The Cash Ban Breakthrough – The Game’s Afoot!

Latest on the cash ban, which was presented in Parliament today, with Robbie Barwick from the CEC.

On 19 September 2019, the Senate referred the provisions of the Currency (Restrictions on the Use of Cash) Bill 2019 [Provisions] to the Economics Legislation Committee for inquiry and report by 7 February 2020.

Submissions close 15 November 2019.

https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Economics/CurrencyCashBill2019

If you’d like to be part of a delegation to visit your local MP, call the CEC on 1-800 636 432 to be put in touch with others in your area.

Use and share these links for finding MPs and Senators. Click the link, and find the heading State/Territory in the box titled Refine Search on the right hand side of the page. Click on your state and call as many MPs and Senators as you can, on their Parliament House numbers, starting with 02-6.

MPs:

Senators:

Melissa’s Site:

Has The Fed Lost Control?

If today’s second consecutive repo was supposed to calm the stress in the secured lending market and ease the funding shortfall in the interbank market, it appears to have failed says Zerohedge.

As the WSJ said on Tuesday:

For the first time in more than a decade, the Federal Reserve injected cash into money markets Tuesday to pull down interest rates and said it would do so again Wednesday after technical factors led to a sudden shortfall of cash.

The pressures relate to shortages of funds banks face resulting from an increase in federal borrowing and the central bank’s decision to shrink the size of its securities holdings in recent years. It reduced these holdings by not buying new ones when they matured, effectively taking money out of the financial system.

Bloomberg said while the spike wasn’t evidence of any sort of imminent financial crisis, it highlighted how the Fed was losing control over short-term lending, one of its key tools for implementing monetary policy. It also indicated Wall Street is struggling to absorb record sales of Treasury debt to fund a swelling U.S. budget deficit. What’s more, many dealers have curtailed trading because of safeguards implemented after the 2008 crisis, making these markets more prone to volatility.

And Bloomberg today signals more intervention ahead.

The Federal Reserve made crystal clear that it doesn’t want U.S. money market rates to spike again like they did early this week, announcing it will — for the third day in a row — inject cash into this vital corner of finance.

On Thursday, the New York Fed will offer up to $75 billion in a so-called overnight repurchase agreement operation, adding another dose of temporary liquidity to restore order in the banking system. It made the same offer Tuesday and Wednesday, deploying a tool it hadn’t used in a decade. This latest action follows the Fed’s reduction in the interest rate on excess reserves, or IOER, another attempt to quell money-market stresses.

The prior operations have calmed markets, with repo rates declining Wednesday to more normal levels after jumping to 10% on Tuesday, four times where it was last week.

In addition, as Credit Swiss points out, Basel changed the rules:

The longer term issue is that the definition of “excess reserves” has changed in a Basel III environment. Previously excess reserves were defined by the Fed’s standard. If banks held more in the Federal Reserve accounts than they needed to settle transactions with one another, they had excess reserves. Now, under Basel III, excess reserves are defined by a global standard. Banks not only need enough reserves to settle accounts with one another at the end of each day – they also need to hold enough reserves for liquidity and capital buffer purposes. Indeed, reserves are better “high quality liquid assets” (HQLA) than even US Treasuries. In this context, at the beginning of 2017 (when Basel III really kicked in), banks found themselves with excess reserves by Fed standards, but deficient reserves by Basel III standards. Making matters worse for a little while were the Fed’s balance sheet reduction efforts, draining reserves from the system

This could be a signal of a potential liquidity crisis (echoes of 2007?).

Zerohedge says not only did O/N general collateral print at 2.25-2.60% after the repo operation, confirming that repo rates remain inexplicably elevated even though everyone who had funding needs supposedly met them thanks to the Fed, but in a more troubling development, the Effective Fed Funds rate printed at 2.30% at 9am this morning, breaching the Fed’s target range of 2.00%-2.25% for the first time.

Source: Bloomberg, Zerohedge

And yes, it is quite ironic that on the day the Fed is cutting rates, the Fed Funds was just “pushed” above the top end of the target range for the first time ever.

This also means that the EFF-IOER spread has now blown out to an unprecedented 20bps, yet another indication that the Fed has lost control of the rates corridor.

Source: Bloomberg, Zerohedge

But in what may be the most concerning move, today’s print for the Secured Overnight Financing Index (SOFR), which is widely expected to be Libor’s replacement, exploded higher by 282bps to a record 5.25%.

Source: Bloomberg, Zerohedge

Commenting on the blow out in the SOFR, Goldman had this to say on the “extremely volatile” price action in the key funding index:

The SOFR market saw extremely volatile price action over the course of the day…. Almost 20k in SERU9 blocks printed from 11:15am through the afternoon, pushing SERFFU9 from -10 to -21.5. Shortly after 4pm the market was given another jolt of adrenaline as news of a second Fed operation to be conducted tomorrow morning at 8:15am caused the spot-6mo curve to go bid into the close.

The problem here is that since SOFR is expected to replace LIBOR as the reference rate for several hundred trillions in fixed income securities, a spike such as this one would be perfectly sufficient to wreak havoc across market if indeed it had been the key reference rate.

Finally, courtesy of BMO’s Jon Hill, here is some commentary on today’s oversubscribed, and clearly insufficient, repo operation by the Fed:

Today’s emergency repo operation was oversubscribed with $51.6 bn in Treasury and $22.8 bn in MBS collateral accepted. The weighted average in USTs was 2.215%, with a high rate of 2.36% and a low of 2.10%. This should help alleviate some stress in USD funding markets, and the fact that it’s occurring earlier in the morning than Tuesday should help keep daily averages more subdued than yesterday – SOFR printed at a remarkable 5.25% (a stunning 282 bp spike) with fed funds still unknown but scheduled to be released at 9:00 AM ET and likely to print outside of the target range.

If Powell is successful at guiding the market toward assuming a mid-cycle adjustment, one specific repricing that will occur is in 2020 forwards, which are still factoring in one and a half 25 bp cuts next year as shown in the attached (admittedly, precision here is difficult due to the illiquidity of the Jan ’21 contract). This contrasts with the FOMC’s desire to execute a more modest drop in overnight rates and the price response here will be a focal point in determining how markets are responding to the impending Fed communication. If Powell is effective, look for that area of the curve to steepen sharply.

Fed Cuts Again

The Fed chair Jerome Powell said after the decision ” We don’t see a recession, we’re not expecting a recession, but are are making monetary policy more accommodative”, saying it is a mistake to hold onto your firepower until a downturn has gathered moment. This was seen by the market as “hawkish”, much to Trump’s annoyance! The US dollar was stronger after the announcement.

Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in July indicates that the labor market remains strong and that economic activity has been rising at a moderate rate. Job gains have been solid, on average, in recent months, and the unemployment rate has remained low. Although household spending has been rising at a strong pace, business fixed investment and exports have weakened. On a 12-month basis, overall inflation and inflation for items other than food and energy are running below 2 percent. Market-based measures of inflation compensation remain low; survey-based measures of longer-term inflation expectations are little changed.

Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability. In light of the implications of global developments for the economic outlook as well as muted inflation pressures, the Committee decided to lower the target range for the federal funds rate to 1-3/4 to 2 percent. This action supports the Committee’s view that sustained expansion of economic activity, strong labor market conditions, and inflation near the Committee’s symmetric 2 percent objective are the most likely outcomes, but uncertainties about this outlook remain. As the Committee contemplates the future path of the target range for the federal funds rate, it will continue to monitor the implications of incoming information for the economic outlook and will act as appropriate to sustain the expansion, with a strong labor market and inflation near its symmetric 2 percent objective.

In determining the timing and size of future adjustments to the target range for the federal funds rate, the Committee will assess realized and expected economic conditions relative to its maximum employment objective and its symmetric 2 percent inflation objective. This assessment will take into account a wide range of information, including measures of labor market conditions, indicators of inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and readings on financial and international developments.

Voting for the monetary policy action were Jerome H. Powell, Chair, John C. Williams, Vice Chair; Michelle W. Bowman; Lael Brainard; Richard H. Clarida; Charles L. Evans; and Randal K. Quarles. Voting against the action were James Bullard, who preferred at this meeting to lower the target range for the federal funds rate to 1-1/2 to 1-3/4 percent; and Esther L. George and Eric S. Rosengren, who preferred to maintain the target range at 2 percent to 2-1/4 percent.

The accompanying data flags lower rates ahead.

Scandinavian, Dutch and Swiss Mortgage Performance

Fitch Ratings says residential mortgage loans in Scandinavia, the Netherlands and Switzerland have seen exceptionally strong performance despite high loan-to-value (LTV) ratios and significant household debt. This reflects generous social security systems and large household wealth, which are a common denominator of these ‘AAA’ rated jurisdictions with strong public finances.

The growth of housing debt in Scandinavia, the Netherlands and Switzerland can be explained by a combination of tax deductibility, low interest rates, and unique features of each respective mortgage market. These include long contractual tenors and interest-only periods. Limited repayment has made borrowers more sensitive to house price decreases. However, macro-prudential requirements in each country are helping to address the risk that high household debt could jeopardise financial stability.

Macro-prudential measures were originally focused on maximum LTV and stressed affordability at origination, but lower mortgage rates continued to stimulate mortgage growth. Banking authorities therefore imposed minimum mortgage loan amortisation as well as maximum loan-to-income (LTI) or debt-to-income ratios. Such restrictions have contributed to the recent adjustment in Norwegian and Swedish house prices and limited lending growth in Denmark. Swiss regulators have tightened capital requirements for banks and promoted self-regulation, which established minimum amortisation for mortgages above 66% LTV. Gradual changes to tax incentives and underwriting standards were introduced by the Dutch authorities, especially since 2013, which have made the mortgage market more resilient.

DFA Updates Scenarios And Answers Questions – Replay

We ran our September 2019 live event last night with strong participation from our audience. During the show we discussed our updated scenarios (based on a starting point of August 2018) and answered a range of questions on property and finance.

The edited edition of the show is available to view in replay. This excludes the pre-show and live chat, but does include some behind the scene glimpses.

Our scenarios present a range of alternative outcomes, looking 2-3 years out. “Business As Usual” is based on the RBA’s view, with some tweaks – as we do not believe unemployment will fall to their target of 4.5%! Here there is a path to higher home prices, though with falls later as the current “recovery” reverses.

Things Can Only Get Better” – is our view of the fading local economy without significant international economic disruption, with unemployment rising, as retail and construction slows, countered by additional Government intervention within their “surplus” limits. Here home prices fall once again.

Not Yet Doomsday” is our scenario where international economic conditions deteriorate (China, US, Brexit Etc…) as global growth slows. This has a significant impact on the local economy and the spillover effects drive the Australian economy into recession. As liquidity pressures emerge one bank will need assistance.

Armageddon” is where we get a GFC 2.0 type event, with global liquidity under pressure, and banks needing to be rescued by either bailing in or bailing out. The spillover impacts will be significant (as once again tax payers or households end up picking up the tab. More QE will follow.

Finally “Doomsday” would be the case where Central Banks and Governments allow banks to fail, with all the knock-on consequences.

As well as estimating the impact on unemployment and home prices we also weight the probability of each outcome. This is updated each month as new information arrives via our Core Market Model.

The original live stream recording is also available, with the show commencing at 30 mins in to allow for the live chat replay.

A Cash Flash!

More on the Cash Restriction Bill with Robbie Barwick from the CEC.

The Liberal/Nationals joint party room agreed to support the bill, despite the 4,000 or so public submissions not posted by Treasury, and the details of the bill yet to be released. Democracy at work?

Use and share these links for finding MPs and Senators.

Click the link, and find the heading State/Territory in the box titled Refine Search on the right hand side of the page. Click on your state and call as many MPs and Senators as you can, on their Parliament House numbers, starting with 02-6.

MPs:
Senators:

Melissa’s Site

RBA Minutes – Rates To Go Lower…

The RBA released their minutes today. Clear talk of more cuts, against a weaker global scene. But holding on to households spending more as the housing sector wakens. Rates will be lower for longer as Central Banks globally cut to the max. Saved somewhat by Government spending and higher iron ore price, but small businesses not borrowing, and households not spending.

International Economic Conditions

Members commenced their discussion of the global economy by noting that business conditions in the manufacturing sectors in many economies had remained subdued. They discussed the escalation of the US–China trade and technology disputes, which had intensified the downside risks to the global outlook. By contrast, conditions in more domestically focused sectors had generally continued to be resilient, supported by ongoing strength in labour markets. Employment growth had remained robust in the major advanced economies, although it had eased a little in some economies in recent months, and unemployment rates had remained low. Although wages growth had picked up, year-ended inflation had remained below target in the major advanced economies. Members noted that inflation in the United States had increased in recent months.

The main development over the previous month had been the escalation of the US–China trade and technology disputes. The United States had announced higher tariffs on most imports from China, including consumer goods that had not previously been subject to the tariff increases, to take effect over the remainder of 2019. Members noted that recent and prospective increases in tariffs could increase consumer price inflation in the United States by between ¼ and ½ percentage point over the following few years, based on a range of published estimates. In response to the US announcements, China had suspended purchases of US agricultural products and had announced plans to increase tariffs on around one-half of the value of US imports. In value terms, US exports to China had contracted by around 20 per cent over the year to June, while US imports from China had been around 3 per cent lower. Members also noted that some other east Asian economies were benefiting from the diversion of US imports away from China.

More generally, global trade volumes had fallen over the previous year, reflecting both the escalation of trade tensions and slower growth in Chinese domestic demand. Weak external demand had been reflected in slowing growth in global industrial production and below-average conditions in the global manufacturing sector. Recent indicators suggested trade-related activity would remain weak for some time.

Members noted that weak external demand and heightened geopolitical uncertainty had contributed to lower growth in business investment in many economies, including the United States, the euro area and the United Kingdom. These economies had also recorded declines in investment intentions. By contrast, in the United States the household sector had been resilient, but overall GDP growth had slowed in the June quarter. GDP growth had also slowed in most euro area countries in the June quarter; Germany had recorded a small contraction in GDP. By contrast, GDP growth in Japan had been moderate, supported by consumption brought forward ahead of a scheduled increase in the consumption tax in October, as well as ongoing growth in investment, bolstered by the need to address labour shortages.

Recent data suggested that growth in China had eased further. Most indicators of economic activity had slowed in July, including in components being supported by recent policy measures, such as infrastructure investment. The level of steel production had declined slightly. Retail sales growth had resumed its downward trend, after having received a boost from strong growth in car sales in recent months ahead of tighter emission standards coming into effect. In India, recent indicators had also pointed to output growth slowing.

Weak global trade had continued to weigh on growth in east Asia. Trade within the region and with China had contracted further in June. Growth in industrial production and survey measures of manufacturing conditions had remained weak. Political unrest had weighed on economic conditions for businesses and households in Hong Kong, while an ongoing dispute with Japan had disrupted South Korean production of electronics. However, domestic demand elsewhere in the region had held up, supported by government policies in some cases.

Iron ore prices had declined since the previous meeting, but were around 40 per cent higher than a year earlier. Market reports had attributed these declines to a number of factors, including concerns about the outlook for steel demand in China following the escalation of the disputes between the United States and China in early August, lower steel prices and an easing in supply concerns. The prices of coal and rural commodities had been somewhat lower over the prior month, while oil and base metals prices had been little changed, except where there had been disruptions to the supply of specific metals.

Domestic Economic Conditions

The main information on the domestic economy received since the previous meeting had been on the labour market as well as partial indicators of output growth in the June quarter in the lead-up to the publication of the national accounts. Quarterly GDP growth was expected to be around ½ per cent, supported by a strong recovery in resource exports from earlier supply disruptions.

The ABS capital expenditure (Capex) survey suggested that mining investment had grown in the June quarter, driven by an increase in machinery & equipment investment. The Capex survey suggested there had also been an increase in machinery & equipment investment by the non-mining sector in the June quarter, while non-residential construction was expected to have declined. Investment intentions for 2019/20 had been positive for the mining sector, but had been modestly lower for the non-mining sector. Members noted that the outlook for the construction sector was particularly weak.

Members recognised that, overall, Australian businesses had not appeared to have been affected by the weak trade environment to the same extent as businesses in other advanced economies. This was partly because Australia’s exports are more exposed to Chinese domestic demand and less integrated in global supply chains.

Consumption growth was expected to have remained low in the June quarter. Retail sales volumes had been weak in the June quarter and the value of retail sales had fallen in July. The low- and middle-income tax offset (LMITO) was expected to boost household income, and thus support consumption growth, in coming quarters. However, the Bank’s liaison with retailers suggested that this had yet to lift spending noticeably. Members noted that even if the LMITO was used to pay off debts, this would still bring forward the point at which households could increase their spending.

Established housing market conditions had steadied in recent months. Reported housing prices in Sydney and Melbourne had risen noticeably in August and auction clearance rates had increased further, although volumes had remained low. Housing market conditions had been subdued elsewhere, although there were signs of housing prices stabilising in Brisbane. Housing turnover had remained low. Consequently, spending on home furnishings and other housing-related items was not expected to contribute to consumption growth in the near term. Indicators suggested that dwelling investment had declined further in the June quarter and indicators of earlier stages of residential building activity had remained weak; building approvals had declined further in June and other measures of early-stage activity and buyer interest had remained at low levels.

Employment growth had remained strong in July, but the unemployment rate had remained at 5.2 per cent. Employment growth over preceding months had been broadly based across states and had predominantly been in full-time work. Strong employment growth had been accompanied by a further increase in the participation rate, which had recorded another all-time high. Members noted that the increase in participation had been particularly notable for New South Wales. Forward-looking indicators had continued to suggest that employment growth would moderate over the following six months. Information from liaison suggested employment intentions had remained weak in the residential construction sector but positive among services firms.

Wages growth had remained low and the upward trend in wages growth appeared to have stalled. The wage price index had increased by 2.3 per cent over the year to the June quarter. Private sector wages growth had been unchanged in the quarter, while public sector wages growth had been a little higher. Most of this increase had been the result of a one-off adjustment to equalise the wages of nurses and midwives in Victoria with those in New South Wales.

Financial Markets

Members commenced their discussion of financial markets by noting that government bond yields had declined and were at record lows in many countries, including Australia. Volatility and risk premiums in global financial markets had increased in August, following the escalation of the disputes between the United States and China and disappointing economic data releases in Germany and China. The persistent downside risks to the global economy, combined with subdued inflation, had led a number of central banks to reduce interest rates in recent months and further monetary easing was widely expected.

In the United States, market pricing implied that the federal funds rate was expected to decline by around 100 basis points over the following year. Market participants also expected the European Central Bank to provide additional monetary stimulus in the near term, including renewed asset purchases and a reduction in its policy rate further into negative territory. Central banks in a number of other advanced economies had also eased policy, or signalled that they were prepared to do so, in response to subdued inflation, moderating activity and downside risks to growth. For similar reasons, central banks in emerging markets had also been easing policy over recent months and had signalled the possibility of further easing.

Financial conditions for corporations remained accommodative globally. This reflected market participants’ ongoing expectations that central banks were likely to deliver further monetary easing to sustain the global economic expansion. Corporate bond spreads had increased a little in August, but remained low. Equity prices had declined somewhat, reflecting concerns about the outlook for growth, but remained substantially higher over the year to date. In Australia, equity prices were 5 per cent below the record high reached in late July. Australian listed companies’ profits had risen, driven by the resources sector. At the aggregate level, companies had increased their dividends over the preceding year, although this reflected higher dividends in the resources sector in particular.

In China, the authorities had intervened to support three small banks in preceding months, and the People’s Bank of China had continued to maintain a high level of liquidity in the banking system. While funding conditions for smaller banks had tightened this year, money market rates and corporate and government bond yields in China had generally remained low and market participants were expecting further easing in monetary policy in the period ahead.

In foreign exchange markets, the Chinese renminbi had depreciated against the US dollar in August following the escalation of the US–China disputes, while the Japanese yen had appreciated over the month. The Australian dollar had been little changed at around its lowest level in some years.

In Australia, borrowing rates for both businesses and households were at historically low levels, as were banks’ funding costs. Variable mortgage rates had declined broadly in line with the reductions in the cash rate in June and July. Fixed mortgage rates had also declined substantially over the preceding six months. Financial market pricing continued to imply that the cash rate was expected to be lowered by another 25 basis points by November 2019, with a further cut expected in the early part of 2020.

Growth in housing credit had been little changed over the year to July, having declined steadily through 2018. Credit to investors had declined slightly over previous months. Meanwhile, housing loan approvals to both owner-occupiers and investors had increased for the second consecutive month in July. This pick-up in loan approvals had followed a significant decline over the preceding two years and was consistent with the signs of stabilisation in the established housing market. Borrowing by large businesses had continued to grow at a relatively strong pace. In contrast, small businesses’ access to finance remained difficult, and had become more difficult over the preceding year as banks had tightened their lending practices. While new sources of non-traditional finance had been growing, including equity funding from family offices and private equity funds, they remained a small share of business funding.

Members had a detailed discussion of the ways in which financial conditions abroad affect Australia. They discussed how shifts in world interest rates and global risk premiums flow through to domestic financial conditions. While Australia’s floating exchange rate means that monetary policy can be set largely according to domestic considerations, members discussed the large shifts in savings/investment decisions globally, which were affecting the level of interest rates everywhere, including in Australia. Members also noted the critical role that the exchange rate had played over many years as a shock absorber for the Australian economy. One important factor here has been that Australian entities raising offshore funding are able to do so in Australian dollars, either directly or via hedging markets.

Considerations for Monetary Policy

Turning to the policy decision, members observed that the news on the international economy had confirmed that the risks to the global growth outlook were to the downside. The trade disputes between the United States and China had escalated and growth in China had continued to slow. There had been further indications that these developments were affecting trade and investment decisions in overseas economies, although businesses had continued hiring and labour market conditions had remained tight.

Against this backdrop and with ongoing low inflation, a number of central banks had reduced interest rates over recent months and further monetary easing was widely expected. Long-term government bond yields had declined and were at record lows in many countries, including Australia. Borrowing rates for both businesses and households were also at historically low levels, and the Australian dollar exchange rate was at the lowest level that it had been in recent times.

Domestically, members considered a number of developments over preceding months that had a bearing on the monetary policy decision. First, employment had continued to grow strongly and the participation rate was at a record high. However, the unemployment rate had remained steady at around 5.2 per cent over recent months. At the same time, wages growth had remained low and there were few indications that wage pressures were building. Members noted that a further gradual lift in wages growth would be a welcome development. Taken together, recent outcomes suggested that spare capacity remained in the labour market and that the Australian economy could sustain lower rates of unemployment and underemployment.

Second, there had been further signs of a turnaround in established housing markets, especially in Sydney and Melbourne, although housing turnover had remained low. Housing credit growth had remained subdued, although mortgage rates were at record low levels and there was strong competition for borrowers of high credit quality. Data on residential building approvals and information from the Bank’s liaison program suggested that there was likely to be further weakness in dwelling investment in the near term; members recognised that this could sow the seeds of an upswing in the housing price cycle at some point, particularly given the lengthy stages in the construction of higher-density residential housing. Demand for credit by investors continued to be subdued and credit conditions, especially for small and medium-sized businesses, remained tight.

Finally, based on partial indicators, GDP growth in the June quarter was expected to have been around ½ per cent. The largest contributions to growth were expected to have been from exports and public demand. Private final demand, which includes consumption, business investment and dwelling investment, was expected to have been weak.

Looking forward, the outlook for output growth was being supported by the low level of interest rates, recent tax cuts, signs of stabilisation in some established housing markets and a brighter outlook for the resources sector. A key uncertainty continued to be the outlook for consumption growth, which was expected to increase over time, supported by a gradual pick-up in growth in household disposable income and improvements in conditions in the housing market. Inflation pressures remained subdued, but inflation was expected to increase gradually to be a little above 2 per cent over 2021 as output growth picked up and the labour market tightened.

Based on the information available, members judged that it was reasonable to expect that an extended period of low interest rates would be required in Australia to make sustained progress towards full employment and achieve more assured progress towards the inflation target. Members would assess developments in both the international and domestic economies, including labour market conditions, and would ease monetary policy further if needed to support sustainable growth in the economy and the achievement of the inflation target over time.

The Decision

The Board decided to leave the cash rate unchanged at 1.00 per cent.

NSW Mortgage Arrears Higher In July – S&P

Australian prime home loan arrears fell in July in all states except NSW and South Australia, but they remain above their five-year average, new data from Standard & Poor’s has shown, via The Adviser.

The Standard & Poor’s Performance Index (SPIN) for Australian prime mortgages dropped to 1.49 per cent in July 2019, down from 1.51 per cent a month earlier, S&P Global Ratings’ recent RMBS Arrears Statistics: Australia report showed.

According to the data, which measures the weighted average of residential mortgage loans that are more than 30 days past due in publicly and privately rated Australian RMBS transactions, prime arrears typically drop in spring and are expected to decline during the third quarter of the year.

However, while the arrears index dropped month-on-month, the data showed that arrears were 11 basis points higher than they were in July 2018 and remain above their five-year average of 1.25 per cent.

Looking at arrears on a national level, arrears improved in six states and territories, with NSW and South Australia showing an uptick in arrears.

NSW saw an increase to 1.29 per cent, while South Australia saw arrears rise to 1.54 per cent in July 2019.

Western Australia recorded the largest drop in arrears during July, with the rate decreasing 14 basis points to 2.91 per cent.

According to S&P, the majority of this improvement was for loans 30-60 days in arrears. Loans more than 90 days in arrears, however, continued to increase in the western state.

Owner-occupier arrears improved in July, falling by 3 basis points to 1.71 per cent.

However, investor arrears remained mostly unchanged in July, falling by 1 basis point to 1.46 per cent from the previous month. 

According to S&P, this partly reflects the “generally tighter lending conditions for investors in the current environment”.

“We expect arrears to continue to decline as the recent rate cuts filter through. These improvements are likely to be seen in the earlier arrears categories, which are more sensitive to interest-rate movements. We expect longer-dated arrears to remain elevated in a softer economic environment,” S&P analysts stated.

“Recent rises in housing finance approvals could bolster refinancing conditions, which started to improve in July, rising 5.4 per cent in seasonally adjusted terms. This will help to stabilize arrears and prepayment rates if the current momentum continues because refinancing is a common way for borrowers to self-manage their way out of arrears.”

RBA on the rising arrears rate

The level of mortgages past due has been noted in recent months, with the Reserve Bank of Australia’s head of financial stability, Jonathan Kearns, noting in June that the number of people in arrears on their home loans had reached the highest level recorded since the global financial crisis.

In an address to the 2019 Property Leaders’ Summit in Australia in June, Mr Kearns discussed the factors contributing to the continual rise in home loan arrears.

Mr Kearns claimed that “cyclical upswings” in arrears were attributable to weak economic conditions, which include falling or stagnant wages and softness in the housing market – which may inhibit some borrowers from selling their property to ease their mortgage burden.

The head of financial stability also acknowledged that tighter lending standards can conversely impact a borrower’s ability to meet their mortgage repayments, pointing to previous restrictions on interest-only lending, which prevented borrowers from rolling over the interest-only period.

Mr Kearns also conceded that tighter serviceability measures may prevent distressed borrowers from refinancing their loan, cited by S&P as one of the factors contributing to the rise in delinquencies.

However, Mr Kearns pointed to internal data collected by the Reserve Bank, which suggested that the application of tighter lending standards has been “effective” in improving credit quality.

Mr Kearns said at the time that he expected the overall arrears rate to continue rising, but he claimed the trend would not pose a significant threat to financial stability.

“To the extent that we can point to drivers of the rise in arrears, while the economic outlook remains reasonable and household income growth is expected to pick up, the influence of at least some other drivers may not reverse course sharply in the near future, and so the arrears rate could continue to edge higher for a bit longer,” he said.

“But with overall strong lending standards, so long as unemployment remains low, arrears rates should not rise to levels that pose a risk to the financial system or cause great harm to the household sector.”