Free Windows 10 Will Not Salvage Shrinking PC Sales – Fitch

Microsoft Corporation’s new Windows 10 operating system released on 29 July will not reverse declining PC sales, says Fitch Ratings.

Fitch believes that PC demand will remain structurally weak, exacerbated by users’ adoption of touch screen-enabled larger smartphones and tablets. Demand could fall further as vendors look to raise prices in Europe and Japan to offset the effects of a rising US dollar.

Microsoft’s decision to offer Windows 10 as a free upgrade is likely to shrink PC shipments further, unlike in the past – when a new Windows operating system incentivised consumers to buy new PCs. The free upgrade is likely to extend the PC replacement cycle, given that Windows 7 is compatible with Windows 10. However, Windows 10 should benefit sales in the hybrid laptop market which is still a niche area, with its new gesture- and voice-control features. Annual PC sales have been declining since 2012; and shipments will drop by the mid- to high-single digits to 300 million units in 2015, according to market forecasters.

Notably, too, we expect that Asian sales growth will no longer be strong enough to offset declining sales in the US and Europe. Tablets and smartphones present stronger competition for PCs in developing markets, as a smaller proportion of emerging-market consumers own more than one computing device. Steep declines in global PC shipments in 2015 are also due to a rising US dollar and temporary demand growth stimulated by Microsoft’s 2014 decision to end support for Windows XP.

The profitability of most PC vendors is likely to be hurt by shrinking sales; a market which is consolidating but still competitive; rising inventory levels; and unfavourable currency effects. Average operating margins for the top three PC vendors have halved to about 3%-5.5% since 2011-2012. Of the three, Lenovo has the best operating margin at 5.5%, and derives a large part of its profitability from the Chinese business PC market. The PC operating margin of the second-largest manufacturer, Hewlett Packard  has narrowed to 3% (2011: 5.5%). This should expand, however, from expectations of higher-profit-margin product sales, market share gains and cost restructuring. Dell has stopped disclosing PC profitability following its leveraged buy-out in 2013.

We believe that PC market share will gradually consolidate among the top-three vendors, and could drive a modest expansion in profit margins. Market leaders are focusing on profitable growth and a richer sales mix of hybrids, thin and mobile products, the commercial market and services.

The big three firms have gradually gained market share, and now control about 51% versus 45% in 1Q14. Lenovo’s “protect and attack” strategy – whereby it focuses on protecting its Chinese market share while boosting its share in US and European markets – is bearing fruit. The company has increased its PC market share by 200bp to 19.5%, and has been the PC market leader for eight quarters.

NAB announces $50 million innovation fund

National Australia Bank (NAB) has announced that it will establish a $50 million fund to further accelerate the bank’s focus on customer-led innovation.

The NAB Ventures fund will enable NAB to access leading ideas and capabilities from around the world through entering into partnerships, alliances and making investments in innovative companies.

“This is an investment in our business designed to improve customer experience through innovative solutions, making banking easier, better and simpler,” NAB CEO Andrew Thorburn said.

“Banking globally is undergoing a digital transformation and NAB Ventures will ensure NAB is able to embrace these changes to deliver innovative solutions for our customers.”

It is envisaged the $50 million will be deployed over 3 years and will be invested both in Australia and overseas.

NAB Ventures will be part of NAB Labs, a dedicated innovation capability designed to build a culture of innovation and customer-led design within NAB, and position the bank to be agile and adaptive to rapidly changing digital advancements.

The fund will have two key objectives:

  • Deliver accelerated access to new capability, technology, intellectual property, and businesses that could be deployed into NAB and its customer offering; and
  • Enhance NAB’s insight into and connection with emerging business models and technology. Key areas of focus include mobile platforms, payments and data and analytics.

NAB has also introduced a Digital Acceleration Program to enable digital innovation to be developed and put in the hands of customers and bankers quickly.

“It’s critical that we are able to act quickly and be nimble in bringing digital innovation to market,” Mr Thorburn said.

NAB Labs has a dedicated team but also draws on people from across the bank and external partners – as well as extensive customer engagement – to design, experiment and develop new products and capability.

Mr Thorburn added: “We want our team to be among the best global thinkers in the innovation space and give our customers access to the best innovative thought – and we recognise that won’t all necessarily come from inside NAB.

“NAB Ventures will further enable us to access the best minds and cutting edge ideas.”

Is Amazon the New King of Retail?

From Brandchannel.

When Jeff Bezos founded Amazon as an online purveyor of books and then expanded the online giant into more and more verticals, he continually explained to investors that he wanted to forego short-term profits in favor of long-term diversification and domination of the businesses that Amazon entered. Has Amazon accomplished that? Check.

And obviously it’s not finished yet, as recent predictions indicate that Amazon will surpass Macy’s as America’s biggest apparel retailer in the next couple of years. And according to reports from Silicon Valley, it’s exploring more offline options for pickup and brick-and-mortar stores in the US, building on tests now underway in Europe and Canada.

When Amazon reported a quarterly breakthrough into the black on July 23rd, investors furiously bid up the stock. And in the process, Amazon crossed another historic threshold: It became worth more to investors than Walmart, the king of “old-fashioned” retailing.

Wall Street cognoscenti had predicted another loss and a more modest sales gain than the nearly 20 percent increase Amazon reported, which certainly helped its appeal. The 14 percent jump in its stock price on Thursday added more than $30 billion to Amazon’s market value and pushed its capitalization snapshot for the first time past Walmart’s, which ended the day at $230 billion versus Amazon’s $250 billion.

“The retail king has lost its crown,” declared Quartz. “The changing of the guard reflects the growing consensus that online retailing will play an increasingly central role in the global economy over the coming decades and underscores the high premium investors are placing on the growth they expect Amazon to deliver.”

That’s not the whole story, of course. Walmart is hardly giving up. Under new CEO Doug McMillon, it is fighting back furiously to become a true rival force to Amazon in e-commerce—witness Walmart’s attempts to echo the Amazon Prime Day promotion on July 15. And Walmart has recovered some of its mojo in the crucial bricks-and-mortar space, stemming sales declines and boosting wages for its lowest-paid workers.

Amazon is at a new sort of pinnacle vis-a-vis Walmart right now. But it promises to be a continuing game of king of the hill.

Digital Now The Default – ASIC

ASIC has released new guidance and waivers to further facilitate businesses providing disclosures through digital channels and to encourage innovative communication of information about financial products and services. It is essentially a ‘digital first’ option, meaning that consumers can expect electronic delivery as the default option. It recognises the significant online migration underway, and will be welcomed by many. Two points, this is a departure from “omnichannel” strategies, and it may not provide suffice protection for those who choose not to, or cannot use digital channels. The digital divide does still exist, and disadvantaged households will be least well served.

ASIC Commissioner John Price said, ‘The measures announced today respond to changing consumer preferences, with ever increasing numbers of people transacting digitally. Almost 15 million Australians now have a home internet connection and 68% of those online are using three or more devices to access the internet.

‘The changes mean product disclosure statements (PDS) and other financial services disclosure documents will be delivered to consumers digitally as the default option, unless the consumer opts out. This will reduce the costs of printing and mailing for businesses while preserving choice for those consumers who wish to receive paper.’

‘ASIC wants industry to harness the opportunities of digitisation and is encouraging the use of more engaging forms of communication using digital media – interactive, video and audio. This can boost consumer understanding of financial services and products,’ Mr Price said.

ASIC has given relief to enable providers to make many disclosures available digitally, and notify the client the disclosure is available, without the need for client agreement to receive the disclosures in that manner (‘publish and notify’ method). This relief allows for disclosure by, for example, sending clients:
(a) an email, SMS, app notification, social media notification or other digital message with a hyperlink or similar connection, or instruction to access the disclosure; or
(b) a notification that the disclosure is available digitally

The publish and notify method of delivery is available for the following disclosures:
(a) FSGs and SOAs;
(b) PDSs;
(c) ongoing disclosure of material changes and significant events;
(d) periodic statements; and
(e) information statements for CGS depository interests.

Rather than seeking agreement to deliver in this way, the provider must merely notify the client that they intend to make disclosures available digitally, and will notify the client when those disclosures are available. The client must then be given at least seven days to opt out of this publish and notify method, should they choose to do so

They say:

  1. An advantage of digital disclosure for clients is that it can incorporate more engaging forms of media and can be interactive. This can make the information more attractive and easier to understand for clients. It can also be more timely, convenient and reliable.
  2. Digital disclosure also has advantages for providers in reducing the costs of printing and mailing.
  3. ASIC has taken a technologically neutral approach to disclosures and do not mandate the delivery of disclosures digitally. It is for providers to determine the method of delivering disclosures that best suits their clients or their products and that will not expose those clients to undue risk of scams and fraud. For example, a margin-lending product might work particularly well online because clients are likely to be monitoring their investments online.
  4. While the Corporations Act expressly permits the electronic delivery of financial services disclosures, we understand that some providers have been discouraged from doing so because of uncertainty about what specific practices the law allows.
  5. Consumer protection under digital delivery still exists

ASIC-Digital-Disclosure

Further evidence of the digital revolution. As we said recently:

“DFA has just updated the 26,000 strong household survey examining their channel preferences. Our report summarises the main findings.

We conclude that the move towards digital channels continues apace, facilitated by new devices including smartphones and tablets, and the rise of “digital natives” – people who are naturally connected.

We outline the findings across each of our household segments, and also introduce our thought experiment, where we tested household’s attitudes to the various existing and emerging brands in the context of digital banking. We found a strong affinity between digital natives and the emerging electronic brands, and a relative swing away from the traditional terrestrial bank players.

These trends create both threat and opportunity. The threat is that traditional channels, especially the branch, become less relevant to digital natives, and becomes the ghetto of older, less connected, less profitable customers. The future lays in the digital channels, where the more profitable and digitally aware already live. Players need to migrate fast, or they will be overtaken by the next generation of digital brands who are looking towards becoming players in financial services. The game is on!”

Cool factor drives merchant interest in Apple Pay

According to eMarketer, Cool factor—not customers—drives merchant interest in Apple Pay. Merchants are interested in adding Apple Pay to their offerings at the point of sale. But according to Goldman Sachs, that interest is largely based on an elusive factor: “coolness.”

Leading Drivers of Merchant Interest in Apple Pay According to US Merchant Acquirers and ISOs, March 2015 (% of respondents)Novelty and “cool factor” were driving about 43% of merchant interest in Apple Pay, the March 2015 survey of US merchant acquirers and ISOs found. By comparison, one in five said merchants’ customers were actually asking for Apple Pay. In even fewer cases were merchants pressured to keep up with the competition. Still, most respondents said relatively few merchants were interested in offering Apple Pay—over half indicated that under 10% of merchants were interested, while 28.6% put that figure between 10% and 20%.

Goldman also asked merchant acquirers and ISOs about their own plans to enable acceptance of Bitcoin; a majority said they had no such plans.

Research shows that consumers who use Apple Pay tend to like it—but mobile payments are still a decidedly niche activity.

The future of data science looks spectacular

From The Conversation.

It wasn’t that long ago that we lived in an entirely analogue world. From telephones to televisions and books to binders, digital technology was largely relegated to the laboratory.

But during the 1960s, computing had started to make its way into the back offices of larger organisations, performing functions like accounting, payroll and stock management. Yet, the vast majority of systems at that time (such as the healthcare system, electricity grids or transport networks) and the technology we interacted with were still analogue.

Roll forward a generation, and today our world is highly digital. Ones and zeroes pervade our lives. Computing has invaded almost every aspect of human endeavour, from health care and manufacturing, to telecommunications, sport, entertainment and the media.

Take smartphones, which have been around for less than a decade, and consider how many separate analogue things they have replaced: a street directory, cassette player, notebook, address book, newspaper, camera, video camera, postcards, compass, diary, dictaphone, pager, phone and even a spirit level!

Underpinning this, of course, has been the explosion of the internet. In addition to the use of the internet by humans, we are seeing an even more pervasive use for connecting all manner of devices, machines and systems together – the so-called Internet of Things (or the “Industrial Internet” or “Internet-of-Everything”).

Complex systems

We now live in an era where most systems have been instrumented and produce very large volumes of digital data. The analysis of this data can provide insights into these systems in ways that were never possible in an analogue world.

Data science is bringing together fields such as statistics, machine learning, analytics and visualisation to provide a rigorous foundation for this field. And it is doing this in the same way that computer science emerged in the 1950s to underpin computing.

In the past, we have successfully developed complex mathematical models to explain and predict physical phenomena. For example, we can accurately predict the strength of a bridge, or the interaction of chemical molecules.

Then there’s the weather, which is notoriously difficult to forecast. Yet, based on numerical weather prediction models and large volumes of observational data along with powerful computers, we have improved forecast accuracy to the point where a five-day forecast today is as reliable as a two-day forecast was 20 years ago.

But there are many problems where the underlying models are not easy to define. There isn’t a set of mathematical equations that characterise the health care system or patterns of cybercrime.

What we do have, though, is increasing volumes of data collected from myriad sources. The challenge is that this data is often in many forms, from many sources, at different scales and contains errors and uncertainty.

So rather than trying to develop deterministic models, as we did for bridges or chemical interactions, we can develop data-driven models. These models integrate data from all the various sources and can take into account the errors and uncertainty in the data. We can test these models against specific hypothesis and refine them.

It is also critical that we look at these models and the data that underpins them.

360 degree data

At my university, we have built a Data Arena to enable the exploration and visualisation of data. The facility leverages open-source software, high-performance computing and techniques from movie visual effects to map streams of data into a fully immersive 3D stereo video system that projects 24 million pixels onto a four metre high and ten metre diameter cylindrical screen.

Inside the Data Arena.

Standing in the middle of this facility and interacting with data in real-time is a powerful experience. Already we have built pipelines to ingest data from high-resolution optical microscopes and helped our researchers gain insight into how bacteria travel across surfaces.

We read 22 million points of data collected by a CSIRO Zebedee which had scanned the Wombeyan Caves, and ten minutes later we were flying though the cave in 3D and exploring underground.

No matter what sort of data we have been exploring, we have inevitably discovered something interesting.

In a couple of cases, it has been immediately obvious we have errors in the data. In an astronomical dataset, we discovered we had a massive number of duplicate data points. In other situations, we have observed patterns that hadn’t been evident to domain experts who had been analysing the data.

This phenomenon is the classic “unknown unknown” (made famous in 2002 by US Secretary of Defence Donald Rumsfeld) and highlights the power of the human visual system to spot patterns or anomalies.

Today’s world is drenched in data. It is opening up new possibilities and new avenues of research and understanding. But we need tools that can manage such staggering volumes of data if we’re to put it all to good use. Our eyes are one such tool, but even they need help from spaces such as that provided by Data Arena.

Omniwealth pays penalty for potentially misleading advertising

Omniwealth Services Pty Ltd has complied with an ASIC infringement notice, paying a  $10,200 penalty after including potentially misleading claims on its website.

Omniwealth’s website included a page on the advantages of investing in property within a self-managed super fund (SMSF). This page compared the performance of a geared property investment within a self-managed super fund to an ungeared equity investment within a self-managed super fund.

The webpage was also promoted through the social media profile of Omniwealth’s CEO with a statement that investing in property in a self-managed super fund has taxation, leverage and diversification advantages and included a link to the Omniwealth webpage’s related article.

ASIC was concerned that the webpage did not give a balanced message about the returns, benefits and risks of investing in property in a self-managed super fund, and in particular that the uncertainty of forecasts was not made clear.

ASIC Deputy Chair Peter Kell said: ‘Making appropriate investment decisions is one of the most important responsibilities of SMSF trustees. ASIC is determined that SMSF trustees get accurate information and are not misled by advertising, including on websites and through social media.’

As the use of social media for promoting financial products and advice services increases, it is important that financial consumers are not misled or misinformed. ASIC encourages financial services providers using social media to regularly review their content and consider ASIC’s guidance on promoting financial products and advice services in Regulatory Guide 234 Advertising financial products and advice services including credit: Good practice guidance. (RG 234)

Omniwealth has removed the statements from its website and related social media profiles and has fully cooperated in responding to ASIC’s concerns.

Background

The payment of an infringement notice is not an admission of a contravention of the ASIC Act consumer protection provisions. ASIC can issue an infringement notice where it has reasonable grounds to believe a person has contravened certain consumer protection laws.

In 2012, in response to the growth in SMSFs ASIC established an SMSF Taskforce. The advertising to SMSF trustees or potential trustees through social media has been a recent specific focus of the Taskforce.

Publically available information may be read, and acted on, by a wide range of consumers with a variety of personal circumstances. ASIC encourages all SMSF trustees to look at the information available on the MoneySmart website and provided by the Australian Tax Office. Content that recommends a strategy, which requires a particular set of personal circumstances for it to be relevant, may be better suited to a personal advice situation.

The Benefits of Combining Content Marketing and Segmentation

Interesting segment from marketingsherpa on how customer segmentation and targeted content can work.

One of the most talked-about marketing trends at the moment may also be one of the most effective. According to Demand Metric, content marketing generates three times as many leads as traditional outbound marketing while costing 62% less.

At MarketingSherpa Email Summit 2015, Courtney Eckerle, Manager of Editorial Content, MarketingSherpa, sat down with Stephen Bruner, Marketing Manager, Precor, to discuss the value of content marketing and segmentation as well as the benefits of implementing a strategy using both of these marketing methods.

Precor is the second largest fitness equipment manufacturer in the U.S. and third in the world. Its clients are primarily fitness clubs and consumers. The company focuses on helping each of these consumer segments find the best products for their needs.

Watch the video excerpt from the MarketingSherpa Media Center to learn more about the relationship between content marketing and segmentation:

What does digitalisation mean for Germany’s banking sector?

An interesting speech by Dr Andreas Dombret, Member of the Executive Board of the Deutsche Bundesbank, at the Bundesbank symposium on “Banking supervision in dialogue”, Frankfurt am Main, 8 July 2015.   He concludes that everyone involved can benefit from digitalisation, but none more so than private customers in the short term. New technology and stronger competition mean businesses that are even better tailored to their personal needs but the industry needs to work towards ensuring that Germany’s banking sector does not remain a blank spot on the digital world map.

The computer on board America’s first lunar module weighed around 30 kg. It had the processing power of a pocket calculator, which you can now pick up anywhere for a couple of euro – unless of course you just use the calculator app on your mobile phone or tablet.

Around the time of the US moon landing, well over 40 years ago, the computer gradually started to become a part of life, both at work and, later, at home. Then, almost 20 years later, the internet began to take off too. These days, it’s no longer just the manufacturing industry – under the umbrella of Industry 4.0 – but also banks and other financial service providers that are caught up in a new wave of digitalisation.

The question we have to ask ourselves – you, as bankers, and my colleagues and I as Bundesbankers – is what can our sector do to keep this wave of advancement from dragging us down and instead allow it to propel us forward into new territory?

Don’t get me wrong, the majority of banks started to set up sophisticated IT infrastructures for their core banking business decades ago, with online banking now part of the standard package. However, the current wave of digitalisation is not only simplifying and speeding up individual processes, but also changing many of the rules of the game in banking business.

What is the driving force behind this wave of digitalisation? It essentially consists of three elements which I will discuss in my speech today, namely technology, competition and customers.

It goes without saying that the digitalisation of the financial sector has been fuelled, to a large extent, by the development of highly effective, state-of-the-art technologies.

Thanks to broadband networks, smartphones and advances in data processing, the technical boundaries are shifting so quickly that they practically no longer exist. Thoughts are now turning towards how to put that to good use. Economically speaking, there are all sorts of advantages to digitalisation. With intelligent and well applied IT solutions, you can automate processes and reduce variable costs. No time is wasted in processing, combining and analysing information. At the same time, today’s IT landscape is helping us to eliminate complexity. Last but not least, it enables us to tailor services to our customers’ individual needs.

Another element of the driving force is the emergence of new sources of competition. Gone are the days when it was just banks positioned in what surfers call the line-up, waiting to catch the best waves. In recent years, companies leading innovation in financial technology, or FinTech companies, have developed a large number of IT-based business models for payment transactions, credit brokerage and investment advice.

Generally, only a small proportion of these innovative ideas and start-ups ever actually make it off the ground. The creativity and innovation of FinTech companies is nevertheless proof of the development potential to be unlocked in the banking sector.

In addition to technology and competition, we must not forget that customers too are part of the driving force. In the past, people considered banking to be something that could only be done in person. Nowadays, encouraged by how information technology has improved other areas of their lives, bank customers are becoming increasingly open to – and sometimes even request – new technological solutions for doing their banking. As I’ve already said, many people now take online banking for granted, and it is becoming ever more widely accepted, owing to innovative concepts such as online video consultation services, digital credit brokerage and the incorporation of social media into banking.

There is no doubt about it, the digitalisation of the financial sector has clearly taken a huge leap forward and there’s no going back. But what will the sector move on to next? Suggestions extend to “banking without banks”, that is to say, creating an efficient financial sector without banks. Sometimes the media even pitch banks against their “digital” competitors in a battle to survive.

But of course we still need banks – don’t let anyone persuade you otherwise. First, given the variety of accounts they have on offer, they are indispensable, even to innovative financial service providers. Second, they too have a competitive edge when it comes to digitalisation. For example, they are able to cover the entire range of services and lines of business, thereby creating synergies for customers and the institution alike. People also still have immense trust in banks and savings banks when it comes to data security – at least that’s what the surveys say. They also continue to appreciate the personal contact with banks, particularly when dealing with more complex financing issues.

In any case, I think it is very unwise to think about the future in black and white terms. Banks are already working together with start-ups and, in some cases, are developing highly innovative concepts on their own. Moreover, many FinTech companies first need a convincing business model before they can really launch an offensive against banks. Lastly, who knows what the sector’s next move will be. The recent competition posed by streaming services in the music industry shows how the tables can be turned, even years after the start of digitalisation. That’s why, at this juncture, I’m not going to venture a look into the crystal ball, which has become somewhat outdated in the meantime.

Banks and savings banks, however, should be careful not to underestimate developments. Particularly in the field of computer technology, it is sometimes the case that even experts are wrong in their predictions. For example, in 1995 Bill Gates described the internet as just a “passing fad”. And in 1943 the then CEO of IBM made an even more unfortunate prediction, saying that he thought there was a world market for maybe five computers. In business, therefore, the old adage still stands: if you don’t jump on the bandwagon, you’ll soon be left behind.

Virtues in the digital age

It is obviously not the supervisors’ job to offer you advice on the right strategy for dealing with digitalisation. The successful fate of a business model can be put down to entrepreneurial skills. Ultimately, the markets decide. Nevertheless, I would like to pass on two key messages that I consider particularly important given the digitalisation megatrend.

The first relates to what I was just saying: “sitting it out is not an option”. It may seem like a virtue to concentrate on what you’re good at and to sit back quietly waiting to see what changes come. In a period of rapid change, though, this approach would probably lead you to a dead end. If you don’t move forwards, you end up going backwards.

Take a look at the industries where digitalisation has already well and truly made its mark. Whether it’s the photo and film industry, the music industry or the telecommunications sector, digitalisation has not only made these industries introduce a new medium, but it has also forced them to gain new core competencies. Established enterprises that have been successful up until now are not necessarily failing because they are unwilling to innovate, but rather because they are not prepared to undergo a complete strategic realignment.

Kodak is often mentioned as a cautionary example here. As a producer of film for analogue cameras, Kodak found itself in major financial difficulties when digital photography started to take over. In 2012, the company had to file an insolvency petition and only managed to survive thanks to a radical restructuring.

The risk of being caught off guard goes hand in hand with time pressure. During a period of change, fundamentally new standards and new customs are formed. Once the first trails have been established in the field of digitalisation, there seems to be little point worrying about plotting a course.

Take the area of payment transactions as an example. Competitors such as PayPal or recently Apple have implemented payment systems tailored to consumers in the digital environment. Once customers become used to a new way of paying, competitors offering similar products certainly have a difficult job trying to convince them to switch providers. With their collective push for online payment transactions, German credit institutions therefore find themselves in the unaccustomed role of the attacker. This is precisely why it’s so important that members of the German banking community work together to increase their chances.

In summary, I can only recommend that the German banks and savings banks avoid sitting back and waiting for changes to occur, but instead that they actively and intensively tackle the issue of digitalisation and ascertain its implications for their institution. But I get the impression that there is no real tendency in Germany to sit around and wait.

My next message is, in short, “learn the new game rules”. Imagine for a moment that you are a football coach. Your team has all the right tactics in place and is doing well this season. Next season, however, the rules of the game are set to change – perhaps the number of goals on the pitch is going up, or more than two teams are to compete on the pitch at one time, or the surface is changing from grass to something else. How would you prepare your team? One thing is clear: you first need to learn and understand the new rules before you can develop a successful game plan.

Let’s look at three of the new game rules that I believe could have a huge impact in a digitalised financial sector. You could say that they are the basic digital principles you need to understand in order to find the right tactics.

Game rule number one: the individual needs and wishes of customers are taking on a whole new level of significance. Easily accessible, transparent and personalised services are becoming the norm. In social networks, when shopping online or searching for information, consumers are already used to having their own needs catered to. Customers also want their banking to fit in and keep up with their lifestyle in future – this is especially, but not only, true for the younger generation.

Providers aiming for success need to get into the habit of looking at things from the customer’s perspective. Above all, this means being able to cater to different lifestyles and social trends. Companies that manage to build relationships with their customers by providing comfort and accessibility tend to come up trumps. It’s no longer about the average customer, but about each individual. The number of goals on the pitch has, without a doubt, increased.

This brings us to game rule number two. Not only is the number of goals increasing, but there are now more players on the pitch, who, incidentally, do not come with the traditional background and qualifications. Competition is becoming more global and more transparent, the competitors more diverse. Online, the customer’s next provider is probably just a few clicks away – even across national borders.

And a quick look at the banking supervisor’s website won’t even help you to identify all these competitors anymore. In addition to FinTech companies, other industries with a strong IT focus are only one step away from the banking world. We are already seeing established online enterprises starting to link their enormous customer bases and their experience in digital processes and data management with banking services. The lines between industries are blurring. Now more than ever, banks need to be aware of what the competition is doing so that they can review and refine their own strategies.

Game rule number three relates to adaptability. If you go from playing on a hard pitch to artificial turf, your tactics need to remain flexible. The digital world welcomes experimentation, is prone to sudden trends, and is constantly changing. Although the banking industry may not always be subject to all of this constant movement, adaptability is definitely becoming more important and relies on a flexible IT infrastructure, for example, to support it. Business models can also be more open and flexible in structure; just think of the “digital ecosystem” strategies banks are now employing. With these strategies, the bank provides a digital platform, the contents of which customers and other service providers can have a hand in shaping.

If you want to survive in the digital financial sector, you need to embrace and play by its new game rules. It’s not just the strategy itself you need to examine, but also the thought process on which it is based. If you don’t think “digitally”, you’re going to find it difficult to compete for digital customers.

Digitalisation from a banking supervisor’s perspective

Ladies and gentlemen, supervisors are interested in credit institutions that are stable and profitable in the long term. At this point in my speech, you may see digitalisation as nothing but a threat to your usual business. But I would encourage you to see it from a different perspective – one from which digitalisation is not the problem but rather the solution.

What currently concerns us, as supervisors, as much as it does you, as bankers, is the lack of profitability in the German banking system, the main cause of which is the prolonged period of low interest rates. Solving the problem of weak earnings is key to ensuring the stability of the financial system – and as you know, this is especially true for Germany. In this regard, digitalisation may very well be part of the solution.

The careful use of information technology can, for example, open up new business areas and boost profitability in the medium term. From easy-to-use, everyday IT applications to “big data” analyses, a large number of potential sources of income are being explored at the moment. And practical add-on services ensure that customers remain loyal to their bank even if competition becomes fiercer. Stability does not mean standing still, which is why it is probably in the interest of the supervisors if banks adapt to new demands in order to retain or even increase their profitability.

But digitalisation also has an impact on the cost side. For instance, the branch network in Germany is still relatively close-knit and therefore expensive. Digitalisation may help banks to continue to reach a large number of customers, even with a less dense network of branches. I look forward to hearing what Mr Buschbeck and his panel have to say on this matter later.

Digitalisation may ultimately also benefit risk management. Making prompt, well-informed decisions is more challenging than ever. Just think of the increasingly complex connections between markets, countries and products, and the growing dynamism of the markets. Efficient IT architecture – by which I mean systems that are consistent, flexible and accurate – can give institutions a quick overview of their activities and risks. Well-informed decision-makers increase their own chances of success and also protect the financial system as a whole from speculation and knee-jerk reactions.

However, supervisors must also be aware of potential risks to the stability of the financial system. The new playing field and the new players are highly likely to entail new risks. As regulators, we are already committed to protecting critical infrastructures, together with other authorities and the relevant providers. And you may be sure that we will also keep an eye on the new, largely unregulated competitors such as FinTech companies, for example.

Nonetheless, digitalisation also creates new risks for individual banks. The most innovative digital solutions are of little use if they simultaneously open the gates to huge risk. Cyber risk has increased considerably over the last few years. This is because the amount of goods that need protecting has grown: as well as financial assets, personal data and hence access to services are now saved in “cyberspace”.

These days, targeted attacks on IT systems can originate from anywhere in the world. Hackers often need little more than a laptop with internet access. A large number of reasons can motivate cyber attacks, which range from simple attacks by amateurs to meticulously planned attacks with an economic or political background. At the same time, new hacking methods spread through the net at lightning speed and are constantly evolving.

Of course, this is an issue that banking supervisors are also dealing with. IT security is therefore one of the focal points for European banking supervisors in 2015. As always, the Bundesbank and the ECB are working together closely and successfully in this area. At the same time, experts from the Bundesbank recently visited the United States of America to exchange ideas and experiences with banking supervisors there. This exchange will continue after the summer break.

But it’s not just targeted attacks that pose a risk. In complex IT systems, in particular, even small system errors can quickly cause enormous damage. Felix Hufeld will address the topic of “cyber risk” in his presentation, so I will make just one final comment. It seems to me that an awareness of these risks does not yet exist at all levels of management at banks. They urgently need to catch up and vastly improve the protection of IT systems and customer data.

Conclusion

Ladies and gentlemen, my speech has dived briefly into the wave of digitalisation that has only recently gathered pace and that will inevitably carry the financial sector to new shores.

Everyone involved can benefit from digitalisation, but none more so than private customers in the short term. New technology and stronger competition mean businesses that are even better tailored to their personal needs. Ladies and gentlemen, you must all work towards ensuring that Germany’s banking sector does not remain a blank spot on the digital world map.

From my point of view, this requires four things.

  • First, every bank needs a “digital agenda” and a flexible strategy.
  • Second, every bank must find a balance between existing strengths and new types of banking business.
  • Third, every bank must be aware of the problem of IT security and must also pass this awareness on to its customers.
  • Fourth, every bank must modernise its IT infrastructure as necessary and ensure that the systems are secure.

Both we, as supervisors, and you, as representatives of Germany’s banks and savings banks, have an interest in a banking system that is stable and profitable in the long term. Learning to play by the new rules and actively shaping the process of change is essential if we are to stay on top of the wave of digitalisation. This applies not only to you, but also to the supervisors, because it is not just about detecting and taking advantage of new opportunities, it is also about recognising and limiting new risks. If we can achieve this, we will all successfully ride the wave of digitalisation.

Raising your Digital Quotient

Interesting article in the McKinsey Quarterly about digital strategy. They suggest that following the leader is a dangerous game. It’s better to focus on building an organization and culture that can realize the strategy that’s right for you.

With the pace of change in the world accelerating around us, it can be hard to remember that the digital revolution is still in its early days. Massive changes have come about since the packet-switch network and the microprocessor were invented, nearly 50 years ago. A look at the rising rate of discovery in fundamental R&D and in practical engineering leaves little doubt that more upheaval is on the way.

For incumbent companies, the stakes continue to rise. From 1965 to 2012, the “topple rate,” at which they lose their leadership positions, increased by almost 40 percent as digital technology ramped up competition, disrupted industries, and forced businesses to clarify their strategies, develop new capabilities, and transform their cultures. Yet the opportunity is also plain. McKinsey research shows that companies have lofty ambitions: they expect digital initiatives to deliver annual growth and cost efficiencies of 5 to 10 percent or more in the next three to five years.

To gain a more precise understanding of the digitization challenge facing business today, McKinsey has been conducting an in-depth diagnostic survey of 150 companies around the world. By evaluating 18 practices related to digital strategy, capabilities, and culture, we have developed a single, simple metric for the digital maturity of a company—what might be called its Digital Quotient, or DQ. This survey reveals a wide range of digital performance in today’s big corporations.

Their examination of the digital performance of major corporations points to four lessons:

  • First, incumbents must think carefully about the strategy available to them. The number of companies that can operate as pure-play disrupters at global scale—such as Spotify, Square, and Uber—are few in number. Rarer still are the ecosystem shapers that set de facto standards and gain command of the universal control points created by hyperscaling digital platforms. Ninety-five to 99 percent of incumbent companies must choose a different path, not by “doing digital” on the margin of their established businesses but by wholeheartedly committing themselves to a clear strategy.
  • Second, success depends on the ability to invest in relevant digital capabilities that are well aligned with strategy—and to do so at scale. The right capabilities help you keep pace with your customers as digitization transforms the way they research and consider products and services, interact, and make purchases on the digital consumer decision journey.
  • Third, while technical capabilities—such as big data analytics, digital content management, and search-engine optimization—are crucial, a strong and adaptive culture can help make up for a lack of them.
  • Fourth, companies need to align their organizational structures, talent development, funding mechanisms, and key performance indicators (KPIs) with the digital strategy they’ve chosen.

Collectively, these lessons represent a high-level road map for the executive teams of established companies seeking to keep pace in the digital age. Much else is required, of course. But in our experience, without the right road map and the management mind-set needed to follow it, there’s a real danger of traveling in the wrong direction, traveling too slowly in the right one, or not moving forward at all.