Digital Finance Analytics (DFA) Blog
"Intelligent Insight"
Economist John Adams and Analyst Martin North look at recent Hansard records where the Banks discussed their plans for negative interest rates.
The link between the Cash Restrictions Bill and potential Negative Rates are very real, no conspiracy theory here – but fact!
Following the monumental Conservative election victory, now is the time for the economics to work through. Mark Carney is due to leave his post as governor of the Bank of England at the end of January after six and a half years in charge, and the chancellor, Sajid Javid, will be choosing a replacement soon – perhaps before Christmas. Via the UK Conversation.
This will be a pivotal decision for the chancellor – no doubt in close consultation with Boris Johnson and his advisers. Whoever they pick should not expect a honeymoon period. They are arriving against the backdrop of Brexit, widening regional inequality and the prospect of a downturn in the global economy.
The frontrunners are said to be Minouche Shafik, director of London School of Economics; Kevin Warsh, a former top official at the US Federal Reserve; and Andrew Bailey, chief executive of UK regulator the Financial Conduct Authority. Add to these names Jon Cunliffe and Ben Broadbent, both currently deputy governors at the Bank. Behind this sits a couple of more alternative candidates: Santander chair and former Labour minister Shriti Vadera and Boris Johnson’s former economic adviser, Gerard Lyons.
An alternative governor may be just the required medicine at present, since there is a strong case for someone willing to think differently about central bank management. With interest rates still very low in the UK and most other developed economies, there are widespread concerns that central banks will be unable to fight another downturn using the classic response of cutting rates.
Beyond this, there are arguments for revising the entire model of central banking. In recent years, the trend has been for them to manage rates without any political interference and to concentrate purely on keeping inflation low. Indeed, it is almost 30 years to the day since the Reserve Bank of New Zealand became the first central bank to make inflation the sole priority.
In times of inflation, this system made sense. But since the 2007-08 financial crisis, the world has found itself in a situation where economic growth is much weaker and deflation is more of a risk than inflation.
As former Federal Reserve chair Ben Bernanke said in a speech in Tokyo in 2003, “in the face of inflation … the virtue of an independent central bank is its ability to say ‘no’ to the government”, but with protracted deflation of the kind that has continually dogged Japan, “a more cooperative stance” by central banks towards the government is required.
His argument was essentially that it’s hard to sustain inflation by manipulating interest rates, and that you’re more likely to be successful using the fiscal levers of government spending and tax cutting. The same approach is arguably required in the UK today and across the developed world.
Having lost the ability to properly stimulate the economy using interest rates, the Bank of England and other central banks have taken it in turns to resort to quantitative easing – essentially creating money with which to buy mainly government bonds from banks and other financial institutions. This was supposed to drive extra liquidity into the economy, but mainly it has just been used to bid up prices in the likes of the bond market and stock market and exacerbate the wealth gap.
As an alternative, some commentators are now touting “helicopter money”: this would involve central banks creating money that would be handed straight to the public via government tax cuts or public spending – thus requiring them to coordinate their policies in a way that does not happen at present.
This could be pursued in conjunction with a novel concept called “modern monetary theory”, which envisages government targets to boost demand and inflation financed by a disciplined central bank that keeps interest rates at zero. We are already seeing signs of the government moving in the same direction by shifting away from austerity towards more generous spending.
As for the Bank of England’s own targets, greater policy cooperation with the government would provide wiggle room for focusing beyond inflation. In particular, the Bank could play a role in addressing regional inequality. The UK already has the one of the worst rates of regional inequality in the developed world, with areas like the north of England and West Midlands bringing up the rear. This will be heightened by leaving the EU, since these same areas are key to international supply chains and expected to be the worst hit.
The answer is for the government to pursue an industrial policy that aims to improve productivity in regions where it is weakest, through the likes of targeted tax breaks and economic development zones, with an accommodating Bank of England providing the funding to facilitate.
More productive areas attract more capital, which is the reason behind the north-south divide in the first place. Such an industrial policy would encourage more investment in these areas, produce real-wage increases, boost local demand and stimulate regional development. In short, it would help counteract the impact of Brexit.
Two central criteria for the appointment of the next Bank of England governor stand out. First, they must understand the deeper economic and social circumstances that have led to Brexit and the UK’s shift to the right. They must act as governor for the whole country and not just for London plc: a move away from focusing on smoothing short-term fluctuations towards prioritising long-term growth.
Second, the job specification for the next governor says that the candidate should have “acute political sensitivity and awareness”. This might suggest that the government does not want another governor with such outspoken views on say, the economic risks from Brexit. Be that as it may, policy coordination needs to be a priority. I don’t rule out the possibility of the leading candidates being able to work like this, but I worry that they will be too orthodox for the challenge. The government should recognise the shifting sands in central bank policy and appoint someone who is willing to lead from the front.
Author: Drew Woodhouse, Lecturer in Economics, Sheffield Hallam University
RBA’s minutes out today. Clear signals of more action next year, despite the perceived gentle turning point.
Members noted that interest rates were very low around the world, with a number of central banks having eased monetary policy over recent months in response to downside risks to the global economy and subdued inflation. Market expectations for further policy easing by central banks had been scaled back over previous months, with concerns about the downside risks receding a little. The US Federal Reserve had indicated that any further reduction in the federal funds rate would require a material change in the economic outlook. Reflecting these developments, market pricing had pointed to a narrowing in the degree of uncertainty around the expected path for the federal funds rate. Globally, long-term government bond yields had remained at very low levels, but had risen slightly in recent months as the prospects for further easing in monetary policy had diminished.
Financing conditions for corporations remained very accommodative. Robust demand for corporate debt had seen spreads narrow between corporate bond yields and government benchmarks. US equity prices had risen to new highs over the prior month, and had increased significantly since the start of the year relative to corporate earnings. Australian equity prices had also increased over the month, with the ASX 200 returning to the highs reached in July.
Foreign exchange rates had been little changed over the previous month. The People’s Bank of China had continued to implement targeted easing measures to support financing conditions, while remaining conscious of the need to contain financial stability risks. More broadly in emerging markets, central banks had eased monetary policy in recent months. However, political unrest remained a source of volatility for certain markets.
Members discussed the transmission mechanisms for monetary policy in Australia through financial markets. They noted that the reductions in the cash rate this year had been transmitted to broader financial conditions in ways that were consistent with the historical experience. Government bond yields had declined across the yield curve by more than 1 percentage point over the year, which had flowed through to lower funding costs across the economy. The Australian dollar had depreciated by around 6 per cent on a trade-weighted basis over the previous year and remained at the lower end of its range over recent times. The depreciation reflected the reduction in the interest differential between Australia and the major advanced economies, and had occurred despite an increase in the terms of trade over this period.
The recent reductions in the cash rate had been reflected in reduced funding costs for banks, and had flowed through to lower borrowing rates for households. Average variable mortgage rates had declined by around 65 basis points since the middle of the year, as competition for high-quality borrowers had remained strong and households continued to switch away from interest-only loans towards principal-and-interest loans at lower interest rates. These trends were expected to continue.
Consistent with lower mortgage interest rates and improved conditions in some housing markets, housing loan commitments had been increasing over the preceding few months, particularly for owner-occupiers. Growth in credit extended to owner-occupiers had also increased a little in recent months, while lending to investors had still been declining.
Members noted that data from lenders and information from liaison suggested that only a small share of borrowers had actively adjusted their scheduled mortgage payments following the reductions in interest rates. This was consistent with historical experience in the months immediately following a reduction in the cash rate. However, the available data indicated that, even over the longer term, as interest rates had declined borrowers had not been paying down their home loans more quickly than in the past. Mortgage payments as a share of aggregate household income had remained steady over recent years, although were slightly lower than in the first half of the decade.
Interest rates on loans to businesses had also declined to historically low levels. Despite the accommodative funding conditions for large businesses, growth in business debt had slowed, suggesting that demand for finance had softened. Lending to small businesses had been little changed over the preceding year, and access to finance for small businesses remained restricted.
Financial market pricing implied that market participants were expecting a further 25 basis point reduction in the cash rate by mid 2020.
Members discussed longer-term developments in the banking sector, including the strengthening of prudential requirements and the opportunities and challenges presented by advances in technology. Increased capital and liquidity after the financial crisis had made banks safer, but had also raised the relative attractiveness of some forms of market-based finance. Members discussed how advances in technology opened up new opportunities for banks, while also introducing potential new competitors.
Members observed that there had been little change in the global outlook over the previous month, but that some of the downside risks had receded. The near-term uncertainty around US trade policy had diminished because some of the previously planned tariff increases had been postponed and there was some prospect of an initial agreement between the United States and China. In addition, a ‘hard Brexit’ was assessed to be less likely.
Weak trade outcomes had continued to restrain growth in output, particularly for export-oriented economies. Survey indicators of manufacturing activity and export orders had stabilised, although they remained at low levels. Surveyed conditions in the services sector had declined as weaker external demand conditions had spilled over to sectors other than manufacturing. Members noted that even though geopolitical tensions had lessened recently, ongoing uncertainty had adversely affected the confidence and spending decisions of businesses. In the euro area, investment indicators had remained weak and business confidence had declined further since September. In the United States, consumer spending had been solid and employment growth had strengthened. Recently, some survey measures of manufacturing and services activity had increased a little, although industrial production and surveyed investment intentions had declined further in recent months.
Slower growth in China and India, largely unrelated to trade tensions, had also continued to be a feature of the recent pattern of global growth. In China, indicators of activity had been weaker in October. The real levels of retail sales and fixed asset investment had declined in October and the output of a broad range of industrial products had remained subdued. Members noted that, in response to slowing growth, Chinese authorities had eased minimum equity capital requirements for a variety of infrastructure projects (including port, road, rail, logistics and ecological protection projects). In India, the extended monsoon season had exacerbated existing weakness in the economy.
Inflation remained low in the major advanced economies and was below target despite tight labour markets and higher wages growth. Members observed that inflation had generally declined in Asia. In China, although headline consumer price inflation had increased, reflecting higher pork and other meat prices, core consumer price inflation had remained broadly unchanged at a relatively low rate.
Movements in commodity prices had been mixed since the previous meeting. The announcement of further measures to support steel-intensive economic activity in China had supported iron ore prices. At the same time, reports of a tightening in coal import controls in China had weighed on coking and thermal coal prices. Base metals prices had generally been lower since the previous meeting. Supply developments had continued to support the prices of some rural commodities.
A number of indicators suggested that growth in Australia had continued at a moderate pace since the middle of the year.
Members discussed survey measures of business confidence and conditions, and consumer sentiment. Business confidence had been below average and below its recent high levels in 2017 and early 2018, with the decline broadly based across industries. In contrast, survey measures of current business conditions had remained around average in recent months. Members noted that, historically, business conditions had been a better indicator of current economic activity than measures of business confidence, although its main advantage was timeliness rather than adding information not present in other indicators.
Growth in household disposable income had been weak over recent years, in both nominal and real terms. Members noted the importance of income growth as a key driver of consumption growth, although the earlier downturn in the housing market had also had a noticeable effect. The recent recovery in the established housing market was expected to be positive for consumption growth in the period ahead. Retailers in the Bank’s liaison program had suggested that nominal year-ended sales growth had been little changed in October and November.
Households’ expectations about future economic conditions had declined significantly since June. Members noted that the prolonged period of slow income growth had affected both consumer sentiment and growth in household consumption. Members observed that the decline in sentiment had coincided with an increasingly negative tone in news coverage of the economy. Notwithstanding this, households’ assessment of their own financial situation relative to a year earlier had remained broadly steady and somewhat above average. Historically, households’ assessments of their own finances generally have mattered more for household consumption decisions than their expectations about future economic conditions.
Conditions in established housing markets had continued to strengthen over the previous month. Housing prices had increased further in Melbourne and Sydney and this experience had been broadly based across both cities. Growth in housing prices had increased in Brisbane, Adelaide and regional areas, and housing prices had increased in Perth for the first time in two years. Non-price indicators had also pointed to a strengthening of conditions in the established housing market: auction clearance rates had remained high in Sydney and Melbourne, and auction volumes had picked up, albeit from a very low base.
By contrast, conditions in the new housing construction market had remained subdued. Residential construction activity was expected to continue to contract for several quarters, despite conditions in established housing markets having strengthened. Although there had been tentative signs of an improvement in conditions in some of the earlier stages of building activity, most indicators had remained weak, and most developer contacts in the liaison program were yet to report increased sales of new housing.
Business investment appeared to have eased in the September quarter. Information from the ABS Capital Expenditure (Capex) survey and preliminary non-residential construction data suggested that non-mining investment had decreased in the quarter, led by a marked decline in machinery & equipment investment. The Capex survey had provided the fourth estimate of investment intentions for 2019/20. Non-mining investment in 2019/20 was expected to be weaker than previously envisaged, while the survey continued to suggest that mining investment would contribute to growth over time, as firms invested to sustain – and in some instances expand – production.
Conditions in the labour market and wages data had shown little change since earlier in the year. The unemployment rate had remained around 5¼ per cent in October. Employment had declined by 19,000 in October as both full-time and part-time employment had declined. This had followed a sustained period of stronger-than-expected employment growth, which had remained at 2 per cent over the year despite the most recent monthly decline. The employment-to-population ratio and the participation rate had both remained at high levels. Over the previous few months, measures of the number of job advertisements had not changed much and firms’ near-term hiring intentions had remained broadly stable. Employment intentions among the Bank’s liaison contacts had generally been moderate, but had been weakest for firms exposed to residential construction.
The wage price index (WPI) had increased by 0.5 per cent in the September quarter, to be 2.2 per cent higher in year-ended terms, which was broadly as had been expected. Private sector wages growth had been 2.2 per cent in year-ended terms, and had levelled out in recent quarters following its gentle upward trend of the previous couple of years. This was consistent with information from liaison that a larger share of firms expected wages growth to be stable (rather than increasing) in the year ahead compared with a year or so earlier. Growth in the private sector WPI measure including bonuses and commissions had risen to 3 per cent in year-ended terms, which was the highest rate of growth since late 2012. This was consistent with information from liaison indicating that firms had been using temporary measures to retain and reward employees rather than permanent wage increases. Public sector wages growth had slowed in the September quarter following the one-off boost from the large wage outcome for Victorian nurses and midwives in the June quarter.
Turning to the policy decision, members noted that there had been little change in the economic outlook since the previous meeting. Globally, financial market conditions had been more positive, as market participants’ concerns about downside risks had receded a little and a number of central banks had eased monetary policy. There were also signs of stabilisation in several recent economic indicators, particularly for the manufacturing industry.
Domestically, after a soft patch in the second half of 2018, the Australian economy appeared to have reached a gentle turning point. GDP growth in the September quarter was expected to have continued at a similar pace since the beginning of the year. Most of the partial data preceding release of the national accounts had been in line with expectations, although non-mining investment had been weaker and public spending a little stronger. The outlook for growth in output continued to be supported by lower interest rates, the recent tax cuts, high levels of spending on infrastructure, a pick-up in the housing market and the improved outlook in the resources sector. However, members noted that weak growth in household income continued to present a downside risk to consumer spending, and that a low appetite for risk could be constraining businesses’ willingness to invest. The drought in many parts of Australia was another source of uncertainty for the outlook.
Members observed that labour market conditions had been broadly unchanged since earlier in the year. While this outcome had largely been in line with forecasts, it remained an area to monitor, both because an improving labour market was important for its own sake and also because a tightening in the labour market would put upward pressure on wages growth and inflation. It was noted that the current rate of wages growth was not consistent with inflation being sustainably within the target range, unless productivity growth was extraordinarily weak, nor was it consistent with consumption growth returning to trend.
Members discussed the transmission to the economy of the interest rate reductions since the middle of the year. They noted in particular that the available evidence suggested that more stimulatory monetary policy had been working through the usual channels of lower bond yields, a depreciation of the exchange rate and lower interest rates on mortgages. There had also been an effect on housing prices, increased housing turnover in the established market and some early signs of a stabilisation in housing construction activity. The upturn in the housing market was a positive development for the economy in the near term, but could become a source of concern if borrowing were to run too quickly ahead of income growth.
Members also discussed community concerns about the effect of lower interest rates on confidence, noting the decline in business confidence and consumer sentiment this year. This decline had coincided with heightened economic uncertainty globally, a period of softer growth in the Australian economy and weakness in household income growth, and the Board had responded to these factors in preceding months. While members recognised the negative confidence effects for some parts of the community arising from lower interest rates, they judged that the impact of these effects was unlikely to outweigh the stimulus to the economy from lower interest rates.
In assessing the evidence, members noted that monetary policy had long and variable lags and that indebted consumers may take some time before increasing their spending in response to a decline in their mortgage interest payments. More generally, the persistently low growth in household incomes continued to be a source of concern for the consumption outlook. Economic growth and the unemployment rate remained broadly consistent with the forecasts, but members agreed that it would be concerning if there were a deterioration in the outlook. As in other countries, there was no real concern of inflation rising quickly.
The Board concluded that the most appropriate approach would be to maintain the current stance of monetary policy and to continue to assess the evidence of how the easing in monetary policy was affecting the economy. Members agreed that it would be important to reassess the economic outlook in February 2020, when the Bank would prepare updated forecasts. As part of their deliberations, members noted that the Board had the ability to provide further stimulus to the economy, if required. Members also agreed that it was reasonable to expect that an extended period of low interest rates would be required in Australia to reach full employment and achieve the inflation target. The Board would continue to monitor developments, including in the labour market, and was prepared to ease monetary policy further if needed to support sustainable growth in the economy, full employment and the achievement of the inflation target over time.
The Board decided to leave the cash rate unchanged at 0.75 per cent.
We discuss a recent article on MMT.
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/dec/08/turning-the-economic-tide-could-a-radical-monetary-theory-fix-australias-woes
The Reserve Bank will consider quantitative easing once rates fall to 25 basis points. It’s a tool that has been used by other countries, often with devastating consequences for society. Via InvestorDaily.
Australia is in uncharted territory, economically speaking. We’re latecomers to the low-rate party and we’re still getting used to it. Home owners are loving it but retailers are not. Unemployment is low but a record number of Aussies want to work more. It’s a strange time.
The Reserve Bank of Australia only has a few options left if it fails to hit its inflation target and lift economic growth. It can continue to reduce the cash rate and even go into negative rates, as the European Central Bank (ECB) had done. The ECB benchmark deposit rate was cut by 10 basis points in September to negative 0.5 per cent. The ECB also reintroduced its quantitative easing program of buying 20 billion euros ($32 billion) worth of government and corporate bonds every month in an effort to prevent the European economy from sliding off a cliff.
The ECB has been using QE on and off since 2009 in an effort to lift inflation. In 2015 the central bank began purchasing 60 billion euros worth of bonds each month. This increased to 80 billion euros in April 2016 before coming back down to 60 billion a year later.
In the UK, the Bank of England bought gilts (British government bonds) and corporate bonds during its QE program during the global financial crisis in 2009. QE programs also took place in 2011 and 2016.
Meanwhile, the US Federal Reserve has undertaken three separate rounds of QE, the last of which it began tapering in June 2013. The US halted its program in October 2014 after acquiring a total US$4.5 trillion of assets.
When a QE program takes place, a central bank begins buying securities with money that didn’t exist before the QE process began. They are essentially printing money and giving it to large corporates and the government through the purchase of these bonds, the logic being that the proceeds will be used to buy new assets (like mortgages) and invest, which in turn will drive the economy.
The money doesn’t directly hit the wallets of consumers. Unlike “helicopter money”, which the Rudd government dished out during the financial crisis, QE has a much more indirect impact on consumers. Financially speaking.
But the broader political and social impacts have had a lasting psychological effect on the populations of Europe and the US.
“If we look at the experience offshore, QE has been great at raising the level of assets in conjunction with a permanently lower interest rate,” Fidelity International’s Anthony Doyle said this week.
“QE has stimulated asset price growth. The ‘haves’ have benefited compared to the ‘have nots’; income inequality has grown across the economies that have implemented quantitative easing and socially we have seen big shifts to the Right or to the Left in terms of the political spectrum.
“If you think about Donald Trump, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, Jeremy Corbyn, Brexit, Boris Johnson. The next decade could be characterised by moves to the Right or Left here as well if we follow a path that other economies have pursued.”
AMP Capital chief economist Shane Oliver told Investor Daily that QE “probably helps people who have shares and property more than it does people who have bank deposits.”
Prior to the election of Mr Trump in 2016, Luis Zingales of the University of Chicago Booth School of Business told Bloomberg that central bank policies are largely to blame for the rise of populism.
Here in Australia, the Reserve Bank will have to consider the impact that QE could have on a society that has witnessed a banking royal commission that exposed widespread misconduct within the financial services industry.
If the impact on Europe and the US of QE on the people is anything to go by, Australia is well placed to split down the middle and begin gathering on the far edges of the political spectrum.
We were late to the low rate party. We might just be late to the populism party too.
The latest trade figures, RBA decision and market movements all signal important economic messages. We examine the data.
As expected the RBA held the cash rate today, but still leaves the door open for cuts next year. Given the weaker economic data we are seeing, those further cuts are pretty much assured.
At its meeting today, the Board decided to leave the cash rate unchanged at 0.75 per cent.
The outlook for the global economy remains reasonable. While the risks are still tilted to the downside, some of these risks have lessened recently. The US–China trade and technology disputes continue to affect international trade flows and investment as businesses scale back spending plans because of the uncertainty. At the same time, in most advanced economies unemployment rates are low and wages growth has picked up, although inflation remains low. In China, the authorities have taken steps to support the economy while continuing to address risks in the financial system.
Interest rates are very low around the world and a number of central banks have eased monetary policy over recent months in response to the downside risks and subdued inflation. Expectations of further monetary easing have generally been scaled back. Financial market sentiment has continued to improve and long-term government bond yields are around record lows in many countries, including Australia. Borrowing rates for both businesses and households are at historically low levels. The Australian dollar is at the lower end of its range over recent times.
After a soft patch in the second half of last year, the Australian economy appears to have reached a gentle turning point. The central scenario is for growth to pick up gradually to around 3 per cent in 2021. The low level of interest rates, recent tax cuts, ongoing spending on infrastructure, the upswing in housing prices and a brighter outlook for the resources sector should all support growth. The main domestic uncertainty continues to be the outlook for consumption, with the sustained period of only modest increases in household disposable income continuing to weigh on consumer spending. Other sources of uncertainty include the effects of the drought and the evolution of the housing construction cycle.
The unemployment rate has been steady at around 5¼ per cent over recent months. It is expected to remain around this level for some time, before gradually declining to a little below 5 per cent in 2021. Wages growth is subdued and is expected to remain at around its current rate for some time yet. A further gradual lift in wages growth would be a welcome development and is needed for inflation to be sustainably within the 2–3 per cent target range. Taken together, recent outcomes suggest that the Australian economy can sustain lower rates of unemployment and underemployment.
Inflation is expected to pick up, but to do so only gradually. In both headline and underlying terms, inflation is expected to be close to 2 per cent in 2020 and 2021.
There are further signs of a turnaround in established housing markets. This is especially so in Sydney and Melbourne, but prices in some other markets have also increased recently. In contrast, new dwelling activity is still declining and growth in housing credit remains low. Demand for credit by investors is subdued and credit conditions, especially for small and medium-sized businesses, remain tight. Mortgage rates are at record lows and there is strong competition for borrowers of high credit quality.
The easing of monetary policy this year is supporting employment and income growth in Australia and a return of inflation to the medium-term target range. The lower cash rate has put downward pressure on the exchange rate, which is supporting activity across a range of industries. It has also boosted asset prices, which in time should lead to increased spending, including on residential construction. Lower mortgage rates are also boosting aggregate household disposable income, which, in time, will boost household spending.
Given these effects of lower interest rates and the long and variable lags in the transmission of monetary policy, the Board decided to hold the cash rate steady at this meeting while it continues to monitor developments, including in the labour market. The Board also agreed that due to both global and domestic factors, it was reasonable to expect that an extended period of low interest rates will be required in Australia to reach full employment and achieve the inflation target. The Board is prepared to ease monetary policy further if needed to support sustainable growth in the economy, full employment and the achievement of the inflation target over time.
Who owns central banks, and how accountable are they? We start a series looking at these important questions.
Who owns central banks, and how accountable are they? We start a series looking at these important questions.
According to an article in InvestorDaily, RBA Governor Philip Lowe has poured water on the prospects of quantitative easing (QE), saying Australia “shouldn’t forget about fiscal policy” to prevent a recession.
“QE is not on the agenda at this time,” Governor Lowe told at the annual dinner of the Australian Business Economists.
Interest rates will have to hit 0.25 per cent before the RBA considers QE – something that economists are predicting by mid-2020. But Governor Lowe doesn’t think QE will be necessary, saying that the Australian economy is in a good position and that the RBA will achieve its goals.
“At the moment, though, we are expecting progress towards our goals over the next couple of years and the cash rate is still above the level at which we would consider buying government securities.”
However, Governor Lowe hinted again that he would prefer the use of fiscal policy rather than monetary policy to ward off a recession, citing a report from the Committee on the Global Financial System (CGFS), which he recently chaired.
“The report also notes that there may be better solutions than monetary policy to solving the problems of the day,” Governor Lowe said.
“It reminds us that when there are problems on the supply-side of the economy, the use of structural and fiscal policies will sometimes be the better approach. We need to remember that monetary policy cannot drive longer term growth, but that there are other arms of public policy than can sustainably promote both investment and growth.”
Governor Lowe also said that the willingness of central banks to provide liquidity could reduce the incentive for financial institutions to hold their own adequate buffers and create an “inaction bias” from prudential regulators or fiscal authorities.
“If this were the case, it could lead to an over-reliance on monetary policy,” he said.
The sentiments about quantitative easing have been echoed by fund managers. Sarah Shaw, chief investment officer at 4D infrastructure and Chris Bedingfield, principal at Quay Global Investors have urged the government to instead allocate investment in infrastructure to create jobs and boost productivity.
Ms Shaw noted the need to replace roads, bridges and other structures with better planned “forward-thinking” infrastructure is high.
“If you think about the need for infrastructure spend that I’m talking about, if you put a number on it, it’s maxed at $4 trillion by 2040 of infrastructure capacity that’s needed,” she said.
“If you think about that and you’re in an interest rate environment as low as it is today, if you’re not borrowing to invest in a much-needed infrastructure, then there’s something wrong.”
She added she looks for companies that are locking in fixed term bet to invest for future cash flows, because “now is the time to do it” with the current low cash rate.
“Why shouldn’t countries be doing that?” Ms Shaw queried.
“I’ll give you an example: China during the GFC, biggest form of quantitative easing – 35,000 kilometres of high-speed rail. That’s the sort of quantitative easing that we should be looking at here in Australia.”
VanEck has predicted there will be more rate cuts in 2020.
As discussed with John Adams in our recent post, we did not come away with the same conclusion, and Westpac, for example is forecasting QE will hit during 2020.
