Buy Now Pay Later loans are finally being finally recognised and regulated as a form of credit, despite the industry saying they do not provide credit. But as I have said before, if it quacks like a duck and swims like a duck – it’s a duck.
Given that up to one third of households have used some form of Buy Now Pay Later in the past year, these reforms are long overdue, not least because we see a high correlation between financial stress and the use of these facilities, and a proliferation of BNPL being used for everyday expenses, energy bills and other essentials, as well as for bigger items like solar panels.
And more than 20% of users end up paying late payment and other fees, and many also can hold multiple BNPL debts at the same time, meantime their finances are not under control. The regulations have come about after concerns that the unregulated nature of BNPL was resulting in lenders charging excessive late payment fees and engaging in unaffordable lending practices that led some customers to experience financial hardship and stress.
So now the government has announced its plans to regulate the buy now pay later (BNPL) sector and consumers could see some big differences to the fees they pay, how they apply for credit and the impact on their credit rating and is now consulting on its plans until mid-April before finalising the legislation, which will probably be introduced into parliament in the second half of this year. The new laws will take effect six months later.
I think the arrangements for small loans of 2000 and below are still too weak, because we see households holding multiple loans at the same time, so the regulations should be higher here. On the other hand given the current tight financial conditions it is important not to cut desperate people off from some financial options other than going to unregulated loan sharks, which do still operate in some more deprived areas.
The underlying issues are the fact that use of credit has now become normalised by society and the financial services industry, when for some households this just creates problems, which ultimately put them in a worse financial position, and of course high inflation costs and low wages growth are a catalyst for financial distress. This is not nanny state intervention, but rather a further small but critical steps to help people make better financial decisions.
However, a bigger emphasis on financial education in schools and a more cautionary approach to debt would ultimately improve the lot of so many Australians. But at least this particular duck is now being recognised for what it is.
