As More Households Are Crushed, Bankers Talk Their Own Book On Easing Mortgage Lending Rules!

Guess what, Bankers are looking at ways to ease lending standards to pump the market some more, as bank margins are under pressure at a time when lending growth is already strong, and more households are already in financial difficulty.

The value of new housing loans have risen by 17.9% since March 2023, to $27.6 billion dollars and were up 3.1% in March, according to the ABS.

The ABS also released their latest estimates of real living costs for households, they said Employee households recorded the largest annual rise in living costs of all household types with a rise of 6.5 per cent,

No surprise then that the DFA surveys for April showed a further rise in mortgage stress, to more than half of mortgaged borrowers, with many first-time borrowers and young growing families most exposed. In addition, rental stress remains very high, underscoring the pressures created by bad policy over many years, making housing unaffordable. On my live show coming up on Tuesday, we will look at this is more detail, and do a further post code deep dive.

AMP chief economist Shane Oliver says there might be scope to reduce buffers for people refinancing — the banks already have some room to do that — but cautions against significant changes to lending laws.

“We’ve gone through a very difficult time in the economy in terms of the massive rise in interest rates, and we’ve come through — so far anyway — at a relatively low level of arrears,” he notes.

“That partly reflects the responsible lending that the banks have been undertaking over the last few years. If we had to take a dramatic easing in lending standards, and the rules around that, the risk is that the next cycle could be far worse.”

http://www.martinnorth.com/

Go to the Walk The World Universe at https://walktheworld.com.au/

The Palace Coup You Need To Know About…

We have found another example of power pushing out those who are trying to control the banks, and the playbook is PRECISELY the same as the Aussie Post Affair.

I discuss this with Robbie Barwick from the Citizens Party, in the context of the planned removal of Responsible Lending protections and a response to try to remove this risk. You will not believe this…

https://citizensparty.org.au/morrison-government-overthrows-another-inconvenience-banks

But you can help once again to ensure the Cross-Benchers in the Senate know we are serious about keeping these essential protections.

Go to the Walk The World Universe at https://walktheworld.com.au/

The SME Responsible Lending Misdirection [Podcast]

The appalling proposed changes to Responsible Lending got stalled in the Senate last week. But the Government is going to try and convince the cross-benches they should be passed for the sake of the SME sector.

However, this is absolute misdirection, as SME lending (globally as well as locally) are impacted by a range of broader factors, including the risk-weights, which explain the reason for credit rationing. It has nothing to with Responsible lending, it is just a convenient excuse to try and push the opposition over the line. Just remember the Hayne Royal Commission clearly recommended keeping the current consumer protections. And also, SME lending is in any case not subject to Responsible Lending provisions. This is a dog-whistle by a desperate Politicians keen to serve their Banking masters.

Go to the Walk The World Universe at https://walktheworld.com.au/

Digital Finance Analytics (DFA) Blog
Digital Finance Analytics (DFA) Blog
The SME Responsible Lending Misdirection [Podcast]
Loading
/

The SME Responsible Lending Misdirection

The appalling proposed changes to Responsible Lending got stalled in the Senate last week. But the Government is going to try and convince the cross-benches they should be passed for the sake of the SME sector.

However, this is absolute misdirection, as SME lending (globally as well as locally) are impacted by a range of broader factors, including the risk-weights, which explain the reason for credit rationing. It has nothing to with Responsible lending, it is just a convenient excuse to try and push the opposition over the line. Just remember the Hayne Royal Commission clearly recommended keeping the current consumer protections. And also, SME lending is in any case not subject to Responsible Lending provisions. This is a dog-whistle by a desperate Politicians keen to serve their Banking masters.

Go to the Walk The World Universe at https://walktheworld.com.au/

Labor, Cross-benches: Stop This Lending Disaster! [Podcast]

My final plea to the Senate to oppose the proposed changes to Responsible Lending rules when its debated tomorrow. We do not need more irresponsible lending, and we need people to champion the interests of ordinary Australians, not just the banking sector.

Apart for significant misinformation and spin about the proposed changes, Commissioner Hayne in the Royal Commission into Financial Services was crystal clear: My conclusions about issues relating to the NCCP Act can be summed up as ‘apply the law as it stands’

The dissenting report from the Senate by Senator Nick McKim Australian Greens Senator for Tasmania makes all the right points:

What this bill boils down to is that people will be left to fend for themselves. As is befitting of this government’s ideology, this bill will shift the burden of responsibility from the bank to the consumer. The vast majority of borrowers will not be provided with the most basic of consumer protection, which is that the product being sold to them is fit for purpose.

This gets to a fundamental question about how markets are regulated and what protections should be provided to consumers. Commissioner Hayne explored this issue at length and highlighted it in the second of four key observations that he made about the misconduct that he uncovered in the Introduction to his Final Report:

…entities and individuals acted in the ways they did because they could. Entities set the terms on which they would deal, consumers often had little detailed knowledge or understanding of the transaction and consumers had next to no power to negotiate the terms. At most, a consumer could choose from an array of products offered by an entity, or by that entity and others, and the consumer was often not able to make a well‑informed choice between them. There was a marked imbalance of power and knowledge between those providing the product or service and those acquiring it.

This is why consumer regulation exists. Because the dream of the efficient-market hypothesis, where well-informed individuals act rationally, seeking out the best deal for themselves, and, in doing so, this bill is designed to let the banks get on with writing loans as big as they possibly can, whether it’s good for people or not, so that they can pay even bigger bonuses and rack up even bigger profits. In a country that already has one of the highest levels of consumer debt per capita in the world, this bill would give the banks a license to entice people into even more debt. Rather than building productive capacity and ensuring individual security, this would further constrain household spending, further constrain innovation, and further lead Australia down the dead end path that is an economy built on ever increasing house prices at the expense of just about everything else.

Go to the Walk The World Universe at https://walktheworld.com.au/

Digital Finance Analytics (DFA) Blog
Digital Finance Analytics (DFA) Blog
Labor, Cross-benches: Stop This Lending Disaster! [Podcast]
Loading
/

Labor, Cross-benches: Stop This Lending Disaster!

My final plea to the Senate to oppose the proposed changes to Responsible Lending rules when its debated tomorrow. We do not need more irresponsible lending, and we need people to champion the interests of ordinary Australians, not just the banking sector.

Apart for significant misinformation and spin about the proposed changes, Commissioner Hayne in the Royal Commission into Financial Services was crystal clear: My conclusions about issues relating to the NCCP Act can be summed up as ‘apply the law as it stands’

The dissenting report from the Senate by Senator Nick McKim Australian Greens Senator for Tasmania makes all the right points:

What this bill boils down to is that people will be left to fend for themselves. As is befitting of this government’s ideology, this bill will shift the burden of responsibility from the bank to the consumer. The vast majority of borrowers will not be provided with the most basic of consumer protection, which is that the product being sold to them is fit for purpose.

This gets to a fundamental question about how markets are regulated and what protections should be provided to consumers. Commissioner Hayne explored this issue at length and highlighted it in the second of four key observations that he made about the misconduct that he uncovered in the Introduction to his Final Report:

…entities and individuals acted in the ways they did because they could. Entities set the terms on which they would deal, consumers often had little detailed knowledge or understanding of the transaction and consumers had next to no power to negotiate the terms. At most, a consumer could choose from an array of products offered by an entity, or by that entity and others, and the consumer was often not able to make a well‑informed choice between them. There was a marked imbalance of power and knowledge between those providing the product or service and those acquiring it.

This is why consumer regulation exists. Because the dream of the efficient-market hypothesis, where well-informed individuals act rationally, seeking out the best deal for themselves, and, in doing so, this bill is designed to let the banks get on with writing loans as big as they possibly can, whether it’s good for people or not, so that they can pay even bigger bonuses and rack up even bigger profits. In a country that already has one of the highest levels of consumer debt per capita in the world, this bill would give the banks a license to entice people into even more debt. Rather than building productive capacity and ensuring individual security, this would further constrain household spending, further constrain innovation, and further lead Australia down the dead end path that is an economy built on ever increasing house prices at the expense of just about everything else.

Go to the Walk The World Universe at https://walktheworld.com.au/

The Responsible Lending Debacle

We discuss the current Senate inquiry into the proposed changes to responsible lending regulation. Submissions will close on the 3rd February, so its not too late to make a submission, to protect the rights of consumers.

https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Economics/NCCPEcoRocovery

Go to the Walk The World Universe at https://walktheworld.com.au/

Never Mind The Credit Quality: Feel The Width! [Podcast]

We discuss today’s changes to responsible lending. More unnatural acts..

Digital Finance Analytics (DFA) Blog
Digital Finance Analytics (DFA) Blog
Never Mind The Credit Quality: Feel The Width! [Podcast]
Loading
/