Category: Property Market

Welcome to our latest summary of finance and property news to the 26^th May 2018 with a distinctively Australian flavour.

Watch the video, listen to the podcast, or read the transcript.

I had a number of interesting discussions with people who follow our analysis of the property market this past week.  One in particular which stood out was from Melbourne who told me that in February 2017 he decided to sell his home, and got an indication it would sell conservatively for 1.3 million dollars. After a delay he took it to auction in August 2017 and struggled to see $1.25 million. But that property is now worth $1.15m a $150,000 drop from Feb 2017 to May 2018 or 11%.  He also told me that back in 2017 he could have got a mortgage of $980,000, but now, on the same financial basis he can only access $670,000 today.

That in a nutshell is what is happening in the major markets, with people’s mortgage borrowing power being curtailed, and as a result home prices are falling. And they will fall further.

We had a bevy of analysts revising down their forecasts for future home prices this week. It is tricky to determine the extent of any fall ahead, and most predictions will of course be wrong. But the more significant factor in play is the significant change in the atmospherics around the housing sector. More are going negative. And when the largest lender in Australia signals they expect a fall, even a mild one, this is significant.

Recently Morgan Stanley said it is predicting property prices could fall by about 8% in 2018, and lending by more than a third. Morgan Stanley suggests there’ll not only be further price weakness in the months ahead, but also the likelihood of renewed softening in building approvals. It says these two factors will likely weigh on household consumption and building activity, seeing Australian economic growth decelerate, rather than accelerate, this year.

CBA has also gone negative on housing, now forecasting a mild correction. Gareth Aird, senior economist at CBA says that Australian residential property prices have fallen over the past six months. Additional declines appear likely over the next 1½ years due to a further tightening in lending standards, a continued lift in supply, potentially higher mortgage rates and more rational price expectations from would-be buyers. But he says a hard landing, however, looks unlikely and “is not our central scenario”.

We discussed this analysis in more detail in our recent release “Another Bank Goes Negative On Housing” which is still available.  And remember CBA is the largest mortgage lender for owner occupied loans. Until recently they were bullish on prices, so this reversal is significant.

And UBS, who called the top of the market earlier than most, says macroprudential tightening ‘phase 3’, is a ‘game changer’ that will materially further tighten credit ahead, with higher living expense assumptions & debt to-income limits cutting borrowing capacity ~30-40%. Indeed, they says, housing is already weakening more quickly than our bearish view, with home loans dropping by ~10% since Aug-17, before the full Royal Commission impact. We have shifted our base case towards our ‘credit tightening scenario’, where home loans falls ~20%, credit growth drops to ~flat, prices fall persistently, & the RBA holds for longer. This coupled with record housing supply in coming years & a slump in foreign buyers sees us downgrade our house price outlook to fall 5%+ over the next year; below our prior 0 to -3% y/y. They conclude that housing activity will correct & prices to fall; still with downside risk: We still expect commencements, activity & prices to have an ongoing ‘downturn’ until at least 2019 – with downside risk from a ‘credit crunch’ scenario amid regulatory tightening & the Royal Commission. But housing should not ‘crash’ without (unexpected) RBA rate hikes or higher unemployment. So that’s ok then…

CoreLogic added some colour to the question of home prices by assessing home price growth across each decile, which confirms that values have fallen fastest at the premium end of the market. The broad trend findings in the CoreLogic May Decile Report showed that values have been falling on an annual basis across the 10th decile (the premium end of the market), while all other valuation deciles enjoyed positive (albeit restrained) growth over the twelve months to April 2018. National dwelling values were 0.2% higher over the 12 months to April 2018 – the slowest annual rate of growth since values fell -0.3% over the 12 months to October 2012.  Analysing deeper at a decile level, it was only the most expensive 10% of properties that recorded a fall in values over the year (-4.3%) and all other sectors recorded annual growth greater than 0.2%.

In Sydney the most expensive decile, have fallen 7.2% over the past year, while in Melbourne the same decile fell just 2.4%. In contract the cheapest 10% of houses rose 1.5% in Sydney, and 11.9% in Melbourne over the past year. This is thanks partly to first home buyer stamp duty concessions implemented by both state governments from 1 July 2017. But be warned, if Perth is any guide, the top of the market falls first, but other sectors soon follow. This is one reason why we continue to hold the view prices will drop further than many analysts are predicting.

The credit tightening is real, borrowing power is being reduced, and investors are voting with their feet. We continue to see investors planning to exit the market before prices fall further.  If you want further evidence, look no further than the latest auction clearance rates. CoreLogic says the combined capital city auction market continues to soften throughout 2018; while volumes have remained relatively steady over each of the last 3 weeks the weighted average clearance rate has continued to decline. Last week, the combined capitals returned a final auction clearance rate at a record year-to-date low of 56.8 per cent, the last time clearance rates were tracking at a similar level was in early 2013.  With 2,100 homes taken to auction last week almost half of these failed to sell, over the same period last year the clearance rate was a much higher 73.1 per cent across 2,824 auctions.

In Melbourne, the final auction clearance rate increased last week across a slightly lower volume of auctions, with 62 per cent of the 1,033 auctions reported as selling, up on the previous week when the final clearance rate across the city dropped below 60 per cent (59.8 per cent- 1,099 auctions).

Sydney’s final auction clearance rate fell to 54 per cent last week, the lowest recorded since late 2017, with 672 homes taken to auction which was lower than the week prior when 787 auctions were held and a higher 57.5 per cent cleared.

Across the remaining auction markets, Adelaide was the only capital city to see a rise in clearance rate last week with volumes also increasing across the city.

This trend is set to continue with CoreLogic currently tracking 2,164 auctions, increasing slightly on last week’s final figures which saw 2,100 auctions held. Sydney is expected to see the most notable difference in volumes this week; increasing by 15 per cent on last week with a total of 775 homes scheduled for auction.  Australia’s other largest auction market Melbourne is set to host 1,064 auctions this week, remaining somewhat consistent on the 1,033 auctions held last week at final results.  In any case there are doubts about the auction stats, as we discussed in “Auction Results Under the Microscope”.

Across the smaller auction markets, Tasmania is the only other auction market to see a rise in week-on-week volumes, with Adelaide and Perth down more than 30 per cent on last week, while Brisbane and Canberra’s volumes are down to a lesser degree.

When compared to activity last year, both volumes and clearance rates were tracking considerably higher, with 2,885 auctions held on this same week one year ago when the success rate of auctions were tracking consistently above the 70 per cent mark throughout the first half of 2017; a much different trend to what we are currently seeing.

All the indicators are for more falls.

As the property market rotates, and demand slackens, property developers with a stock of newly built, or under construction dwellings – mostly high-rise apartments are trying tactics from deep discounting, cash bribes, or 100% mortgages to persuade people to buy. Remember there are around 200,000 units coming on stream over the next year or two and demand is falling.  So we were interested to see (thanks to a tip off from our community) a WA initiative which was recently announced by Apartments WA – “Backed by the foundations of the BGC Group – Western Australia’s largest residential home builder and largest private company, we make your buying journey a seamless process from finding you the right apartment, assisting with obtaining finance, right through to settlement and key handover”.

They have coined the “Preposit”.  In essence a buyer gets to live in a property, whilst saving for a deposit, and when that deposit is accumulated, they can complete a purchase. It’s a way to get currently vacant apartments occupied by people who ultimately may buy.   They call it ” the Afterpay© of the real estate industry”.   The weekly payments, would cover the equivalent of rent and saving for a deposit. Finance is provided by Perth based Harrisdale Pty Ltd trading as The Loan Company. They hold a financial service licence. There are few details on the Preposit site, and we have no idea of the financial arrangements below the surface. So we suspect any prospective buyer should ask some hard questions about the overall risks and real effective costs. Remember that they are not an Authorised Depository Institution, so any money “saved” with them for a deposit could be at risk. I put in a call to the company, who said they would call back to discuss “Preposit”, but they never did!

I have been following the latest rounds of hearings at the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry, which is exploring lending for small businesses.

It’s been quite dramatic, with stories of business owners with impossible dreams, walking into commercial ventures which had a limited chance of success. The banks on the stand appear to have made procedural mistakes, and when things go wrong often went for the jugular to cover their losses. This included relying on guarantees even if it meant selling the guarantors property, and the case studies included sad stories of people losing their homes.  This included a disabled pensioner, blind and riddled with medical problems; her daughter, a budding small business operator. Or an ambitious woman trying her hand at running a pie shop with the hope of retiring early.

But the way the story is presented is only half the story. Yes, the banks failed in their duties on occasions, but on the other hand many businesses need finance if they are to start, and banks want to lend. What is really going wrong?

My theory is there small businesses are not get access to the advice they need to make a balanced assessment as to the viability of their operation.  By default, they assume if the bank provides funding then the business must be viable – but this is not necessarily so. The bank is only concerned with protecting their loan, and ensuring they can cover the risk of loss – this is not the same as considering the business in the round. We discussed this analysis in more detail in our recent release “The Problem With Small Business Lending”.   And remember about 53 per cent of the nation’s 2.2 million small to medium businesses need finance to continue trading.

The Australian Financial Review reported on our recent research on the Bank of Mum and Dad funding business start-ups. More than 33,000 business owners are estimated to have seed finance – or ongoing financial support – from loans that are secured with their parents’ home, analysis of home ownership and borrowing numbers reveals. The average cash injection is about $56,000 but loans typically range from few hundred dollars to more than $1 million, the analysis reveals. But while the number of parents providing direct cash support to their siblings’ business is increasing there has been a big fall in the number willing to put their houses on the line. That’s because of increased understanding that a lender could foreclose if there a default, which means parents’ best intentions risk the threat of homelessness by prodigal sons or daughters, according to financial advisers. said the number of parents guaranteeing a loan with their homes has fallen by about 8 per cent in the past year. This is because of the greater focus on financial advice and a better understanding of the risks involved with a guarantee, plus thanks to the strong rises in property there is more equity in a property.

Next, we look at the latest from the US where the adjustments to the Dodd-Frank Act (DFA) – sound familiar?) are expected to be signed into law next week. The changes ease the capital and regulatory requirements for smaller institutions and custody banks by raising the systemic threshold to $250 billion from $50 billion for enhanced prudential standards (EPS), reduce stress testing requirements and modify applicability of proprietary trading rules (the Volcker Rule). The legislation reduces regulations for U.S. small to mid-size banks in particular, while only providing de-minimis regulatory relief to the largest U.S. banks. The change to the systemic threshold reduces the number of banks subject to heightened regulatory oversight to 12 from 38. Regulators will still have discretion to apply EPS to banks with $100 billion-$250 billion in assets. Banks above $250 billion in assets would not see much benefit from the legislation.

Fitch Ratings says stress testing has provided discipline for banks and is an important risk governance practice that is considered in its rating analysis. The elimination or meaningful reduction of stress testing would likely have negative ratings implications. And this at a time when debt is very high.

Moody’s says the return of a 3% 10-year Treasury yield is making itself known in the housing industry. Markets have already priced in a loss of housing activity to the highest mortgage yields since 2011. They conclude that just as it is overly presumptuous to predict the nearness of a 4% 10-year Treasury yield, it is premature to declare an impending top for the benchmark Treasury yield. Thus far in 2018, the 11% drop by the PHLX index of housing-sector share prices differs drastically from the accompanying 3% rise by the market value of U.S. common stock. In addition, the CDS spreads of housing-related issuers show a median increase of 78 bp for 2018-to-date, which is greater than the overall market’s increase of roughly 23 bp. Finally, 2018-to-date’s -1.97% return from high-yield bonds is worse than the -0.13% return from the U.S.’ overall high-yield bond market. Despite the lowest unemployment rate since 2000, the sum of new and existing home sales dipped by 0.7% year-over-year during January-April 2018. All this shows the impact on the housing sector as rates rise.

The highest effective 30-year mortgage yield in seven years has depressed applications for mortgage refinancings. For the week-ended May 18, the MBA’s effective 30-year mortgage yield reached 5.01% for its highest reading since the 5.04% of April 15, 2011. The effective 30-year mortgage yield’s latest fourweek average of 4.95% was up by 63 bp from the 4.32% of a year earlier. March 2018’s 7% yearly drop by the NAR’s index of home affordability showed that the growth of after tax income was not rapid enough to overcome the combination of higher home prices and costlier mortgage yields. March incurred the 17th consecutive yearly decline by the home affordability index. The moving three-month average of home affordability now trails its current cycle high of the span-ended January 2013 by 23%.

And according to the  latest from The St.Louis Fed On The Economy Blog, individuals who were in financial distress five years ago were about twice as likely to be in financial distress today when compared with an average individual. They argued that financial distress is not only quite widespread but is also very persistent. They show that the share of households with past financial distress increased from approximately 6.6 percent in 1998 to 12.2 percent in 2016. They conclude that households that have encountered an episode of financial distress in the past are 1.5 times more likely to delay payment today, compared to average households.

Why is this US data relevant to us? Well first, the debt levels in the US are significantly lower than here as home prices relative to income are lower there. We have more households in financial difficulty as a result. Second, the higher rates are likely to impact local funding costs here, which will put pressure on local banks funding costs, and third, higher rates will further tighten credit availability, and as in the US, this is likely to impact the construction sector – so expect to see more unnatural acts to try to attract buyers into a falling market – to which I reply, caveat emptor – let the buyer beware!

Finally, the latest data from S&P Global Ratings using their Mortgage Performance Index (SPIN) to March 2018 shows a rise in arrears – they increased to 1.18% in March from 1.16% in February and there was a significant hike in 90+ defaults.  WA and NT continue their upward trends, both above 2% and rising.  Home loan delinquencies fell in New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia, and the Australian Capital Territory in March. Of note, mortgage arrears in South Australia appear to have turned a corner; the state’s March 2018 arrears of 1.35% are well down from a peak of 1.81% in January 2017. This reflects a general improvement in economic conditions in South Australia, in line with national trends. Western Australia remained the state with the nation’s highest arrears, sitting at 2.37% in March.

But S&P says say arrears more than 90 days past due made up around 60% of total arrears in March 2018, up from 34% a decade earlier. This shift partly reflects a change in the reporting of arrears for loans in hardship that came in response to regulatory guidelines. Even accounting for this, however, there has been a persistent rise in this arrears category, though the level of arrears overall remains low.  And I recall Wayne Byers recent comment to the effect that at these low interest rates, defaults should be lower!

The pressure on households is set to continue. The crunch is getting nearer.