Mortgage Stress – Page 29 – Digital Finance Analytics (DFA) Blog

The Top 10 Mortgage Stress Post Codes In The Sydney Region

Continuing our series covering the latest Digital Finance Analytics mortgage stress analysis, today we look at the Sydney region. Despite low interest rates, many households are in mortgage stress. Here is a map showing the number of households we assess as being in mortgage stress by post code. There are more households in western Sydney in difficulty.

Here is the list of the top 10 post codes. The post code with the largest number of households in mortgage stress currently is 2650, Turvey Park. Of note is the household segment most represented here – namely mature, older households. In fact as you go down the top ten list, the striking observation is that various segments are represented, including young families, battlers, and older households.

When we examine the drivers of stress, three elements are working in combination to create the issues, despite ultra low interest rates. These households have high levels of debt, relative to income (large mortgages and credit card debt); their incomes are static or falling in real terms and child care costs are high, and increasing, compounding the high costs of living. We also note that a disproportionate number of households have loans dating from 2012-13, when lending criteria were more generous, and as a result, they have higher than average loan to value and loan to income ratios. Many would fail now to get the loan they have, based on current criteria and some are finding refinancing to cheaper loans difficult.

Next time we will look at Brisbane.

Mortgage Stress – It’s All About Granularity

We have updated the Digital Finance Analytics Mortgage Stress Analysis, to August 2016, using data from our household surveys. Contrary to what might be thought, whilst the ultra-low mortgage rates are easing the finances of some households, mortgage stress still exists, and it’s iron hand is being felt by more than 21% of households. But it is not equally spread across the population, so you need to get granular to see what is going on. Worth though noting the Roy Morgan data we reported already, estimated 18.4% of households were in mortgage stress, so some correlation.

Over the next few days we will drill into the details to highlight where the pain is most severe, but today we start with an overview.

Before we start, we define mortgage stress, not as a fixed percentage of income servicing the mortgage, rather we examine the household budget, comparing the income with outgoings, including mortgage repayments and other commitments. Those in mortgage stress do not have sufficient free funds to pay their mortgage on time, without difficulty. You can read more about our definitions of mortgage stress here.

Looking at the summary analysis, the largest proportion of households who are borrowing and in mortgage stress reside in TAS and SA, then VIC, WA; all above the national average. QLD and NSW are below the average, along with NT.

In total there were 769,592 households nationally in stress. Looking at the number of households in stress by state however, NSW has the largest number with 244,119.

Turning to our household segments, those in the disadvantaged fringe and young growing family groups are the most strongly represented.

But, expressed as a percentage of segments in stress, young growing families are most exposed, with 41% in mortgage stress, slightly ahead of battling urban 36.7% and disadvantaged fringe 36%. Young affluent, stressed seniors and wealthy seniors were the least stressed.

Finally, here is the top 30 or so, nationally. The most stressed post code in Australia at the moment is 4350, Harristown, with more than 7,000 households in difficulty. Note too that those at the top of the list are not necessarily as expected. Some older and more affluent segments are also being hit.

Next time we will look in more detail at some of the states, and discuss the underlying causes of mortgage stress. But for now, it is clear that mortgage stress is still a very significant economic factor.

Not on struggle street yet, but mortgage stress risk is rising

From The Conversation.

Newly released analysis from Roy Morgan reaffirms that it is the lowest-income households that face the highest mortgage stress. And, contrary to what many might expect, the worst stress is not in Sydney and Melbourne, where property prices have hit record highs.

The Roy Morgan report estimates that 18.4% of Australian households are experiencing mortgage stress, a situation where over one-third of their income goes towards servicing a home loan.

Mortgage stress can lead to many complex social issues. It is considered one of the underlying causes of the Global Financial Crisis.

For many households affected by mortgage stress, defaulting is the last resort. Yet, as the mortgage-servicing pressure increases, so does mortgage risk.

Mortgage risk, the chance of a borrower defaulting, has increased to 83.2% for households earning under $60,000 per year. It is, however, virtually non-existent for households earning more than $150,000.

Income is more important than interest rates

The Roy Morgan report highlights the importance of income, more so than house prices and borrowing costs, to mortgage stress. In fact, interest rates would need to more than double to match the impact of a loss of income on housing stress.

The previous peak in mortgage stress was in 2008-09, a period of high interest rates and bubble-like price growth in Sydney and Melbourne.

This time around, record low interest rates appear on the surface to be counter-balancing the default rate. Yet this is tied to a stagnation in income levels.

House prices and income levels moved in step until 2013. While house prices have continued to increase, household income levels have flattened since then, when the cash rate dropped to a historic low of 2.75%. The cash rate is now even lower at 1.50%, with further cuts forecast.

The troubling prediction from this is that mortgage stress among Australian households is set to remain high, despite the current low interest rates.

Widening inequality

As home ownership concentrates among wealthier households, this report also shows that higher-income households are more resilient to increases in interest rates. This means, too, that home ownership increasingly requires a dual income.

The owner-occupied home is often referred to as the largest single asset that most households own. In countries like Australia and the USA, home ownership is promoted by government and linked to many aspects of future wellbeing. However, as recent HILDA analysis shows, owner-occupied households are becoming far less common.

The “Great Australian Dream” is expected to apply to only a minority of households next decade. With those in the already most marginalised parts of society most affected by mortgage stress, a change in the structures that incentivise home ownership is required to minimise the growing inequality gap.

Pockets of pain

The limitation with national averages is that pockets of pain are brushed over. The report drills into state-by-state analysis and metro vs regional comparisons.

While the largest mortgages across the country, averaging over $300,000, are in Sydney, mortgage stress is highest in Tasmania and South Australia.

Mortgage stress in Tasmania and South Australia sits well above the national average, as do their unemployment figures, 6.5% and 6.9% respectively, against a national average of 5.7%. Households in regional areas are also facing more acute mortgage stress than their city counterparts.

The housing market underpins the Australian financial sector

Regulators aren’t taking any chances. With nearly $1 trillion in outstanding mortgage debt, double the pre-GFC level, the 2014 Financial Systems Inquiry identified that mortgages are now a significant systemic risk. In a recent speech on the prudential regulator’s outlook, APRA general manager Heidi Richards stated that “the housing market now underpins our financial sector”.

APRA has been tightening the lending standards of the big banks. Effective from July 1, the big banks have been required to apply higher “risk weightings” to residential mortgages. These determine the amount of capital held against assets to limit the likelihood of insolvency.

The silver lining to this otherwise depressing analysis is that the risks to financial stability are relatively low. Home ownership concentrated amongst wealthier households actually means there is a high degree of aggregate resilience to changes in future interest rates and incomes.

However, the report’s focus is on current incomes. To brace for a true housing market downturn, the key will be monitoring employment and income statistics – unemployment rates as well as hours.

Author:Danika Wright, Lecturer in Finance, University of Sydney

Mortgage Arrears Move Higher, Again

Standard & Poor’s Performance Index (SPIN) for May 2016 shows that 1.21% of high quality residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) were in arrears during the month, which is higher than the 1.14% reported in April. In fact this is the seventh month in a row that arrears have lifted. A year back the index was standing at 1.07%.

The index covers the universe of Australian RMBS rated by S&P. It measures the weighted-average arrears more than 30 days past due on loans in RMBS transactions. It is worth highlighting that it does not necessarily represent the entire market, as specific loan portfolios will be selected to package up and sell.

S&P says that the larger upward movements were in the major banks and other bank categories, while non-bank financial institutions was the only sector to see a decline in arrears. Most of the increase in arrears for the month was in the more severe category of 90-plus days overdue. The major banks’ 90 day-plus arrears rose four basis points to 0.48%, while non-banks fell a point to 17 basis points. This is an interesting observation as the major banks, in theory at least should have more sophisticated risk assessment capabilities.

They also say that the proportion of non-conforming loans in arrears increased to 4.71 per cent during the month from 4.25 per cent in April. However, note the non-conforming measure tends to exhibit some volatility from month to month and remains low by historical standards and well below the peak of 17 per cent in 2009.

Mortgage Stress Falls As Rates Are Cut

We have run our mortgage stress models, using data from our latest household surveys. At the moment, 21.73% of households are in difficulty (a fall thanks to lower rates from last years), though some locations and segments are above 30%. You can read about how we calculate mortgage stress in the Anatomy of Mortgage Stress.

Households in stress are having to cut back spending, are likely to be putting more on credit cards, will have refinanced to reduce payments, may be in arrears, or are taking to a broker about refinancing. The stress model has been updated with the latest survey data, and recent mortgage repricing. This covers owner occupied loans only. In our experience, stressed households, in a flat income environment do not recover, and grind on into greater difficulty later – also of course they are very exposed should rates rise.

Our first chart shows the proportion of households in stress by age of loan. (Of course most loans are just a few years old, so there are more households in recent years. We still see the impact of high first time buyer volumes in 2010 flowing though to higher stress levels, still.

Stress is not just the domain of the young. In fact proportionally, older households with loans are more likely to be stressed – though the numbers with a mortgage are much lower – this is because incomes are squeezed, and households have outstanding mortgages for longer.

Our master household segmentation shows that younger families, and disadvantaged households are more likely to be in stress. The affluent are least impacted.

Finally, we have a view by state and region. There are considerable differences across the states and by location. Again, this does not show the relative count by area, but remember half of all loans reside in NSW and VIC.

Overall we conclude that the cash rate cuts and deep discounts on refinanced loans have eased the pain for many households, despite static incomes. This chimes with recent improved household finance confidence levels.

Provided rates stay low, or go lower, stress levels will remain contained provided employment rates do not rise. Of course the real killer would be interest rate rises. But we are now not expecting lifts in rates anytime soon.

DFA Analysis Of Highly Leveraged Households Featured In Nine News Segment

Nine News tonight, using data from the DFA household research programme, highlighted the highly leveraged status of many households who have bought into the property market in the past couple of years.

Our research has shown that in some eastern suburbs within the Sydney area for example, many households would find even a small rise in mortgage interest rates would create significant financial headaches. The most exposed suburbs nationally are listed below.

The analysis is based on responses to our survey which asks whether households feel they could cope with covering the costs of an additional 1% on their mortgage. Given that many have mortgages of more than $500,000, even a small rise is enough to create problems, especially given static income. Note also that more affluent segments are more at risk.

Read more about our research in our recent blog posts.

Mortgage Stressed Household Count In Melbourne

Continuing our series of the number of households experiencing mortgage stress by post code, today we look at Melbourne. Here is the geo-map showing the relative number of households in each post code district. We have not shown this distribution before.

The areas with the highest count are listed below. Note the DFA segment distribution represented in each one. Whilst many are young families, or disadvantaged, many are more wealthy, and these have had access to larger loans, and more valuable property. But as a result they are more exposed, especially as incomes are static and costs are rising. Some are also getting squeezed by lower returns from savings and deposits with the banks.

We will post Brisbane next time.

Seven News Does Sydney Property

Seven covered the DFA research in a segment on their evening news tonight in Sydney.

Mortgage Stressed Household Count In Sydney

Continuing our analysis of mortgage stress (one of the drivers of our estimation of the probability of default), we have estimated the actual number of households in each post code who are experiencing stress currently. To recap, Mortgage stress is a poorly defined term. The RBA tends to equate stress with defaults (which remain at low levels on an international basis). A wider definition is 30% of income going on mortgage repayments (not consistently pre-or-post tax). This stems from the guidelines of affordability some banks used in 1980’s and 1990’s, when economic conditions were different from today. This is a blunt instrument. DFA does not think there is a good indicator of mortgage stress, so we use a series of questions to diagnose mortgage stress focusing on owner occupied households. Through these questions we identify two levels of stress – Mild and Severe.

Mild = households maintaining repayments, but by reprioritising expenditure, borrowing more on loans or cards, and refinancing
Severe = households who are behind with their repayments, are trying to sell, are trying to refinance, or who are being foreclosed

We maintain a rolling sample of 26,000 statistically representative households using a custom segment model nationally. Each month we execute omnibus surveys to 2,000 households. Our questions provide a current assessment of mortgage stress. We also model and project likely mortgage stress given the current and expected economic conditions. You can read about the methodology here. The map shows the number of households who are currently in mortgage stress.

This is an interesting view because it shows the absolute estimated number, not the percentage of households. We have not published this view before.

Most striking is the range of master household segments which are represented. An indication that stress is not directly correlated with affluence. We will post data for some of the other regions another time.

Households Necks In The Debt Noose

The ABS data released yesterday, highlights that overall household debt is sky high, much of it linked to mortgage borrowing. Whilst household net worth is over $8 trillion, its mainly thanks to house price inflation (and stock market holdings inflated by ultra low interest rates and QE). The RBA data tells the story. Using their data, (E2 HOUSEHOLD FINANCES – SELECTED RATIOS) we see that the ratio of housing debt to income is rising, in fact both the ratio covering owner occupied housing, and that covering both owner occupied housing and investment housing has risen significantly.

Of course, interest rates are low, so the ratio of interest payments to income are lower than when interest rates were at their peak in 2008. So the common assumption is that whilst debt is high, households can service it, and those with higher incomes have the greatest debt exposure.

In addition, banks are now “required” by APRA to use an interest rate of 7% when considering a loan application, higher than the common practice of a number of banks. APRA highlighted recently the range of rates banks were using for serviceability testing.

Chart 4: Existing mortgage debt shows interest rate used in investor serviceability assessment between 4%-9%

Some banks were underwriting loans with a very small serviceability buffer, so will have loans on book at greater risk, but at the moment serviceability is not required to be marked to market on an ongoing basis (though that may change under Basel IV).

This takes us to mortgage stress. Now, DFA has been tracking mortgage stress for year. Low interest rates have got many out of difficulty.

Mortgage stress is a poorly defined term. The RBA tends to equate stress with defaults (which remain at low levels on an international basis). A wider definition is 30% of income going on mortgage repayments (not consistently pre-or post tax). This stems from the guidelines of affordability some banks used in 1980’s and 1990’s, when economic conditions were different from today. This is a blunt instrument. DFA does not think there is a good indicator of mortgage stress, so we use a series of questions to diagnose mortgage stress focusing on owner occupied households. Through these questions we identify two levels of stress – Mild and Severe.

Mild = households maintaining repayments, but by reprioritising expenditure, borrowing more on loans or cards, and refinancing
Severe = households who are behind with their repayments, or are trying to sell, or are trying to refinance, or who are being foreclosed

In our latest data on stress we have noted some concerning trends. Despite the ultra-low interest rates, the proportion of households in some degree of mortgage stress is rising. This is because incomes are static, household expenses are rising and the average mortgage is larger, especially in some centres like Sydney. So if we look at segmented data we see that for some borrowing households, as many as 10% are registering in the severe category, and many more in the mild category. Many are just, and only just keeping their heads above water. Larger loans means they are more leveraged.

If we look at the severe stress by segment, by when the loan was last drawn down, we see significant peaks in more recent years (when loans were larger) than older loans. Typically in in years 2 and 3 of a loans life that stress is highest.

Now consider this. Assuming an average $350,000 mortgage over 30 years, if rates were to rise 1%, the average monthly costs for a p&i loan would rise by $220 and for an interest only loan $291. Such a rise would likely lift the proportion of households with mortgage stress from 35% of all borrowing households to close to 50% in our modelling. Interest only loans are more sensitive to rises.

We conclude that many households are a hair’s breadth away from difficulty. Another way of asking a similar question is how much free cash is available at the end of the month. For many households with large mortgages and average incomes, the short answer is nothing. No flex. No safety net. Whilst in the early 2000’s incomes were rising fast there is not easy exit this time. Many households are in the debt noose. Let’s hope no-one pulls the rope.