemptive positioning.

Resmiac announces key changes to prime alt doc loans

According to MPA, non-bank lender Resmiac has announced key policy changes to its prime alt doc product, aimed at giving self-employed borrowers even more choice.

Among the key policy changes announced is an increase in maximum loan amount to $1,500,000 for those borrowers seeking to borrow up to 75 per cent of the security value, the ability to access cash out for any worthwhile purpose and the removal of automated credit decisions.

Additionally, the non-bank says borrowers will now have more flexibility when it comes to verifying their income with the option of either an accountant’s letter, six months Business Activity Statements or three months business bank statements to support their declared income.

Higher Mortgage Risk-Weights First Step to Strengthen Australian Bank Capital – Fitch

Fitch Ratings states that an increase in the minimum average Australian residential mortgage risk-weight for banks accredited to use the internal ratings-based (IRB) approach for regulatory capital calculations was expected, and is only the first step in higher capital requirements for these banks. Greater levels of capital are likely to be required over the next 18-24 months as further measures from Australia’s 2014 Financial Services Inquiry (FSI) are implemented and adjustments to the global Basel framework are finalised.

The announced increase in minimum mortgage risk-weights is the first response to the final FSI report, published December 2014, which also recommended Australian banks’ capital positions be ‘unquestionably strong’. The latter recommendation is aimed at improving the resilience of the banking system given its reliance on offshore funding markets, its highly concentrated nature, and the similarity in the business models of most Australian banks. The change in mortgage risk-weights should provide a modest boost to the competitiveness of smaller Australian deposit takers that currently use the standardised approach for regulatory capital calculations.

The change announced by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) on 20 July 2015 is likely to be the first of a number of changes made to strengthen the capital positions of Australian banks. APRA referred to the higher risk-weights as an interim measure, with final calibration between IRB and standardised models expected once the Basel committee’s review of the framework is completed – this is unlikely to be before the end of 2015.

The move will result in minimum average risk-weights for Australian residential mortgage portfolios increasing to at least 25% from around 16% at the moment. APRA estimates this would increase minimum common equity tier 1 (CET1) requirements by about 80bps for Australia’s four major banks – Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (ANZ; AA-/ Stable), Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA; AA-/ Stable), National Australia Bank Limited (NAB; AA-/ Stable), and Westpac Banking Corporation (Westpac; AA-/ Stable). This is equivalent to nearly AUD12bn for the four banks based on regulatory capital disclosures at 31 March 2015. The only other bank to be impacted is Macquarie Bank Limited (A/ Stable) which has estimated a CET1 impact of about 20bps, or AUD150m.

The higher risk weights will be implemented on 1 July 2016, giving the affected banks nearly 12 months to address capital shortfalls. Sound profitability means that shortfalls could be met through internal means – the AUD12bn is equivalent to about 40% of annualised 1H15 net profit after tax for the four major banks. Fitch expects the banks will look at increasing the discount on dividend reinvestment plans, and/or underwriting participation in these schemes to meet shortfalls. However, raising capital in equity markets is also an option to address both the requirement early and in anticipation of future increases in regulatory capital requirements. Banks have already begun increasing capital positions, with a number of the major banks announcing capital management activity at their 1H15 results.

The size of the increased capital requirement will vary across the banks based upon their loan portfolio compositions – CBA and Westpac have the largest Australian mortgage portfolios and therefore their minimum capital requirements are expected to be the most impacted.

CBA Follows The Mortgage Pricing Crowd

CBA has announced changes to its investment loan pricing.  Like ANZ, which we covered yesterday, the price rise applies to existing as well as new investment loans, which means that the move, whilst ostensibly connected with APRA’s 10% growth hurdle actually has more to do with the changing capital requirements which were announced this week and the ability to offer keen rates to attract new owner occupied loans (which are not caught by the 10% cap).

Commonwealth Bank has today taken further steps to moderate investor home loan growth and to manage its portfolio to address the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority’s concerns regarding investment home lending growth. The interest rate on investor home loans will increase by 27 basis points to 5.72% per annum. Fixed rates for 1,2,3,4 and 5 year new investor home loans will also increase by between 10 and 40 basis points. There are no increases to the SVR on owner occupied loans and fixed rates for some owner occupied loans have been reduced.

Demand for investor home loans across Australia has reached historic highs, with recent data noting that over 50% of new home loan approvals are for investment purposes. Last December, APRA introduced new regulatory measures to reinforce sound residential lending practices, including actions to restrict investor lending growth to no more than 10% p.a.

Matt Comyn, Group Executive for Retail Banking Services said: “As Australia’s largest home lender, we support the prudential regulator’s actions to ensure lending practices remain sustainable and we have been actively managing our investment home loan portfolio to remain below the 10% growth limit.

“Despite making a range of changes to our investor lending policies in the past few months we have witnessed ongoing investor lending growth, and at an industry level, investor lending approvals remain 22% higher than 12 months ago.”

Commonwealth Bank has moved to ensure it remains competitive for owner occupied loans and we have reduced rates on our 1,2,3, and 4 year fixed rate loans by up to 30 basis points. These fixed rate changes came into effect this week (22 July 2015).

“In the current market conditions, we believe these changes strike an appropriate balance in our portfolio between owner occupied home loans and those seeking investment loans,” Mr Comyn said.

Fixed rate loans for investors will increase by between 0.10% and 0.40% . This will apply to new loans only and will come into effect from 31 July 2015.

The new investment home loan rate of 5.72% remains one of the lowest rates offered by CBA and is 0.18% lower than the rate six months ago. It will apply to new and existing customers and will come into effect from 10 August 2015.

We expect the other majors to topple into line, so moving pricing of investment loans higher. Some fixed owner occupied rates are cut, so CBA is re-balancing its portfolio. Now of course the question will be, does this translate into dampening demand for investment property, as the RBA hopes, or does it simply lift the interest costs which can be set against tax, (remember many investment loans are interest only). Given the significant capital appreciation we have been seeing lately, and that fact that rates are low (as low as ever) we suspect demand will still be there. It is conceivable as this works through the RBA may have more wriggle room for another rate cut, but we are not so sure.

ANZ Re-balances Mortgage Pricing

As we foreshadowed, the banks are beginning to tweak their mortgage strategies in response to the 10% cap in investment loans, and in a drive to re-balance towards owner-occupied borrowers.

ANZ today announced interest rates for residential investment property loans will increase to manage investor lending growth targets and in response to changing market conditions. There is no change to other variable lending rates including the Standard Variable Rate for owner-occupied home loans or for business lending. Fixed rates for new owner-occupied home lending will be reduced by up to 0.40%.

Effective Monday, 10 August 2015, ANZ’s variable Residential Investment Property Loan (RIPL) Index Rate will rise by 0.27% to 5.65%pa (5.76%pa comparison rate). Fixed rates for new Residential Investment Lending will also increase by up to 0.30%.

ANZ CEO Australia Mark Whelan said: “Although interest rates for residential property investors are at very low levels historically, the decision to raise interest rates for residential investment lending has been difficult but necessary in the current environment. “It allows us to balance the mix of our lending between owner-occupied and investment lending as well as the impact of changing market conditions. This includes a decision to cut fixed rates for new owner-occupied home lending. “This is a considered decision that takes into account our customers’ position and the criteria we look at when setting rates including our competitive position, our regulatory obligations and the state of the residential property market,” Mr Whelan said. ANZ has also introduced a series of other measures recently to improve the mix between investor and owner occupied lending. For residential investment lending, these include reducing interest rate discounts, increasing the deposit required to at least 10% and increasing interest rate sensitivity buffers.

Those who are above APRA’s 10% guidance will be dialing investment loans down and turning to owner occupied loans to bolster their mortgage portfolio growth. On the other hand, those below the 10% threshold seem to be seeing an opportunity to grow their investment portfolio as others pull back. Non-banks are also joining in. Banks who are well above the 10% annual target will of course have to write smaller numbers of loans in the second half to balance out the full year.

MBS-May-2015--Loans-YOY-InvThe other factor in play are the capital changes APRA announced this week, from 16% to 25% for IRB banks by July 2016. ANZ’s approach of applying the lift in investment loan rates to its entire variable portfolio indicates their strategy is designed to take account of the capital allocation changes ahead. It will be interesting to see if other banks follow suit and we see investment loans repriced across the market. We think this is a likely outcome.

Strengthening Macroprudential Policy in Europe

Speech by Mr Vítor Constâncio, Vice-President of the European Central Bank, at the Conference on “The macroprudential toolkit in Europe and credit flow restrictions.”

The current euro area environment, with policy rates required to stay low for a prolonged period of time and an apparent disconnect between the business and financial cycle, clearly points to a situation where monetary policy cannot deviate from price stability objectives to influence the financial cycle. This is the task of macroprudential policy. While acknowledged in principle, this fact has not yet been fully reflected in our policy frameworks.

In summary, two major moves are required. First, macroprudential policy must place greater emphasis on preventing large fluctuations in the financial cycle, rather than simply increasing resilience to shocks when they occur. In addition to the bank-side capital based measures enhancing banks’ resilience, borrower-based instruments (such as LTVs or DSTIs), which have proved to be more effective in curtailing excessive credit growth, and are also applicable in a time-varying fashion, should gain more prominence. In particular, borrower-based measures should be properly embedded in European legislation, which is not the case at present. Second, a broader macroprudential toolkit is needed to address risks stemming from the shadow banking sector due to its increasing role in credit intermediation. This could involve measures such as redemption gates and loading fees to provide additional safeguards. Guided stress tests can provide comparable assessments of the health of individual institutions and of the resilience of the financial system as a whole. Appropriate policy responses to mitigate growing risks need however to be calibrated, in order to ensure a contained impact on credit supply to the real economy.

RBA Minutes Says Impact Of Investment Lending Scrutiny Not Showing Yet

The RBA released their minutes today for July. Little new really, though they comment that housing credit growth had been steady and remained relatively strong for investors in housing, although it had not accelerated. Any effects of regulators’ greater scrutiny of investor lending were probably not yet evident in the data. We expect to see the impact of the brakes being applied by the banks in the next quarter but our surveys continue to show strong demand from the investment sector.

The Board’s discussion about economic conditions opened with the observation that economic growth in Australia’s major trading partners appeared to have been around average in the June quarter. Consumption growth had been little changed for most trading partners in recent months, although it was perhaps a bit stronger in the United States and somewhat weaker in China. The level of consumption in Japan remained well below that seen prior to the increase in the consumption tax in 2014. Core inflation rates had been stable in year-ended terms over recent months and remained below the targets of most central banks. Members also observed that trade volumes, particularly within the Asian region, appeared to have fallen recently. Consistent with this observation, growth in industrial production across a number of east Asian economies had slowed a little.

In China, there had been little change in the monthly indicators of economic activity, although conditions had been a bit more positive in some sectors than early in 2015. The Chinese property market had improved somewhat; residential property prices overall had risen for the first time in a year and floor space sold had increased in the past few months. Members reflected that the recent easing in monetary conditions would provide additional support to the property market and growth more broadly, although it could be some time before a significant pick-up in construction activity began. Recent efforts by central government authorities to increase infrastructure investment further and reform local government financing arrangements were also expected to support investment.

Commodity prices overall had fallen since the previous meeting, driven by iron ore and oil prices. Growth in crude steel production had been modest and steel prices had fallen noticeably over the past month. Iron ore production in China had continued to decline. Shipments of iron ore from Australia and Brazil appeared to have increased in June, which contributed to lower iron ore prices over the past month.

Following quite strong output growth in Japan in the March quarter, more timely indicators pointed to modest growth in the June quarter. Labour market conditions had continued to improve, resulting in the unemployment rate falling further and the ratio of jobs to applicants continuing to rise. Wage growth and financial market measures of inflation expectations were higher than a year earlier and were expected to feed into higher core inflation over time. Members considered the importance for Japan of policy reforms designed to address some longer-term structural challenges, such as the ageing of the population.

In the United States, recent data pointed to moderate growth in economic activity in the June quarter following weakness in the March quarter. The labour market had strengthened further, with growth in non-farm payrolls employment rebounding in April and May and the unemployment rate falling. While there had been some increase in measures of wage growth, core measures of inflation remained below the Federal Reserve’s inflation target.

In the euro area, the available indicators pointed to modest economic growth and above-average sentiment in the June quarter, continuing the recent trend of improved conditions in the euro area as a whole. Members noted that exports had made a significant contribution to the pick-up in growth in the region but investment was still well below the levels seen prior to the global financial crisis. The unemployment rate had continued to fall modestly since its peak two years earlier, but varied sharply across the euro area; the unemployment rate was highest in Greece, where output was more than 25 per cent below its level prior to the financial crisis.

Domestic Economic Conditions

Members noted that output had increased by 0.9 per cent in the March quarter and by 2.3 per cent over the year. Resource exports had made a significant contribution to growth, reflecting better-than-usual weather conditions in the quarter. Dwelling investment had remained strong and while consumption growth had picked up over the past year or so, it had remained below average. Business investment had contracted in the quarter and there had been little growth in public demand. More recent economic indicators suggested that domestic demand had continued to grow at a below-average pace over recent months, but that labour market conditions had continued to improve.

Members observed that consumption grew faster than household income over the year to the March quarter. As a result, the saving ratio had declined further, although it remained well above the level it had been over much of the past 25 years. Year-ended growth in retail sales had been little changed over recent months and liaison suggested that this was likely to have continued into June. Retail sales growth had been relatively strong in New South Wales and Victoria but weaker in Queensland and Western Australia, in line with observed differences in economic conditions across the country. At the same time, surveys indicated that consumers had viewed their financial situation as being above average over the past year, notwithstanding the relatively weak growth in labour incomes. Members observed that this was likely to reflect the very low level of interest rates and strong growth in net household wealth.

Dwelling investment increased by 9 per cent over the year to the March quarter. An increase in the construction of new dwellings accounted for most of this growth, but the alterations and additions component had also contributed more recently, recording the first increase in a year in the March quarter. Forward-looking indicators pointed to further strong growth in dwelling investment in the period ahead. Members noted that there had been ongoing divergence in conditions in established housing markets across the country, as well as between houses and apartments. Housing prices had continued to rise rapidly in Sydney and to a lesser extent in Melbourne. Elsewhere, there had been little change in housing prices over the past six months or so. Prices of apartments had been growing less rapidly than those of houses, which members considered to be consistent with the relatively strong growth in the supply of higher-density housing in many capital cities.

Growth in housing credit overall had been stable over recent months at around 7 per cent on an annualised basis, while growth in lending to investors had been steady at a bit above 10 per cent. Members observed that the household debt-to-income ratio, calculated by netting funds held in mortgage offset accounts from total household debt to the financial sector, had increased over the year to March but had not exceeded previous peaks. Members discussed the fact that high housing prices had different implications for existing home owners, who benefited from increased wealth, and potential new home owners, who were finding it more difficult to finance a home purchase.

Investment in both the mining and non-mining sectors appeared to have fallen in the March quarter, although the split between the two components remained subject to some uncertainty. Profits for non-mining firms had increased by 6 per cent over the past year. More recent survey measures of business conditions, confidence and capacity utilisation had picked up to be around, or even above, their long-run averages. In contrast, private non-residential building approvals had remained weak.

The monthly trade data suggested that resource exports, including iron ore and coal, had declined in the June quarter. Coal exports had been affected by the severe storms in the Hunter region of New South Wales in late April. Members noted that there had been further signs of growth in service exports, in part a response to the depreciation of the exchange rate. Over the past year, net service exports had made a similar contribution to output growth as exports of iron ore, even though total import volumes had increased in the March quarter.

Labour force data indicated further signs of improvement in May. Employment growth had picked up over the year to exceed the rate of population growth. As a result, the unemployment rate had been relatively stable since the latter part of 2014 and had fallen slightly in May to 6 per cent. Members observed that employment growth had been strongest in household services and that employment and vacancies had been growing for business services but had remained little changed in the goods sector. As with other state-based indicators, employment growth and job vacancies had been strongest in New South Wales and Victoria. Forward-looking labour market indicators had been somewhat mixed over recent months. The ABS measure of firms’ job vacancies overall suggested that demand for labour could be sufficient to maintain a stable or even falling unemployment rate in the near term, while other forward-looking indicators suggested only modest growth in employment in coming months.

Members noted that the latest estimates indicated that the population had increased by 1.4 per cent over the year to the December quarter, down from a peak rate of growth of 1.8 per cent over 2012. The slower growth was primarily accounted for by a decline in net immigration, which was particularly pronounced in Western Australia and Queensland, consistent with weaker economic conditions in those states. Members observed that the lower-than-expected growth in the population helped to reconcile the below-average growth in output over the past year with a broadly steady unemployment rate.

Despite recent improvements in labour market indicators, members reflected that there was still evidence of spare capacity in the labour market. Consistent with this, the latest national accounts data indicated that non-farm average earnings per hour had recorded the lowest year-ended outcomes since the early 1990s and that unit labour costs had been little changed for around four years.

Financial Markets

International financial markets were mainly focused on developments in Greece and the fall in Chinese equity markets over the past month.

Members were briefed on recent developments in Greece. The ‘no’ vote in the referendum on the creditors’ latest proposals raised several issues, first among which was how the Greek authorities could reopen the banks. A critical vulnerability in the near term was related to whether the European Central Bank would provide additional emergency liquidity assistance. A second issue was how Greece would be able to service its external debt and a third was the challenges faced by the Greek authorities in improving the competitive position of the economy. Although these issues were of great concern to the Greek populace, the direct economic implications for the global economy and Australia were assessed by members to be relatively limited. They noted that the reaction of financial markets to these developments had been fairly muted. This was consistent with the economic and financial exposures to Greece – apart from the official sector’s financial exposure – being quite low.

Members noted that spreads to 10-year German Bunds on comparable bonds issued by Italy, Spain and Portugal had not risen much, with the limited contagion from developments in Greece likely to have reflected a general view of markets that previous adjustment policies in those countries had been relatively successful.

Members then turned their discussion to developments in bond markets more generally. Yields on longer-maturity German Bunds and US Treasuries had risen sharply over the first half of June, with German 10-year yields reaching 1 per cent, compared with a historic low of 8 basis points in mid April. German yields declined somewhat following the announcement of the Greek referendum. Longer-term sovereign yields of most other developed countries, including Australia, tended to move in line with US Treasuries.

Expectations about the timing of the US Federal Reserve’s first increase in the federal funds rate were little changed over the past month. Market pricing continued to suggest that the first increase would occur around the end of 2015. Although commentary by Federal Reserve officials suggested that it could be a little sooner than that, they continued to emphasise that the exact timing of the first increase would be less important than the pace of subsequent increases, which were expected to be gradual.

The People’s Bank of China (PBC) eased monetary policy further in June by cutting benchmark deposit and lending rates by 25 basis points, citing low inflation and a consequent increase in real interest rates. In addition, the PBC announced cuts to the reserve requirement ratio for selected financial institutions. The Chinese authorities had also announced a proposal to allow banks more flexibility in their choice of funding mix and asset allocation, which could lead to an increase in the supply of credit over time.

The Reserve Bank of New Zealand lowered its policy rate by 25 basis points, to 3.25 per cent, citing the decline in New Zealand’s terms of trade and the disinflationary effect of stronger-than-expected labour force growth.

Global equity markets fell by 3 per cent over the course of June, with broad-based falls and price movements generally tending to reflect fluctuations in sentiment about Greece. The Chinese equity market also fell sharply in June, partly in response to what was only a modest tightening of restrictions on margin lending. Mainland share prices were still well above their levels of a year earlier but the sharpness of the recent fall prompted the Chinese authorities to announce a number of measures, including an indefinite suspension of initial public offerings, an equity stabilisation fund and a funding facility for brokers. The Australian equity market underperformed several other advanced economy markets in June, mainly reflecting falls in resources and consumer sector share prices.

Global foreign exchange markets were relatively subdued in June. The euro recorded only a modest and short-lived fall when markets opened after the announcement of the Greek referendum result. The Australian dollar was 3 per cent lower against the US dollar and on a trade-weighted basis.

Corporate bond issuance in Australia had been strong over the course of 2015 to date, particularly by resource companies, although much of the increase reflected refinancing.

Pricing of Australian money market instruments suggested that the cash rate target was expected to remain unchanged at the present meeting.

Considerations for Monetary Policy

Members noted that global economic conditions remained consistent with growth in Australia’s major trading partners being around average over the period ahead. Global financial conditions were very accommodative and would remain so even in the event that the Federal Reserve started to raise its policy interest rate later in the year. Recent data suggested that conditions in Chinese property markets had improved and the authorities had acted to support activity by easing a range of policies further. Members noted that the recent volatility in Chinese equity markets and potential spillovers from developments in Greece would require close monitoring.

Domestically, the key forces shaping the economy over the past year were much as they had been for some time. Very low interest rates were working to support strong growth in dwelling investment and, together with strong housing prices, had supported consumption growth. Resource exports had made a substantial contribution to growth and mining investment had declined significantly, while public demand had been flat over the past year. Although output growth in the March quarter had been stronger than expected, growth over the year remained below average and early indications were that the strength in the March quarter had not carried through to the June quarter. Non-mining business investment had been subdued and surveys of businesses’ investment intentions suggested that it would remain so over the coming year. Nevertheless, non-mining business profits had increased over the past year and surveys suggested that business conditions had generally improved over recent months to be a bit above average.

Conditions in the housing market had been little changed in the most recent months, with notable strength in Sydney. Housing credit growth had been steady and remained relatively strong for investors in housing, although it had not accelerated. Any effects of regulators’ greater scrutiny of investor lending were probably not yet evident in the data.

Recent data indicated that employment had grown more rapidly than the population and the unemployment rate had been relatively stable since the latter part of the previous year. The easing in population growth over the past year helped to reconcile below-average growth in output with the relatively steady unemployment rate. Nevertheless, spare capacity remained, as evidenced by the level of the unemployment rate, historically low wage growth and unit labour costs that had been stable for a number of years. On this basis, members assessed that inflationary pressures were well contained and likely to remain so in the period ahead.

Commodity prices had fallen further and the Australian dollar had depreciated over the past month. Although the exchange rate against the US dollar was close to levels last seen in 2009, the decline in the Australian dollar had been more modest in terms of a basket of currencies. Members noted that the exchange rate had thus far offered less assistance than would normally be expected in achieving balanced growth in the economy and that further depreciation seemed both likely and necessary.

In light of current and prospective economic circumstances and financial conditions, the Board judged that leaving the cash rate unchanged was appropriate. Information to be received over the period ahead on economic and financial conditions would continue to inform the Board’s assessment of the outlook and hence whether the current stance of policy remained appropriate to foster sustainable growth and inflation consistent with the target.