Household Financial Confidence Finds A Floor

The latest results from our household surveys revealed that household financial confidence recovered just a little in recent weeks, but is still in ultra-low territory and well below the neutral 100 measure, at 81.4.

So far, the impact of virus concerns have not translated into households finances, whereas the bushfires, floods and other local events are having a more direct impact.

Across the property segments, owner occupied households are the most positive, thanks to rising prices in some locations and lower interest rates on some mortgages. Property investors and those renting remain more bearish, as rental costs continue in the doldrums.

Across the states the recent trends continue, with both NSW and VIC households under greater financial pressure compared with WA, QLD and SA. Much of this is debt related as the average mortgage size grows ever larger in the two largest states.

We continue to see pressure among younger households building relative to those in the older cohorts. Much of the pressure comes from housing costs one way or another.

Those mortgage free and owning property are relatively better placed than those with a mortgage, or renting. This is because housing costs are such a large element in a budget whether servicing a mortgage or paying rent.

Looking in more detail at the moving parts, living costs continue to rise disproportionately, thanks to more expensive fresh food (drought related), child care and school fees rising fast, accelerating healthcare costs and continued high energy and fuel costs. 95% see their costs higher than a year ago. More are having difficulty with council rates and other regular commitments.

Income growth is muted at best, with 51% saying their income has been reduced in real terms over the past year, with both wages growth sluggish, and income from savings on deposits crashing as the cash rate is cut, and banks squeeze margin. Returns from share investments on the other hand are doing better. Those with spare income are preferring to pay debt down, rather than spend.

Job prospects are also sluggish, with just 6% feeling more secure than a year ago, while 38% are feeling less secure. We continue to see a pattern of multiple jobs, rising part-time jobs, less overtime and gig economy roles on the rise; all creating greater concerns about job security. Underemployment remains a critical issue for many.

Turning to loan finances, some have been able to refinance to lower rate mortgages (and others appear to be missing the opportunity to switch and save), while some households are unable to transfer to a lower rate thanks to underwriting constraints. Households are able to grab a larger loan now lending standards have been loosened. Lower rates mean that 42% remain about the same with regards to confidence, while 45% are less comfortable than a year ago. We also note a rise in the use of unsecured debt, and buy-now pay-later (which will be the subject of an upcoming article based on new data we have captured). De-leveraging continues among those who can afford it.

On the savings front, those with market investments continue to enjoy paper capital growth, while dividends remains relatively stable. But those with term deposits continue to see rate compression and there is a move from term accounts to call accounts as the margin between the two have fallen further. More than 3 million households rely on income from bank deposits, and the reduction in the returns from deposits is having a dramatic impact on many. That said, many households remain adamant that they do not want to take on more market risk, so reluctantly accept lower income – which in turn flows to lower spending. 43% feel less comfortable than a year ago. Many are dipping to savings, and using capital for living expenses, something which may not be sustainable.

Finally, putting all this together we look at net worth – assets minus loans and other liabilities. The upturn in home prices reported in the media have flowed through to more expectations of growing wealth. 28% now have higher net worth than a year ago. That said 47% have lower net worth, thanks to rising expenses, and little in the way of savings. 24% reported no change. We note some significant differences between the more affluent segments and suburbs where net worth is rising (and supported by rising market investments) compared with regional areas and the urban fringe where there is no evidence of any wealth effect – so far. This is continue to dampen spending.

So, to conclude, we appear to have reached something of a floor in household financal confidence, but the journey back to more balanced settings will only be achieved once real incomes start to rise. Meantime the property recovering and wealth illusion may help a bit, but there is little here to suggest a rise in consumer spending. Many households are trapped in a high housing cost situation (either mortgage debt or rent) and with continued pressure in costs of living, the pressures will remain for some time to come.

The question is, what if anything might break the trend? Well income growth if it came, would assist on the upside, but then if growth stalls further thanks to the second order impacts from the virus, the confidence floor might just disappear. Households are in a finely balanced predicament.

Concerns about AFG Connective mortgage aggregator deal

The ACCC has raised preliminary competition concerns about the proposed acquisition of Connective Group Pty Ltd (Connective) by Australian Finance Group Ltd (ASX:AFG).

AFG and Connective are mortgage aggregators that act as intermediaries between lenders and their affiliated brokers.

“Combining AFG and Connective would create the largest mortgage aggregator in Australia by a significant margin, accounting for almost 40 per cent of all mortgage brokers operating in Australia,” ACCC Chair Rod Sims said.

More than half of all home loans written each year are initiated through the broker channel, and brokers play an important role for consumers when seeking a home loan and for lenders in reaching those consumers.

“AFG and Connective operate in an already concentrated market, and not many other mortgage aggregators offer a similar level or type of service. Additionally, potential entrants or small players may be deterred from expanding by various barriers, including compliance costs,” Mr Sims said.

“The ACCC is concerned there will be limited similar alternatives for brokers to switch to. This may negatively impact the services offered to brokers.”

The ACCC has published a statement of issues and is seeking further information about the supply of mortgage aggregation and distribution services, and the supply of home loans in Australia. The ACCC invites further submissions from interested parties in by 5 March 2020. The final decision will be announced on 7 May 2020.

Further information is available at Australian Finance Group Ltd – Connective Group Pty Ltd.

Background

AFG and Connective provide brokers with access to a panel of lenders, and provide panel lenders access to affiliated brokers to distribute loans. Generally, a broker will be affiliated with one mortgage aggregator at a time, while lenders tend to sit on a number of mortgage aggregator panels.

AFG and Connective also offer brokers various support services to assist them to run their businesses. This includes customer relationship management software that provides brokers with the ability to compare products from the lender panel and assist in the lodgement of loan applications. 

AFG and Connective also offer white-label or own-branded loan products under their respective brands. These products are mostly funded by third party lenders, however, AFG also offer loan products funded by its securitisation program.

CBA 1H20 Result, A Matter Of Perspective

CBA released their 1H20 result today, with a statuary NPAT of $6,161 million, up 34%, but this included a one off gain from the sale of CFSGAM, so its not really meaningful.

On a cash basis, the cost base remains under pressure from compliance, wage inflation and IT investment, plus rising insurance claims and provisions for drought and bushfire. But volume grew, and consumer arrears are lower. Overall one of the better managed banks in Australia.

Thus this cash result on a continuing basis is more relevant. It was down 4.3% on pcp to $4,477m, thanks to stronger revenue growth than anticipated – especially from trading income, despite higher provisions and expenses.

Operating income was flat at $12,416 million while net interest income was up 1.7% thanks to growth of book.

The Group net interest rate margin was 2.11%, up 1 basis point from 2H19. They indicated that the lower cash rate will continue to impact NIM – by around 5 basis points in 2H20, and 4 basis points across the FY 20 and FY 21.

Non-interest income was down 4.6%, mainly thanks to the impact of bushfire related claims ($83m) on insurance income, changes to wealth management fees and hedging losses.

Operating expenses were up 2.6% to %5,429m with $630m was refunded to customers to 31 Dec 2019 following the Royal Commission misconduct and other required remediation. A further $596m is outstanding.

Loan impairment expenses were 17 basis point of average gross loans and acceptances. This was up 2 basis points, but includes 3 basis points for drought and bushfire provisions. They note a fall in consumer arrears thanks to the improved property market, but said pockets of stress remain in the discretionary retail, agricultural and construction sectors. Provisions lifted from 1.28% to 1.34% to $5,026 million.

Mortgage arrears are down a little, though are marginally elevated vs prior years.

Exposure to apartment development has reduced b y 63% since December 2016. Sydney represent 60% of the development exposure.

The percentage of book funded by deposits rose to 71% from 69% in 1H19. Overall average wholesale funding is 5.4 years. The Net Stable Funding ratio improved 1% to 113% and the Liquidity Coverage Ratio increased by 3% to 134%.

The Lever 2 CET1 ratio rose by 100 basis points to 11.7% and is above the APRA threshold. This was helped by recent asset sales. Further divestment proceeds will assist ahead.

A $500m on-market purchase will support the Dividend Reinvestment Plan. No discount will be applied to shareholders.

The bank declared a dividend of $2.00 per share, fully franked – unchanged from 1H19 interim.

The Rise Of Renters By Choice

The private rental sector has expanded at more than twice the rate of the increase in Australian households in the last two decades. This increasingly diverse form of tenure now houses about one in four of us. Via The Conversation.

Australia’s lightly regulated private rental sector means the insecurity of tenants is a key factor in why most Australians aspire to own their home. However, despite this insecurity, our research suggests an increase in people choosing to rent for a long time – ten years or more – accounts for a small part of the growth in private renters.

Much of this growth is attributable to middle- and high-income tenants. Especially in Melbourne and Sydney, high housing prices mean saving for a deposit takes much longer than in the 1990s. In the meantime these households are renting for a long time.

‘Who stays put, loses’

In our survey of 600 private renters in different areas of Sydney and Melbourne, we asked: “Many people are renting privately for longer periods (10+ years). Do you think this is a positive trend?”

About a third responded in mainly positive terms. Their main reasons were:

  • renting is more affordable than owning
  • there are fewer worries and liabilities
  • renting is more flexible than owning.

Some questioned the norm of home ownership in Australia.

For a more in-depth understanding, we interviewed 60 long-term private renters in low, medium and high-rent areas in Melbourne and Sydney. Almost all who chose to rent mentioned flexibility as a key advantage.

“Choosers” highly valued the freedom to move or travel at will. Zygmunt Bauman’s concept of liquid modernity highlights the increasing desire for transience. As he explains:

Transience has replaced durability at the top of the value table. What is valued today (by choice as much as by unchosen necessity) is the ability to be on the move, to travel light and at short notice. Power is measured by the speed with which responsibilities can be escaped. Who accelerates, wins; who stays put, loses.

Renters in their own words

Patricia*, who lives in a high-rent part of Melbourne, has always rented.

Well since I came to Australia in 1977, I rented. I didn’t want to buy. Got close [to buying] a couple of times, but changed my mind.

I just travel anywhere and everywhere. I thought […] if you’ve got a house you’re stuck there, and I thought, no. I work hard for my money, so that money that I work hard for is for me, not to have a [permanent] roof over my head. […] Renting has been good for me because I can still do what I want.

Myra lives in a studio apartment in a high-rent area in Sydney and has no desire to own a home. She is single, in her mid- to late 30s, and earns well. The possibility of being asked to vacate did not bother her.

Maybe I’ve been lucky, but every situation has always sorted itself out. You know a lot of people would have freaked out if they had to move out […] It didn’t concern me in the slightest, yeah. I mean not at all. There’s always somewhere to stay. So it suits my lifestyle. I wouldn’t want to buy [a property], even if I had the money.

Leanne inherited a third of a house. Rather than using the proceeds to buy a property, she decided to move to Melbourne’s inner city (a high-rent area) and continue renting.

So I thought rather than put money into a house […] I would invest it and I could travel and go to concerts and live the life I wanted to lead, so that’s basically what I did and I’m still renting.

Pam was renting in a low-rent area in outer Sydney. She felt her situation required the flexibility of renting:

The relationship was rocky and you can’t predict the future, but I knew it wasn’t going to end up in marriage and kids and all that kind of crap […] We were both working, both earning good money and we could have afforded to buy a house between us […] But for me it was like, no. I don’t know where this [her relationship] is going, so no way, I’m not going to put myself in that predicament and then have to go through court to go, “This is mine, this is yours”, all that crap. But so it was my choice to rent and to stick to it […] I’m not going to rely on anybody else for anything, no way.

Her renter status allowed Pam to make a rapid, clean break.

I just got up one day and walked cos I knew he was going to ask me to marry him the next day, so I said: “I’m just going to go to the shops to get a packet of cigarettes.” I left everything behind. I went for a walk, never went home.

For the families with children who choose to rent long-term, the key reason is it allows them to live in highly desirable areas where they cannot afford to buy. Gabrielle and her partner earn well and live in a high-rent area in Sydney:

Sure it [home ownership] provides you with security and you don’t have that stress of […] having to move. I get that, but at the same time, you know for us, for example, if we wanted to buy we’d be paying four times what we pay at the moment in a mortgage […] It doesn’t really make financial sense to go and do that […] You’d have to live somewhere. So I choose to live in a nice area where my children are [at school].

They also did not want the burden of a large mortgage:

[…] I have no desire to put myself in a position where I have a $2 million mortgage and have to work for the rest of my short life to pay for it […]

Although probably only a small proportion of people choose to rent long-term, this option may be gaining ground. Young, well-paid professionals in particular see the flexibility of private renting as attractive.

Location also seems to be a critical factor. Most of the choosers rented in desirable inner suburbs of Sydney and Melbourne, which would otherwise be inaccessible. An estimated one-in-eight private renters are “rentvestors” who rent where they want to live and buy elsewhere to get a foothold in the housing market.

*All names used are pseudonyms.

Authors: Alan Morris, Research Professor, University of Technology Sydney; Hal Pawson, Associate Director – City Futures – Urban Policy and Strategy, City Futures Research Centre, Housing Policy and Practice, UNSW; Kath Hulse, Research Professor, Centre for Urban Transitions, Swinburne University of Technology

The Catch-22 In The Housing Market

Despite the recent influx of positive reporting on the trajectory of the housing market, there remains “a fundamental, structural problem” with the price of property in Australia, according to financial analyst Martin North. Via Australian Broker.

While the rising home values evidenced from mid-2019 have been largely celebrated as an overtly positive trend, North has his doubts. 

“It’s not sensible to hope and assume prices will continue to go ever higher. House prices are very high relative to income. Actually, very high relative to any other measure you can name, like GDP,” he said. 

A recently-released Demographia survey showed Australia has some of the most unaffordable property in the world. While Hong King and Vancouver claimed the top two spots on the list, Sydney and Melbourne came right after.

“Further, we’ve got too much debt in our system, which is supported by debt that’s difficult to repay, even at low interest rates,” said North.

“There is definitely a cap, in my view, on how much home price growth we should expect and will see.”

The affordability concerns which have dominated Australia for years were again thrown into sharp relief by recent figures around hopeful market entrants.  

“The latest data shows the first home buyer average loan is now $408,000 across Australia – the highest it’s ever been,” said North.

“That’s massive for a first-time buyer trying to get into the market. Think about the income multiples that figure represents; that’s maybe eight, nine, 10 times what many people make.

“It’s an unsustainable position to be in. We can’t allow home prices to continue to run away. It will create a bigger problem for us later.”

It’s important to focus on the hard data amidst the sea of vested parties doubling down on their own rhetoric, North said.

“The banks want property prices to go higher because if they go lower, they have much more risk in their system and on their books than they want to admit,” he explained.

“The Reserve Bank and Treasury both want prices to rise to create the wealth effect. If people feel more wealthy, which they generally do as prices rise, they go and spend more. Trying to bring prices higher is really the only lever they’ve got.”

However, according to North, it’s “failed policy” to bank the future of the economy on “ever-inflated house prices” with nothing else to support it.

“I come back to the fundamental reality of the ratio between debt and income, the ratio between debt and GDP,” he said.

“We’re in an unsustainable position. We’re betting the farm on the property sector and, in my view, it’s going to fall over at some point; it’s just a question of how soon.”

Australia’s Banks Are Preparing To Bail-In Retail Bank Deposits

Economist John Adams and Analyst Martin North examines recent changes to the terms and conditions from our major banks. Have you read yours recently?

APRA’s list of ADI’s: https://www.apra.gov.au/register-of-authorised-deposit-taking-institutions

DFA Age/Segment Distribution

In response to a question, we are publishing a couple of analytic slides which shows the relationship between DFA household and property segments and age bands.

Our segments are derived from multi-factorial analysis but do have an age related dimension also. You can read more here.

The first chart maps our master segmentation.

The second is our property segmentation.

Both are based on data to January 2020.

Auction Results 08 Feb 2020

Domain released their preliminary results for today (the first full week back in the new year).

Volumes are up on last year at the same time and clearance rates will be higher (though will settle below 74.7% as more results come in).

Canberra listed 51, reported 36 and sold 30, with 6 passed in giving a Domain clearance of 83%.

Brisbane listed 84, reported 35 and sold 14 with 3 withdrawn and 21 passed in giving a Domain clearance of 37%.

Adelaide listed 50, reported 27 and sold 16 with 11 passed in giving a Domain clearance of 59%.

Yeh! Central Banks Will Save Us – The Property Imperative Weekly 8th Feb 2020

The latest edition of our weekly finance and property news digest with a distinctively Australian flavour.

  • Contents:
  • 00:20 Introduction
  • 00:51 US Markets
  • 02:05 Trade Wars
  • 02:30 Monetary Policy
  • 03:50 Virus Threat
  • 09:00 China
  • 11:40 Eurozone
  • 12:30 Deutsche Banks
  • Australian Segment
  • 14:30 RBA Policy
  • 19:00 Services Index
  • 19:15 Property
  • 20:20 Tap and Go Rules
  • 21:20 Reporting Season Coming Up
  • 23:15 AMP Penalty
  • 24:55 Cash Ban Latest