Investment Property Lending Sucking Finance From Business

The latest data form the RBA on credit aggregates to June 2015, tells the continuing story of growing investment property lending, and a relative reduction in lending to business. The data on total loans outstanding (stock) shows there was a fall in lending to business in the month of 0.36%, which translates to a growth of 4.3% for the year to $789 bn. On the other hand, lending for housing rose 0.6% in the month, and 7.3% for the year, (higher than last year at 6.4%) to $1,481 bn. Owner occupied housing rose 0.47% to $945 bn, whilst investment lending grew 1.10% to $536 bn. Other personal lending rose 0.15% to $137 bn.

RBA-Credit-June-2015Total lending to business as a share of all lending fell again to 32.8%, this is not healthy as productive growth comes from business investing in their futures. This is not as strong as we need to sustain the economy.

RBA-CreditBusiness-June-2015Looking at the mix of lending for housing, investment lending was up to 36.2%. It has never been higher. This inflates house prices, and banks balance sheets, but the wealth is artificial, and unproductive.

RBA-CreditHousing-June2015 Finally we think there are some funnies in these numbers, which when we have completed the analysis of the APRA monthly banking statistics, we will comment on further. Suffice it to say, it seems maybe some loans were reclassified last month from owner occupied to investor loans, so might be distorting the data.

RBA Minutes Says Impact Of Investment Lending Scrutiny Not Showing Yet

The RBA released their minutes today for July. Little new really, though they comment that housing credit growth had been steady and remained relatively strong for investors in housing, although it had not accelerated. Any effects of regulators’ greater scrutiny of investor lending were probably not yet evident in the data. We expect to see the impact of the brakes being applied by the banks in the next quarter but our surveys continue to show strong demand from the investment sector.

The Board’s discussion about economic conditions opened with the observation that economic growth in Australia’s major trading partners appeared to have been around average in the June quarter. Consumption growth had been little changed for most trading partners in recent months, although it was perhaps a bit stronger in the United States and somewhat weaker in China. The level of consumption in Japan remained well below that seen prior to the increase in the consumption tax in 2014. Core inflation rates had been stable in year-ended terms over recent months and remained below the targets of most central banks. Members also observed that trade volumes, particularly within the Asian region, appeared to have fallen recently. Consistent with this observation, growth in industrial production across a number of east Asian economies had slowed a little.

In China, there had been little change in the monthly indicators of economic activity, although conditions had been a bit more positive in some sectors than early in 2015. The Chinese property market had improved somewhat; residential property prices overall had risen for the first time in a year and floor space sold had increased in the past few months. Members reflected that the recent easing in monetary conditions would provide additional support to the property market and growth more broadly, although it could be some time before a significant pick-up in construction activity began. Recent efforts by central government authorities to increase infrastructure investment further and reform local government financing arrangements were also expected to support investment.

Commodity prices overall had fallen since the previous meeting, driven by iron ore and oil prices. Growth in crude steel production had been modest and steel prices had fallen noticeably over the past month. Iron ore production in China had continued to decline. Shipments of iron ore from Australia and Brazil appeared to have increased in June, which contributed to lower iron ore prices over the past month.

Following quite strong output growth in Japan in the March quarter, more timely indicators pointed to modest growth in the June quarter. Labour market conditions had continued to improve, resulting in the unemployment rate falling further and the ratio of jobs to applicants continuing to rise. Wage growth and financial market measures of inflation expectations were higher than a year earlier and were expected to feed into higher core inflation over time. Members considered the importance for Japan of policy reforms designed to address some longer-term structural challenges, such as the ageing of the population.

In the United States, recent data pointed to moderate growth in economic activity in the June quarter following weakness in the March quarter. The labour market had strengthened further, with growth in non-farm payrolls employment rebounding in April and May and the unemployment rate falling. While there had been some increase in measures of wage growth, core measures of inflation remained below the Federal Reserve’s inflation target.

In the euro area, the available indicators pointed to modest economic growth and above-average sentiment in the June quarter, continuing the recent trend of improved conditions in the euro area as a whole. Members noted that exports had made a significant contribution to the pick-up in growth in the region but investment was still well below the levels seen prior to the global financial crisis. The unemployment rate had continued to fall modestly since its peak two years earlier, but varied sharply across the euro area; the unemployment rate was highest in Greece, where output was more than 25 per cent below its level prior to the financial crisis.

Domestic Economic Conditions

Members noted that output had increased by 0.9 per cent in the March quarter and by 2.3 per cent over the year. Resource exports had made a significant contribution to growth, reflecting better-than-usual weather conditions in the quarter. Dwelling investment had remained strong and while consumption growth had picked up over the past year or so, it had remained below average. Business investment had contracted in the quarter and there had been little growth in public demand. More recent economic indicators suggested that domestic demand had continued to grow at a below-average pace over recent months, but that labour market conditions had continued to improve.

Members observed that consumption grew faster than household income over the year to the March quarter. As a result, the saving ratio had declined further, although it remained well above the level it had been over much of the past 25 years. Year-ended growth in retail sales had been little changed over recent months and liaison suggested that this was likely to have continued into June. Retail sales growth had been relatively strong in New South Wales and Victoria but weaker in Queensland and Western Australia, in line with observed differences in economic conditions across the country. At the same time, surveys indicated that consumers had viewed their financial situation as being above average over the past year, notwithstanding the relatively weak growth in labour incomes. Members observed that this was likely to reflect the very low level of interest rates and strong growth in net household wealth.

Dwelling investment increased by 9 per cent over the year to the March quarter. An increase in the construction of new dwellings accounted for most of this growth, but the alterations and additions component had also contributed more recently, recording the first increase in a year in the March quarter. Forward-looking indicators pointed to further strong growth in dwelling investment in the period ahead. Members noted that there had been ongoing divergence in conditions in established housing markets across the country, as well as between houses and apartments. Housing prices had continued to rise rapidly in Sydney and to a lesser extent in Melbourne. Elsewhere, there had been little change in housing prices over the past six months or so. Prices of apartments had been growing less rapidly than those of houses, which members considered to be consistent with the relatively strong growth in the supply of higher-density housing in many capital cities.

Growth in housing credit overall had been stable over recent months at around 7 per cent on an annualised basis, while growth in lending to investors had been steady at a bit above 10 per cent. Members observed that the household debt-to-income ratio, calculated by netting funds held in mortgage offset accounts from total household debt to the financial sector, had increased over the year to March but had not exceeded previous peaks. Members discussed the fact that high housing prices had different implications for existing home owners, who benefited from increased wealth, and potential new home owners, who were finding it more difficult to finance a home purchase.

Investment in both the mining and non-mining sectors appeared to have fallen in the March quarter, although the split between the two components remained subject to some uncertainty. Profits for non-mining firms had increased by 6 per cent over the past year. More recent survey measures of business conditions, confidence and capacity utilisation had picked up to be around, or even above, their long-run averages. In contrast, private non-residential building approvals had remained weak.

The monthly trade data suggested that resource exports, including iron ore and coal, had declined in the June quarter. Coal exports had been affected by the severe storms in the Hunter region of New South Wales in late April. Members noted that there had been further signs of growth in service exports, in part a response to the depreciation of the exchange rate. Over the past year, net service exports had made a similar contribution to output growth as exports of iron ore, even though total import volumes had increased in the March quarter.

Labour force data indicated further signs of improvement in May. Employment growth had picked up over the year to exceed the rate of population growth. As a result, the unemployment rate had been relatively stable since the latter part of 2014 and had fallen slightly in May to 6 per cent. Members observed that employment growth had been strongest in household services and that employment and vacancies had been growing for business services but had remained little changed in the goods sector. As with other state-based indicators, employment growth and job vacancies had been strongest in New South Wales and Victoria. Forward-looking labour market indicators had been somewhat mixed over recent months. The ABS measure of firms’ job vacancies overall suggested that demand for labour could be sufficient to maintain a stable or even falling unemployment rate in the near term, while other forward-looking indicators suggested only modest growth in employment in coming months.

Members noted that the latest estimates indicated that the population had increased by 1.4 per cent over the year to the December quarter, down from a peak rate of growth of 1.8 per cent over 2012. The slower growth was primarily accounted for by a decline in net immigration, which was particularly pronounced in Western Australia and Queensland, consistent with weaker economic conditions in those states. Members observed that the lower-than-expected growth in the population helped to reconcile the below-average growth in output over the past year with a broadly steady unemployment rate.

Despite recent improvements in labour market indicators, members reflected that there was still evidence of spare capacity in the labour market. Consistent with this, the latest national accounts data indicated that non-farm average earnings per hour had recorded the lowest year-ended outcomes since the early 1990s and that unit labour costs had been little changed for around four years.

Financial Markets

International financial markets were mainly focused on developments in Greece and the fall in Chinese equity markets over the past month.

Members were briefed on recent developments in Greece. The ‘no’ vote in the referendum on the creditors’ latest proposals raised several issues, first among which was how the Greek authorities could reopen the banks. A critical vulnerability in the near term was related to whether the European Central Bank would provide additional emergency liquidity assistance. A second issue was how Greece would be able to service its external debt and a third was the challenges faced by the Greek authorities in improving the competitive position of the economy. Although these issues were of great concern to the Greek populace, the direct economic implications for the global economy and Australia were assessed by members to be relatively limited. They noted that the reaction of financial markets to these developments had been fairly muted. This was consistent with the economic and financial exposures to Greece – apart from the official sector’s financial exposure – being quite low.

Members noted that spreads to 10-year German Bunds on comparable bonds issued by Italy, Spain and Portugal had not risen much, with the limited contagion from developments in Greece likely to have reflected a general view of markets that previous adjustment policies in those countries had been relatively successful.

Members then turned their discussion to developments in bond markets more generally. Yields on longer-maturity German Bunds and US Treasuries had risen sharply over the first half of June, with German 10-year yields reaching 1 per cent, compared with a historic low of 8 basis points in mid April. German yields declined somewhat following the announcement of the Greek referendum. Longer-term sovereign yields of most other developed countries, including Australia, tended to move in line with US Treasuries.

Expectations about the timing of the US Federal Reserve’s first increase in the federal funds rate were little changed over the past month. Market pricing continued to suggest that the first increase would occur around the end of 2015. Although commentary by Federal Reserve officials suggested that it could be a little sooner than that, they continued to emphasise that the exact timing of the first increase would be less important than the pace of subsequent increases, which were expected to be gradual.

The People’s Bank of China (PBC) eased monetary policy further in June by cutting benchmark deposit and lending rates by 25 basis points, citing low inflation and a consequent increase in real interest rates. In addition, the PBC announced cuts to the reserve requirement ratio for selected financial institutions. The Chinese authorities had also announced a proposal to allow banks more flexibility in their choice of funding mix and asset allocation, which could lead to an increase in the supply of credit over time.

The Reserve Bank of New Zealand lowered its policy rate by 25 basis points, to 3.25 per cent, citing the decline in New Zealand’s terms of trade and the disinflationary effect of stronger-than-expected labour force growth.

Global equity markets fell by 3 per cent over the course of June, with broad-based falls and price movements generally tending to reflect fluctuations in sentiment about Greece. The Chinese equity market also fell sharply in June, partly in response to what was only a modest tightening of restrictions on margin lending. Mainland share prices were still well above their levels of a year earlier but the sharpness of the recent fall prompted the Chinese authorities to announce a number of measures, including an indefinite suspension of initial public offerings, an equity stabilisation fund and a funding facility for brokers. The Australian equity market underperformed several other advanced economy markets in June, mainly reflecting falls in resources and consumer sector share prices.

Global foreign exchange markets were relatively subdued in June. The euro recorded only a modest and short-lived fall when markets opened after the announcement of the Greek referendum result. The Australian dollar was 3 per cent lower against the US dollar and on a trade-weighted basis.

Corporate bond issuance in Australia had been strong over the course of 2015 to date, particularly by resource companies, although much of the increase reflected refinancing.

Pricing of Australian money market instruments suggested that the cash rate target was expected to remain unchanged at the present meeting.

Considerations for Monetary Policy

Members noted that global economic conditions remained consistent with growth in Australia’s major trading partners being around average over the period ahead. Global financial conditions were very accommodative and would remain so even in the event that the Federal Reserve started to raise its policy interest rate later in the year. Recent data suggested that conditions in Chinese property markets had improved and the authorities had acted to support activity by easing a range of policies further. Members noted that the recent volatility in Chinese equity markets and potential spillovers from developments in Greece would require close monitoring.

Domestically, the key forces shaping the economy over the past year were much as they had been for some time. Very low interest rates were working to support strong growth in dwelling investment and, together with strong housing prices, had supported consumption growth. Resource exports had made a substantial contribution to growth and mining investment had declined significantly, while public demand had been flat over the past year. Although output growth in the March quarter had been stronger than expected, growth over the year remained below average and early indications were that the strength in the March quarter had not carried through to the June quarter. Non-mining business investment had been subdued and surveys of businesses’ investment intentions suggested that it would remain so over the coming year. Nevertheless, non-mining business profits had increased over the past year and surveys suggested that business conditions had generally improved over recent months to be a bit above average.

Conditions in the housing market had been little changed in the most recent months, with notable strength in Sydney. Housing credit growth had been steady and remained relatively strong for investors in housing, although it had not accelerated. Any effects of regulators’ greater scrutiny of investor lending were probably not yet evident in the data.

Recent data indicated that employment had grown more rapidly than the population and the unemployment rate had been relatively stable since the latter part of the previous year. The easing in population growth over the past year helped to reconcile below-average growth in output with the relatively steady unemployment rate. Nevertheless, spare capacity remained, as evidenced by the level of the unemployment rate, historically low wage growth and unit labour costs that had been stable for a number of years. On this basis, members assessed that inflationary pressures were well contained and likely to remain so in the period ahead.

Commodity prices had fallen further and the Australian dollar had depreciated over the past month. Although the exchange rate against the US dollar was close to levels last seen in 2009, the decline in the Australian dollar had been more modest in terms of a basket of currencies. Members noted that the exchange rate had thus far offered less assistance than would normally be expected in achieving balanced growth in the economy and that further depreciation seemed both likely and necessary.

In light of current and prospective economic circumstances and financial conditions, the Board judged that leaving the cash rate unchanged was appropriate. Information to be received over the period ahead on economic and financial conditions would continue to inform the Board’s assessment of the outlook and hence whether the current stance of policy remained appropriate to foster sustainable growth and inflation consistent with the target.

RBA leaves the cash rate unchanged at 2.0 per cent

At its meeting today, the Board decided to leave the cash rate unchanged at 2.0 per cent.

The global economy is expanding at a moderate pace, but some key commodity prices are much lower than a year ago. This trend appears largely to reflect increased supply, including from Australia. Australia’s terms of trade are falling nonetheless.

The Federal Reserve is expected to start increasing its policy rate later this year, but some other major central banks are continuing to ease policy. Hence, global financial conditions remain very accommodative. Despite fluctuations in markets associated with the respective developments in China and Greece, long-term borrowing rates for most sovereigns and creditworthy private borrowers remain remarkably low.

In Australia, the available information suggests that the economy has continued to grow over the past year, but at a rate somewhat below its longer-term average. The rate of unemployment, though elevated, has been little changed recently. Overall, the economy is likely to be operating with a degree of spare capacity for some time yet. With very slow growth in labour costs, inflation is forecast to remain consistent with the target over the next one to two years, even with a lower exchange rate.

In such circumstances, monetary policy needs to be accommodative. Low interest rates are acting to support borrowing and spending. Credit is recording moderate growth overall, with stronger borrowing by businesses and growth in lending to the housing market broadly steady over recent months. Dwelling prices continue to rise strongly in Sydney, though trends have been more varied in a number of other cities. The Bank is working with other regulators to assess and contain risks that may arise from the housing market. In other asset markets, prices for equities and commercial property have been supported by lower long-term interest rates.

The Australian dollar has declined noticeably against a rising US dollar over the past year, though less so against a basket of currencies. Further depreciation seems both likely and necessary, particularly given the significant declines in key commodity prices.

The Board today judged that leaving the cash rate unchanged was appropriate at this meeting. Information on economic and financial conditions to be received over the period ahead will inform the Board’s assessment of the outlook and hence whether the current stance of policy will most effectively foster sustainable growth and inflation consistent with the target.

Home Lending Rose to $1.47 Trillion in May

The RBA lending aggregates for May 2015 tell the ongoing story of housing lending dominated by investment loans, and housing becoming an ever larger proportion of total bank debt. Total bank lending stock grew to $2.4 trillion in May, with $1.47 trillion in housing, growing at 0.42% in the month, business lending up 0.35% to $792 million and personal lending (excluding housing) down a little to $141 million. Overall housing lending was 61.1% of all bank lending (excluding government loans) – an all time high.

Lending-May-2015-RBALooking more closely at housing, the $1.47 trillion was split into owner occupied lending of $958 million, up 0.42% in the month, and investment lending of $508m, up 0.81%, showing again the disproportionate focus on investment property.

Housing-Lending-May-2015-RBAWe can but reiterate our two key points. First, housing lending is squeezing out productive lending to business, and in so doing continues to inflate banks balance sheets, and house prices, neither productive economically speaking; whilst business finds it hard to get the support it needs to create productive growth. In the context of a mining slow down, this is a serious problem, which will not be addressed by $20k capital write-offs. Capital rules favour home lending too much.

Second, the distortions created by ever larger bands of property investors, makes it harder for younger families to buy a home – indeed many are going direct to the investment sector in a bid to get a look in. However, those who analyse relative risks in an investment portfolio versus an owner occupied portfolio indicate there are higher risks in the investment pools, especially in a down turn. These risks are not recognised by the current Basel rules, and such risks are not currently priced into investment loans.

The data so far does not demonstrate any impact from the “tighter” APRA rules for investment lending, maybe next month? Even if one or two banks slow their investment lending growth rates and tighten their underwriting criteria, others will happily step in.

Households Necks In The Debt Noose

The ABS data released yesterday, highlights that overall household debt is sky high, much of it linked to mortgage borrowing. Whilst household net worth is over $8 trillion, its mainly thanks to house price inflation (and stock market holdings inflated by ultra low interest rates and QE). The RBA data tells the story. Using their data, (E2 HOUSEHOLD FINANCES – SELECTED RATIOS) we see that the ratio of housing debt to income is rising, in fact both the ratio covering owner occupied housing, and that covering both owner occupied housing and investment housing has risen significantly.

Household-Debt-Ratio-1Of course, interest rates are low, so the ratio of interest payments to income are lower than when interest rates were at their peak in 2008. So the common assumption is that whilst debt is high, households can service it, and those with higher incomes have the greatest debt exposure.

Household-Debt-Ratio-2 In addition, banks are now “required” by APRA to use an interest rate of 7% when considering a loan application, higher than the common practice of a number of banks. APRA highlighted recently the range of rates banks were using for serviceability testing.

Chart 4: Existing mortgage debt shows interest rate used in investor serviceability assessment between 4%-9%

Some banks were underwriting loans with a very small serviceability buffer, so will have loans on book at greater risk, but at the moment serviceability is not required to be marked to market on an ongoing basis (though that may change under Basel IV).

This takes us to mortgage stress. Now, DFA has been tracking mortgage stress for year. Low interest rates have got many out of difficulty.

Mortgage stress is a poorly defined term. The RBA tends to equate stress with defaults (which remain at low levels on an international basis). A wider definition is 30% of income going on mortgage repayments (not consistently pre-or post tax). This stems from the guidelines of affordability some banks used in 1980’s and 1990’s, when economic conditions were different from today. This is a blunt instrument. DFA does not think there is a good indicator of mortgage stress, so we use a series of questions to diagnose mortgage stress focusing on owner occupied households. Through these questions we identify two levels of stress – Mild and Severe.

  • Mild = households maintaining repayments, but by reprioritising expenditure, borrowing more on loans or cards, and refinancing
  • Severe = households who are behind with their repayments, or are trying to sell, or are trying to refinance, or who are being foreclosed

In our latest data on stress we have noted some concerning trends. Despite the ultra-low interest rates, the proportion of households in some degree of mortgage stress is rising. This is because incomes are static, household expenses are rising and the average mortgage is larger, especially in some centres like Sydney. So if we look at segmented data we see that for some borrowing households, as many as 10% are registering in the severe category, and many more in the mild category. Many are just, and only just keeping their heads above water. Larger loans means they are more leveraged.

Stress-June-2015If we look at the severe stress by segment, by when the loan was last drawn down, we see significant peaks in more recent years (when loans were larger) than older loans. Typically in in years 2 and 3 of a loans life that stress is highest.

Loan-Age-and-StressNow consider this. Assuming an average $350,000 mortgage over 30 years, if rates were to rise 1%, the average monthly costs for a p&i loan would rise by $220 and for an interest only loan $291. Such a rise would likely lift the proportion of households with mortgage stress from 35% of all borrowing households to close to 50% in our modelling.  Interest only loans are more sensitive to rises.

We conclude that many households are a hair’s breadth away from difficulty. Another way of asking a similar question is how much free cash is available at the end of the month. For many households with large mortgages and average incomes, the short answer is nothing. No flex. No safety net.  Whilst in the early 2000’s incomes were rising fast there is not easy exit this time. Many households are in the debt noose. Let’s hope no-one pulls the rope.

Repayment-Table

When monetary policy reaches its limits, what of fiscal policy?

From The Conversation. In a recent address to the Economic Society of Australia, the Reserve Bank Governor Glenn Stevens hit the nail on the head when he remarked that “monetary policy alone can’t deliver everything we need and expecting too much from it can lead, in time, to much bigger problems”.

What was particularly important in this address was the (implicit) suggestion that the answer goes hand in hand with another question; what should we expect from fiscal policy?

Though at first sight it might appear to be a rather tenuous link, a decent review of the taxation system and more generally of the revenue side of the fiscal equation, may be a big help in taking some of the burden off monetary policy from its current constraints.

Stevens is not alone in suggesting that too much might be being expected of central bankers in promoting growth and reducing unemployment. Similar sentiments have come from former Federal Reserve Chairman, Ben Bernanke.

It is useful to distinguish two aspects to the question of whether we expect too much of monetary policy. The first is whether we can expect it to work when the economy is on the downswing in the same degree as when it is on the upswing. In particular, can we expect an easing of monetary policy to stimulate growth as effectively as a tightening of monetary policy can choke it off.

Central banks for the most part have a brief of keeping inflation within a certain range and, with that done, to assist in keeping the economy’s growth rate near to trend; in the best of worlds, consistent with full employment.

Expectations about what more accommodating monetary policy can do for a sluggish economy have at times had to take a reality check here and in other parts of the world. Bringing interest rates down and making the assets side of bank balance sheets more liquid via “quantitative easing” can stimulate the real economy only to the extent that the binding constraint on spending by consumers and business is a financial one.

But in an environment where producers expect sluggish or even falling domestic or export demand, one would also expect to see sluggish investment demand, regardless of interest rates or the willingness of banks to lend. In other words, slow growth in demand may well mean expected rates of return from investment in new plant are revised down as much as interest rates.

As Stevens noted in his address, lower interest rates may not help consumption expenditure much either in present circumstances, since household sector’s debt burden means that it “has the least scope [compared with government and corporations] to expand their balance sheets to drive spending”.

And, as plenty of commentators have noted, injections of liquidity and easing credit conditions may be channelled into financial assets which don’t have significant stimulatory effects on the real side of the economy, which is where we need it for growth and reduced unemployment.

Some have even argued that a lengthy period of easy monetary policy has adverse distributional effects benefiting owners of stock and property. However the precise distributional effects of seem rather complex and less than clear cut, and will depend in part on whether or not accommodatory monetary policy stimulates the economy and hence employment growth.

The second and perhaps broader aspect related to expectations about what monetary policy can and should do is that it is often asked to effectively make use of a limited toolbox to deal with conflicting objectives. One could be forgiven for thinking that in this country we have only one macro policy instrument – interest rates – to both control inflation and manipulate growth in economic activity.

The obvious elephant in the room here is fiscal policy.

In his address Stevens actually raises an old and interesting idea about fiscal policy: that it can have a stimulatory role perfectly consistent with “sound financing” (to borrow a perverted phrase with which Keynes’ was forced to do battle); where stimulatory expenditure and any increased debt are on the capital or investment side of the budget.

Such fiscal stimulus may even have what some economists refer to as a “crowding-in” effect: a positive impact on expectations about growth, as Stevens notes. This idea also provides a bulwark against the nonsense about fiscal contraction or consolidation (as it’s euphemistically called) being necessary to stimulate the economy.

The caution here from the Governor is also sound it seems; that capital expenditure is not overnight, so the confidence boost is probably more important for the short-term than the actual direct impact on government expenditure.

In any case, if fiscal policy in general and government expenditure in particular is to come back into its own as a macro policy instrument, reform of the revenue base and thus the tax system is paramount.

But note here, a significant driver of tax reform should be the sustainable funding of an expenditure side which fulfils its macro economic role as a generator of demand growth and its social role in generating infrastructure.

Tax reform should not be seen exclusively as code for a lower taxes, this being an end, the means to which to point of is government withdrawing from its expenditure responsibilities. Unfortunately, this latter view seems to dominate much discussion in this country.

From a macro policy standpoint, looking at tax or more appropriately at the revenue side of the fiscal equation may well have a positive spin-off for monetary policy, leaving it to focus, if that is the continued wish of the political masters, on inflation.

And if one is worried about complex adverse distributional effects of monetary policy, expenditure on infrastructure, done properly, would surely help redress inequality by lifting the social wage.

Author: Graham White, Associate Professor, School of Economics at University of Sydney

Low Interest Rates Not Connected With Business Investment Decisions

The RBA today published a paper on business investment decisions and their relationship to interest rate settings. They are clearly trying to understand why, when interest rates are in absolute terms low, business investment is still flat. Indeed in real terms, non-mining business investment in Australia has been little changed for several years.

“Firms typically evaluate investment opportunities by calculating expected rates of return and the payback period (the time taken to recoup the capital outlay). Liaison and survey evidence indicate that Australian firms tend to require expected returns on capital expenditure to exceed high ‘hurdle rates’ of return that are often well above the cost of capital and do not change very often. In addition, many firms require the investment outlay to be recouped within a few years, requiring even greater implied rates of return. As a consequence, the capital expenditure decisions of many Australian firms are not directly sensitive to changes in interest rates. Furthermore, although both the hurdle rate of return and the payback period offer an objective decision rule on which to base expenditure decisions, the overall decision process is often highly subjective, so that ‘animal spirits’ can play a significant role.”

“Analysis of the investment decision process helps to explain the subdued growth of non-mining business investment. First, there is some evidence of a tightening in investment criteria since the global financial crisis. For example, some firms have reduced their maximum payback period, suggesting implied discount rates for investment decisions may have increased even as long-term interest rates declined.

Second, identifying investment opportunities with returns exceeding the typical hurdle rate of around 15 per cent may be difficult for many firms given their expectations for the growth of their sales.

It is clear from discussions with liaison contacts that the overall decision process is highly subjective, which in turn allows ‘animal spirits’ to play a role. As noted, firms frequently reject investment decisions that satisfy self-imposed quantitative criteria on other grounds, such as concerns about the economic outlook, the availability of capital within the company, or shareholders’ preferences. Some managers have noted that they have taken a more cautious approach to capital expenditure since the financial crisis, either because there is more uncertainty about the future or they are more averse to taking risks. As a consequence, firms with a range of opportunities may only be willing to pursue the most profitable projects in the current economic environment.

Although changes in interest rates may not have a direct effect on investment decisions for many firms, interest rates will still have a powerful indirect influence on firms’ investment decisions. For example, a reduction in interest rates may improve firms’ cash flows through reductions in interest payments, freeing up cash for other purposes. More broadly, interest rates affect economic activity via a number of channels, including the saving and spending behaviour of households, the supply of credit, asset prices and the exchange rate, all of which affect the level of aggregate demand.

“Detailed discussions with managers and survey evidence indicate that the lack of direct interest rate sensitivity partly arises because Australian firms typically use effective discount rates that are high and sticky to evaluate capital expenditure opportunities. This reflects the use of hurdle rates that are considerably higher than the weighted average cost of capital and are adjusted infrequently, or a requirement that any outlay must be expected to be recouped within a few years”.

We think it may have something to do with the hurdle rate to assess projects, but it has more to do with levels of confidence. Many firms are still in hunker down and survive mode, not one which is conducive to encourage investment for future growth. Lack of demand of course becomes self-fulfilling.

Structural Features of Australian Residential Mortgage-backed Securities

The RBA has published a paper on Structural Features of Australian Residential Mortgage-backed Securities. It provides a useful overview of the securitisation market in Australia, which is one important element in product funding. We have summarised some of the key points.

A residential mortgage-backed security (RMBS) is a collection of interrelated bonds that are secured by a dedicated pool of residential mortgages (the ‘mortgage collateral pool’). The payments of principal and interest on these bonds are funded from the payments of principal and interest made on the underlying mortgage collateral by the mortgagors. Historically, RMBS have provided an alternative to bank deposits as a source of funding for residential mortgages. This has been particularly important for smaller authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs) and non-ADIs that have limited access to deposit funding or term funding markets.

Securitisation-SchematicBy allowing smaller institutions to raise funding in the capital markets, RMBS promote competition between lenders in the residential mortgage market. After increasing steadily in the early 2000s, issuance of Australian RMBS to third-party investors fell in the wake of the global financial crisis when these securities were adversely affected by a loss of confidence in the asset class globally despite the low level of mortgage defaults in Australia. The market has recovered somewhat over the past couple of years.

RMBS-June-2015RMBS have been an eligible form of collateral in repurchase agreements (repos) with the RBA since 2007. During the height of the global financial crisis, RMBS formed a significant part of the RBA’s repo collateral and hence played an important role in the RBA’s response to the crisis. Currently, RMBS form the largest class of securities held under the RBA’s repos, although unlike the earlier episode, this has been in response to innovations in the payments system. From 1 January 2015, the RBA has provided a Committed Liquidity Facility (CLF) to eligible ADIs as part of Australia’s implementation of the Basel III liquidity standards. In total, the CLF provides ADIs with a contractual commitment to $275 billion of funding under repos with the RBA, subject to certain conditions. Given that RMBS are eligible collateral that could be provided to the RBA were the CLF to be utilised, they represent a substantial contingent exposure for the RBA and, hence, understanding RMBS is particularly important in terms of managing the RBA’s balance sheet.

While discussions of RMBS often focus on the mortgage collateral pool, as all payments to investors are made from the cash flows generated from this pool, the structural features of RMBS play an equally  important part in determining the risks facing the holders of these securities. The ‘structure’ of an RMBS refers to the number and size of the interrelated bonds of the RMBS, the rules that determine how payments are made on these bonds and various facilities that support these payments.

This article provides a summary of the structural features typically found in Australian RMBS and how these have evolved over the past decade.

One element of note is tranching.

Securitisation-Tranching-June-2015In summary, tranching enhances one part of the RMBS liability structure at the expense of another, by reducing credit and prepayment risk on the senior notes, while increasing these risks for the junior notes. Since 2005, there has been an increase in the degree of tranching in Australian RMBS. The average number of notes in an RMBS has increased from three in 2005 to four in 2015, with most of the increase occurring after 2008. The increase has been concentrated in the junior notes (which are typically rated below AAA), with the average number of such notes increasing by 1.5 per RMBS. The increase has been more pronounced in RMBS issued by non-ADIs.

The higher number of tranches for RMBS issued by non-ADIs reflects the need for non-ADI sponsors to fund their mortgage lending fully through RMBS issuance. This has led RMBS issued by non-ADIs to be structured with a larger number of tranches with different characteristics that appeal to a broad range of investor risk appetites.

The structures of Australian RMBS have evolved over time. Australian RMBS have generally become more structured over the past 10 years, especially since the global financial crisis: the tranching of both credit and prepayment risk has increased; the use of principal allocation mechanisms that vary over the life of the RMBS has become more widespread; bullet notes have been added; and various external and internal support facilities have continued to be used.

The increased structuring, which has developed to address changing market conditions, does not necessarily create more risk for investors, especially if they are provided with transparent and complete information about RMBS structures. Indeed, there has been a significant increase in the size of the credit enhancement provided to the most senior notes through the subordination of junior notes, with the increase in excess of the requirements of the credit rating agencies. The reliance on external credit support from LMI has also declined.

Understanding RMBS structures is essential to the effective risk management and valuation of RMBS because the RMBS structure determines how the risks generated from the securitised mortgages are borne by each particular RMBS note. Given the importance of RMBS as collateral in the RBA’s repurchase agreements, the RBA has a keen interest in understanding RMBS structures.

The RBA’s reporting requirements for repo-eligible asset-backed securities, which come in effect from 30 June 2015, will provide standardised and detailed information, not only on the mortgages backing RMBS, but also on the RMBS structures, including their cash flow waterfalls.

 

Wage Growth Decline

The RBA published a paper on The Decline in Wage Growth. In real terms wages are static or falling for many, and we note from our own surveys that as a result, households are under increasing stress, because costs of living continue to rise. In fact the recent cuts in the mortgage rate as the cash rate has fallen, as effectively got people off the hook. This would reverse quickly if rates started to rise, because the average mortgage is bigger now, and held for longer. But whats behind the decline? We summarise the discussions.

 

The rate of wage growth has important implications for the macroeconomy. Wages are the largest source of household income and the largest component of business costs, and so have significant implications for consumer price inflation. Wage growth has declined markedly in recent years to the lowest pace since at least the late 1990s, according to the wage price index.

Wage-Price-Trend-2015Wage measures with a longer history suggest that this has been the longest period of low wage growth since the early 1990s recession. Across these measures, the rate of annual wage growth has declined to around the pace of inflation, about 2–3 per cent. The slowing in wage growth has occurred alongside faster growth in labour productivity. This has also helped to moderate growth in labour costs for firms, beyond the impact of lower wage growth. Accordingly, growth in the labour cost of producing a unit of output (unit labour costs, or ULCs) has also declined markedly since 2012. Indeed, the level of ULCs has been little changed for more than three years – the longest such period since the early 1990s.

Even accounting for temporarily lower inflation expectations, real wage growth from the perspective of consumers has declined markedly, to around zero.

Real-Wage-Growth-2015The recent low wage growth has not been unique to Australia. Internationally, wage growth has been lower than forecast for several developed economies in recent years, including some where labour markets have tightened considerably. Various factors have been proposed to explain this weakness, including secular trends that have been in place for some time and have also resulted in a general decline in the labour share of income. However, the decline in wage growth in Australia stands out, with the extent of the forecast surprise for Australia particularly large in the context of OECD countries in recent years

Wage-Growth-OECD-2015Several factors appear to explain much of the decline in Australian wage growth. There has been an increase in spare capacity in the labour market, and expectations of future consumer price inflation have declined to be a bit below average. Inflation in output prices in recent years has been particularly subdued, in large part owing to the lower terms of trade. More generally, the decline in the terms of trade and fall in mining investment in recent years mean that the economy requires a lower ‘real’ exchange rate, which has been in part delivered by low wage growth. A statistical model indicates that these factors do not fully explain the extent of decline in wage growth, suggesting that other factors, such as an increase in the flexibility of wages to market conditions, may also have contributed.

 

A range of related factors appear to explain much of the decline in wage growth in Australia in recent years. Below-average growth in economic activity has translated into subdued growth in labour demand, which has resulted in an increase in spare capacity in the labour market. At the same time, expectations for consumer price inflation have moderated to be below average. The decline in the terms of trade and falls in mining investment appear to have played a particularly important role, weighing on economic activity and placing pressure on firms to contain costs. This has partly unwound the relatively strong inflation in Australian unit labour costs over the period of the mining boom, which was part of the economy’s adjustment to the domestic income boost from the higher terms of trade. Altogether, the result has been an adjustment in Australia’s relative labour costs, improving cost competitiveness against other advanced economies. In effect, this has assisted in bringing about some adjustment of the real exchange rate. Statistical estimates suggest that these factors explain much, but not all, of the episode, meaning there may also have been some other forces at play including an improvement in the flexibility of wages.

While a large wage adjustment has taken place, wage growth is widely expected to remain low. Evidence from the Bank’s liaison with businesses, alongside surveys of firms and union officials, suggest that the general pace of wage growth is not expected to pick up over the year ahead. One further factor that may continue to weigh on wage growth is a ‘pent-up’ adjustment. Reports through the Bank’s business liaison in recent years have indicated that many firms and employees have been reluctant to bargain for wage growth below expected inflation of 2–3 per cent. Accordingly, wage outcomes of 2–3 per cent have been relatively common over the past couple of years among liaison contacts. Outcomes lower than this, which would imply a fall in real consumer wages, are generally seen to have a negative effect on worker morale and productivity, as well as on the retention of quality staff. So while the decline in wage growth has been large, it might have been larger still if not for this element of rigidity in real wage growth. Accordingly, a degree of ‘pent-up’ downward pressure on wage growth might remain for a time, even if labour market conditions more generally were to improve.

Bank Fees $12 Billion in 2014

The RBA just published the results of its annual bank fee survey, based on data from 16 institutions covering 90% of the Australian banking sector. Last year, overall fees rose 2.8% to $12 billion compared with 2.6% the previous year. The rise is a combination of rises in unit prices, and volumes. Households fees rose 1.5% to $4,141 million, and business grew 3.5% to $7,791 million. The data does not include wealth management, broker, loan mortgage insurance, or other fees across financial services and the non-bank sector.

Looking in more detail at households, higher fee income reflected growth in credit card and personal lending fees, whereas fee income from housing lending and deposit accounts declined.

Household-Fees-2014Fee income from credit cards, which represents the largest component of fee income from households, increased by 5.9 per cent. You can read our previous analysis of the credit card business here.

Total deposit fee income decreased slightly in 2014, following a modest increase in 2013. The decrease in fees from household deposits was broad based across most types of fees on deposit accounts. In particular, account-servicing and transaction fee income, as well as some fee income on other non-transaction accounts (e.g. break fees on term deposit accounts) declined notably. This decrease was the result of fewer customers incurring these fees rather than a decrease in the level of fees, as well as customers shifting to lower fee products. However, this was partially offset by an increase in income from more frequent occurrences of exception fees (such as overdrawn fees and dishonour fees) and foreign exchange conversion fees being charged on deposit accounts involving such transactions.

Total fee income from housing loans decreased in 2014, with all components of housing loan fee income decreasing, including exception fees. This was due to a combination of fewer instances of penalty fees being charged, and lower unit fees as a result of strong competition between banks in the home lending market. Similar to 2013, there was a decrease in fee income from housing lending despite strong growth in such lending. Several banks again reported waiving fees on this type of lending for some customers.

Fees to business rose, across both small and large businesses.

Business-Fees-By-Coy-Size-2014Growth was driven by increases in merchant service fee income and, to a lesser extent, fee income from loans. Business fee income from deposit accounts and bank bills declined over 2014.

The increase in merchant service fees was mainly attributable to an increase in utilisation of business credit cards and a slight increase in some merchant unit fees. Merchant fee growth was approximately evenly spread across both small and large businesses. The increase in loan fee income was mainly from an increase in account-servicing and exception fees from small businesses, which was a result of higher lending volumes (including through the introduction of some new lending products). Fee income from loans to large businesses increased slightly due to a higher volume of prepayment fees (though this was mostly offset by declines in other fee income from large businesses).

The increase in exception fee income from business loans was also mainly from small businesses, mostly in the form of honour fees (fees charged in association with banks honouring a payment despite insufficient funds in the holder’s account).

Fee income from business deposits continued to decline in 2014, with most of the decrease resulting from lower account-servicing and transaction fees, particularly for small businesses (small businesses account for the majority of business deposit fee income). The decrease was the result of a combination of lower volume growth and customers shifting to lower fee products.

Business-Fees-By-Type-2014  We observe that the “fee wars” appears to be over now (triggered by NAB a few years ago), and we expect to see subtle rises in fees as bank margins come under increasing pressure. Also, small business bears the brunt of the charges across a number of categories, and we expect this to continue, because the sector is under less pressure from a bank competitive standpoint, and many SME’s have no where else to go.