An Open Letter to Australians: Only Glass-Steagall Can Save You from the Banks

Via Wall Street On Parade – Pam Martens: April 4, 2019

Dear Engaged Citizens in Australia:

As both the interim and final report from your Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry has confirmed, the good, decent, hardworking people of Australia are under attack from their own banking system in a manner reminiscent of an attack from a foreign invader that wants to destroy the will and financial resources of the citizens in order to gain absolute control of the country.

Americans, more than any other people in the world, can understand and relate to the precarious predicament in which you now find yourselves. The devious vices and devices of your banksters to transfer the meager savings of the common man and woman to their own greedy pockets have been laid bare by your Royal Commission. But just as happened here in the United States following the report of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, no concrete measures to end the domination of the banks has occurred.

Australians, like Americans, remain on the road to financial ruin at the hands of predatory banking behemoths that are using their concentrated money and political power to attack each and every democratic principle that we cherish as citizens – from repealing consumer-protection legislation to installing their own shills in government to regulatory capture of their watchdogs to corrupting the overall financial system that underpins the stability of our two countries. Sadly, citizens at large do not understand that their own deposits at these mega banks are being used to accomplish these anti-democratic goals.

What has now occurred in Australia is precisely what has occurred in America. Last year Bob Katter, MP in your House of Representatives, introduced the Banking System Reform (Separation of Banks) Bill 2018 in the Australian Parliament. This year, Senator Pauline Hanson introduced a bill of the same name in the Australian Senate. The legislation is tailored after the 1933 legislation that was passed in the United States, the Glass-Steagall Act, to defang the banking monster that brought on the 1929 stock market crash and ensuing depression by separating commercial banks, which take in the deposits of risk-adverse savers, from the globe-trotting, risk-taking, derivative-exploding investment banks. (An unsavory group of bank shills succeeded in repealing the Glass-Steagall legislation in the U.S. in 1999 and then enriched themselves from the repeal. One year later the U.S. experienced the dot.com bust and eight years after that the country experienced the greatest financial crash since the Great Depression – what you call the GFC or Global Financial Crisis but U.S. bank lobbyists prefer to dub The Great Recession.)

U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren, a Democrat, and the late Senator John McCain, a Republican, had been introducing the 21st Century Glass-Steagall Act for the past five years in the U.S. Congress. Just like the legislation proposed in Australia, it would have restored integrity to deposit-taking commercial banks by separating them from the predatory investment banks that financially incentivize their employees to fleece unsuspecting customers while using the deposits to engage in high-risk gambles that regularly implode. The powerful mega banks in the U.S. and their legions of lobbyists have worked hard to prevent this legislation from gaining momentum.

Despite the critical need for this legislation in both countries, mainstream media has not done its share to inform and educate the public about the pending legislation. We know this to be true in Australia because the Royal Commission received more than 10,000 submissions from the Australian public while the Senate’s request for public comment on the Glass-Steagall legislation has thus far received just 350 responses. The Senate Committee has elected to publish just a sliver of those responses.

You can submit your comments on the Australian legislation using an online form; or you can email your submission to economics.sen@aph.gov.au; or you can mail your submission to Senate Standing Committee on Economics, PO Box 6100, Parliament House, Canberra ACT 2600, Australia. The deadline for submissions is a week from this Friday, April 12, 2019.

It is already clear where Australia is heading without this legislation. Australia will become the plaything of a global banking cartel just as is occurring in the United States. See Goldman Sachs’ Top Lawyer Is Part of a Secret Banking Cabal as CEO Blankfein Denies One Exists; and Citigroup, Deutsche Bank Face Australian Court in Landmark Cartel Case; and Banking Fraternity Felons. Your children will become the debt slaves to the banks in order to get an education; the banks will carve out their own private justice system to hear customers’ claims against them, effectively closing the courthouse doors for bank fraud claims; and your country will end up with the greatest wealth inequality since the 1920s.

Or, you can mobilize to pass the Glass-Steagall Act legislation. The choice is yours. (Americans, I hope you’re listening too.)

Is it safer under the Mattress?

It promises to be a dog fight Royale.  The four big banks can be expected to behave like uncontrollable Pit Bulls, determined to savage Senator Hanson’s Banking System Report (Separation of Banks) Bill 2019.   This Bill is about re-establishing confidence in the banking system by separating ‘core banking’, called retail and commercial banking where deposits are protected, from the risky wholesale and investment banking. 

By Patricia Warren, Byron Echo Vol 33 #40 March 13, 2019 p21

By default the recent Haynes Royal Commission has brought focus on how banks are currently structured to do business.  It’s their power base and they will fight to defend it.  Fur will fly because bankers do not want a firewall between deposits and the flow of these into their trading activities.  Bloodletting can be expected should this Bill stand in the way of using your money to cover their gambling in high return investments, including derivatives. 

Learned from the GFC?

People are reminded that it was the collapse of the derivatives market that brought about the Global Financial Crisis 2007/08.  Nothing has been learned.  In December 2018 “The notional value of the derivatives cleared worldwide is 4.4 times world GDP, up from 2.8 times in 2008.”   While not all derivatives are evil, it is estimated that Australian banks are currently exposed to more than $37Tr in derivatives and billions in short term debt.  The global derivatives markets are vast, unregulated, some deliberately untraceable in off-shore entities and commonly off the books.  Currently, there is potentially US$540Tr of global derivatives set to ignite a global financial crisis. 

Divorce time

The idea of separating core banking activities from the higher risk investment banking is not new.  Leading financial commentator, Alan Kohl wrote of his random sampling of 10,140 submissions to the Royal Commission, “ Without exception they called for the banks to be broken up and most of them, surprisingly, used the term ‘Glass Steagall’ suggesting that the now-repealed American law that used to forcibly separate banking from insurance and investment banking be introduced into Australia”.   Hanson’s Bill has been crafted after the Glass Steagall and modified to suit the Australian conditions. 

There is widespread support for the breaking up of the banks, including that coming from former CEOs of major banks, academics and former Prime Minister Paul Keating.  In fact, there are now more people supporting the breakup of the banks since the Royal Commission than before it.

The banks are powerful and effective lobbyists exercising undue influence not only in the market place where they work like an oligopoly but with both major political parties to which they reportedly have donated $2.6m. Their relationship with Treasury and the regulator, Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority (APRA) has been described as ‘incestuous’.

Currently there is approximately $2.8Tr held in deposits as unsecured loans in Australian financial institutions of which over 80% is concentrated in the four big banks.  Banks are currently paying very little interest on deposits whilst using a significant proportion of funds to trade in high risk areas.   

BAIL IN

Under Australia’s BAIL IN legislation, where there is no explicit exclusion of deposits in the law, deposits are exposed to cover the gambling risks of financial institutions in times of financial crisis in the global system.  So, if the derivatives market collapses, as it did in the GFC, then cash will be used to BAIL IN and stablise failing global institutions be it from peoples’ term deposits, business operating and superannuation fund accounts.  Politicians have refused to amend the Financial Sector Legislation Amendment (Crisis Resolution Powers and Other Measures) Act 2018 (FSLA) to exclude deposits from this and hence are protecting the bankers and their risk taking behavior.

Deny Risk

CEO’s of the major banks and other leading financial institutions deny that deposits are at risk. They argue they are controlled by APRA’s prudential standards and that ‘currently’ and ‘as the legislation sits’, only ‘capital instruments’ can be called upon to stablise a failing institution.  But APRA can change this under the secrecy provisions of the FSLA to capture deposits as part of BAIL IN.  There is a loop hole which allows APRA to change its standards to include ‘instruments’ ‘that are not currently considered capital under prudential standards.” 

Failed Gatekeeper

No CEO responded to concerns raised directly with them months ago about that provision.  Nor did APRA! APRA has failed as the gatekeeper on our financial system.  

 APRA takes recommendations  directly from the International Bank of Settlement (IBS).  This means our financial institutions are influenced by the motivation of the central bankers to protect the global financial system above depositors.

Under the Banking System Reform (Separation of Banks) Bill 2019 it is intended to break that direct connection.  Instead, APRA must not only come before an Australian parliamentary committee for “prior express written approval and consent” to act before implementing any recommendations or decisions of any foreign bank, or foreign authority but have Parliamentary approval to change its prudential standards for the purpose of regulating our financial institutions.

Public Inquiry

Parliament’s Senate Standing Committee on Economics is currently holding a public inquiry on the Bill and calling for submissions.   It is a numbers game and broad based support of the Bill is needed to counter what can be expected from the banks, Treasury and APRA.

Submissions need only read:  I support the Banking System Reform (Separation of Banks) Bill 2019 and I support the  separation of retail commercial banking activities involving the holding of deposits from wholesale and investment banking as proposed in the Bill.  Submissions need to be sent to economics.sen@aph.gov.au or mailed to the Senate Standing Committee on Economics PO Box 6100 Canberra ACT 2600 by 12 April 2019.  If you want your cash made more secure then you’re encouraged to make a submission.  Alternatively, there is always under the mattress.

Another Swipe At Banking Separation (Podcast)

I discuss the latest on the Senate Inquiry into Banking Separation (Glass-Steagall) with Robbie Barwick from the CEC. We have a significant opportunity to drive the change to benefit Australians and Australia.

Link to CEC release for instructions:

http://cecaust.com.au/releases/2019_02_18_Submission.html

Link to Senate Economics Legislation Committee inquiry website:

https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Economics/BankingSystemReform

Digital Finance Analytics (DFA) Blog
Digital Finance Analytics (DFA) Blog
Another Swipe At Banking Separation (Podcast)
Loading
/

Another Swipe At Banking Separation

I discuss the latest on the Senate Inquiry into Banking Separation (Glass-Steagall) with Robbie Barwick from the CEC.

We have a significant opportunity to drive the change to benefit Australians and Australia.

Link to CEC release for instructions

Link to Senate Economics Legislation Committee inquiry website

Structure Is A Dirty Word (Podcast)

The Senate has initiated an inquiry into the structural separation of the banks, following the Hayne report, and the bill represented to the chamber.

I discuss the critical issues surrounding this with businessman John Dahlsen, who was a director at ANZ for many years. John and I were both mentioned in the Hansard on this topic!

In our last post we had discussed the outcomes of the Royal Commission and I follow up with questions from that post, in the light of new developments.

There are so many compelling reasons to support structural separation, yet there are powerful forces which will resist the concept.

The bottom line is structural separation would be good for customers, good for shareholders, and good for businesses seeking finance; and reduce the structural risks in the banking system thanks to derivatives and too big to fail. So why is structure a dirty word?

This will help you to prepare a submission to the inquiry when its formally sought!

Digital Finance Analytics (DFA) Blog
Digital Finance Analytics (DFA) Blog
Structure Is A Dirty Word (Podcast)
Loading
/

Structure Is A Dirty Word

The Senate has initiated an inquiry into the structural separation of the banks, following the Hayne report, and the bill represented to the chamber.

I discuss the critical issues surrounding this with businessman John Dahlsen, who was a director at ANZ for many years. John and I were both mentioned in the Hansard on this topic!

In our last post we had discussed the outcomes of the Royal Commission and I follow up with questions from that post, in the light of new developments.

There are so many compelling reasons to support structural separation, yet there are powerful forces which will resist the concept.

The bottom line is structural separation would be good for customers, good for shareholders, and good for businesses seeking finance; and reduce the structural risks in the banking system thanks to derivatives and too big to fail. So why is structure a dirty word?

This will help you to prepare a submission to the inquiry when its formally sought!

What Does Glass-Steagall Really Mean?

I discuss the potential impact of an Australian Glass-Steagall banking separation with Robbie Barwick from the CEC.

There is a bill in the Parliament currently, and The Banking Royal Commission is taking submissions on strategic issues such as the structure of banking in Australia, so this is a timely discussion.

It also offers a mechanism to protect bank deposits and to restore trust to mainstream banking, something sorely needed as the Commission revealed.

Please consider supporting our work via Patreon

Please share this post to help to spread the word about the state of things….

 

The Vision Thing – How To Reconstruct Our Banking System and “Make Australia Great Again”.

Robbie Barwick from the CEC and I discuss a broad range of issues centered on fixing the banking system, and the Australian economy more broadly in the light of the Royal Commission interim report.

You may not agree with Robbie’s 5 point plan, but this is a thought provoking episode which will challenge a few assumptions along the way.

As you know, DFA is about facilitating debate!

Five Experts discuss causes of 2008 crash

CEC

Please consider supporting our work via Patreon

Please share this post to help to spread the word about the state of things….

Banking Strategy
Banking Strategy
The Vision Thing - How To Reconstruct Our Banking System and "Make Australia Great Again".



Loading





/

The Vision Thing – How To Reconstruct Our Banking System and “Make Australia Great Again”

Robbie Barwick from the CEC and I discuss a broad range of issues centered on fixing the banking system, and the Australian economy more broadly in the light of the Royal Commission interim report.

You may not agree with Robbie’s 5 point plan, but this is a thought provoking episode which will challenge a few assumptions along the way.

As you know, DFA is about facilitating debate!

 

Five Experts discuss causes of 2008 crash

The CEC

Please consider supporting our work via Patreon

Please share this post to help to spread the word about the state of things….

Where Are We With “Breaking Up The Banks?”

I discuss the latest developments emerging from the Royal Commission, plus the Glass Steagall bill with Robert Barwick from the CEC.

Please consider supporting our work via Patreon ;

Please share this post to help to spread the word about the state of things….

CEC

Banking Strategy
Banking Strategy
Where Are We With "Breaking Up The Banks?"



Loading





/