Interesting test today, as according to the latest ABS figures on unemployment trend stayed at 5.2%, but seasonally adjusted rose 0.2% to 5.3%. Who will report what (many were keen to highlight the recent falls in SA terms, will the reverse be true too?). We continue to prefer the more reliable trend series. Note too the incoming rotation group had a higher unemployment rate than the group it replaced. So, how much is real and how much noise? Still whatever, on these numbers you can forget wages growth. And this is before the China freeze really hit!
Employment and hours
In January 2020, trend monthly employment increased by around 20,000
people. Full-time employment increased by around 15,000 and part-time
employment increased by around 5,000 people.
Over the past year, trend employment increased by around 257,000 people
(2.0 per cent), in line with the average annual growth over the past 20
years (2.0 per cent).
Year on Year Employment Change Over 20 Years (%)
Full-time employment growth (1.7 per cent) was above the average annual growth over the past 20 years (1.6 per cent) and part-time employment growth (2.8 per cent) was below the average annual growth over the past 20 years (3.0 per cent).
The trend monthly hours worked increased by less than 0.1 per cent in January 2020 and by 1.3 per cent over the past year. This was lower than the 20 year average annual growth of 1.6 per cent.
Underemployment and underutilisation
The trend monthly underemployment rate remained steady at 8.5 per cent in January 2020, and increased by 0.2 percentage points over the past year.
“The underemployment rate continues to remain high, but is still below the levels from 2016-17,” said Mr Hockman.
The trend monthly underutilisation rate also remained steady at 13.7 per cent in January 2020, an increase of 0.4 percentage points over the past year.
States and territories trend unemployment rate
The monthly trend unemployment rate increased in Victoria and decreased in South Australia and Tasmania in January 2020. The unemployment rate remained steady in all other states and territories.
Over the year, unemployment rates fell in Western Australia, Tasmania and the Australian Capital Territory. Unemployment rates increased in New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, and the Northern Territory. Seasonally adjusted data
The seasonally adjusted unemployment rate increased by 0.2 percentage points to 5.3 per cent in January 2020, while the underemployment rate increased 0.3 percentage points to 8.6 per cent. The seasonally adjusted participation rate increased by 0.1 percentage points to 66.1 per cent, and the number of people employed increased by around 14,000.
The net movement of employed in both trend and seasonally adjusted terms is generally underpinned by over 300,000 people leaving employment and around 300,000 people entering employment in the month.
In original terms, the incoming rotation group in January 2020 had a lower employment to population ratio than the group it replaced (62.0% in January 2020, compared to 64.2% in December 2019), and was higher than the sample as a whole (61.8%). The incoming rotation group had a lower full-time employment to population ratio than the group it replaced (43.2% in January 2020, compared to 44.5% in December 2019), and was higher than the sample as a whole (42.7%).
The incoming rotation group had a higher unemployment rate than the group it replaced (5.8% in January 2020, compared to 4.0% in December 2019), and was higher than the sample as a whole (5.7%). The incoming rotation group had a lower participation rate than the group it replaced (65.8% in January 2020, compared to 66.9% in December 2019), and was higher than the sample as a whole (65.6%).
ASIC has today started a four week consultation on draft guidance about the new best interests duty for mortgage brokers.
The new obligations were legislated by the Parliament in response to Recommendation 1.2 of the Royal Commission.
From 1 July, the obligations will require mortgage brokers to act in
the best interests of consumers and to prioritise consumers’ interests
when providing credit assistance.
Announcing the
consultation, ASIC Commissioner Sean Hughes said, ‘The obligations
properly align the interests of mortgage brokers with the interests and
expectations of their clients – the borrowers. Consumers should feel
confident that their broker is offering the best loan for their
circumstances and we expect that consumer outcomes will improve as a
result of this reform.’
‘We have released this
draft guidance for consultation as early as possible, to help promote
certainty for mortgage brokers as industry prepares for the new
obligations to commence in July’ Mr Hughes added.
ASIC’s proposed approach to the guidance is outlined in Consultation Paper 327 Implementing the Royal Commission recommendations: Mortgage brokers and the best interests duty
(CP 327). Consistent with the legislation, the draft guidance is
high-level and principles-based, but also incorporates practical
examples. The purpose of the guidance is to explain the obligations
introduced by the Government, it does not prescribe conduct or impose
additional obligations.
The draft guidance is
structured around the key steps common to the credit assistance process
of brokers, such as gathering information, considering the product
options available and presenting options and a recommendation to the
consumer.
ASIC welcomes views from
all interested stakeholders on the proposals in CP 327, as well as the
draft guidance. This will allow ASIC to understand how the guidance can
best assist brokers to meet these new legal obligations. ASIC expects
that the new obligations will also improve competition in the home
lending market.
ASIC seeks public comment on the draft guidance by 20 March 2020.
ASIC intends to publish final guidance before the obligations commence on 1 July 2020.
Download
Consultation Paper 327: Implementing the Royal Commission recommendations: Mortgage brokers and the best interests duty
Background
In February 2019, Parliament passed the Financial Sector Reform (Hayne Royal Commission Response—Protecting Consumers (2019 Measures) Act 2020,
which introduces a best interests duty for mortgage brokers in response
to Recommendation 1.2 of the Royal Commission. The duty is a statement
of principle which seeks to align the interests of the mortgage broker
with the interests and expectations of the consumer.
ASIC’s proposed guidance
will assist mortgage brokers to comply with these new legal obligations
by setting out ASIC’s views on what the best interests duty provisions
require and steps that can minimise the risk of non-compliance.
The best interests duty
introduced by the Government applies in addition to the responsible
lending obligations. ASIC’s draft guidance explains the interaction of
these two obligations, including that information gathered for the
purpose of complying with the responsible lending obligations may help
brokers to comply with the best interests duty.
ASIC’s draft guidance follows research we published last year in Report 628Looking for a mortgage: Consumer experiences and expectations in getting a home loan. Key findings from this research included:
consumers who visit a mortgage broker expect the broker to find them the ‘best’ home loan;
mortgage brokers were inconsistent in the
ways they presented home loan options to consumers, sometimes offering
little (if any) explanation of the options considered or reasons for
their recommendation; and
first home buyers were more likely to take out their loan with a mortgage broker.
Campaigners have called for Chancellor Rishi Sunak to save banknotes and coins, saying without urgent new laws the cash system could collapse within a decade. From the BBC.
They want Mr Sunak to take action in his first Budget on 11 March.
“We
must ensure the shift to digital doesn’t leave millions behind or put
our economy at risk,” said Natalie Ceeney, of the Access to Cash Review.
The Treasury said it wanted “to ensure everyone who needs cash can access it.”
Cash
is important to millions of people, who still use it for paying for
vital goods and services, such as utility and council bills.
According
to the Financial Inclusion Commission, nearly two million people in
Britain don’t have a bank account, meaning they need notes and coins to
pay their way.
There were 11 billion
cash payments in the UK in 2018, but they are forecast to fall to 3.8
billion in 2028, accounting for fewer than one in 10 (9%) of all
payments.
A cashless society
“The UK is fast becoming a cashless society – without knowing what this really means for consumers or for the UK economy,” said Ms Ceeney.
Over
the past year, 13% of free-to-use UK cash points have closed, as lower
levels of cash use have made them economically unviable. A quarter (25%)
of the machines now charge people to withdraw their cash.
The
Post Office’s cash access service has come under threat. Barclays
recently reversed plans to stop customers taking cash out from Post
Offices after a backlash.
Long-term access to cash
“The
cash network has already been dramatically eroded, and unless urgent
action is taken in the Budget, it’s clear that it will crumble
completely,” warned Jenny Ross, Which? Money Editor.
“The
new Chancellor must seize this opportunity and guarantee long-term
access to cash in the Budget, while developing a clear strategy to
ensure that the transition to digital payments doesn’t leave anyone
behind.”
Various initiatives have been
set up by the industry to help maintain people’s access to cash,
including cashback initiatives at local shops and a “request an ATM”
service.
But the Access to Cash Review
believes the only way to manage the cash system is for the government to
legislate and give regulators the tools that they need to protect cash
access.
Banks should be forced to provide suitable cash access to their customers, they say.
A spokesman for the
Treasury said: “Technology has transformed banking for millions of
people, but we know that many still rely on cash.
“That’s why we’ve invested £2bn to ensure everyday banking services are available at 11,500 Post Office branches across the UK.
“We’re also working closely with industry and regulators to ensure everyone who needs cash can access it.”
A
UK Finance spokesman said the banking and finance industry recognises
the importance of ensuring cash remains free and widely available for
those that continue to need it.
It said
the industry has introduced a number of measures to achieve help,
including “arrangements by Link to protect free-to-use ATMs in more
remote and rural areas and to ensure that every High Street in the UK
has free access to cash.”
The trade
body warned that there is no “one size fits all” approach and
understanding the needs of local communities is critical.
We discuss the rent buy decision with Damian Klassen Head of Investments, Nucleus Wealth, and the broader issues of asset allocation in these uncertain times.
Note Nucleus Wealth DISCLAIMER: This presentation has been prepared by Nucleus Wealth and is for general information only. Every effort has been made to ensure that it is accurate, however it is not intended to be a complete description of the matters described. The presentation has been prepared without taking into account any personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It does not contain and is not to be taken as containing any securities advice or securities recommendation.
Furthermore, it is not intended that it be relied on by recipients for the purpose of making investment decisions and is not a replacement of the requirement for individual research or professional tax advice. Nucleus Wealth does not give any warranty as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of information which is contained in this presentation.
Except insofar as liability under any statute cannot be excluded, Nucleus Wealth and its directors, employees and consultants do not accept any liability for any error or omission in this presentation or for any resulting loss or damage suffered by the recipient or any other person. Unless otherwise noted, Nucleus Wealth is the source of all charts; and all performance figures are calculated using exit to exit prices and assume reinvestment of income, take into account all fees and charges but exclude the entry fee. It is important to note that past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. This document was accompanied by an oral presentation, and is not a complete record of the discussion held. No part of this presentation should be used elsewhere without prior consent from the author.
ABS Chief Economist, Bruce Hockman stated
“The seasonally adjusted quarterly rise of 0.5 per cent extended the
period of moderate growth observed throughout 2019, and was influenced
by the relative stability of the labour underutilisation rate. Annually,
both private and public sector wages rose 2.2 per cent; this was the
lowest public sector growth rate since the commencement of the index in
December quarter 1997.”
For the first time since 2012, private
sector wages grew at a faster rate than the public sector (0.5 compared
to 0.4 per cent), in original terms.
Across industries, annual wage growth
in 2019 ranged from 1.6 per cent for the information media and
telecommunication services industry to 3.1 per cent for the health care
and social assistance industry.
Victoria recorded the highest through
the year growth of 2.7 per cent, while Western Australia recorded the
lowest for the sixth consecutive quarter (1.7 per cent)
Members commenced their discussion of the global economy by noting the International Monetary
Fund’s forecast for global growth to pick up in 2020 and 2021. The easing in trade tensions
between
the United States and China, and ongoing stimulus delivered by central banks, had supported a
modest
improvement in the growth outlook for a number of economies. Global manufacturing and trade
indicators,
notably export orders, had continued to show signs of stabilising in late 2019. Inflation had
remained
low and below most central banks’ targets. Members also discussed the coronavirus outbreak,
which
was a new source of uncertainty regarding the global outlook.
In China, a range of activity indicators had picked up in the December quarter, which suggested
that
targeted fiscal and monetary easing had been working to stabilise economic conditions. In east
Asia, the
growth outlook had been supported by signs of a turnaround in the global electronics cycle and
more
stimulatory fiscal and monetary policies in some economies in the region. On the other hand, the
outlook
for output growth in India had been revised lower given the broad-based slowing in economic
activity
there.
In major advanced economies, indicators for manufacturing and services activity had ticked up
slightly
and tight labour markets had supported growth in consumption. In the United States, lower
interest rates
had supported a pick-up in residential investment. Business investment intentions had
stabilised.
Japanese economic activity had slowed as expected following the increase in the consumption tax
in
October 2019, but the fiscal stimulus that had been announced was expected to support growth. In
the
euro area, survey indicators of conditions in the manufacturing sector appeared to have bottomed
out,
but investment had remained weak.
The progress in addressing the US–China trade and technology disputes had alleviated an
important downside risk to global growth. However, given the nature of the ‘phase one’
deal and the potential for tensions to re-escalate, this risk had not been eliminated.
Members discussed the coronavirus outbreak, noting that it was a new source of uncertainty for
the
global economy. With the situation still evolving, members observed that it was too early to
determine
the extent to which growth in China would be affected or the nature of the international
spillovers. It
was noted that previous outbreaks of new viruses had had significant but short-lived negative
effects on
economic growth in the economies at the centre of the outbreak. Members observed that it was
difficult
to know how representative these earlier episodes could be. China now accounted for a much
larger share
of the global economy and was more closely integrated, including with Australia, than in 2003 at
the
time of the SARS outbreak. The economic effects would depend crucially on the persistence of the
outbreak and measures taken to contain its spread.
Some commodity prices, notably for industrial metals, iron ore and oil, had fallen on concerns
that the
coronavirus outbreak would disrupt production in China and reduce Chinese commodity demand in
the near
term. By contrast, rural prices had been little changed.
Domestic Economic Conditions
The Australian economy had grown modestly in the September quarter. While growth in public demand
and
exports had been relatively strong, growth in household spending and investment had remained
weak. The
output of the farm sector had also subtracted from growth over the preceding year, reflecting
the
effects of ongoing drought conditions. Members noted that the recent bushfires had devastated
some
regional communities and that this was expected to have reduced GDP growth over the December and
March
quarters. The effects of the coronavirus outbreak were also expected to subtract from growth in
exports
over the first half of 2020.
Overall, economic growth was expected to be weaker in the near term than had been forecast three
months
earlier, partly because of the effects of the bushfires and the coronavirus outbreak. However,
GDP
growth was still expected to pick up over the forecast period, supported by accommodative
monetary
policy, a pick-up in mining investment, and recoveries in dwelling investment and consumption.
The
recovery from the bushfires was expected to add to growth in the second half of 2020. The
central
forecast for growth remained unchanged since November, at 2¾ per cent over 2020
and
around 3 per cent over 2021.
An increase in mining investment was expected in the near term and a turnaround in dwelling
investment
was likely to have occurred by the end of 2019. However, the recovery in consumption was less
certain
and more consequential for overall demand. There was also uncertainty around estimates of the
effects of
the bushfires and the coronavirus outbreak: it was difficult to assess potential indirect
effects on
activity from these events and relevant data were yet to be published.
Household consumption had been lower than expected in the September quarter despite strong growth
in
household disposable income, supported by the receipt of tax offset payments and lower interest
payments
following the recent reductions in the cash rate. Information from the ABS retail sales release
and the
Bank’s liaison program had suggested that retail sales volumes were likely to have grown
only
modestly in the December quarter; although nominal retail sales had increased strongly in the
month of
November, much of this increase was likely to have been purchases brought forward to take
advantage of
‘Black Friday’ sales. Measures of consumer sentiment had declined over recent
months, but
consumers’ views on their personal financial situation, which historically have had a
stronger link
to consumption, had been little changed.
Members noted that a number of factors had contributed to the slowdown in consumption growth
since
mid 2018. The downturn in the housing market had reduced households’ wealth, and the
extended
period of weak growth in household income had probably lowered expectations of future income
growth.
Members observed that the prolonged period of slow growth in income was expected to continue to
weigh on
consumption over coming quarters. Furthermore, recent data had suggested that households were
directing
more income to saving and reducing their debt.
Looking ahead, the Bank’s forecast was for growth in consumption to increase gradually,
sustained
by moderate growth in household disposable income and the recovery in the housing market. Growth
in
housing prices had picked up in most capital cities and parts of regional Australia over recent
months.
Prices had increased very strongly in Sydney and Melbourne in recent months. Higher housing
prices and
the associated increase in housing turnover were expected to support consumption and dwelling
investment.
Dwelling investment had continued to decline in the September quarter, however, and was expected
to
decline further in the near term. Nonetheless, leading indicators were consistent with the
forecast of a
trough in dwelling investment towards the end of 2020, followed by a recovery through 2021.
Private
residential building approvals had increased in the December quarter. Contacts in the Bank’s
business liaison program had reported an increase in sales of new homes and greenfield land in
recent
months.
Business investment declined in the September quarter, with both mining and non-mining investment
weaker than expected as at November. Mining investment had been considerably lower
because
work on new liquefied natural gas plants had continued to wind down. Information from business
liaison
contacts and the recent ABS capital expenditure survey continued to support the view that mining
investment was passing through a trough. Non-mining investment was expected to be subdued in the
near
term, but then to increase modestly, consistent with the expected pick-up in domestic activity.
Public
investment had been stronger than expected in the September quarter and information from
government
budgets had suggested public spending would continue to support growth in the near term,
including
through funding of initiatives for bushfire recovery and drought relief.
The unemployment rate had declined slightly to 5.1 per cent in December. Employment
growth
had moderated in the December quarter, but had remained at 2.1 per cent over the year.
All the
growth in the quarter had been in part-time employment. The Bank’s forecast of employment
growth
had been revised downwards for the first half of 2020, reflecting the overall signal from
leading
indicators and the downward revision to forecast GDP growth in the near term. The unemployment
rate was
expected to remain in the 5–5¼ per cent range for some time before
declining to
around 4¾ per cent in 2021, as GDP and employment growth picked up.
Members noted that the inflation data for the December quarter had been in line with
expectations.
Headline CPI inflation had been 0.6 per cent in the quarter and 1.8 per cent
over
2019. Trimmed mean inflation had been 0.4 per cent in the quarter and 1.6 per cent
over 2019. Housing inflation had continued to be a significant drag on overall inflation,
with little
change in rents both in the quarter and over the year. New dwelling prices had risen in the
December
quarter following earlier declines because smaller discounts had been offered by developers.
Inflationary pressures were expected to remain subdued. Underlying and headline inflation were
expected
to increase a little to around 2 per cent over the following couple of years as spare
capacity
in the economy declined. Wages growth was expected to be largely unchanged over the following
couple of
years because mild upward pressure on growth in the wage price index would likely be offset by
downward
pressure from the increase in the superannuation guarantee from mid 2021.
Members noted that the risks around the wage and price inflation forecasts were evenly balanced.
Wages
growth could pick up faster than expected if labour market conditions tightened by more than
expected.
The increase in the superannuation guarantee in 2021 was forecast to constrain wages growth for
some
wage earners, although the timing and extent of this was uncertain and broader measures of
earnings
growth could be expected to be boosted a little. Domestic inflationary pressures would depend on
a range
of factors, including how fast the economy recovered from the soft patch over the preceding
year, the
persistence of the effect of the drought on food prices, and developments in the housing market.
Financial Markets
Members noted that developments in global financial markets had reflected evolving perceptions of
key
risks.
Up until mid January, concerns over global downside risks had eased following stabilisation in a
range
of forward-looking indicators of growth, the passage of the ‘phase one’ US–China
trade deal and improved prospects for an orderly Brexit. In response, long-term government bond
yields
and equity prices had risen. The US dollar and Japanese yen had depreciated a little, while
the
Chinese renminbi had appreciated. There had also been renewed capital flows into emerging
markets.
However, since then these moves in financial markets had been partly reversed as market
participants
became concerned about the potential effect of the coronavirus on the prospects for global
economic
growth. In particular, government bond yields had declined noticeably to be back at very low
levels. In
Australia, the 10-year government bond yield had declined in line with movements abroad, to
below
1 per cent. Also, the US dollar and Japanese yen had appreciated, while the
Chinese
renminbi had depreciated. The Australian dollar had also depreciated to be around its lowest
level since
2009.
Overall, global financial conditions remained accommodative, in part because of ongoing stimulus
delivered by central banks. After some easing of monetary policies in 2019, central banks in the
major
advanced economies had indicated that their current policy settings were likely to remain
appropriate
for some time. Central banks in the United States, Europe and Japan had recently left policy
settings
unchanged, noting that some downside risks had receded for the time being. However, they had
also
signalled that they were prepared to ease policy further if necessary, and markets were
expecting some
further easing in the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada in the year ahead. In China,
the
central bank had recently implemented targeted measures to support economic growth, including by
providing additional liquidity to the financial system.
Corporate financing conditions had generally remained favourable, including in Australia. Credit
spreads were at low levels and global equity prices had been higher over recent months,
notwithstanding
the volatility associated with the coronavirus outbreak. Members noted that equity market
valuations
were high relative to earnings in a number of economies, which could be explained partly by low
long-term bond yields keeping overall discount rates low relative to history.
Domestically, the reductions in the cash rate in 2019 had seen bank funding costs and lending
rates
reach historic lows. The major banks were estimated to be paying interest of 25 basis
points or
less on a little over one-quarter of their deposit funding. Around 60 basis points of the
75 basis point reduction in the cash rate since mid 2019 had been passed through to
standard
variable mortgage rates. However, the actual rates that households were paying on their
outstanding
variable-rate loans had declined by more than this, with the average rate declining by almost
70 basis points over the same period. This additional decline reflected strong competition
among
lenders for high-quality borrowers and households continuing to switch from (more expensive)
interest-only loans. If this were to continue, by around mid 2020 the average rate paid on
outstanding variable-rate mortgages would have declined by around 75 basis points since May
2019.
Households’ total mortgage payments increased in the December quarter, with a rise in
principal
and excess payments more than offsetting the decline in interest payments. Members discussed
whether
this increase reflected a change in behaviour by households and the potential for it to persist.
They
noted that some households were likely to be repaying their debts faster in response to low
growth of
their incomes and the earlier fall in housing prices. The process of balance sheet adjustment
had been
facilitated in part by the reductions in the cash rate as well as by the higher tax refunds for
low- and
middle-income earners, both of which had boosted disposable incomes.
Consistent with stronger conditions in some established housing markets, housing loan commitments
had
continued to rise. That had been driven largely by owner-occupiers, and growth in credit
extended to
owner-occupiers had increased to 5½ per cent on a six-months-ended annualised
basis in
December. Despite accommodative funding conditions for large businesses, growth in business debt
had
slowed over the six months to December.
Financial market pricing at the time of the meeting suggested that market participants expected a
further 25 basis point cut in the cash rate by mid 2020.
Before turning to the policy decision, members reviewed the policy and academic discussions
taking
place around the world regarding the operation of macroeconomic policy and monetary policy
frameworks in
an environment where interest rates are low because of structural factors. These discussions
focused on
a range of issues, including: the appropriate level and specification of inflation targets; the
cases
for and against more aggressive monetary policy easing when policy interest rates are near the
effective
lower bound; the role of forward guidance and strategies for lowering long-term interest rates
and their
potential side-effects; and the role of fiscal policy. Members also reviewed the international
discussions regarding possible changes in the monetary transmission mechanism at low interest
rates.
Considerations for Monetary Policy
In considering the policy decision, members observed that the outlook for the global economy
remained
reasonable, with signs that the slowdown in global growth was coming to an end. The progress in
addressing the US–China trade and technology disputes had reduced but not eliminated an
important
downside risk to global growth. The coronavirus outbreak was a new source of uncertainty. While
it was
too early to tell what the overall effect would be, the outbreak presented a material near-term
risk to
the economic outlook for China and for international trade flows, and thereby the Australian
economy.
Global financial conditions remained positive. This partly owed to ongoing stimulus delivered by
central banks, and financial market participants expected some further monetary easing in some
economies. Long-term government bond yields were back at very low levels, including in
Australia.
Borrowing rates for households and businesses were at historically low levels, and there was
strong
competition among lenders for borrowers of high credit quality. Conditions in some established
housing
markets had strengthened, and mortgage loan commitments had also picked up. The Australian
dollar had
depreciated to be around its lowest level since 2009.
The outlook for the Australian economy was for growth to improve, supported by a turnaround in
mining
investment and, further out, dwelling investment and consumption. In the short term, the effects
of the
bushfires were temporarily weighing on domestic growth, but the recovery was likely to reverse
the
negative effects on GDP by the end of the year. The forecast recovery in consumption growth
remained a
key uncertainty for the outlook. Consumption had been weak, as households had been gradually
adjusting
their spending to the protracted period of slow growth in incomes and to the fall in housing
prices.
Although housing prices had been rebounding nationally, it was too soon to see the response to
this in
household spending, and it was unclear for how long the period of balance sheet adjustment would
continue.
The unemployment rate had declined a little to 5.1 per cent and was expected to remain
around
this level for some time before declining further to a little below 5 per cent as
economic
growth picked up. Wages growth was expected to be largely unchanged over the following couple of
years.
Members agreed that a further gradual lift in wages growth would be a welcome development and
was needed
for inflation to be sustainably within the 2–3 per cent target range.
In the December quarter, CPI inflation had been broadly as expected at 1.8 per cent
over the
year. Inflationary pressures had remained subdued, held down by flat housing-related costs.
Inflation
was expected to increase gradually to 2 per cent over the following couple of years,
in
response to some tightening in labour market conditions.
Given this outlook, members considered how best to respond.
Members reviewed the case for a further reduction in the cash rate at the present meeting. This
case
rested largely on the only gradual progress towards the Bank’s inflation and unemployment
goals.
Lower interest rates could speed progress towards the Bank’s goals and make it more assured
in the
face of the current uncertainties. In considering this case, the Board took into account that
interest
rates had already been reduced to a low level and that there are long and variable lags in the
transmission of monetary policy. The Board also recognised that the incremental benefits of
further
interest rate reductions needed to be weighed against the risks associated with very low
interest rates.
Internationally, concerns had been raised about the effect of very low interest rates on
resource
allocation in the economy and their effect on the confidence of some people in the community,
notably
those reliant on savings to finance their consumption. A further reduction in interest rates
could also
encourage additional borrowing at a time when there was already a strong upswing in the housing
market.
The Board concluded that the cash rate should be held steady at this meeting. Members agreed that
it
was reasonable to expect that an extended period of low interest rates would be required in
Australia to
reach full employment and achieve the inflation target. The Board would continue to monitor
developments
carefully, including in the labour market, and remained prepared to ease monetary policy further
if
needed to support sustainable growth in the economy, full employment and the achievement of the
inflation target over time.
The Decision
The Board decided to leave the cash rate unchanged at 0.75 per cent.
REINZ has released their January 2020 residential report today, and they reported the busiest January in 4 years. The annual average rise across New Zealand was 7%, with Auckland at 4.4% and other areas up 9.1%. Auckland is actually now among the faster-rising regions. Prices in Canterbury are rising, although to date this has been slower than many other regions.
In January the median number of days to sell a property nationally decreased by 6 days from 48 to 42 when compared to January 2019 – the lowest days to sell for the month of January in 3 years.
Low interest rates and lighter regulation are driving the market. Over 2019, the RBNZ cut the OCR from 1.75 percent to 1 percent and they indicate that the OCR will remain at 1 percent for some time. In response, household debt continues to rise. Lower debt servicing costs enables higher household spending on consumption, although returns from savings will be lower as well.
Over the past year New Zealand construction activity has ramped up substantially while net migration has steadily declined. The cancellation of earlier plans to introduce a capital gains tax has also helped to drive the market.
For New Zealand excluding Auckland, the number of properties sold increased by 0.9% when compared to the same time last year (from 3,279 to 3,308) – also the highest for the month of January in 4 years.
In Auckland, the number of properties sold in January increased by 9.7% year-on-year (from 1,180 to 1,295) – the highest number of residential properties sold in the month of January since January 2016.
Sales in Auckland were the highest for the month of January in four years, with particularly strong uplifts in sales volumes in North Shore City (+29.0%), Waitakere City (+28.6%) and Rodney District (+21.1%).
Regions outside Auckland with the highest percentage increase in annual sales volumes during January were: • Nelson: +42.6% (from 54 to 77 – 23 more houses) • Manawatu/Wanganui: +15.3% (from 281 to 324 – 43 more houses) – the highest for the month of January in 3 years • Bay of Plenty: +11.5% (from 340 to 379 – 39 more houses) – the highest for the month of January in 4 years • Marlborough: +11.3% (from 62 to 69 – 7 more houses). Regions with the largest decrease in annual sales volumes during January were: • Tasman: -29.3% (from 58 to 41 – 17 fewer houses) – the lowest since January 2017 • Southland: -27.2% (from 151 to 110 – 41 fewer houses) – the lowest for the month of January in 6 years • Otago: -17.1% (from 269 to 223 – 46 fewer houses) – the lowest for the month of January in 9 years.
In the recent Reserve Bank NZ Monetary Policy Statement, they indicated that over the medium term, annual house price inflation is expected to slow as net immigration moderates, residential construction activity remains high, and the effects of past lower mortgage rates fade.
However, they expect residential investment growth is expected to pick up over the next six months, in line with recent high levels of residential building consent issuance. That said, residential investment is forecast to decline very gradually as a share of GDP later in the projection period, reflecting ongoing capacity constraints in the construction sector.
In December 2019, the Government announced a substantial investment package of $12bn, equivalent to around 4 percent of annual nominal GDP. The Treasury forecasts that $8.1bn will be spent between June 2020 and June 2024, mainly on infrastructure projects
Which is probably just as well, given that business investment is forecast to fall ahead.
We discuss our submission to the Senate Inquiry into funding for the SME sector. The proposed bill will provide incentives for the big banks, but do little to address the real issues. We offer an alternative approach, using data from our SME surveys.
We are pleased to offer our submission for consideration.
The Bill as proposed will do little to address the underlying SME funding
issues we have in Australia, despite benefitting the incumbent major investors
through their equity shares. It might play well from a “we are doing something
for SME’s” perspective, but in reality, it will do little.
To address the real problem of SME funding, we recommend
a FinTech style structure, as already proven in the UK and elsewhere across
Europe. This would enable the allocated funds to reach more businesses, but
more importantly also facilitate a transformation of lending to the SME sector
in Australia, including driving incumbents to lift their game.
This transformational play would demonstrate the
Governments active support for the SME sector, but also lead to broader and
deeper change, to the benefit of the local economy.
Introduction
Digital Finance Analytics is a boutique research and
advisory firm which curates a rolling 52,000 firm survey each year, with ~4,000
new firms added each month. The survey is a telephone omnibus and is executed
on our behalf by a reputable service bureau. It is statistically accurate
across the country.
We design the questions, and analyse the results using our
Core Market Model. The survey has seen running for more than 15 years. We have
several clients who subscribe to our data services, as well as those to receive
copies of the free summaries. Clients include several financial services
companies, FinTechs and Government agencies, within Australia and beyond.
We hold information about their business structure, banking
relationships and financial profile, as well as their digital behaviour. This
provides a multi-factorial basis for our underlying segmentation[i],
which has proved to be both stable, and insightful over time.
There is tremendous diversity in the SME sector, and as a
result one size certainly does not fit all. We believe strong segmentation is
essential to be able to translate strategy into effectively action. We focus on
what we call “the voice of the customer”.
This enabled us to develop models and descriptors for each
of the clusters. Businesses are placed within the model descriptions in a
best-fit manner. We believe that the results should be judged largely on the
interpretability and usefulness of results, not whether the clusters are “true”
or “false”.
When these stable segments are cross-linked with our
research, we can compare the different needs and opportunities across the
groups, and we can prepare segment specific treatment plans for each.
The custom segmentation we use is well distributed by count
across the business community. Growing business and Cash Strapped Sole Traders
are the two largest groups. As expected, the count of Large Established Firms
is the lowest.
In the light of our research, we have reviewed the
provisions of the proposed legislation and wish to make three major points.
SME’s Are Indeed an Essential Part of Our Economy.
The small and medium business sector (SME) is a critical
growth engine for the economy, with more than 3 million businesses offering
employment for more than 7 million Australians. The characteristics of these
businesses are varied from newly founded part-time entities, through to
businesses employing up to 100 people and with a turnover of up to $10 million
each year. More than 77% have a turnover of less than $500,000 each year. 91.3%
have an annual turnover of less than $2 million each year. So, one size does
not fit all.
The largest industry segment is Construction (17%), followed
by Professional, Scientific and Technical (12.5%) and Rental, Hiring and Real
Estate Services (11.5%). Financial Services (9%) and Agribusiness (8.25%) are
the next two. Note that Mining accounts for only 0.4% of all SME’s.
Nearly half of all businesses have been trading for less
than 4 years. Cash Strapped Sole Traders are most likely to fail (55% in 5
years), followed by Cash Strapped Sole Traders and Stable Subcontractors. The
highest failure rates are found in Transport, Financial Services, Real Estate
and Construction.
Most SME’s are true small businesses and one quarter of
SME’s have a sales turnover off less than $50,000 each year, and more than half
have a turnover of less than $150,000 per annum. Most low turnover businesses
are unincorporated. Those businesses with larger turnovers are more likely to
be formed as a company.
Looking at the state distribution, 60% of businesses are in
NSW and VIC.
Funding Is Indeed A Growing Problem for SME’s.
We have detected an increasing problem where more businesses
are unable obtain suitable finance to enable them to grow and invest in their
businesses. Underlying this is the fact
that demand from households and businesses for services from the SME sector is
waning as the broader economy falters. SME’s are the canary in the economic
coalmine!
For many segments, the need for working capital is the main
issue, and the main cause of this need relates to delayed payments. This is
particularly a concern among some smaller businesses. The average debtor days
is still elevated, with 45% of firms reporting an average settlement time from
invoicing of 50-60 days. There were minor variations across the states. Debts from Large Corporates and Government
entities are both taking longer to settle due to “enhanced” cash flow
management techniques.
The average number of banking relationships varies across
the segments. Larger and more complex businesses are likely to spread their
relationships. Others, in need of funding, will also try to access facilities
from many sources, and so have more complex relationships.
Satisfaction with banking services remains in the doldrums,
with around half of all businesses dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied with
their bank, and only 17% very satisfied.
The satisfaction rating did vary by segment, with more established
firms who do not need to borrow the more satisfied, while newer smaller firms,
seeking to borrow, the least satisfied. For them access to credit was a
significant issue.
Compliance and price were the two most significant causes of
dissatisfaction, though only 5% said obtaining funding was the root cause of
their concerns. When asked about their propensity to switch lenders, 61% said
they would consider moving. However, when we examined their length of time with
existing banking relationships, many are rusted on long term. The inertia, and
the gap between intent to switch and switching is explained by a combination of
time constraints, complexity of switching and lack of available alternatives.
Again, this footprint varies by segment.
We continue to see the rise of FinTech lenders operating in
Australia. Around 23% of SME’s have applied, and a further 10% say they will
apply for funding. Overall awareness is rising, although there are some
concerns about the true costs of borrowing from this source.
Many lenders are reluctant to lend to the sector, require
security (mortgage over property for example) and funding is expensive. Banks
prefer to lend to households as opposed to businesses, partly because of the
relative capital ratio costs and lower risk profiles.
Some businesses are turning to the growing FinTech sector,
where unsecured finance is available, at a price, but getting funding through
these channels can be expensive because of lack of true competition and high
demand.
Finally, we agree with the proposition that Australia
currently lacks a patient capital market for small and medium enterprises. But this is not the main issue blocking the
growth of the sector. Access to straightforward credit is.
But the Proposed Bill Is Targeting the Wrong SME Segments
We understand the fund will invest between $5 million to $15
million in small and medium enterprises that have a turnover of between $2
million and $100 million, where they can demonstrate three years of revenue
growth and a clear vision to expand.
Established Australian businesses will be eligible to apply
for equity capital investments between $5 million and $15 million.
Small-business owners will not have to give up control for this investment.
The Business Growth Fund’s investment stake will range from
10 to 40 per cent, setting a balance between business owners keeping control of
their business and providing enough incentives for investors. Initially, the
Business Growth Fund could support 10 investments per year, with the aim to
increase to 30 per year as the fund develops. Banks and superannuation
contributions could enable the fund to grow to $500 million.
Our research indicates that this particular segment is
small, can already obtain funding for such expansion (many would fit within our
“Business In Transition” segment), and as a result we do not believe many would
be prepared to give up such a large stake in their growing businesses. It seems
this is more orientated to offer investors and the financial sector a return,
than being shaped best to provide support for those small businesses which need
assistance the most. The small number of transactions envisaged will also not
assist many businesses, and the target is clearly not the bulk of those with
real funding needs.
Thus, we cannot support the current proposal (which we also
note is imprecise in terms of the assessment processes, return hurdles and
other matters). Our view is that the current proposal appears rushed, and too
high-level. But our main point is, it is targeting the wrong SME’s.
We Think There Is A Better Option
We believe there is a better option to assist SME’s in their
growth agenda. The truth is there is a dearth of financing available from
existing major players. Their risk and capital ratios mean they prefer to lend
to households for mortgage purposes, then to small business. As interest rates
fall, this pressure is being exacerbated.
We think a better model would be to provide funding via the
emerging Fintech sector, by either providing funding to flow to existing FinTech’s,
or by creating a new Government backed marketplace where FinTech’s and SME’s
can transact.
There are good examples of such models[ii].
For example, in the UK, the main contenders are Tide (focused solely on SMEs,
small or medium-sized companies) and Starling (which has retail accounts as
well). In France, the big player is Qonto. In Germany, there’s Penta and Hufsy
(which is based in Denmark). In Norway, Aprila. For “micro-businesses” of 1-10
people, there’s Holvi in Finland, Coconut, Anna and CountingUp in the UK, and
Shine in France.
Tide now claims over 1.4% of the UK’s SMEs as clients (up
from 1% in December 2018), and is gunning for 8% market share by 2023, aided by
a £60m UK government grant.
Meanwhile, Starling has 46,000 SME members, up from 30,000
in March, with £100m from the same government grant to develop its business
banking offering.
Qonto in France has grown from 15,000 small business
customers to 40,000 in the past year, and is expanding into Germany, Spain and
Italy this year. Finnish startup Holvi, which was bought by Spanish bank BBVA
in 2016, claims 150,000 customers and is expanding into France, Italy, the
Netherlands, Ireland and Belgium.
There is a lot of space for growth because the European
market — with 24.5m SMEs — is still extremely dominated by the big lenders. In
the UK, for example, four big banks have a 90% share of SME banking.
This was an intentional strategy from the UK Government to
disrupt the inadequate SME sector. And in response the incumbents have been
forced to respond and are now upping their game and starting their own
digital-focused business banks as well to compete. In November 2018, NatWest
launched Mettle. Santander’s “start-up” small business bank, Asto, also
launched in the UK late 2018 Meanwhile, HSBC is building its own small business
bank start-up, known internally as Project Iceberg.
In addition, the cost of funding to SME’s has dropped and
the Fintech sector has developed, supported by the core injection of UK
Government funding.
These digital plays cover a wide range of services which
SME’s need, as well as basic payments, transactions and lending. And they are
tending to create a marketplace where businesses and service providers and
lenders can interact. This is transformational.
The SME experience has been significant, with easier access
to funding, faster decisions, and the resultant rebalancing of the industry has
lifted mainstream lenders too. If a similar model was replicate here, the SME
sector would win. Australia would win.
Conclusion
The point to make, is rather than a thin deal flow
targeting larger SME’s which really do not need assistance, a revised strategy
could facilitate transformation of finance to SME sector. Thus, the planned investment
could be made by the Australian Government, but leading to more productive
outcomes. If we were to replicate a UK model, we think it should be the current
inflight Fintech-based approach, rather than one which favours incumbents, and
which does not deal with the core issues Australian SMEs face.
Thus, we recommend that the current proposed Bill is
withdrawn, and the strategy redeveloped to take account of the emerging Fintech
scene
Martin North
Principal
Digital Finance Analytics
9th February 2020
[i] Our
partitional clustering approach means that the segments are defined using multi-factor
cluster analysis and split into non-overlapping tribes, rather than in a
hierarchical tree. To achieve this, we developed a proprietary scoring system
based on Lloyd’s algorithm, (also known as Voronoi iteration) for grouping data
points into a given number of categories. This is often referred to as k-means
clustering. The modelling is iterated sufficiently to enable adequate
separation between clusters, as determined by Lloyds’s algorithm.
We will be running our latest live show tomorrow 20:00 Sydney on 18th February. Join us live, to ask a question, or send one in beforehand via the DFA blog