New Retail Broking Franchise Promises a Digital Revolution

According to Australian Broker Online, leading aggregator Connective’s new retail broking franchise, iConnect Financial promises a digital revolution for those brokers who come on board.

Speaking at the soft initial launch in Sydney yesterday, Connective’s general manager of strategy distribution & digital, Steve Heavey said the next wave of growth in the mortgage industry is going to be digital disruption.

“One thing we do know is that 80% of consumers looking to refinance or looking to take out a loan get online to get some form of information. Two thirds of those consumers actually use tools, like product comparison sites. They look at how much they can borrow and all of the other tools that banks and other broking businesses provide.

“People are using technology far more than they ever have and the rate at which it is being taken up is astronomical. There is a belief within Connective that the organisations that marry data capture through technology and digital means with a really good customer experience are the businesses that are going to be able to take hold of that next wave of competition. So what we did was build a range of digital platforms.”

As a part of iConnect’s promise to capture the next wave of competition through a digital revolution, Heavey announced the launch of a new comparison website, RateWatchers, which will generate leads for its iConnect brokers.

“We know that there are a large number of people that go online and do product comparison. So RateWatchers.com.au is another digital platform which we are launching, which is our product comparison site. There will SEO campaigns and SEM campaigns and social campaigns all across the digital platforms to try and engage with those consumers who are looking for product comparison information.

“One of the things we will do differently with RateWatchers is that because we know people are time poor, we are going to actually capture some information and tell them that we will look after watching the rate for them. As soon as the rate hits below where they are at, we will let them know. And any of those leads coming out of that will go to our brokers who operate under iConnect.”

The second way in which iConnect plans to be a digital disruptor is to launch an online lender, OnlineHomeLoans.com.au, which will also link back to its iConnect Financial brokers.

“…[T]here is a large number of consumers online who are really, really rate driven. You only have to look at loans.com.au, or the take up that UBank has had. Lots of people go online thinking they can take out an online home loan and get a 3.99% rate and that sounds fantastic,” Heavey said.

“But we all know that a couple of steps into the process they are on the phone and they want to talk to someone. So the whole thing around online home loans isn’t what it has all cracked up to be… But we know the consumers are online looking and we need to provide a platform for them to engage with us so hopefully when they get to the point in the process of clicking on a button where they need to talk to someone, those leads go across straight to iConnect Financal brokers.”

Finally, consumers will be connected to iConnect brokers through an online broker search engine, BrokerFind.com.au.

“The last platform is a little bit like that real estate one where you find the best agent. It is for time poor people who don’t have a relationship with a broker and want to talk to someone, but also want to deal with someone really local.

“We will have all the iConnect brokers, wherever they’re positioned across the country, in a search engine where consumers will be able to go and find them really easily. It is once again, a lead generator.”

Connective announced its new retail aggregation business, iConnect Financial in August. The aggregator just wrapped up its initial launch phase in Melbourne and Sydney, with a national rollout planned for early 2016.

Aussies using only their Mobile or Tablet to bank triples in 3 years

According to Roy Morgan, an estimated 1.1 million (5.8% of) Australians use only their mobile phone or tablet to conduct banking activities in an average 4 week period. In three years, the number of Australians doing “mobile-only banking” has tripled. This means they do not use any other banking channel, such as website, branches, adviser/banker or the telephone, to deal with their bank. This chimes with earlier DFA research on channel preferences, where we showed that specific segments lead the way into digital usage.

By June 2015, 33% of Australians conducted internet banking using a mobile phone or tablet (app) in an average four week period. This has resulted in a group of people that only deal with their banks via a mobile or tablet. As assumed, younger generations take up digital channels at higher rates than older ones, with close to one out of ten people under 34 years old doing ”mobile-only banking”.

% who only conduct banking via a mobile phone or tablet in 4 week period

Aussies using only their Mobile or Tablet to bank triples in 3 years

Why Companies Need Their Customers to ‘Love’ Them

Important opinion piece in Knowledge@Wharton, which reaffirms our view that most traditional organisations still do not “get” the digital transformation which is under way – as discussed in our “Quiet Revolution” report.

For many of us, Google, Apple, Facebook and Amazon (the GAFA four), feel as essential as the air we breathe. It’s hard to imagine our lives — working, socializing, shopping and entertaining — without them.

They are outstanding in the intimacy that they create with their customers. They make a strong effort to understand the unique characteristics and preferences of each customer and use the insights that they gain to serve the customer better. Further, they see each customer as a complete personality with needs around different facets such as work, play, socializing and self. They serve these needs wholly — and this, in turn, encourages more sharing and openness from their customers.

In short, these four companies are building a long-term, holistic and generous relationship with their customers. It’s almost as if they love us — not like our parents or spouses, of course, but by way of “unselfish, loyal and benevolent concern for the good of another.” And the result? In 2014, Google’s revenue was up 19% year over year, Amazon’s sales were up 20% year over year, Facebook’s revenue was up 58% year over year and Apple’s revenue was up 7%, ending the year with their best-ever quarter.

Traditional brands are trying to join the game and gain that essential-as-air quality. But they find it difficult to move beyond a transactional relationship. Usually, we only see and hear from them when they want something from us. These companies are very focused on whether or not customers are loyal to them, but they rarely consider how loyal they are to their customers. Their actions often seem self-serving; soliciting Facebook “likes” to promote themselves. This short-sighted approach stems from a common view that customers don’t have much to offer beyond what’s in their wallets.

Most established firms remain hesitant when it comes to this type of customer equality and mutuality. Our research on the business models of the S&P 500 Index companies (based on data from 1972 to 2013) indicates that at present more than 80% of companies employ older business models where customers are valued only for their dollars and not for their assets, insights and contributions. If your organization can break ranks and adopt this new way of thinking and acting, you will see that the more you share with your customers and the more you understand them, the more they will love you.

What does digitalisation mean for Germany’s banking sector?

An interesting speech by Dr Andreas Dombret, Member of the Executive Board of the Deutsche Bundesbank, at the Bundesbank symposium on “Banking supervision in dialogue”, Frankfurt am Main, 8 July 2015.   He concludes that everyone involved can benefit from digitalisation, but none more so than private customers in the short term. New technology and stronger competition mean businesses that are even better tailored to their personal needs but the industry needs to work towards ensuring that Germany’s banking sector does not remain a blank spot on the digital world map.

The computer on board America’s first lunar module weighed around 30 kg. It had the processing power of a pocket calculator, which you can now pick up anywhere for a couple of euro – unless of course you just use the calculator app on your mobile phone or tablet.

Around the time of the US moon landing, well over 40 years ago, the computer gradually started to become a part of life, both at work and, later, at home. Then, almost 20 years later, the internet began to take off too. These days, it’s no longer just the manufacturing industry – under the umbrella of Industry 4.0 – but also banks and other financial service providers that are caught up in a new wave of digitalisation.

The question we have to ask ourselves – you, as bankers, and my colleagues and I as Bundesbankers – is what can our sector do to keep this wave of advancement from dragging us down and instead allow it to propel us forward into new territory?

Don’t get me wrong, the majority of banks started to set up sophisticated IT infrastructures for their core banking business decades ago, with online banking now part of the standard package. However, the current wave of digitalisation is not only simplifying and speeding up individual processes, but also changing many of the rules of the game in banking business.

What is the driving force behind this wave of digitalisation? It essentially consists of three elements which I will discuss in my speech today, namely technology, competition and customers.

It goes without saying that the digitalisation of the financial sector has been fuelled, to a large extent, by the development of highly effective, state-of-the-art technologies.

Thanks to broadband networks, smartphones and advances in data processing, the technical boundaries are shifting so quickly that they practically no longer exist. Thoughts are now turning towards how to put that to good use. Economically speaking, there are all sorts of advantages to digitalisation. With intelligent and well applied IT solutions, you can automate processes and reduce variable costs. No time is wasted in processing, combining and analysing information. At the same time, today’s IT landscape is helping us to eliminate complexity. Last but not least, it enables us to tailor services to our customers’ individual needs.

Another element of the driving force is the emergence of new sources of competition. Gone are the days when it was just banks positioned in what surfers call the line-up, waiting to catch the best waves. In recent years, companies leading innovation in financial technology, or FinTech companies, have developed a large number of IT-based business models for payment transactions, credit brokerage and investment advice.

Generally, only a small proportion of these innovative ideas and start-ups ever actually make it off the ground. The creativity and innovation of FinTech companies is nevertheless proof of the development potential to be unlocked in the banking sector.

In addition to technology and competition, we must not forget that customers too are part of the driving force. In the past, people considered banking to be something that could only be done in person. Nowadays, encouraged by how information technology has improved other areas of their lives, bank customers are becoming increasingly open to – and sometimes even request – new technological solutions for doing their banking. As I’ve already said, many people now take online banking for granted, and it is becoming ever more widely accepted, owing to innovative concepts such as online video consultation services, digital credit brokerage and the incorporation of social media into banking.

There is no doubt about it, the digitalisation of the financial sector has clearly taken a huge leap forward and there’s no going back. But what will the sector move on to next? Suggestions extend to “banking without banks”, that is to say, creating an efficient financial sector without banks. Sometimes the media even pitch banks against their “digital” competitors in a battle to survive.

But of course we still need banks – don’t let anyone persuade you otherwise. First, given the variety of accounts they have on offer, they are indispensable, even to innovative financial service providers. Second, they too have a competitive edge when it comes to digitalisation. For example, they are able to cover the entire range of services and lines of business, thereby creating synergies for customers and the institution alike. People also still have immense trust in banks and savings banks when it comes to data security – at least that’s what the surveys say. They also continue to appreciate the personal contact with banks, particularly when dealing with more complex financing issues.

In any case, I think it is very unwise to think about the future in black and white terms. Banks are already working together with start-ups and, in some cases, are developing highly innovative concepts on their own. Moreover, many FinTech companies first need a convincing business model before they can really launch an offensive against banks. Lastly, who knows what the sector’s next move will be. The recent competition posed by streaming services in the music industry shows how the tables can be turned, even years after the start of digitalisation. That’s why, at this juncture, I’m not going to venture a look into the crystal ball, which has become somewhat outdated in the meantime.

Banks and savings banks, however, should be careful not to underestimate developments. Particularly in the field of computer technology, it is sometimes the case that even experts are wrong in their predictions. For example, in 1995 Bill Gates described the internet as just a “passing fad”. And in 1943 the then CEO of IBM made an even more unfortunate prediction, saying that he thought there was a world market for maybe five computers. In business, therefore, the old adage still stands: if you don’t jump on the bandwagon, you’ll soon be left behind.

Virtues in the digital age

It is obviously not the supervisors’ job to offer you advice on the right strategy for dealing with digitalisation. The successful fate of a business model can be put down to entrepreneurial skills. Ultimately, the markets decide. Nevertheless, I would like to pass on two key messages that I consider particularly important given the digitalisation megatrend.

The first relates to what I was just saying: “sitting it out is not an option”. It may seem like a virtue to concentrate on what you’re good at and to sit back quietly waiting to see what changes come. In a period of rapid change, though, this approach would probably lead you to a dead end. If you don’t move forwards, you end up going backwards.

Take a look at the industries where digitalisation has already well and truly made its mark. Whether it’s the photo and film industry, the music industry or the telecommunications sector, digitalisation has not only made these industries introduce a new medium, but it has also forced them to gain new core competencies. Established enterprises that have been successful up until now are not necessarily failing because they are unwilling to innovate, but rather because they are not prepared to undergo a complete strategic realignment.

Kodak is often mentioned as a cautionary example here. As a producer of film for analogue cameras, Kodak found itself in major financial difficulties when digital photography started to take over. In 2012, the company had to file an insolvency petition and only managed to survive thanks to a radical restructuring.

The risk of being caught off guard goes hand in hand with time pressure. During a period of change, fundamentally new standards and new customs are formed. Once the first trails have been established in the field of digitalisation, there seems to be little point worrying about plotting a course.

Take the area of payment transactions as an example. Competitors such as PayPal or recently Apple have implemented payment systems tailored to consumers in the digital environment. Once customers become used to a new way of paying, competitors offering similar products certainly have a difficult job trying to convince them to switch providers. With their collective push for online payment transactions, German credit institutions therefore find themselves in the unaccustomed role of the attacker. This is precisely why it’s so important that members of the German banking community work together to increase their chances.

In summary, I can only recommend that the German banks and savings banks avoid sitting back and waiting for changes to occur, but instead that they actively and intensively tackle the issue of digitalisation and ascertain its implications for their institution. But I get the impression that there is no real tendency in Germany to sit around and wait.

My next message is, in short, “learn the new game rules”. Imagine for a moment that you are a football coach. Your team has all the right tactics in place and is doing well this season. Next season, however, the rules of the game are set to change – perhaps the number of goals on the pitch is going up, or more than two teams are to compete on the pitch at one time, or the surface is changing from grass to something else. How would you prepare your team? One thing is clear: you first need to learn and understand the new rules before you can develop a successful game plan.

Let’s look at three of the new game rules that I believe could have a huge impact in a digitalised financial sector. You could say that they are the basic digital principles you need to understand in order to find the right tactics.

Game rule number one: the individual needs and wishes of customers are taking on a whole new level of significance. Easily accessible, transparent and personalised services are becoming the norm. In social networks, when shopping online or searching for information, consumers are already used to having their own needs catered to. Customers also want their banking to fit in and keep up with their lifestyle in future – this is especially, but not only, true for the younger generation.

Providers aiming for success need to get into the habit of looking at things from the customer’s perspective. Above all, this means being able to cater to different lifestyles and social trends. Companies that manage to build relationships with their customers by providing comfort and accessibility tend to come up trumps. It’s no longer about the average customer, but about each individual. The number of goals on the pitch has, without a doubt, increased.

This brings us to game rule number two. Not only is the number of goals increasing, but there are now more players on the pitch, who, incidentally, do not come with the traditional background and qualifications. Competition is becoming more global and more transparent, the competitors more diverse. Online, the customer’s next provider is probably just a few clicks away – even across national borders.

And a quick look at the banking supervisor’s website won’t even help you to identify all these competitors anymore. In addition to FinTech companies, other industries with a strong IT focus are only one step away from the banking world. We are already seeing established online enterprises starting to link their enormous customer bases and their experience in digital processes and data management with banking services. The lines between industries are blurring. Now more than ever, banks need to be aware of what the competition is doing so that they can review and refine their own strategies.

Game rule number three relates to adaptability. If you go from playing on a hard pitch to artificial turf, your tactics need to remain flexible. The digital world welcomes experimentation, is prone to sudden trends, and is constantly changing. Although the banking industry may not always be subject to all of this constant movement, adaptability is definitely becoming more important and relies on a flexible IT infrastructure, for example, to support it. Business models can also be more open and flexible in structure; just think of the “digital ecosystem” strategies banks are now employing. With these strategies, the bank provides a digital platform, the contents of which customers and other service providers can have a hand in shaping.

If you want to survive in the digital financial sector, you need to embrace and play by its new game rules. It’s not just the strategy itself you need to examine, but also the thought process on which it is based. If you don’t think “digitally”, you’re going to find it difficult to compete for digital customers.

Digitalisation from a banking supervisor’s perspective

Ladies and gentlemen, supervisors are interested in credit institutions that are stable and profitable in the long term. At this point in my speech, you may see digitalisation as nothing but a threat to your usual business. But I would encourage you to see it from a different perspective – one from which digitalisation is not the problem but rather the solution.

What currently concerns us, as supervisors, as much as it does you, as bankers, is the lack of profitability in the German banking system, the main cause of which is the prolonged period of low interest rates. Solving the problem of weak earnings is key to ensuring the stability of the financial system – and as you know, this is especially true for Germany. In this regard, digitalisation may very well be part of the solution.

The careful use of information technology can, for example, open up new business areas and boost profitability in the medium term. From easy-to-use, everyday IT applications to “big data” analyses, a large number of potential sources of income are being explored at the moment. And practical add-on services ensure that customers remain loyal to their bank even if competition becomes fiercer. Stability does not mean standing still, which is why it is probably in the interest of the supervisors if banks adapt to new demands in order to retain or even increase their profitability.

But digitalisation also has an impact on the cost side. For instance, the branch network in Germany is still relatively close-knit and therefore expensive. Digitalisation may help banks to continue to reach a large number of customers, even with a less dense network of branches. I look forward to hearing what Mr Buschbeck and his panel have to say on this matter later.

Digitalisation may ultimately also benefit risk management. Making prompt, well-informed decisions is more challenging than ever. Just think of the increasingly complex connections between markets, countries and products, and the growing dynamism of the markets. Efficient IT architecture – by which I mean systems that are consistent, flexible and accurate – can give institutions a quick overview of their activities and risks. Well-informed decision-makers increase their own chances of success and also protect the financial system as a whole from speculation and knee-jerk reactions.

However, supervisors must also be aware of potential risks to the stability of the financial system. The new playing field and the new players are highly likely to entail new risks. As regulators, we are already committed to protecting critical infrastructures, together with other authorities and the relevant providers. And you may be sure that we will also keep an eye on the new, largely unregulated competitors such as FinTech companies, for example.

Nonetheless, digitalisation also creates new risks for individual banks. The most innovative digital solutions are of little use if they simultaneously open the gates to huge risk. Cyber risk has increased considerably over the last few years. This is because the amount of goods that need protecting has grown: as well as financial assets, personal data and hence access to services are now saved in “cyberspace”.

These days, targeted attacks on IT systems can originate from anywhere in the world. Hackers often need little more than a laptop with internet access. A large number of reasons can motivate cyber attacks, which range from simple attacks by amateurs to meticulously planned attacks with an economic or political background. At the same time, new hacking methods spread through the net at lightning speed and are constantly evolving.

Of course, this is an issue that banking supervisors are also dealing with. IT security is therefore one of the focal points for European banking supervisors in 2015. As always, the Bundesbank and the ECB are working together closely and successfully in this area. At the same time, experts from the Bundesbank recently visited the United States of America to exchange ideas and experiences with banking supervisors there. This exchange will continue after the summer break.

But it’s not just targeted attacks that pose a risk. In complex IT systems, in particular, even small system errors can quickly cause enormous damage. Felix Hufeld will address the topic of “cyber risk” in his presentation, so I will make just one final comment. It seems to me that an awareness of these risks does not yet exist at all levels of management at banks. They urgently need to catch up and vastly improve the protection of IT systems and customer data.

Conclusion

Ladies and gentlemen, my speech has dived briefly into the wave of digitalisation that has only recently gathered pace and that will inevitably carry the financial sector to new shores.

Everyone involved can benefit from digitalisation, but none more so than private customers in the short term. New technology and stronger competition mean businesses that are even better tailored to their personal needs. Ladies and gentlemen, you must all work towards ensuring that Germany’s banking sector does not remain a blank spot on the digital world map.

From my point of view, this requires four things.

  • First, every bank needs a “digital agenda” and a flexible strategy.
  • Second, every bank must find a balance between existing strengths and new types of banking business.
  • Third, every bank must be aware of the problem of IT security and must also pass this awareness on to its customers.
  • Fourth, every bank must modernise its IT infrastructure as necessary and ensure that the systems are secure.

Both we, as supervisors, and you, as representatives of Germany’s banks and savings banks, have an interest in a banking system that is stable and profitable in the long term. Learning to play by the new rules and actively shaping the process of change is essential if we are to stay on top of the wave of digitalisation. This applies not only to you, but also to the supervisors, because it is not just about detecting and taking advantage of new opportunities, it is also about recognising and limiting new risks. If we can achieve this, we will all successfully ride the wave of digitalisation.

Getting The Right Results From Social Media Strategies

We have had the opportunity to work with a number of Australian companies, helping them to understand the true potential of social media. From our surveys we know consumers are migrating fast, many companies are slow to follow. Standing back, many of the players we have engaged with recently had two common issues. First, they felt in their gut there was unharnessed potential in social media, and second they did not know what that leverage point might be. We would also observe, quite often the business leaders we were engaging with were not themselves very active social media users. So we initially immersed them in social, including customer comments from our research.

Our approach boiled down to starting by uncovering what objective the business has – or should have – for their social media. More than half thought it was no more than a brand or marketing channel (and indeed commonly they were frustrated with their presence and saw it as a necessary evil, rather than an opportunity). We then moved the conversation on to explore how both sales and service could be impacted via social, and demonstrated that rather than being a side issue, it had the potential to be integrated into overall strategy and business process. To be clear, social is more than just a communication or marketing tool. Platforms like Twitter offer the potential for customised – perhaps one to one conversations with customers, and are ideally placed for customer service and fulfillment as well as marketing and brand awareness.

There are some good examples of leveraging social right, and DFA likes Twitters case study pages as a way to stimulate ideas. The financial services examples can be found here. From startup Acorns, to Paypal, Visa, ING and Money Supermarket, each has a detailed description of what they did, and how they did it. Here are a few extracts. You should read the extended case studies on their site.

@Acorns wanted to reach a mobile-first audience and drive downloads of its new app. The @Acorns app connects to your credit and/or debit cards and automatically rounds up the change from everyday purchases into any one of five investment portfolios, depending on risk.  Leveraging Twitter’s mobile app promotion and a focused targeting strategy helped the brand surpass its acquisition goals within the first 90 days of the campaign launching. @Acorns was able to monitor performance in real time and optimize creative instantly to connect the messaging with the right audience at the right time.

Acorns on Twitter success

@INGBankTurkiye advertises weekly special loan offers through ‘Survivor Turkey’ TV broadcast sponsorships. The bank wanted to use this partnership to generate mass engagement, increase loan consideration and acquire more customers. @INGBankTurkiye created an integrated marketing campaign around the ‘Survivor Turkey’ sponsorship. During the May 26 broadcast, it announced on TV and Twitter that consumers could tweet their way to lower interest rates. The announcement was followed by the Promoted Trend #Uptomytweet, giving consumers the opportunity to reduce the interest rate on loans from 0.88% to 0.48% by tweeting with the hashtag during an episode of ‘Survivor Turkey.’

With mobile phones playing an ever-increasing role in Australian life, @PayPalAU wanted to raise awareness of its digital wallet app. With it, users can order ahead at cafes, pay for a taxi or send money to a friend anywhere in Australia. To increase app downloads, @PayPalAU wanted to engage savvy smartphone users with an offer they couldn’t resist: free coffee. @PayPalAU offered to buy Sydneysiders a free coffee when they used the PayPal app on Monday 19 May. The offer was valid at over 200 cafes across Sydney. @PayPalAU targeted inner-city trendsetters who Tweeted about coffee, using Twitter as its direct response mechanism. Promoted Tweets with links to the PayPal app download raised awareness of the ‘Free Coffee’ event, which was further amplified across radio, email, outdoor advertising, direct mail, SMS marketing and online platforms.

@MoneySupermkt was planning the launch of a new TV ad in which satisfied customer Dave shows off his ‘epic strut’ after saving money on his car insurance, and celebrity Sharon Osbourne (@MrsSOsbourne) appears impressed by his moves. The brand aimed to maximise interest and conversation around the ad and its @MrsSOsbourne connection. To support the launch of its #EpicStrut ad, and then to maintain the ad’s momentum, @MoneySupermkt planned a four-phase campaign on Twitter. A ‘teaser phase’ sparked intrigue across a wide audience in the 24 hours pre-launch, as Promoted Video of reactions from extras in the ad drove reach and engagement.

Canadians tend to use credit to pay for more established categories like Travel and Dining. Visa Canada (@VisaCA) wanted to encourage cardholders to use their Visa cards more often on Everyday Spend categories (groceries, gas or quick service restaurants) and grow its core business. @VisaCA made up the name “smallenfreuden” to mean using your Visa card for everyday purchases and started a conversation on Twitter around this behavior in three phases. To build curiosity, the brand launched the @smallenfreuden Twitter account and an unbranded teaser campaign centered around the hashtag #smallenfreuden. Billboards around Canada popped up with the question ‘Do you #smallenfreuden?” Similarly mysterious ads across digital sparked online buzz. They pointed to a YouTube video explaining smallenfreuden combines the English word ‘small’ and the German word ‘freuden,’ which translates into ‘joy of the small.’ A week later, the brand launched the @VisaCA handle and revealed its role behind the mysterious teasers with the Promoted Trend #smallenfreuden. Promoted Tweets associated with the Promoted Trend featured embedded rich media. The video content showed the benefits of paying for small purchases like a drink at a hockey game with a Visa card.

 

Apps Drive a Revolution in Digital Banking

Given the massive rise in mobile and tablet use, the role of finance related apps is changing. Whilst most of the major banks in Australia offer some basic functionality, its mostly a version of internet banking, or payments. Yet there are examples of apps which are much more aligned to specific customer groups, and frankly much more sophisticated in terms of function and form. Banks need to take their apps strategy up to the next wave of innovation if they are to build sustaining relationship with digital banking users. We think the future is based on form and function, and needs to be tailored to specific customer segments and their specific needs.

To illustrate this, today we look at a few of the apps out there available in the USA, and some of which which may be coming here. The examples are more to stimulate thought and illustrate the underlying thinking. We are not necessarily advocating these apps, but we think they illustrate digital disruption in play.

The first is Qapital  which says “is the everyday banking service that helps your money go further”. The Swedish startup launched its saving service in March to consumers save for big-ticket items and trips. American users can set up separate FDIC-insured Qapital-branded savings accounts into which they can automatically drop money from their existing bank accounts.

Save automatically using rules

Essentially, the app allows a user to set up rules to turn almost any activity into a savings trigger. These rules could include one that fines you when you indulge (e.g. each time you buy a cream cake), round up transactions and sent the odd cents to a savings account, or create a budget, and if you come in under, the balance is sent to savings.  They also add IFTTT (If This Then That) functionality. With this you can set up savings triggers to automatically put money toward savings goals every time you buy from a nominated store, Starbucks or walk another kilometer, or almost anything you want. They even can link it to a Twitter #tag, or a particular weather forecast. Essentially you set the rule, set and forget, and the savings accrue. “There are almost 200 IFTTT channels to choose from, with thousands of triggers and actions. Make your Qapital savings deposits trigger something fun, or turn a tedious chore into a chance to pay yourself for your trouble. Make your own recipe or check out some of our favorites”.

Going forward, Qapital have plans to partner with Intuit (which makes the finance software behind Quickbooks), which will expand Qapital’s dynamic IFTTT recipe features to users with accounts at over 20,000 smaller banks across the U.S. and by the end of the year, Qapital will release its own branded Visa debit card through the bank that backs all Qapital accounts, the Iowa-based Lincoln Savings Bank.

This is an example of “Gamification” – the application of game mechanics to non-gaming tasks. These mechanics may include leaderboards, points, badges, rankings, specific goals, and rewards (either real or imagined). The overarching concept behind gamification is that it provides someone incentive to do something they otherwise might not do. It turns work into a game, something boring into something fun. Some customers just love it – others will hate it!

Another app example is LevelMoney. The app can connect to a users bank and any other credit cards – they have more than 18,000 financial institutions – and users also input data such as income, bills, and how much you want to save each month. The app calculates a cash balance you can safely spend each day.

Its big on spending tracking an budgetting. It can also automate payments. Its like a personal finance assistant.

Another example is Digit. This app connects to your transaction account, and when there is sufficient money in the account transfers a small amount to a savings account, every few days. Its not like a regular monthly savings plans, it responds to whats happening in the account. When needed a user can request the savings back, and it will be returned in 24 hours. It guarantees never to over-draw your transaction account. Digits communicates with you mostly via text message.

Finally, there is Acorns, which is a financial service that allows users to invest money from a mobile phone.  Acorns Grow Inc. was founded in the United States of America in 2014. Now Acrons plans to commence beta testing in Australia in the third quarter of 2015 with the final Acorns product going live in February 2016.

Acorns helps users proactively invest. The app can round up each of your credit, debit or bank transactions to the nearest dollar, and invest the change into a choice of five diversified portfolios. Simply connect a credit card, debit card or a bank account, and tell Acrorns about yourself. You then select a portfolio based on your own investment goals and the amount of risk you’re comfortable taking. There are no account minimums, no commissions, and fractional investing so even small balances are fully invested. All this via your mobile phone which makes it easy to fund and track your investment account. Acorns is currently available for iOS 7 and 8 and android device running 4.1 and higher. Acorns will also be available via a Web application which will also be launched at the same time as the mobile device.

It worth noting that you can not opt out of any of the ETFs in Acorns’ portfolios, nor of the stocks or bonds of which the ETFs are comprised. You also do not have the option of choosing to invest in any other stocks, bonds, Bitcoin, or other securities through Acorns. There are however multiple ways to fund your Acorns account:

  • Lump Sums: You may add or withdraw money by entering any desired amount on the Deposit/Withdraw screen. There are no fees for depositing or withdrawing money.
  • Automatic Investments (Recurring Deposits): You may set up recurring deposits on a daily, weekly, or monthly basis. Select the amount of money you wish to invest regularly, and then choose the desired time period.
  • Round-ups: You may link your spending bank accounts (credit or debit card) and then round up the virtual change from every transaction. These round-ups can then be manually or automatically moved into your Acorns account.

This can take 5-7 business days to process before the funds become available in your nominated bank account. It can take 1-3 business days for funds transferred to your Acorns account to become available to invest. These funds will be shown as “pending” during this time period. There is currently a daily deposit limit of $10,000. You can withdraw any amount from your balance at any time. Acorns Grow Australia Fund is a registered managed investment scheme (MIS) and regulated under the Australian Securities & Investment Commission (ASIC).

You can monitor your spending through the app and website, allowing you to spot investment opportunities. To access this, you‘ll need to provide your online banking login information. However, this information is not stored and is not viewable by Acorns—it’s simply used to import your spending activity. This will not enable money to be transferred from your bank account.

Who Reads Social Media Small Print?

From The Conversation. Most of us don’t read the social media small print – and it’s a data goldmine for third parties

You may read paper, online is no different. Signing by Shutterstock

The history of human experiments often focuses on biomedical research and the gradual changes in acceptable practice and ethical considerations. But another class of human experiments that has had its own share of controversies is the study of human behaviour.

Internet Mediate Human Behaviour Research (IMHBR) is primarily defined by its use of the internet to obtain data about participants. While some of the research involves active participation with research subjects directly engaging with the research, for example through online surveys or experimental tasks, many studies take advantage of “found text” in blogs, discussion forums or other online spaces, analyses of hits on websites, or observation of other types of online activity such as search engine histories or logs of actions in online games.

It’s big business and the pervasive use of these methodologies is not only by academics but also corporations and governments seeking to support evidence-based policy decisions or to nudge societal behaviour.

Even though the basic principles of “respect for the autonomy and dignity of persons”, “scientific value”, “social responsibility” and “maximising benefits and minimising harm” are the same for this type of research method as for any other, the following issues often pose particular challenges for internet-mediated research: the distinction between public and private information, confidentiality, and informed consent. There is an urgently need to establish clear codes of ethical conduct for IMHBR.

Whose information is it?

The distinction between public and private domains is vitally important since this greatly affects the level of responsibility and obligation of the researcher. For human behaviour research online, however, it is often difficult to determine if participants perceive an online forum as “private” or “public”. While almost all internet communication is recorded and accessible to the mediating platform, such as Facebook and Twitter, and much of it even publicly accessible, users of these platforms may nevertheless consider those communications to be private, despite click-signing the terms and conditions of the service provider.

To quote professor John Preston’s testimony to the House of Commons science and technology committee on responsible use of data:

People treat social media a bit like they treat the pub. They feel that if they go into a pub and have a private conversation, it does not belong to the pub; it is their conversation. They interpret Twitter or Facebook in the same way – as a place to have a conversation.

This was also one of the contributing factors in the Samaritans’ radar debacle where they proposed an alert system to flag when people were tweeting potential distress and suicidal messages. In its post-investigation communication by the Information Commissioner’s Office to the Samaritans, the ICO stated:

On your website you [Samaritans] say that ‘all the data is public, so user privacy is not an issue. Samaritans Radar analyses the tweets of people you follow, which are public tweets. It does not look at private tweets.’ It is our view that if organisations collect information from the internet and use it in a way that’s unfair, they could still breach the data protection principles even though the information was obtained from a publicly available source.

Read the small print. Terms and conditions by Shutterstock

Confidentiality

Anonymisation is one of the most basic steps for maintaining confidentiality and showing respect for the dignity of research participants. It is also a requirement imposed by the Data Protection Act 1998 when dealing with personal data. The need to protect the anonymity of participants is even more pressing when the research uses data from online sources where access to the raw data cannot be controlled by the researcher.

At the same time, the wealth of secondary information sources that can be mined in connection to any hint at the identity of a participant is making it increasingly easy to de-anonymise data. This was publicly shown by journalists for the New York Times who followed the web tail of user No. 4417749 in the AOL Search Log in 2006 and were able to identify her – and also by the lawsuit against Netflix for insufficient anonymisation of information disclosed in a prize competition database.

Terms and conditions that no one reads

In order for informed consent to take place, it is vital that the participant is fully aware of what is being consented to. Unfortunately, current online business practice has heavily eroded the concept of informed consent by habituating people to click-sign terms and conditions forms that are too long and unintelligible to understand.

Sometimes driven by social pressure to join the network their peers are using, people readily skip over the details and give their consent for allowing corporations to access their data for a wide range of purposes. A hint at the dangers of normalising such attitudes towards the concept of informed consent was given by the statement in the controversial 2014 “Facebook news feed manipulation experiment” – a secret study on “emotional contagion” that involved changing what 689,000 users saw from their friends’ feeds to see if it influenced mood.

One of the researchers attempted to defend the study, saying that participants had provided consent because “it was consistent with Facebook’s data use policy, to which all users agree prior to creating an account on Facebook, constituting informed consent for this research”. The data use policy, however, does not provide any information about the nature of that specific study, instead speaking only of “research” in general terms.

Various organisations and learned societies, such as the British Psychological Society, the Association of Internet Researchers, the British Association for Applied Linguistics, the Information Commissioner’s Office, as well as our own research group at Nottingham University and many others are currently actively engaged in formulating and improving the guidelines for internet-mediated research.

As part of this work we are currently running a survey to ask citizens which conditions they would like to impose on researchers for making their social media data available to research studies. Ultimately, without clear guidelines and transparency, we’re hiving out decisions about us and our information to companies, governments and researchers, without us knowing what it will be used for.

Author – Ansgar Koene – Senior Research Fellow, Horizon Digital Economy, CaSMa at University of Nottingham

Release of the Spectrum Review Report

The Minister for Communications and the Parliamentary Secretary announced the release of the Spectrum Review Report, prepared by the Department of Communications.

In May 2014, the Minister for Communications announced a review of the spectrum policy and management framework. Established in 1992, the current framework led the world in how it dealt with the complexities of spectrum management. But today, more than 20 years later, the fast changing nature of technology has dated the framework. It needs to be modernised to reflect changes in technology, markets and consumer preferences that have occurred over the last decade and to better deal with increasing demand for spectrum from all sectors.

The purpose of the review was to examine what policy and regulatory changes are needed to meet current challenges, and ensure the framework will serve Australia well into the future.

Under the Terms of Reference, the review was to consider ways to:

  1. simplify the framework to reduce its complexity and impact on spectrum users and administrators, and eliminate unnecessary and excessive regulatory provisions
  2. improve the flexibility of the framework and its ability to facilitate new and emerging services including advancements that offer greater potential for efficient spectrum use, while continuing to manage interference and providing certainty for incumbents
  3. ensure efficient allocation, ongoing use and management of spectrum, and incentivise its efficient use by all commercial, public and community spectrum users
  4. consider institutional arrangements and ensure an appropriate level of Ministerial oversight of spectrum policy and management, by identifying appropriate roles for the Minister, the Australian Communications and Media Authority, the Department of Communications and others involved in spectrum management
  5. promote consistency across legislation and sectors, including in relation to compliance mechanisms, technical regulation and the planning and licensing of spectrum
  6. develop an appropriate framework to consider public interest spectrum issues
  7.  develop a whole‐of‐government approach to spectrum policy
  8. develop a whole‐of‐economy approach to valuation of spectrum that includes consideration of the broader economic and social benefits.

The Spectrum Review Report highlights the need to simplify the current framework to remove prescriptive regulatory arrangements and to support the use of new and innovative technologies and services across the economy.

The report recommends simplifying processes for new and existing spectrum users and increasing opportunities for market-based arrangements, including spectrum sharing and trading.

The three main recommendations are:

  1. Replace the current legislative arrangements with streamlined legislation that focusses on outcomes rather than process, for a simpler and more flexible framework.
  2. Better integrate the management of public sector and broadcasting spectrum to improve the consistency and integrity of the framework.
  3. Review spectrum pricing to ensure consistent and transparent arrangements to support the efficient use of spectrum and secondary markets.

The report is the outcome of a review conducted by the Department of Communications in conjunction with the Australian Communications and Media Authority, and included extensive stakeholder consultation.

The legislative reforms would:

  1. establish a single licensing system based on the parameters of the licence, including duration and renewal rights
  2. clarify the roles and responsibilities of the Minister and the ACMA > provide for transparent and timely spectrum allocation and reallocation processes and methods, and allow for allocation and reallocation of encumbered spectrum
  3. provide more opportunities for spectrum users to participate in spectrum management, through delegation of functions and user driven dispute resolution
  4. manage broadcasting spectrum in the same way as other spectrum while recognising that the holders of broadcasting licences and the national broadcasters would be provided with certainty of access to spectrum to deliver broadcasting services
  5. streamline device supply schemes
  6. improve compliance and enforcement by introducing proportionate and graduated enforcement mechanisms for breaches of either the law or licence conditions
  7. ensure that the rights of existing licence holders are not diminished in the transition
    to the new framework.

Implementation stages would commence following the passage of legislation. This would again include ongoing consultation with stakeholders and progress over a period of some years.

The Government is currently considering the report and will prepare a response in due course. Stakeholder feedback on the report is welcomed.

The report is available at: www.communications.gov.au/spectrumreview

How Tesco’s Loyalty Card Transformed Customer Data Tracking

From CMO. Insights from Tesco about how to harness the power of customer data. Knowing is not enough, you have to apply the insights and transform.

There were no Big Data systems in 1995. In fact the term wasn’t even be discussed until more than a decade later. But that didn’t stop the UK-based retailer Tesco going ahead and building a Big Data capability.

Speaking at the Retail TECH X conference in Melbourne this week, former Tesco CEO, Sir Terry Leahy, discussed the company’s early foray into data-driven decision making. He credited it as a key reason why a retailer, who in the mid-1990s was ranked a distant third in its market, was able to surpass the performance of its two biggest rivals several times over two decades later.

Loyalty card revolutionises Tesco’s performance

Sir Terry joined the retailer as a marketing executive in 1979, and led the company from 1997 to 2011. He said the key for Tesco was Clubcard, a loyalty card introduced in 1995 that allowed the company to connect and respond to customers through data, rather than through more traditional methods.

“Data is absolutely priceless in transforming the relative position of a business,” Sir Terry said. “It was the first example of what is known today as Big Data.”

Before 1995, Sir Terry said computers were simply not powerful enough to hold information both on product movements and individual purchasing behaviour.

“It was absolutely transformational for the business,” he claimed. “We could treat customers as individuals. And we could learn what they were interested in, what their behaviours were, and we could tailor and target all of their marketing so that it was relevant to that individual consumer.”

Sir Terry said in the year before Tesco launched its ClubCard, Sainsbury’s was worth twice the value of Tesco. Within a year Tesco had overtaken Sainsbury’s. By the time he left the CEO role in 2011 Sir Terry said Tesco had outperformed its rivals tenfold.

“And it improved the productivity of our marketing, between 300 and 1000 per cent depending on the application,” he added. “We were able as a percentage of sales to spend less on our marketing going forward, it made it so effective.”

Understand the true nature of your business

Sir Terry’s formula from boosting the performance of Tesco started with building a true understanding of the true nature of the business.

“We all want the business to be doing well, but that may not be the truth of it,” Sir Terry said. “Today data plays an incredibly important role in bringing into the organisation from outside an accurate picture of how the business is perceived. And it is absolutely crucial that the organisation finds a way of bringing the voice of the customer into the business, because that’s the most reliable voice – that’s the one you should navigate the business by.

“It may be painful to hear, but if you are prepared to listen to what the customer is saying, and if you are prepared to change your business on the basis of that, then you’ll always be in business and stay connected to the customer.”

Performance monitoring through data

The company used data extensively to monitor changing customer preferences, leading to a series of industry innovations that served to transform its performance. Data also led Tesco to introduce the convenience format, going against industry wisdom that suggested that bigger was better.

“Customers were saying they were getting busier and busier, and needed a store that was handier and closer,” Sir Terry said. “So we miniaturised the supermarket into Tesco Express. In 1996 the first one opened, and today there are thousands all over the world, and most retailers no feel it is essential they have a convenience store format as part of the line-up.”

Tesco was also the first food retailer to sell online, and maintains the largest share of any food retailer in the world, holding close to 50 per cent in the UK.

Sir Terry said for an organisation to successfully implement a data strategy, it also required those who were working with data to take a leadership role within the organisation, as data can often lead to conclusions which run counter to conventional thinking.

“Knowing is not enough – you actually have to do something about what you know about customers,” he said. “You have to change the organisation. And it does need different decision-making structures actually to respond to data. It’s got to be actionable or it’s of no value at all, and that takes leadership.”

But despite the heavy investment in technology, Sir Terry said it would have all come to nought had the company lost its connection to its customers – something many consider has happened since he departed in 2011.

“Technology is just a tool,” Sir Terry said. “What matters in the end is the relationship between you and the consumer, and your ability to understand how their lives are changing.”

Digital Disruption and P2P Lending

DFA research was featured in a Sydney Morning Heald feature today “Banks look vulnerable as lucrative loans market gets personal online” by banking reporter Clancy Yates. The article nicely highlights some of the interesting and potentially disruptive plays in the evolving Australian market, including the peer-to-peer lending sector.