The “Tapping Super For Home Purchase” Conundrum!

Housing affordability is shot, as we have been discussing, thanks to demand stoked by high migration, higher lending multiples as the financial system was deregulation, and higher interest rates mirroring the RBA’s battel to tame inflation. As a result first time buyers are delaying their purchase by several years, and more borrowers are leveraged up to the gills, despite first home grant schemes, and shared equity schemes, which as the Productivity Commission showed did help a few get into the market, but lifted prices for everyone else, so did not help structurally.

Australians are already among the highest carriers of household debt in the world. In fact, according to Domain’s 2024 First Home Buyer Report, an entry-price home in Melbourne costs $678,000. In Sydney, it jumps to $927,250. Looking outside the two major cities reduces the cost to $545,000. To be lucky enough to secure any of these options, a 20 per cent deposit will set you back between $109,000 and $185,000.

So where do prospective buyers get that sort of cash? Well some might be able to get help from the Family Bank, as I showed recently, the average is more than $106,000 now, great if you have wealthy parents. Others may be able to save, but it’s a long road, and whilst interest rates are higher than they have been for some time on deposits, it will take years, and longer still if rates are cut later. Then of course there is the old chestnut, use accumulated super.

This week we got a draft report from the parliamentary committee chaired by prominent superannuation critic Andrew Bragg which has upped the ante on the Coalition’s super for housing policy, suggesting first home buyers should be able to withdraw all their retirement savings to buy a house or use it as collateral to help borrow.

My view is that this is actually a proxy political war on the purpose and nature of superannuation, rather than a real honest discussion about how to fix the broken property market. It is in essence a mixture of misdirection – look over there, not here, and avoid the more critical issues of migration control and increased and better-quality supply of affordable housing. Or in other words, it’s a case of fiddling while Rome burns, again.

http://www.martinnorth.com/

Go to the Walk The World Universe at https://walktheworld.com.au/

Today’s post is brought to you by Ribbon Property Consultants.

Author: Martin North

Martin North is the Principal of Digital Finance Analytics

Leave a Reply