Is Fintech Experiencing A Plateau?

The latest edition of “The Pulse of Fintech“, a quarterly report by KPMG along with KPMG Enterprise’s Global Network for Innovative Startups and CB Insights, shows that amid a tougher climate for marketplace lenders and a drop in mega-round activity, investment to VC-backed fintech startups fell 49 percent, but that despite this decline, VC investment in fintech is on pace to exceed 2015 results as more investment comes from mainstream sources, such as banks.

fintech-kpm-2qThey say that in 2016, concerns about high valuations, the lack of significant IPO exits and macro-economic factors seem to have led investors to be more cautious. Over the first 2 quarters, VC investors focussed on more experienced companies with proven technologies or business models.

Overall global investment in fintech companies across both venture-backed and non-venture-backed companies totaled USD$9.4 billion in Q2’16, buoyed by Ant Financial’s $4.5 billion financing. Q2’16 saw VC-backed fintech companies raise $2.5 billion across 195 deals, a 12 percent drop in deal volume compared to Q1’16.

Asia experienced the most dramatic quarter-over-quarter decrease in funding to VC-backed companies – from $2.6bn in Q1 to $800m in Q2, despite a rise in the number of new fintech deals. Whilst VC investment declined, the world’s largest private technology funding round occurred during the quarter when Ant Financial raised $4.5 billion in China.

European Commission sets up fintech task force

The European Commission has launched a Financial Technology Task Force designed to shape its response to the effects of digital innovations in the banking sector.

eec-flags-picThe Task Force brings together services responsible for financial regulation and for the Digital Single Market, along with experts in competition and consumer protection policy. It will be co-chaired by DG Fisma and DG Cconnect.

Digital technologies are changing the way we interact with friends and colleagues, access content and consume. All players of the financial services industry are indeed being disrupted, like in any other sector. Many financial services are already available online or on mobile apps.  However, there is still substantial untapped disruption potential. It can affect the whole financial services ecosystem. More changes are on their way with the advent of new agile innovative players with new business models, user-friendly consumer interfaces, peer to peer services, or advanced automated tools.

The Commission says the unit will engage with market participants with the aim of formulating policy recommendations and measures “in the course of 2017”.

Pointing to the ongoing disruption in the industry engendered by new entrants and new technologies, the Commission states: “The current transformation affects existing financial institutions,as well as the new players, such as fintech startups or large internet platforms. The challenge is both to lay down the right conditions to support innovation and for a future-proof environment to emerge.”

Talking up the objectives of the new Task Force in a speech in Breugel, EC vice president Valdis Dombrovskis says: “It is clear that parts of our banking sector do not have the scale, or in some cases the expertise, to make the most of technological change. Digital payments and other innovations are developing rapidly. European banks will have to seize on digital innovations and work them into their business models.

The Commission is working to keep on top of digital transformation across all sectors. We want to foster innovation, give businesses the space to adapt and make the most of it. But we need to monitor changes closely to keep our existing rules fit for purpose.”

Fintech In Hong Kong Has Government Backing

In a speech by Norman T L Chan, Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority, at HKMA Fintech Day, Hong Kong, in November 2016, he gave a run down on how HKMA is approaching the disruptive revolution via the Fintech Facilitation Office (FFO) which was set up in March, to build an ecosystem to promote the adoption of new technologies in the banking sector; and also discusses four Fintech projects currently in hand. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority is Hong Kong’s currency board and de facto central bank. It is a government authority founded on 1 April 1993.

robo-pic

The event today is organized by the Fintech Facilitation Office (FFO) of the HKMA together with our three strategic partners: the Applied Science and Technology Research Institute (ASTRI), Cyberport and the Hong Kong Science and Technology Parks (the Science Park).  As you are aware, we set up the FFO in March this year with the mission to facilitate the development of fintech in Hong Kong.

In the last few months, the FFO has organized many activities to bring together users and solution providers of fintech, so as to build an ecosystem to promote the adoption of new technologies in the banking sector.  The FFO will continue to develop this collaborative platform together with ASTRI, Cyberport and the Science Park.  In a few moments the HKMA will be signing a Memorandum of Understanding with each of them to formalize the framework of cooperation.

Now I would like to report on the latest progress of four major fintech projects launched by the FFO earlier.  First, following my announcement of the launch of the Cybersecurity Fortification Initiative (CFI) in May, the FFO has been making very good progress in developing the three pillars of the CFI.  A three month industry consultation of the first pillar of CFI, the Cybersecurity Resilience Assessment Programme, was completed in August, with positive responses from the banking sector.  Taking into account the comments received, the FFO is finalising the Assessment Programme and will announce the detailed framework next month for implementation by banks in Hong Kong.  Regarding the second pillar of the CFI, the Cybersecurity Intelligence Sharing Platform, again good progress is being made.  The computer platform will be in operation and available to the banking sector next month as planned.  The last pillar of the CFI is the Professional Development Programme, a training and certification programme for the cybersecurity professionals.  A six-week consultation with the cybersecurity professionals and industry associations was conducted in the summer.  The industry in general welcomes the programme and has suggested the need to recognise certain equivalent qualifications in the market for conducting the cybersecurity assessment and testing.  We agree with this suggestion, and have already formed an industry expert panel with the task of identifying equivalent qualifications and working out the implementation details.  The programme will be rolled out next month as planned.  All in all, with the support of the banking industry and the stakeholders, the CFI implementation is on track and on time.

Second, the HKMA has commissioned ASTRI to carry out a comprehensive study on distributed ledger technology (DLT).  The very fact that DLT allows information or records to be transferred and updated by network participants in a trustworthy, secure and efficient way, carries enormous potential in its application.  However, while the value proposition of DLT is gradually crystallising, the use of DLT in financial services may bring about new risks and challenges in its application.  As a regulatory authority, the HKMA needs to have a better understanding of these issues before DLT can be adopted for wide application in the banking sector.

In this connection, I am pleased to announce that the first stage of this research project is completed and a white paper is published by ASTRI today.  While the white paper affirms the good potential of DLT for application in financial services, it also highlights a number of possible issues which need to be carefully dealt with if DLT is adopted by the banking sector.  For example, the decentralised model may pose some challenges for constructing an effective governance structure and oversight mechanism.  Some legal issues have yet to be thoroughly examined, such as the application and enforceability of laws for the cross-border DLT models, mechanisms for handling liability and dispute resolution if there is no centralised party administrating the DLT platform, and compliance with personal data protection principles in relation to data sharing and perpetual storage.  Also, traditional cybersecurity issues still apply to DLT, including denial of access attacks and other cyber attacks.

The next stage of ASTRI’s study will deliver more detailed findings from a number of the proof-of-concept trials, along with assessment on whether some of this work can be put into action.  It will also address the regulatory implications of DLT, and the general control principles for DLT for the banking and payment industry.  We plan to deliver the next set of results in the form of another white paper in the second half of 2017.

Third, as I announced in September, we are setting up the HKMA-ASTRI Fintech Innovation Hub. I am now pleased to say that, following intensive preparation, the Hub is ready for use as from today.  The Hub is equipped with high-powered computing resources and supported by the experts at ASTRI to allow banks, payment service providers, fintech firms and the HKMA to brainstorm innovative ideas, try out and evaluate new fintech solutions in a safe and efficient manner.  All in all, the Hub will cater for the big and small institutions alike in supporting their research and adoption of fintech.

Last but not least, the HKMA launched the Fintech Supervisory Sandbox in September in order to create a regulatory environment that is conducive to fintech development.  The Sandbox enables banks to conduct pilot trials of their fintech initiatives in a controlled production environment without the need to achieve full compliance with the HKMA’s usual supervisory requirements.  So far, two banks have already made use of the Sandbox to conduct pilot trials of their biometric authentication and securities trading services.  A few banks are discussing with us and planning to make use of the Sandbox for conducting their project trials in the coming few months, in areas such as blockchain, artificial intelligence and many more.

In parallel to all these fintech projects that the FFO has launched, the HKMA has issued 13 Stored Value Facilities licences in two batches under the newly established regulatory regime.  These licensees range from mobile and Internet payment service providers to prepaid card issuers.  As payment and SVF operators are important stakeholders in the fintech ecosystem, we have also invited five of the SVF licensees to join today’s event and share their experience in relation to the latest e-payment developments in Hong Kong.

Leveraging Digital Disruption in Financial Services

From Brandchannel.

As former GE CEO Jack Welch famously said, “Change before you have to.” Some financial firms have thrived in the digital age, adopting technology to not just better serve their consumers, but to upend their own business models. Investment firm BlackRock disrupted how it does business to build the investing platform, Aladdin, that now manages $225 trillion in assets—that’s 7% of the world’s financial assets. Others, unfortunately, have not been so innovative and are starting to hemorrhage clients to robo-advisers, online banks, and traditional incumbents that have been better able to leverage technology to steal market share.

Mobile-Pic

It’s not shocking to acknowledge that the rising ability of consumers to understand and easily manage finances without a traditional broker or bank represents an existential threat to the industry. However, it is shocking to see that some institutions are pretending this trend does not apply to them—that their customers who are older or wealthier will not embrace this new tech. However, with the impending “great wealth transfer,” millennials will be inheriting $30 trillion from their baby boomer progenitors—and with loyalty waning among this group, they’re not likely to stick with their parents’ advisors. The big question is whether they’ll look to financial institutions to manage this new wealth or turn to financial startups that provide them with new tools to manage their money themselves.

Consider shifting consumer attitudes

Since today’s consumers are digitally savvy and always on the go, they’ve come to expect simple user experiences coupled with information that’s easy to understand and always at their fingertips. Millennials, in particular, bank differently. They are generally more informed and more wary than other consumers. According to Nielsen’s second-quarter 2015 Consumer Confidence Report, millennials are cautious spenders and savers, but less trusting of traditional financial and investment strategies.

They’ve taken a do-it-yourself approach to finance. How can incumbent financial institutions maintain market share and maintain trust and loyalty as consumers expect the same on-demand, customer- first digital experiences from their banks that they do from Amazon or Uber?

Push for a cultural shift as much as a digital one

Banks are great at risk management, financial governance, investing, and asset management, as we expect them to be. For most traditional financial services companies, digital services aren’t a priority. However, banks must learn to bring technology to the forefront to drive enhanced customer experiences while still mitigating risks.

Doing this requires a cultural shift as much as a technological one. Leveraging the vast amount of consumer insights can help banks deliver outstanding user experiences and become more effective marketers. However, hiring technologists is not enough—growth requires a deep organizational shift that supports risk and experimentation, while still enforcing a high degree of oversight to ensure that customer’s wealth and privacy are protected.

This balancing act is not easy, and it’s the reason why incumbent financial institutions embrace innovation slowly. When upwards of 50% of new products and business fail, can we expect more from internal projects? Furthermore, can we expect banks to fund projects that have a 50% fail rate? While startups with much less to lose can claim that failure is the new R&D, it’s a hard ethos for an incumbent to adopt, but it must be considered and embraced.

Innovation requires rebuilding

The biggest technology challenges facing financial organizations don’t stem from insufficient budgets. They result from the over-engineered legacy systems that are expensive and painfully difficult to maintain or innovate within. Legacy platforms require armies of engineers to maintain systems in antiquated languages that are older than the web itself. Not only does this stymie innovation, it outright kills it.

The level of protectionism that exists in institutional IT organizations is a double-edged sword. It can be unnerving to innovators, especially those from other industries, who strive to move fast and crave the efficiencies of modern technology. However, protecting the bank’s technology infrastructure is as critical as protecting its vault. Giving an inch in this mission can be disastrous, wiping out trust in the institution. This is why IT wields its protectionist muscle reflexively.

Getting past this reflex is not easy and requires leadership that understands the implications of transformation, and works through it to build platforms, processes, and systems that are user-first versus systems-first. This requires teams that yearn to move faster, to build on modern frameworks, to leverage the same technology and marketing stacks that are powering the contemporary customer experiences we’ve come to expect from Uber, Netflix, Amazon, Facebook, and others.

It’s not adequate to optimize one aspect of the customer experience while another relies on a process that is as old as the bank itself. Instead, banks and financial services organizations need to deliver a customer-first experience at every point of interaction. Focused on delivering an innovative customer experience, digital providers like Wealthfront, FutureAdvisor, and Betterment are not capturing new customers simply due to lower fees, they are driving growth by delivering outstanding interactions at every touchpoint, something most institutions are still struggling to do.

Create content to cultivate trust

Confidence in banks and financial advisors has eroded over time. According to Nielsen, millennial consumers want a transparent and authentic relationship with their financial institutions. Because of this, many are focused on re-evaluating the way they deliver products and services. Smart financial institutions are building trust through increased transparency, re-aligned products, and direct education.

A simple way to build trust is by giving people an easy way to understand how their money is working for them. Leading the pack, JPMorgan Asset Management focuses on simplifying complex financial topics for its financial advisors, so they can do the same for clients. This investment in education and transparency makes clients feel like they’re in the driver’s seat, positioning the brand as the trusted authority that can engage clients on their terms, in their language. The digital realm makes communicating with teams and customers easier and cost effective. However, with a slew of competitors a mere click away, financial brands have to create truly engaging and useful content. Those leveraging videos, infographics, tutorials, and interactive tools to explain complex topics will win the consumer.

Find the right partners

Ask a CEO at a bank or financial institution what success means to them. They’ll likely be more concerned with managing risk, liquidity, and return on investments for shareholders. Critical, yes—but holistic success is also tied to excellence in digital marketing, innovation, analytics, and understanding the customer journey. As technology continues to change the customer experience, financial organizations need to seek partners that are aligned with the needs and behaviors of their end users.

It’s critical to find a partner that understands how to marry financial services, especially the regulatory aspects, with an overarching digital strategy to serve these users. A solid partner should be thinking about the experience across the full customer lifecycle, rather than a single transaction or channel, in order to cultivate trust and longer term relationships.

Investments in easily digestible content and user-centric experiences will not only help mitigate the generational wealth transfer, but allow some incumbents to benefit from it. Financial services organizations that ultimately succeed in navigating disruption are those that effectively leverage data and digital touchpoints to reduce costs and drive growth.


Author: Alex Lirtsman, Founding Partner and Chief Strategist of Ready Set Rocket.

Fintech – The Gap Between Institution and Innovation

In a speech at Web Summit in Lisbon Charlotte Hogg, the Bank of England’s Chief Operating Officer, gave an update on the work of the Bank’s FinTech Accelerator since its launch in June. Charlotte detailed the current work underway and the firms we are engaging with. She also announced that the window for applications for the next round is now open.

Fintech-Pic

The FinTech Accelerator deploys innovative technologies on issues that matter to the Bank’s mission and operations. Working in partnership with FinTech firms we are seeking to develop new approaches, build our understanding of these new technologies and in some way support development of the sector.

Commenting on the progress of the FinTech Accelerator since its launch in June and the completed proof of concepts, Charlotte said:

“We set up the Bank’s FinTech Accelerator in the Bank, launched in June this year, precisely to develop our practical experience of FinTech.  Just over the past six months we have met or researched over 130 start-ups, participated in around 25 conferences, and held roundtables with more than 80 organisations. In listening and learning, we are ableto begin forming a judgement about the impact of these technologies. In the Accelerator, we seek to engage with a large number of FinTech firms and technologies, and to run a series of targeted, rapid proof of concepts (POCs) with a number of them.  All POCs are work on problems or challenges that are important to us, and the firms are carefully chosen through an open process based on our published criteria…Recent POCs have covered three main areas – data analytics, information security, and some work exploring distributed ledgers.”

Charlotte then announced the current POCs and the start-ups the Bank is working with:

“A recent addition to the FinTech Accelerator is a POC with BMLL Technologies that uses a machine learning platform, applied to historic limit order book data, to spot anomalies and facilitate the use of new tools in our analytical capabilities.  A second new POC, with Enforcd, uses an analytic platform designed specifically to share public information on regulatory enforcement action.

We have also partnered with two firms – Anomali and ThreatConnect – that provide innovative technologies to collect, correlate, categorise and integrate cyber security intelligence data.”

Charlotte concluded by announcing that the window for the next round of applications is now open:

“New technologies present opportunities and risks and we need to assess both…as part of our mission to promote the public good.  Today, we’ve opened our next call for applications as we seek to further our research and work, continuing to bridge the gap between institution and innovation.”

57 per cent of Australian fintechs now ‘post-revenue’

From Fintech Business.

More than half of Australian fintech companies are now collecting revenue but only one in seven are profitable, according to an EY survey.

p-and-l-2

The EY FinTech Australia Census was launched at the Fintech Australia Collab/Collide Summit in Melbourne last week.

EY partner Anita Kimber told the conference that 57 per cent of fintech companies in Australia are now collecting money from their customers.

However, only 14 per cent of Australian fintech companies are declaring that they are profitable.

Of the fintech companies that are not profitable, the average ‘burn rate’ is $84,000, Ms Kimber said.

“Average burn rates are particularly high among fintechs that have received commercial funding or that have already realised revenue as they spend more to grow their business and take advantage of the funds available to them,” the report found.

When it comes to the capital, EY research conducted in early 2016 found Australia ranks fifth relative to other leading fintech markets for access to capital.

“Since then, however, the capital situation has been rapidly developing with more inflows of venture capital coming from within and outside Australia,” the study said.

Of the fintechs that have successfully raised capital to date, on average each has raised $3.85 million.

Australian fintech companies in existence for more than three years are on average raised $5 million of capital to date, the report said.

However, EY acknowledged the success rate of Australian fintech companies has been mixed.

“Although successfully funded fintechs outnumber those that fail to raise capital or couldn’t raise what they desired, this doesn’t account for organisations that may not be in existence anymore,” the research found.

“Views in this census were primarily collected from fintechs that remain in existence so there is a skew to fintechs that were successful in their capital raising,” it said.

Looking at the Australian fintech sector more broadly, the EY census found that 54 per cent of the sector is based in NSW, while 28 per cent of fintech companies are in Victoria.

Twenty-five per cent of fintechs are focused on lending, while 21 per cent are in the personal finance/asset management space.

The average age of leaders in the fintech space is 41, of whom 87 per cent are male and 13 per cent are female.

Forty-one per cent of fintech companies flagged “building partnerships with banks and other financial institutions” as a key external challenge, EY found.

ASIC and Ontario Securities Commission sign agreement to support innovative businesses

ASIC says Innovative fintech companies in Australia and Ontario, Canada will be able to draw on support from the combined resources of their financial regulators as they seek to operate in the others’ market, under a new agreement.

Ontario Securities CommissionAsic Coporate Logo Standard Version Colour

Under the agreement, signed in Toronto this week, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) will refer to one another those innovative businesses seeking to enter the others’ market. The regulators may provide support to innovative businesses before, during and after authorisation to help reduce regulatory uncertainty and time to market.

The agreement follows the creation of the Innovation Hub at ASIC in April 2015 and the OSC LaunchPad in October 2016. These initiatives were established to help businesses with innovative ideas navigate financial/securities regulation, support them through the authorisation process and ease their engagement with the regulator.

Signing the agreement, John Price, ASIC Commissioner, said:

‘ASIC is committed to encouraging innovation that has the potential to benefit financial consumers and investors. Since we launched our Innovation Hub last year we have seen a surge in requests by fintech startups seeking assistance about how to navigate the regulatory requirements. These have covered a wide range of issues, as you would expect of such a young and exciting sector, but include robo or digital advice, crowd-sourced equity funding, payments, marketplace lending and blockchain business models. Some of these business concepts are already looking to expand internationally, and these agreements with like-minded regulators will be a significant factor in paving the way.’

Maureen Jensen, Chair and CEO of the OSC, said:

‘Last month, the Ontario Securities Commission unveiled OSC LaunchPad. This is the first dedicated team by a securities regulator in Canada to help fintech businesses navigate securities law requirements and accelerate time-to-market. Today’s agreement – another first for a Canadian securities regulator – reflects our commitment to improving the regulatory experience for emerging businesses that are offering innovative services, products and applications of benefit to investors.’

To qualify for the support offered by the agreement, innovative businesses will need to meet the eligibility criteria of their home regulator. Once referred by the regulator, and ahead of applying for authorisation to operate in the new market, the business will have access to dedicated staff that will help them to understand the regulatory framework in the market they wish to join, and how it applies to them.

ASIC and the OSC have also committed to share information on emerging trends in each other’s markets and the potential impact on regulation.

In March 2015, ASIC announced that it would establish an online Innovation Hub to assist innovative fintech businesses navigate ASIC’s regulatory system. Through its Innovation Hub, ASIC engages with the fintech community, provides assistance to innovative fintech start-ups and liaises with fintech experts through ASIC’s Digital Finance Advisory Committee.

On October 24, 2016, the OSC announced ‘OSC LaunchPad’ to engage with fintech businesses, provide the opportunity for support in navigating securities requirements and strive to keep regulation in step with digital innovation. This initiative supports innovation while fulfilling the OSC’s mandate to provide protection to investors and promote confidence in its markets.

Kenyan and Australian regulators sign agreement to support fintech innovation

ASIC says the Capital Markets Authority of Kenya (CMA) and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) today signed a Co-operation Agreement which aims to promote innovation in financial services in their respective markets.

The agreement was signed in the margins of the Board meeting of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) held in Hong Kong this week.

Fintech-Pic

The agreement sets up a framework for co-operation between the CMA and ASIC in the expanding space of innovation in financial services. The parties have agreed to share information in their respective markets including on emerging market trends and regulatory issues arising from the growth in innovation.

Paul Muthaura, Chief Executive, CMA, said: ‘We are committed to facilitating innovation in financial services, leveraging Kenya’s positioning in the region as an innovation centre. This however calls for us to assess lessons learned and to compare strategies to balance innovation and regulation with our peer regulators.’

‘The CMA has recently commenced efforts towards the establishment of a Regulatory Sandbox structure that is designed to encourage innovation in the capital markets. This strategy reflects the CMA’s role in facilitating the introduction of new fintech products in the capital markets area.’

‘ASIC has developed an Innovation Hub and we are keen to share best practices in terms of how to address regulatory issues pertaining to innovation in financial services.’

Greg Medcraft, Chairman, ASIC, said: ‘We are excited to be working more closely with CMA. It operates in a jurisdiction that has seen significant fintech innovation growth. Innovation in financial services isn’t confined by national borders. We hope this agreement will help to break down barriers to entry both here and in Kenya.

‘Since ASIC launched its Innovation Hub in 2015, we have seen a surge in requests by fintech start-ups seeking assistance about how to navigate the regulatory requirements.

‘Most recently we have consulted on the establishment of a Regulatory Sandbox that proposes an environment to allow start-ups to test concepts without a licence – we are currently considering the results of that consultation.’

Signs of Hope For Fintech?

According to Finder.com.au, during last weeks parliamentary inquiry into banks, there was significant discussion which spells increased opportunities for fintech.

Fintech-Pic

While the line of questioning taken by House of Representative economics committee did not directly relate to fintech, the answers and defences at the four inquiries reveal several interesting points that relate to the fintech sector, for both banks and fintech companies.

Data sharing

Westpac and NAB were questioned over the sharing of customer data in order to increase competition. This is a key issue for the fintech sector and, if introduced, would help increase competition and better inform fintech innovations.

Brian Hartzer, CEO of Westpac said he supports data sharing, but the process needs to be “well-governed”.

“Data is a really important part of what we do and at Westpac we embrace that,” he said. “We’re very supportive, but don’t underplay how important it is to put that control around.”

Hartzer ended by saying that Westpac would comply with any change in the law.

Andrew Thorburn, CEO of NAB, went further, saying he would support any move that required banks to share customer data. He also directly related the issue to fintech.

“We welcome competition,” he said. “That’s how this bank has survived and competed for 150 years…And now we’ve got new competition, fintechs that are coming at us and we welcome that too. You have to lift and get better and that’s good for customers.”

However, neither were ready to commit to the proposal of bringing the UK’s open data regime to Australia. Hartzer said what was happening in the UK was interesting, but Australia needs to make sure privacy controls are in place. When questioned, NAB’s Thorburn also agreed to take notice on what incentives he will provide to executives to ensure data sharing happens.

Business loan interest rates

While not dwelled on for long in any of the four inquiries, the high rates charged on business loans was brought to the attention of each CEO. The small business lending market has been booming, and it’s overrun with fintech companies. Lenders have been offering faster funding and opening out the eligibility criteria for a loan, but the main difference is that the loans are usually unsecured. Approval is based on business revenue and performance, which is analysed using various algorithms. This has resulted in several banks partnering with smaller business lenders to help them service customers.

Commonwealth Bank’s chief Ian Narev was the first that was forced to defend its rates, which are 5.75% above the cash rate.

“There is a view generally because a business loan is secured by a mortgage over someone’s home that therefore interest rates should be the same as the home loan, that’s just not true,” he said.

Questioning turned to the GFC, because current business loan rates were higher than during 2008-09.

“When the global banking system went through the experience of the global financial crisis, what we all looked at was the fact that appropriately pricing or risk has ceased to occur,” he said.

Also forced to defend Westpac’s rates, Hartzer said it would be “fair to say” the bank had underestimated the loss rate for small business loans.

“Small business loans go bad about five times more often than a home loan. And the loss rate is around 10 times. The combination of all those things has fed into that difference.”

Shayne Elliot pointed to ANZ’s increasing amount of small business lending – 13-15% each year – but admits growth is needed.

“It’s not huge but I want it to be bigger. There is a transition happening in the economy … and we want to be part of that and help those businesses set up,” he said.

“What people want is a really competitive rate, and then they want the right service proposition.”

As banks struggle to continue to offer business loan rates in line with the cash rate, this presents a real opportunity for fintechs to continue along the small business lending road.

Investments

The banks were also forced to defend their investment advice, which has been the subject of much speculation over the past year. Also coming to the stage is robo-advice, which may prove to be a real competitor to traditional investment advice channels.

Commonwealth Bank’s Ian Narev, in particular, was questioned for his bank’s financial advice errors, admitting he did not act with “requisite speed” to fix errors. He also told the committee that an independent review found that 10% of customers were given the wrong advice by Commonwealth Bank. However, he argued that this 10% of the 8,000 reviews were a small representativee of the whole.

Westpac’s Hartzer said that the nature of investing is “taking a risk,” but admits that there needs to be consequences when customers are poorly advised.

Fintech Offers New Escape Route For Off The Plan Investors

From Fintech Business.

A new off-the-plan property sale platform has been launched to cater for foreign investors who are looking to on-sell their investment via nomination before the settlement date.

Investment--PIC

Aofun.com.au has launched an online platform that will allow property buyers, who have made down payments on off-the-plan properties, the opportunity to on-sell their investment via nomination before settlement.

The platform is primarily targeted at foreign investors who have been ‘caught out’ by the major Australian banks’ decision to tighten their lending to foreign investors.

Aofun founder and chief executive Jason Zhu said many potential sellers who bought an off-the-plan property in the past few years now have “little or no” chance of securing finance.

He said some of these sellers may be willing to forgo the full 10 per cent deposit.

“There is a real opportunity for first home buyers who may not have sufficient savings for their first home to register on the website and acquire their first home with the deposit paid,” Mr Zhu said.

He added that the Aofun platform allows the original buyers to list their property, and hopeful buyers can make an offer.

“Buyers and sellers can then negotiate the final sale price on the property via the online portal. The sale will then proceed through all the normal legal processes.”

Many original buyers may be willing to sell below the original contract amount to avoid a potential lawsuit from the property developer or to avoid receiving a bad credit rating – factors that “may have negative implications for any future immigration application to Australia or investment in Australia,” according to Mr Zhu.

“The reality facing the market is that many of the overseas buyers of these properties, for various reasons, are not going to able to complete their purchases, leading to an oversupply that will inevitably place a sizable burden on the property and construction industries.”