As I discussed on my live show, on Tuesday night with Leith van Onselen, the RBA decided to hold the cash rate at 4.35%, but there were signs of a more hawkish tone from the meeting notes, and the subsequent press conference (which I might add is becoming less useful each time thanks to weak questions supporting weak answers, come on MSM do your job….).
Bullock was clear, we need more data, there are risks to the upside from sticky inflation, but employment is also an important factor, given their dual mandate.
Just remember folks, the RBA at 4.35% is significantly below several other Central Banks, including the Bank of England, which held rates on Thursday at 5.25%, despite inflation falling to 2% last month, Bank of Canada which cut rates by 0.25% to 4.75% and New Zealand’s Reserve Bank holding rates at 5.5%, despite driving the economy there into recession.
Which begs the question, has the RBA done enough on rates to squeeze inflation out of the economy in Australia, despite being lower the peers, mainly because in Australia a greater proportion of mortgages are linked to variable rates than other countries. Economists are divided, with Leith still holding the next cut will be down, as unemployment rises.
But writing on Monday, before the RBA decided to hold rates on Tuesday, Economist Warren Hogan, at the more bullish end of commentators on RBA rates, wrote in the AFR that the flow of data since the last meeting in early May made it a very close call to hold off on further tightening.
The narrow path is still attainable, but it increasingly looks like we will need to get rates up closer to 5 per cent to stay on it.
http://www.martinnorth.com/
Go to the Walk The World Universe at https://walktheworld.com.au/
