Economist John Adams, analyst Martin North and the CEC’s Robbie Barwick discuss their recent visit to Mandurah, in WA, a post code which a couple of years back registered as highly mortgage stressed.
We have released the June 2019 mortgage stress results, based on our running 52,000 household surveys. We found that 32% of households are now dealing with mortgage stress, a record, meaning they are having cash flow issues managing their finances and mortgage repayments.
This translates into more than 1,063,000 households spread across the country, and nearly 71,000 risk default in the year ahead, even taking into account the fall in mortgage repayments represented by the recent rate cuts. Banks loses will rise.
This is because the costs of living continue to run ahead of incomes, while households have larger debts (and are being enticed to buy in the current complex risk environment).
The top post codes in stress are those in the outer suburban fringe areas, where many large estates are still being built, and households are super-highly leveraged.
The RBA released their March 2019 data on household ratios. Whilst these series include small business finance, and include households not borrowing, the trends continue to tell the story of debt, and more debt.
The household debt to income ratio is at a record 189.7, while the housing debt to income ratio was 140.1, again a record and the owner occupied housing debt to income ratio was also up, to 109.3. These are high numbers, on a trend and international comparable basis. Households are drowning in debt.
However the asset to income ratios tell another story. As home prices have fallen, so the ratio has decreased, assets are down relative to income. The exception are financial assets, which benefited from the rise in stock prices this year.
The ratio of interest to income continues to rise because households are borrowing at a faster rate than their incomes are growing, helped of course by lower interest rates. This ratio is below that before the GFC because rates have dropped. And this is the one ratio spruikers turn to to defend the high debt levels – but it is myopic, and going in the wrong direction.
Finally, the RBA data debt to assets shows the pincer movement as home prices fall, and debt rises. This is now heading towards the highest we have seen.
The obvious conclusion is that the debt burden is too great, mortgage stress will go on rising, until the balance between debt and income is restored.
The recent loosening of lending standards simply pours more fuel on the fire. Households are being used a canon fodder in the vein attempt to keep the faltering economy afloat.
Digital Finance Analytics (DFA) has released the May 2019 mortgage stress and default analysis update. Perhaps the rate cuts, rise to the minimum wage, and tax cuts ahead may turn the tide, but so far none of this matters for current household budgets. On the other hand more lending may make budgets even tighter if standards are dropped further.
Once again, it’s the continuing story of pressure on households as ongoing wages growth is not offsetting costs of living, and mortgage repayments as total debt continues to rise. Moreover, the trends have continued post the election.
Across Australia, more than 1,071,829
households are estimated to be now in mortgage stress (last month 1,050,450),
another new record. This equates to more than 31.9% of owner-occupied borrowing
households. In addition, more than 33,427 (30,413 last month) of these are in
severe stress. We estimate that more than 70,502 (last month 70,149) households’
risk 30-day default in the next 12 month. This is as the impact of flat wages
growth, rising living costs and higher real mortgage rates hit home. Bank losses are likely to rise a little ahead.
Our analysis uses the DFA core
market model which combines information from our 52,000 household surveys,
public data from the RBA, ABS and APRA; and private data from lenders and
aggregators. The data is current to the end of May 2019. We analyse household
cash flow based on real incomes, outgoings and mortgage repayments, rather than
using an arbitrary 30% of income.
Households are defined as
“stressed” when net income (or cash flow) does not cover ongoing costs. They
may or may not have access to other available assets, and some have paid ahead,
but households in mild stress have little leeway in their cash flows, whereas
those in severe stress are unable to meet repayments from current income. In
both cases, households manage this deficit by cutting back on spending, putting
more on credit cards and seeking to refinance, restructure or sell their
home. Those in severe stress are more
likely to be seeking hardship assistance and are often forced to sell.
Martin North, Principal of Digital Finance Analytics says that now
the election results are known, and the dust has settled, we are still seeing the
pressures on households are rising, thanks to an accumulation of larger
mortgages compared to income whilst costs are rising, and incomes remain static. Housing credit growth is still running
significantly faster than incomes and inflation and continued rises in living
costs – notably child care, healthcare costs, school fees and electricity
prices are causing significant pain. Many households are depleting their savings
to support their finances or are trying to refinance.
Probability of default extends our
mortgage stress analysis by overlaying economic indicators such as employment,
future wage growth and cpi changes. Our
Core Market Model also examines the potential of portfolio risk of loss in
basis point and value terms. Losses are likely to be higher among more affluent
households, contrary to the popular belief that affluent households are well
protected. This is shown in the segment
analysis below:
Stress by the numbers.
Regional analysis shows that NSW has
297,995 households in stress (284,014 last month), VIC 290,581 (292,114 last
month), QLD 193,155 (184,037 last month) and WA has 140,950 (140,836) last month).
The probability of default over the next 12 months rose, with around 13,222 (13,135
last month) in WA, around 12,948 (12,936 last month) in QLD, 17,773 (17,611
last week) in VIC and 18,822 (18,703 last month) in NSW.
The largest financial losses
relating to bank write-offs reside in NSW ($1.1 billion) from Owner Occupied
borrowers) and VIC ($1.54 billion), though losses are likely to be highest in
WA at 3.1 basis points, which equates to $1,107 million.
A fuller regional breakdown is set out below.
Here are
the top postcodes sorted by number of households in mortgage stress.
Handling
Mortgage Stress
Households who are in financial difficulty should not ignore the signs. Though many do. And trying to refinance to solve the problem often ends up just postponing the inevitable.
We think there are some simple steps households can take:
Step one is to draw up a budget, so you can see where the
money is coming and going. From our research, only half of households have any
budget. This means you can then make decisions about what is most important,
and what can be foregone. Select and prioritise.
Step two is to talk with your lender, as they have a legal
obligation to assist is case of hardship. Yet many households avoid having that
conversation, hoping the problem will cure itself. I have to say, in the
current low-income growth, high cost environment, that is unlikely. And remember rates are likely to rise at some
point.
Step three. Work out what would happen if mortgage rates rose by say half or one percent. Pass that across your budget and examine the impact. Then you will really know where you stand. Then plan accordingly.
You can request our media release. Note this will NOT automatically send you our research updates, for that register here.
[contact-form to=’mnorth@digitalfinanceanalytics.com’ subject=’Request The May 2019 Stress Release’][contact-field label=’Name’ type=’name’ required=’1’/][contact-field label=’Email’ type=’email’ required=’1’/][contact-field label=’Email Me The May 2019 Media Release’ type=’radio’ required=’1′ options=’Yes Please’/][contact-field label=”Comment If You Like” type=”textarea”/][/contact-form]
Note that the detailed results from our surveys and analysis are made available to our paying clients.
Digital Finance Analytics (DFA) has released the April 2019 mortgage stress and default analysis update. Once again, it’s the continuing story of pressure on households as ongoing wages growth is not offsetting costs of living, and mortgage repayments and total debt continues to rise. Recent bank reporting highlights the elevated risks in the household sector as this all plays out.
The latest RBA data on household debt to income to December rose to 189.6[1], and remains highly elevated. Plus, the housing debt ratio continues to climb to a new record of 140.2, according to the RBA. This shows that household debt to income is still increasing.
This is confirmed by the latest
financial aggregates to end March recently released by the RBA, with owner
occupied lending still growing significantly faster than inflation at 5.7%.
This high debt level, in the context of broader financial pressure, helps to explain the fact that mortgage stress continues to rise.
Across Australia, more than 1,050,450 households are estimated to be now in mortgage stress (last month 1,044,666), another new record. This equates to more than 31.7% of owner-occupied borrowing households. In addition, more than 30,413 (27,775 last month) of these are in severe stress. We estimate that more than 70,149 (last month 66,700) households’ risk 30-day default in the next 12 month. This is as the impact of flat wages growth, rising living costs and higher real mortgage rates hit home. Bank losses are likely to rise a little ahead.
Our analysis uses the DFA core
market model which combines information from our 52,000 household surveys,
public data from the RBA, ABS and APRA; and private data from lenders and
aggregators. The data is current to the end of April 2019. We analyse household
cash flow based on real incomes, outgoings and mortgage repayments, rather than
using an arbitrary 30% of income.
Households are defined as
“stressed” when net income (or cash flow) does not cover ongoing costs. They
may or may not have access to other available assets, and some have paid ahead,
but households in mild stress have little leeway in their cash flows, whereas
those in severe stress are unable to meet repayments from current income. In both
cases, households manage this deficit by cutting back on spending, putting more
on credit cards and seeking to refinance, restructure or sell their home. Those in severe stress are more likely to be
seeking hardship assistance and are often forced to sell.
Despite reassurances that household finances are fine, the pressures are rising, thanks to an accumulation of larger mortgages compared to income whilst costs are rising, and incomes remain static. Housing credit growth is still running significantly faster than incomes and inflation and continued rises in living costs – notably child care, healthcare costs, school fees and electricity prices are causing significant pain. Many households are depleting their savings to support their finances or are trying to refinance.
Probability of default extends our
mortgage stress analysis by overlaying economic indicators such as employment,
future wage growth and cpi changes. Our
Core Market Model also examines the potential of portfolio risk of loss in
basis point and value terms. Losses are likely to be higher among more affluent
households, contrary to the popular belief that affluent households are well
protected. This is shown in the segment
analysis below:
Stress by the numbers.
Regional analysis shows that NSW has
284,014 households in stress (286,890 last month), VIC 292,114 (283,753 last
month), QLD 184,037 (185,282 last month) and WA has 140,836 (141,199 last month).
The probability of default over the next 12 months rose, with around 13,135 (12,600
last month) in WA, around 12,936 (12,400 last month) in QLD, 17,611 (16,700
last week) in VIC and 18,703 (17,700 last month) in NSW.
The largest financial losses
relating to bank write-offs reside in NSW ($1.1 billion) from Owner Occupied
borrowers) and VIC ($1.46 billion) from Owner Occupied Borrowers, though losses
are likely to be highest in WA at 3.1 basis points, which equates to $1,046
million from Owner Occupied borrowers.
Here is a regional breakdown.
Here are the top postcodes sorted by number of households in mortgage stress.
Handling
Mortgage Stress
Households who are in financial difficulty should not ignore
the signs. Though many do. And trying to refinance to solve the problem often
ends up just postponing the inevitable.
We think there are some simple steps households can take:
Step one is to draw up a budget, so you can see where the
money is coming and going. From our research, only half of households have any
budget. This means you can then make decisions about what is most important,
and what can be foregone. Select and prioritise.
Step two is to talk with your lender, as they have a legal
obligation to assist is case of hardship. Yet many households avoid having that
conversation, hoping the problem will cure itself. I have to say, in the
current low-income growth, high cost environment, that is unlikely. And remember rates are likely to rise at some
point.
Step three. Work out what would happen if mortgage rates rose
by say half or one percent. Pass that across your budget and examine the
impact. Then you will really know where you stand. Then plan accordingly.
[1]
RBA E2 Household Finances – Selected Ratios December 2018
You can request our media release. Note this will NOT automatically send you our research updates, for that register here.
[contact-form to=’mnorth@digitalfinanceanalytics.com’ subject=’Request The April 2019 Stress Release’][contact-field label=’Name’ type=’name’ required=’1’/][contact-field label=’Email’ type=’email’ required=’1’/][contact-field label=’Email Me The April 2019 Media Release’ type=’radio’ required=’1′ options=’Yes Please’/][contact-field label=”Comment If You Like” type=”textarea”/][/contact-form]
Note that the detailed results from our surveys and analysis are made available to our paying clients.
It was just weeks ago that mention of rising mortgage defaults was met with some sniggers and jeers, with many in the industry pointing to what are still actually very low rates of arrears overall.
So you can imagine the surprise when the boss of one of Australia’s big four banks conceded today that he too was worried about home owners keeping up with their repayments.
If that’s not scary enough, according to the ANZ, as many as 5 per cent of homes slumped into negative equity in March, where the value of what they owe the bank is more than what their home is worth, putting even more pressure on borrowers.
It begs the question: is the worst of the house price falls now over, or is there worse to come?
Digital Finance Analytics (DFA) has released the March 2019 mortgage stress and default analysis update. It’s the continuing story of pressure on households as ongoing wages growth is not offsetting costs of living, and mortgage repayments and total debt continues to rise.
Note: Later in the month we will release mapping showing the percentage of households in stress across postcodes (as opposed to the number estimated to be in stress). We generally avoid this data view because a raw percentage calculation can easily be distorted by postcodes with low counts of borrowing household, but then we have had several requests for this alternative view.
The latest RBA data on household debt to income to December rose to 189.6[1], and remains highly elevated. Plus, the housing debt ratio continues to climb to a new record of 140.2, according to the RBA. This shows that household debt to income is still increasing.
This is confirmed by the latest
financial aggregates recently released by the RBA, with owner occupied lending
still growing significantly faster than inflation at 5.9%.
This high debt level, in the
context of broader financial pressure, helps to explain the fact that mortgage
stress continues to rise. Across Australia, more than 1,044,666 households are estimated
to be now in mortgage stress (last month 1,036,214), another new record. This
equates to more than 31.6% of owner-occupied borrowing households. In addition,
more than 27,775 of these are in severe stress. We estimate that more than 66,700
households’ risk 30-day default in the next 12 months, up 800 from last month. This
is as the impact of flat wages growth, rising living costs and higher real
mortgage rates hit home. Bank losses are
likely to rise a little ahead.
Our analysis uses the DFA core
market model which combines information from our 52,000 household surveys,
public data from the RBA, ABS and APRA; and private data from lenders and
aggregators. The data is current to the end of March 2019. We analyse household
cash flow based on real incomes, outgoings and mortgage repayments, rather than
using an arbitrary 30% of income.
Households are defined as
“stressed” when net income (or cash flow) does not cover ongoing costs. They
may or may not have access to other available assets, and some have paid ahead,
but households in mild stress have little leeway in their cash flows, whereas
those in severe stress are unable to meet repayments from current income. In
both cases, households manage this deficit by cutting back on spending, putting
more on credit cards and seeking to refinance, restructure or sell their
home. Those in severe stress are more
likely to be seeking hardship assistance and are often forced to sell.
The forces continue to build, despite reassurances that household finances are fine. This is because we continue to see an accumulation of larger mortgages compared to income whilst costs are rising, and incomes remain static. Housing credit growth is running significantly faster than incomes and inflation and continued rises in living costs – notably child care, school fees and electricity prices are causing significant pain. Many households are depleting their savings to support their finances.
Probability of default extends our
mortgage stress analysis by overlaying economic indicators such as employment,
future wage growth and cpi changes. Our
Core Market Model also examines the potential of portfolio risk of loss in
basis point and value terms. Losses are likely to be higher among more affluent
households, contrary to the popular belief that affluent households are well
protected. This is shown in the segment
analysis below:
Stress by the numbers.
Regional analysis shows that NSW has
286,890 households in stress (286,469 last month), VIC 283,753 (278,091 last
month), QLD 185,282 (185,424 last month) and WA has 141,199 (139,142 last month).
The probability of default over the next 12 months rose, with around 12,600 in
WA, around 12,400 in QLD, 16,700 in VIC and 17,700 in NSW.
The largest financial losses
relating to bank write-offs reside in NSW ($1.1 billion) from Owner Occupied
borrowers) and VIC ($1.49 billion) from Owner Occupied Borrowers, though losses
are likely to be highest in WA at 3.1 basis points, which equates to $1,045
million from Owner Occupied borrowers.
A fuller regional breakdown is set out below.
Here are
the top postcodes sorted by number of households in mortgage stress.
Handling
Mortgage Stress
Households who are in financial difficulty should not ignore
the signs. Though many do. And trying to refinance to solve the problem often
ends up just postponing the inevitable.
We think there are some simple steps households can take:
Step one is to draw up a budget, so you can see where the
money is coming and going. From our research, only half of households have any
budget. This means you can then make decisions about what is most important,
and what can be foregone. Select and prioritise.
Step two is to talk with your lender, as they have a legal
obligation to assist is case of hardship. Yet many households avoid having that
conversation, hoping the problem will cure itself. I have to say, in the
current low-income growth, high cost environment, that is unlikely. And remember rates are likely to rise at some
point.
Step three. Work out what would happen if mortgage rates rose
by say half or one percent. Pass that across your budget and examine the
impact. Then you will really know where you stand. Then plan accordingly.
[1]
RBA E2 Household Finances – Selected Ratios December 2018
You can request our media release. Note this will NOT automatically send you our research updates, for that register here.
[contact-form to=’mnorth@digitalfinanceanalytics.com’ subject=’Request The March 2019 Stress Release’][contact-field label=’Name’ type=’name’ required=’1’/][contact-field label=’Email’ type=’email’ required=’1’/][contact-field label=’Email Me The March 2019 Media Release’ type=’radio’ required=’1′ options=’Yes Please’/][contact-field label=”Comment If You Like” type=”textarea”/][/contact-form]
Note that the detailed results from our surveys and analysis are made available to our paying clients.