I discuss the Irish financial crisis a decade ago with financial writer, adviser and broadcaster Eddie Hobbs, who lived through the crash and commented on the events in Ireland. He wrote and presented a programme on state broadcaster RTE entitled Rip-Off Republic in 2005.
There are strong parallels to the current situation in Australia and important lessons to be learnt. But as he says, it may already be too late to avoid a crash. He also talks about the post crash environment and how high debt and falling home prices have haunted a generation. In particular there are social consequences which are often ignored and insolvency rules may well protect the banks over individuals.
In our first episode of ‘In the Interests of the People’, Adams and North discuss what are the obligations of Federal Parliamentarians to disclose whether an economic crisis is coming and whether they can be trusted to tell the Australian people the truth about the coming economic crisis in 2019/2020.
Here is an extract from the new show, and links to our new channel. Please do subscribe to it to receive alerts, there, as well as continuing to follow my work here.
Meantime, its business as usual on this channel, with more finance and property news with a distinctly Australian flavour coming right up!
Today we discuss how banks lend, and why the idea that bank deposits
limit bank lending is plain wrong and helps to explain why home prices
have exploded in recent years.
The correlation between home prices and credit availability
are clear to see. We have updated this chart to take account of 2018 data. As
credit rose from 2012 onward, home prices did too. It also suggests that if
credit availability is tightened, we should expect prices to fall – take note,
given the current tighter underwriting standards now in force. This is why I
predict ongoing falls in property prices.
And more specifically, credit for property investment is
even more strongly correlated. As we know investors are attracted by the
capital growth, and also the capital gains and negative gearing tax breaks
available.
What’s most interesting is the relative weight of these
different factors in driving home prices. The four most powerful levers in
terms of home prices is first overall growth in personal credit, including
mortgages and other loans at 27% of total impact. Investment lending
contributed a further 18%, followed by tax policy for investment property
at 17% and the cash rate at 14%. The other factors, the ones which are spoken
about the most, property supply, population growth, planning restrictions and
migration, together make up just 22% of total impact. Or in other words,
without addressing the credit elephant in the room, tax policy and interest
rates, the chances of taming prices is low. First time buyer incentives were
less than 1%!
So the greatest of these is credit policy, which has for
years allowed banks to magic money from thin air, to lend to borrowers, to
drive up home prices, to inflate the banks balance sheet, to lend more to drive
prices higher – repeat ad nauseam! Totally unproductive, and in fact it
sucks the air out of the real economy and money directly out of punters wages,
but make bankers and their shareholders richer. Plus, the second order impacts
to the construction sector.
Two final observations. First the GDP calculation we use in
Australia is flattered by housing growth (triggered by credit growth) and
construction activity. The second driver of GDP growth is population
growth. But in real terms neither of these are really creating true
economic growth, as seen in the per capita data.
Second, the capital regulatory framework from the Bank For
International Settlements is still a hangover from the days when deposits were
thought to drive loans – so holding a ratio of assets to protect deposits made
sense. But given the multiplier effect available to banks via their ability to
issue bonds and the like increase their loan books, the BIS rules as currently
formulated are ineffective. In fact by applying low risk weights to mortgage
loans, they encourage to banks to leverage up more – in Australia our major
banks have only about 5%of shareholder capital at risk. This is way too low.
To, conclude, to solve the property
equation, and the economic future of the country, we have to address
credit. But then again, I refer to the fact that most economists still think
credit is unimportant in macroeconomic terms!
The alternative is to continue to let credit grow well above
wages, and lift the already heavy debt burden even higher. In fact, some are
calling for a reversal of recent credit tightening to resurrect home price
growth. But, that is, ultimately unsustainable, and why there will be an
economic correction in Australia, and quite soon.
Welcome to the Property Imperative weekly to the twenty sixth of January 2019, – Australia day – our digest of the latest finance and property news with a distinctively Australian flavour.
Watch the video or read the transcript.
This week, amid weaker global economic news, there were signs that more stimulus of the financial system is coming, in response to weak growth, stalling inflation, and still low interest rates. Looks like QE2 is just around the corner – meaning more debt, and higher asset prices will devalue the true value of money further. The debt can will indeed, as expected, be kicked down the road, to support the financial system, incumbent governments and the 1%, as real people get taken to the cleaners – again.
And by the way if you value the content we produce please do consider supporting our efforts. You can make a one off donation via PayPal, or consider joining our Patreon programme. We really appreciate those who are contributing to help us continue to make great content.
We start with the global scene, with Fitch ratings reporting that Global
government debt reached 66 trillion US dollars at end-2018, nearly double its
2007 level and equivalent to 80% of global GDP.
Developed market government debt has been fairly stable in US dollar
terms, at close to 50 trillion US dollars since 2012. In contrast, Emerging
market debt has jumped to 15 trillion US dollars from 10 trillion over the same period, with the
biggest increases in percentage terms being in the Middle East and North Africa
(104%) and Sub-Saharan Africa (75%), though these regions still have
comparatively low debt stocks, at less than 1 trillion US dollars each.
And Fitch also pointed out
that recent corporate defaults – including Snton, Reward and KDX in China, have
highlighted the risk of broader disclosure and governance problems among
Chinese corporates, as well as the variable quality of local auditing, despite
these companies having reported under agreed accounting standards. You can see our recent discussion with Robbie
Barwick on the problems created by the big four Auditing firms, and why the CEC
is calling for an audit of our big four banks – see “Auditing The Banks
– The Bankers’ Deadly Embrace”.
And among the Davos circus, The IMF’s latest
World Economic Outlook Update, January 2019, says that global growth in 2018 is
estimated to be 3.7 percent, as it was last fall, but signs of a slowdown in
the second half of 2018 have led to downward revisions for several economies.
Specifically, growth in advanced economies is projected to slow from an
estimated 2.3 percent in 2018 to 2.0 percent in 2019 and 1.7 percent in 2020. Weakness
in the second half of 2018 will carry over to coming quarters, with global
growth projected to decline to 3.5 percent in 2019 before picking up slightly
to 3.6 percent in 2020 (0.2 percentage point and 0.1 percentage point lower,
respectively, than in the previous WEO). This growth pattern reflects a
persistent decline in the growth rate of advanced economies from above-trend
levels—occurring more rapidly than previously anticipated—together with a
temporary decline in the growth rate for emerging market and developing
economies in 2019, reflecting contractions in Argentina and Turkey, as well as
the impact of trade actions on China and other Asian economies.
Specifically, growth in advanced economies is projected to slow from an
estimated 2.3 percent in 2018 to 2.0 percent in 2019 and 1.7 percent in 2020.
This estimated growth rate for 2018 and the projection for 2019 are 0.1
percentage point lower than in the October 2018 WEO, mostly due to downward
revisions for the euro area. We
discussed this in our show “It Is Time To
Prepare For The Next Downturn”. Problem is the quest for growth is getting harder
as we reach peak debt.
Some high-ranking World Economic Forum participants at Davos spoke out
sharply negatively against Bitcoin, predicting that its price would literally
drop to zero. A little over a year ago, such statements caused a flurry of
market emotions. Now these messages are honoured only by a slight smirk. The
summary is simple: over the year the market has matured. The main awareness of
investors is that no one knows for sure the future of cryptocurrency, and
long-term growth forecasts up to “hundreds of thousands of dollars for a coin”
or “zeroing rates” are worthless and have no effect on anything.
Elsewhere ECB President Mario Draghi said this week that the risks
surrounding the euro area growth outlook have moved to the downside on account
of the persistence of uncertainties related to geopolitical factors and the
threat of protectionism, vulnerabilities in emerging markets and financial
market volatility.
This triggered a Euro sell-off to its lowest level since early December
2018, and the German economy looks especially exposed now. The ZEW Economic Sentiment for Germany was
released this week, and the ZEW president said “It is remarkable that the ZEW
Economic Sentiment for Germany has not deteriorated further given the large
number of global economic risks”. The
German economy has been grinding along at 1.5% per annum, the lowest in five
years, and recent forecasts suggest a lower 1.1% ahead, thanks to basket of
risks including Brexit. But as Bloomberg said, one main factor behind the slump
in the German manufacturing sector was the failure of inflation, particularly
producer price inflation to drop in line with the tumbling price of oil in
recent months. That’s in part, because of what’s happening to the Rhine, which
has seen its water levels drop after a drought during the summer. The Rhine is
crucial for German industry because it provides not only an avenue for the
distribution of raw materials to German manufacturers but also a means of
transporting finished goods to Europe’s largest port, Rotterdam, which sits at
the river’s mouth. Low water levels in the Rhine, translates into a “supply
shock in German manufacturing,” by lowering the availability of key goods
needed for the sector, which come to factories situated on the river by barge.
These barges need a depth of water to traverse the river above current levels.
And the latest from the US, is suggesting that the FED may have finished with interest rate hikes in the near term, and even their quantitative tightening agenda may be in question, in the light of the market reactions at the end of last year and pressure from political quarters in the US.
And to emphasize the “loosening” bias, in the UK, still in the Brexit muddle, the UK Financial Conduct Authority said they plan to improve so-called mortgage prisoners’ access to refinancing by relaxing current mortgage affordability regulations that preclude them refinancing into cheaper mortgage deals because they fail to meet affordability standards that were tightened in 2016. The FCA has suggested that authorised UK lenders would be willing to refinance such mortgage prisoners if the borrower qualified for refinancing under the new rules, which would require the new mortgage installments to be lower than previous installments and for the borrower to be up to date with their payments. The new rules would replace current affordability tests for these borrowers, which make sure a borrower has enough money left to pay their mortgage installments in a stressed interest rate environment after covering all other basic needs (e.g. bills, food, childcare).
This despite the continued unaffordable housing across many countries,
including the UK, as reported in the newly released 15th edition of
the Demographia survey. Once again it
shows that Australia and New Zealand property is unaffordable. Globally there
were 26 severely unaffordable major housing markets in 2018. As normal they
argue for planning reforms to release land, but do not consider credit
availability, the strongest lever to affordability! You can watch our show on this
“Housing Affordability – Still In The Doldrums”. The severely unaffordable major markets
include all in Australia (5), New Zealand (1) and China (1). Two of Canada’s
six markets are severely unaffordable. Seven of the 21 major markets in the
United Kingdom, and 13 of the 55 major markets in the United States are
severely unaffordable.
This is simply the fruits of unrelenting quantitative easing, money printing and easy credit. Yet we seem destined for more of the same.
Locally there was one bright spot this week, unemployment fell to a
record 5% low, according to the ABS data to
December 2018. The participation rate remaining steady at 65.6%; and the employment
to population ratio remaining steady at 62.3%. In fact, they revised down last
month’s data to get to the 5%, where it remained in December. This will temper
any RBA response to the falling housing market in our view. But of course the
hurdle to be “employed” is ultra-low, and many of the jobs are in sectors
paying low wages, plus we expect to see a rise in unemployed construction
workers ahead, so this may be a hollow victory.
But beyond that, you had to look hard to find any other good news on the
economy here this week. For example, following the heavy 15% decline in new car
sales in 2018, plus the 9% decline in motorcycle sales, Moody’s said
delinquencies for Australian auto loan asset-backed securities (ABS) has
surpassed Global Financial Crisis levels. These auto loans are non-revolving
with a fixed interest rate so they are an excellent benchmark to true credit
stress and this again shows the impact of high debt despite low interest rates.
As our mortgage stress analysis highlights, many households are up to their
eyeballs in debt.
And there was more evidence of the weakness in the Australian economy. The Economist took a bearish view, saying our housing market is now one of the most overvalued… Household debt has reached 200% of disposable income. The saving rate is skimpy… House prices have been falling for a year. Australia’s banks may not have been quite as conservative as previously advertised. The share of interest-only loans, favoured by speculators, was as high as 40%. The number of permits issued for apartment buildings has fallen. The momentum that drove the market up, as higher prices fuelled expectations of further gains, works in reverse too. The lucky country has avoided so many potential slip-ups that even long-standing bears are wary of predicting a fall. The more banana skins you dodge, the bigger the manhole waiting for you.
And we made a series of posts this week, which underscores the
pressures, mainly centred on housing and finance. For example, AFG, the mortgage
aggregator showed a significant slowing in loan applications in their latest
quarterly index. NAB lifted their mortgage
rates for existing variable rate borrowers, by up to 16 basis points, as NABs
chief customer officer Mike Baird said that the bank could no longer afford to
absorb higher funding costs. And AMP’s Shane Oliver upped his
expectation of home price falls in Sydney and Melbourne to 25%, see our post The “Good News” on Property Prices, where we discussed his reasoning, and also highlighted
that another half a percent of mortgage rate rises are on the cards thanks to
higher funding costs.
Following Domains property price trend falls, released this week, see our post “More Evidence of Home Price Falls”, CoreLogic’s home price index slide again. As a
result, the quarterly decline has steepened to 3.31%, across the five capital
cities, with Sydney, Melbourne and Perth worst hit. In the last year home
values have fallen by 7.1%, thanks mainly to falls in Sydney, Melbourne and
Perth. And from past peaks, dwelling values have fallen by 8.1%, led by Sydney
(-12.1%), Melbourne (-8.5%) and Perth (-16.3%). And remember these are
averages, some areas have done much worse.
CoreLogic says Weekly rents across the nation fell by -0.1% in December
2018 to be -0.3% lower over the fourth quarter of 2018 however, rents increased
by 0.5% over the 12 months to December 2018. Capital city rents were -0.4%
lower over the quarter and unchanged year-on-year while regional market rents
were 0.3% higher over the quarter to be 1.8% higher over the past 12 months. The
annual change in both combined capital city and national rents is the lowest on
record based on data which is available back to 2005. Over the past 12 months,
rents have increased in all capital cities except for Sydney and Darwin. Brisbane
and Perth are the only two capital cities in which the annual change throughout
2018 has accelerated relative to the change in 2017.
NAB’s latest property survey to December 2018, showed that confidence,
prices and transaction expectations are all falling, no surprise there. Average survey expectations for national
house prices for the next 12 months were cut back further in Q4, and are now
tipped to fall -2.4% (-1.0% in Q3). This
largely reflected a big downward revision by property professionals in VIC, who
now expect prices to fall by a much bigger -4.0% (-2.4% forecast in Q3). In
NSW, expectations were also scaled back heavily to -3.9% (-2.4% forecast in Q3).
As a result, VIC has also replaced NSW as the weakest state for house price
growth in the next 12 months. Falling
house prices are expected to extend beyond VIC and NSW. In SA/NT, average
prices are also expected to fall 0.4% (-0.3% in Q3). In QLD, property
professionals now believe prices will fall -0.5% in the next 12 months, after
forecasting growth of 0.8% in the previous survey. WA is the only state in
which property professionals don’t expect prices to fall in the next 12 months
(0.0%), albeit expectations have been scaled back from 0.5% forecast in Q3.
Consequently, WA has replaced QLD for having the best prospects for house
prices in the country in the next 12 months.
In early-December, NAB Economics revised down their house price forecasts,
seeing a larger peak to trough fall of around 10-15% in capital city dwelling
prices. House prices continued to fall Q4 alongside the cooling in the housing
market more generally. Capital city house prices declined by 6.1% in 2018, and
are now 6.7% lower than their peak in mid-2017… Overall, they expect some
further price declines in 2019, before levelling out in 2020. We expect the
weakness to be driven by ongoing declines in Sydney and Melbourne…
But the killer was the data on foreign buyer transactions, which shows a significant fall in both new and established home purchases. And linked to that, and the fall in new building approvals, the Australian reported that more building firms are under pressure. “Dozens of development sites in Sydney, Brisbane and Melbourne, some large enough for 600-unit apartment towers, are hitting the market as Chinese developers plagued by poor buyer appetite and lack of finance are forced to sell. “The apartment market is in serious trouble and development sites are falling in price. A lot of Chinese paid pretty big prices in 2016 and a lot of development sites doubled or trebled in value between 2014 and 2018 and they will halve or worse,” Property Developer David Kingston told The Australian. “I am certain the Chinese will be selling development sites for multiple reasons including the fact that development margins have disappeared and values have plummeted. The ability to obtain development finance has been substantially reduced, and the ability to pre-sell apartments has collapsed.”
We appeared in a number of television shows this week, I took part in a
discussion on Peter Switzer’s
Money Talks, along with Michael Blythe from CBA and Nicki Hutley from Deloitte, making
my case for more sustained falls in home prices, compared with the mainstream –
we will see who is right in a year or two!
I discussed the latest trends in home prices on ABC News 24, and also discussed the latest on the high-rise
building fiasco, after the Opal Tower. Talking, of which the Australian has reported that
The NSW government could be liable for any major defects in at least four major
apartment projects in Sydney Olympic Park as well as a flagship tower in the
city’s $8 billion Green Square project under its own laws that define the
“developer” as the legal owner of the land… Under NSW statutory warranties, the
owners corporation of an apartment block can sue the developer and builder
within two years for minor defects and six years for major defects. Sydney Olympic Park Authority, a NSW
government entity, was the legal landowner in the case of Opal Tower and Ecove,
the developer, never owned the land. Sydney Olympic Park Authority has
confirmed it had a similar Project Delivery Agreement with four other of its
projects: Australia Towers, Jewel, The Pavilions and Bennelong… The NSW
government’s property developer, Landcom, likewise said it retained ownership
of the land at Green Square… Remember
that under the six-year warranty period introduced via the recent Home Building
Act, those people living in high-rise constructed prior to 2012 don’t even have
the option of taking a builder to court – they must fund any remediation works
themselves.
And finally, I spent more than 3 hours with Nine’s Sixty Minutes team,
making a contribution to their next programme on home prices, in which we
touched on our home price scenarios (now more mainstream that during the
previous show back last August), household finances and negative equity. It is
likely to go to air within the next month, so keep an eye out for it.
So to the markets. The Australian markets, did pretty well, with the ASX
up 0.61% on Friday to 4,869, which is down just 2.6% compared with a year ago.
The low employment number helped to lift prices higher. The volatility index in Australia was 4.21%
lower on Friday to end at 11.98, but is still 11.2% higher than a year ago. The
ASX financials index ended the week at 5,747 on Friday, and up 0.37% on the
day, but still 11.71% lower than a year ago, which really underscores the
pressures on the sector – the Royal Commission final report is due next week,
but it may be delayed for political reasons. We will see.
Among the individual banks, ANZ was up 1.04% on Friday to 26.19 but is
still 10% lower than a year ago, while CBA was up just 0.04% on Friday to
72.54, and is 7.91% lower than a year ago. NAB rose 0.65% to 24.74 after the
mortgage repricing announcement, but remains 15.58% lower than a year ago,
while Westpac was up 0.62% to 25.88, and is 16.69% lower than a year ago. So
the Hain effect is fully visible.
Among the regionals, Bank of Queensland was up 1.28% to end at 10.28,
but is 17% lower than a year ago, Suncorp was up 0.69% to 13.05, but down 5%
over the past year, Bendigo and Adelaide Bank was up 0.63% to 11.22, just 2%
lower than a year back, while AMP fell 7.87% on more bad news, as they
published a further profit
warning, to end a 2.34, an amazing 54% lower than a year ago. AMP expects to
report an underlying profit of “around $680m” and profit attributable to
shareholders of “approximately $30m. Macquarie Group was down slightly to 117.81
but up 12.53% compared with a year ago. In contrast Lenders Mortgage Insurer
Genworth was up 0.89% on Friday to 2.26, but down 23% over the year, and
Mortgage Aggregator Mortgage Choice was up 0.5% to 1.00, but down 59% from this
time last year.
The Aussie was up 0.10% to 71.90, down 12% compared with last week, and
more analysts have marketed to lower ahead, towards 60 cents. The Gold Aussie
cross was up 0.47% to 1,815, and up 7% on the year. The Aussie Bitcoin Cross
was up 4.65% to 4,702 on Friday but down 67.58% compared with a year ago.
Wall Street gained ground on Friday in a broad-based rally as investors
were heartened by news that Washington would move to temporarily end the
longest U.S. government shutdown in history. All three major U.S. stock indexes
advanced, with the Dow up 0.75% to end at 24,737, though still down 6% across
the year, and the Nasdaq eking out their fifth straight weekly gains, up 1.29%
to 7,165 and down 3% from a year ago. But the S&P 500 posted its first
weekly loss of the year, despite being up 0.85% on Friday to 2,665 snapping a
four-week run and down 6% from a year ago, and the S&P 100 ended up 0.74%
to 1,176 and down 7% from a year back.
The indexes backed off their highs after President Donald Trump
confirmed he and lawmakers agreed to advance a three-week stop-gap spending
plan to reopen the government. In fact, Investor sentiment had faltered in
recent days in the face of revived jitters related to the shutdown and the
prolonged U.S.-China tariff spat.
Among these uncertainties, the ongoing trade dispute between the United
States and China continues to worry investors. With the World Economic Forum in
Davos, Switzerland, nearing its conclusion, business leaders have expressed
worries over the tariff battles, saying they are “fed up” with
Trump’s policies. An escalation of the U.S.-China trade war would sharpen the
global economic slowdown already under way, according to a Reuters poll of
hundreds of economists worldwide.
In an interview with CNBC, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross shook investor
sentiment on trade on Thursday, saying that the U.S. was still “miles and
miles” from a trade deal with China. That came a day after Top White House
economic adviser Larry Kudlow denied that the U.S. had cancelled a trade
meeting with Chinese officials that was slated for this week. China’s Vice
Premier Liu He will return to the U.S. next week to resume the next round of
trade talks.
The rally on Wall Street was also propped up by expectations for a more
dovish tone from the Federal Reserve, when it meets next week, following a
report from The Wall Street Journal that the Fed is closer than expected to
ending its balance sheet unwind.
The VIX, or fear index was lower, down 7.78% on Friday to 17.42, but
still 65% higher than this time last year, suggesting elevated risk. The
S&P Financials index was up 1.73% on Friday to 431.73, but 13% lower than a
year ago, suggesting pressure on the sector.
Goldman Sachs was higher, up 1.49% to 200.74, but 26% lower than a year
ago.
In the tech sector, Apple was up 3.31% to 135.76, 12% lower than a year
ago, Alphabet Google was up 1.62% to 1,102, but 7% down from a year back, while
Amazon was 21% higher than a year ago, up 0.95% on the day, and ended at
1,670.57. Facebook was up 2.18% to 149.01, but is 22% down on this time last
year, while Intel fell 5.47% to end at 47.04, still up 9% from last year. The
10-year Treasury bond was up 1.71% to 2.76, while the 3-month bond was up 0.61%
to 2.38, suggesting fund costs will remain elevated.
The US dollar index fell 0.82% to end at 95.81, and is up 8.5% over the
year. The British pound grew steadily during this week, adding 2% against the
dollar and ended at 1.32. An unexpectedly strong wages report was supported in
the following days with positive buzz around Brexit. First, we received reports
of a possible postponement of the Brexit date in order to avoid “exit without
deal”. On Friday, there was news of support for Theresa May’s plan by the
Northern Irish political party.
The Footsie – or FTSE 100 fell 0.14% on Friday to end at 6,809 and 11%
lower than a year ago. The Financial Services Index fell slightly to end at
644.27, down 7% across the last year.
The British currency growth is particularly noticeable against the euro,
as the eurozone economy, on the contrary, saw weak economic data this week: at
the beginning of the week the IMF sharply reduced its growth forecasts for the
eurozone countries in 2019, and on Thursday EUR was under pressure due to
disappointing PMI estimates. On Friday, Ifo data also highlighted slowing.
Their Business Climate indicator fell to almost 3 years’ lows.
The ECB added fuel to the fire, stressing that external risks from China
to Brexit could undermine the region’s economic growth even more. ECB officials
say in their speeches that in 2019 the rate hike may not happen, and that the
recent decline of oil will put pressure on inflation in the coming months.
The Euro US Dollar rose a little to end at 1.1415, down 9% from a year
ago. The German DAX added 2.6% from Wednesday lows. Deutsche Bank rose 4.24% to
8.036, but is still down 51% from a year ago as the business restricting
continues. At least it went back above the 8 level, seen by many as a critical
break point.
Next week’s news from the US will be in the spotlight of the markets. On
Wednesday, the Fed will announce its decision on the rate and hold a press
conference; labour market indicators will be published on Friday. Many releases
on the US economy are postponed because of the shutdown, so the remaining publications
can cause a stronger than usual market response.
The Chinese Yuan US Dollar rose 0.61% on Friday to 0.1482, and is down
6% from a year ago. Oil was higher, up 0.75% to 53.53, still 19% down from this
time last year, Gold was up 1.77% to 1.302, but 6% lower than last year, Silver
was up 2.97% to 15,76, down 12% over the year, while copper was up 3.35% to
2.73, down 17% over the year.
Finally, bitcoin was down 0.21% to 3,633, following a flash crash
earlier in the week. It remains 68% lower than this time last year and trading
volumes are way down, as speculators take to the side lines. Analysts at
JPMorgan Chase & Co said that the hype surrounding cryptocurrencies and
blockchain — the distributed ledger technology that underpins all cryptocurrencies
— is a little overblown, with inroads to mainstream finance patchy at best.
They said that while advocates tout that most assets can be shifted to a
blockchain-type ledger and the technology will improve everything from
transparency to supply chain efficiency, results are yet to match the industry
buzz.
One sector ripe for a blockchain shake-up, according to crypto
evangelists, is the banking system. Cross-border payments with faster
transaction times and lower costs will propel digital currencies and blockchain
technology into the established banking industry, but the analysts said a
meaningful difference is years away.
Furthermore, a number of prominent companies that began accepting
bitcoin have since thrown in the towel, which includes Dell, Expedia, OKCupid
and Steam, JPMorgan noted. Whilst there may be niche uses in for example trade
finance, they conclude that “most other use cases, such as payments, are
already largely digitalized, so we expect the adoption of blockchain may be
viewed as providing incremental benefits.”
So, it seems to me that the market volatility at the end of last year
have spooked central bankers, and it is likely we will see more QE ahead.
Locally, there is talk of APRA dropping the current 7% serviceability cap to
ease mortgage lending restrictions, the RBA may cut rates, and even sacrifice
the Aussie to stimulate the local economy. However, the downforces on housing,
reinforced by poor affordability and high debt suggests to me that QE may not
be so effective, as we face into lower growth. With rates in many counties
already low, we are entering the “Zero Bounds” twilight zone. Whilst this may
support the overinflated banking system, the impact of real households could
well be disastrous. As I continue to say, prepare yourselves.
I caught up with an independent top-down investor to discuss the Australian economy, the housing sector and bank funding.
They have been on the sidelines until recently, but now believe we are on the slide, so have taken positions.
We discuss their rationale, and highlight the cracks appearing in the economic narrative. Warning this is a long, and quite technical discussion, but it paints an important picture
Note: this was recorded in late Nov 2018, but I held back the release of the show until after the holidays because I regard this as a really important discussion.
The IMF has updated their Global Debt Database, and by including both the government and private sides of borrowing for the entire world, it offers an unprecedented picture of global debt in the post-World War II era.
The long view
Global debt has reached an all-time high of $184 trillion in nominal terms, the equivalent of 225 percent of GDP in 2017. On average, the world’s debt now exceeds $86,000 in per capita terms, which is more than 2½ times the average income per-capita.
The most indebted economies in the world are also the richer ones. The top three borrowers in the world—the United States, China, and Japan—account for more than half of global debt, exceeding their share of global output.
The private sector’s debt has tripled since 1950. This makes it the driving force behind global debt. Another change since the global financial crisis has been the rise in private debt in emerging markets, led by China, overtaking advanced economies. At the other end of the spectrum, private debt has remained very low in low-income developing countries.
Global public debt, on the other hand, has experienced a reversal of sorts. After a steady decline up to the mid-1970s, public debt has gone up since, with advanced economies at the helm and, of late, followed by emerging and low-income developing countries.
Was 2017 different?
For 2017, the signals are mixed. Compared to the previous peak in
2009, the world is now more than 11 percentage points of GDP deeper in
debt. Nonetheless, in 2017 the global debt ratio fell by close to 1½
percent of GDP compared to a year earlier. The last time the world
witnessed a similar decline was in 2010, although it proved short-lived.
However, it is not yet clear whether this is a hiatus in an otherwise
uninterrupted ascending trend or if countries have begun a longer
process to shed more debt. New country data available later in 2019 will
tell us more about the global debt picture. For 2017, we divided up
countries into three groups based on their debt profile and here’s what
we found:
Advanced economies: There has been a retrenchment
in debt build-up among advanced economies. Private debt, although
marginally on the rise, is well below its peak. Also, public debt in
advanced economies experienced a healthy decline of close to 2½ percent
of GDP in 2017. To find a similar reduction in public debt we need to go
back a decade, when global growth was some 1¾ percentage points higher
than today.
Emerging market economies: These countries
continued to borrow in 2017, although at a much slower rate. A major
shift occurred in China where the pace of private debt accumulation,
although still high, decelerated significantly.
Low-income developing countries: Public debt continued to grow in 2017 and, in some cases, reached levels close to those seen when countries sought debt relief.
Overall, the picture of global debt has changed as the world has
changed. The data shows that a big part of the decline in the global
debt ratio is the result of the waning importance of heavily-indebted
advanced economies in the world economy.
With financial conditions tightening in many countries, which
includes rising interest rates, prospects for bringing debt down remain
uncertain. The high levels of corporate and government debt built up
over years of easy global financial conditions, which the Fiscal Monitor documents, constitute a potential fault line.
So, as we close the first decade after the global financial crisis, the legacy of excessive debt still looms large.
Credit risks across many sectors are rising with a looming cyclical deterioration in credit conditions and global debt at near-record levels, says Fitch Ratings. However, the macroeconomic conditions and the sector breakdown of leverage in developed markets differ significantly from the last downturn in 2008. We expect governments and non-financial corporates to be at the center of any coming storm for credit conditions.
Since 2007, aggregate financial sector and
household debt as a percentage of GDP globally has remained roughly
steady according to data from the IIF. In contrast, governments and
non-financial corporates have seen their debt rise significantly, up 27
percentage points (pp) and 16 pp, respectively. These sectors’ capacity
to manage a macroeconomic slowdown accompanied by tightened financial
conditions will thus be challenged.
Government debt/GDP ratios
have increased substantially across most large and developed economies
since 2007, leaving some sovereigns heavily exposed in the event of a
future economic downturn with potential negative rating implications. A
turn in the global credit cycle characterized by tighter financial
conditions is more likely to be felt by emerging markets in the short
term, which will face heightened volatility and capital flow disruption.
Non-financial corporates were not a primary source of risk
during the last financial crisis. However, corporate leverage has risen
markedly since then, enabled by low rates, rising equity valuations and
the expansion of non-bank lenders. In addition, corporate borrowers have
largely used this funding to expand shareholder returns and M&A,
which have far outstripped capex. This has already driven negative
rating trends for U.S. corporates over the past two years, despite
relatively strong economic growth during that time. Ratings distribution
in the U.S. corporates portfolios has changed significantly since the
pre-crisis period, with ‘BBB’ category rated issuers rising relative to
higher investment-grade categories.
Compared to sovereigns and
non-financial corporates, banks in developed markets are in a more
robust and resilient position compared to the last financial crisis.
Capital levels and liquidity are significantly stronger, owing to a wave
of regulatory reform, while reduced risk appetite and smaller loan
portfolios have led to a significant reduction in banking assets as a
proportion of GDP. While banks have retrenched, higher risk lending
activity has moved into less visible areas of the non-banking financial
system. This could increase uncertainty for the financial market heading
into a downturn while adding to risks from the interconnectedness
between non-bank financial institutions and the rest of the financial
market.