The Phony Wars – The Property Imperative Weekly 21 July 2018

Welcome to the Property Imperative weekly to 21th July 2018, our digest of the latest finance and property news with a distinctively Australian flavour.

By the way if you value the content we produce please do consider joining our Patreon programme, where you can support our ability to continue to make great content. Here is the link.

Watch the video, listen to the podcast, or read the transcript.

It’s important to look past the headlines and examine the data, because we need to see the truth beneath.

Let’s start with the housing market this week. Auction clearance rates and volumes continue to fall and Sydney recorded the lowest clearance rate the city has seen since December 2012. CoreLogic says that last week saw 1,178 homes taken to auction across the capital cities, returning a clearance rate of 52.0 per cent. Compare this with 52.6 per cent across 1,411 auctions last week and 69.4 per cent on 1,627 homes this time last year.

Melbourne’s final clearance rate came in at 56.2 per cent across 559 auctions last week, similar to the previous week when 631 auctions were held and a clearance rate of 56.1 per cent was recorded. This time last year auction volumes were higher across the city with 756 homes going under the hammer returning a clearance rate of 74.9 per cent.

Sydney’s final clearance rate dropped to 46.9 per cent last week across 408 auctions, the lowest clearance rate the city has seen since December 2012. In comparison, 552 auctions were held across Sydney over the previous week returning a clearance rate of 50.1 per cent while this time last year, 609 homes went under the hammer, returning a clearance rate of 69.2 per cent.

Across the smaller auction markets, clearance rates improved everywhere except Brisbane. In terms of volumes, Adelaide was the only city to see an increase with an additional 8 homes taken to auction over the week.  Of the non-capital city markets, the Hunter region recorded a 70.6 per cent final auction clearance rate across 17 results, followed closely by Geelong where 70.4 per cent of the 27 auction results were successful.

CoreLogic says auction activity is expected to remain relatively subdued this week with 1,155 homes scheduled for auction across the combined capital cities, similar to last week.  And they also reported that home prices slid further across all the centres other than Brisbane, down another 0.11% in the past week. So absolutely no indication of any improvement.  Today I had the chance to visit five auctions in our area, none sold, and no-one serious made any bids at three of the events.

But this should come as no surprise, as credit is still less available than a few months ago. Indeed, around forty percent of households seeking to refinance their mortgages have been knocked back compared with just 5% a year ago. We discussed these findings as part our analysis of Household Financial Confidence, which overall was lower again – see our post “Household Financial Confidence On The Blink Again” .  The June 2018 edition of the index, which draws information from our rolling household surveys, registered just 89.7, well below the 100 neutral setting and down from 90.2 last month.  Debt remains a major issue, with mortgages being the front line. Households remain highly leveraged. Some households with lower Loan to Value ratios have been able to switch to other, cheaper loans. We also continue to see many households adding to their overall debt via credit cards, or other loans. The new positive credit environment which commenced 1 July 2018 will change the game ahead and credit may become harder to source for some. On the other hand, households continue to dip into their savings to maintain lifestyle and budgets. Significantly more than one third of households with an owner occupied mortgage had savings LESS than the equivalent of one month’s mortgage repayment. The other two thirds had significantly larger resources which would insulate them in a down turn, at least for a time.

CoreLogic has looked at the changes in property values by area from their peaks, with Perth showing a 28% fall alongside Darwin, Brisbane down 12.5%, Adelaide down 7.4%, Canberra down 6.8%, Sydney down 5.3% and Melbourne down 0.9%.  And over the past decade, house values fell on average 27% across Mackay, in Queensland, and more than 34% across the WA outback. These are big falls, and puts the movements in Sydney and Melbourne into perspective – or perhaps provides a better view of where we are headed.

S&P Global Ratings did a job on the banks this week, saying they recently negatively revised their view of the Australian banking sector’s industry risk. Developments over the past two years in the Australian banking sector, including information coming out of hearings at the ongoing Royal Commission, highlight some weaknesses in the effectiveness of regulation in the banking sector, and the conduct, governance, and risk appetite shown by Australian banks. This is a big deal, as we discussed in our post “And Now For The Bad News, At Least For The Banks”.

In addition, The latest S&P Ratings SPIN index to May 2018, based on their portfolio of mortgage backed securities showed a further move up in defaults compared with last month, from 1.36% to 1.38%. There were rises in New South Wales of 0.02%, Queensland of 0.04% and Northern Territory up 0.52%. Significantly, the larger hikes were seen in the major bank portfolios, with the prime spin rising from 1.36% last month to 1.38% in May. There was a rise in 61-90 day past due loans, from 0.22% last time to 0.25%. While these moves are small, arrears are now as high as they were back in 2011, and interest rates are much lower today, so this highlights the risks in the system. This does not appear to be a seasonal issue either; it is more structural.

In addition, personal insolvencies were higher again, according to the Australian Financial Security Authority who released their statistics for 2017–18 and the June quarter 2018. The data reveals a sharp rise in total personal insolvencies to the highest level since the Global Financial Crisis a decade ago, with record high insolvencies reached in WA and NT, and debt agreements also hitting an all-time high.  The pressure on households continues to bite.

Even the RBA minutes, out this week discussed the problem.  And the latest SQM Research data on rentals also showed that Sydney vacancy rates are the highest in 13 years, at 2.8%, potentially putting more pressure on property investors in city.

We also ran some alternative mortgage scenarios this week, showing that even if incomes started to move up, to nearer 3% that’s 1% higher than now, the number of households struggling with their finances would remain well above the long term trends. We remain, as a nation, highly exposed to debt, especially if interest rates rise.   You can watch our video on this analysis “Alternative Mortgage Stress Scenarios”.

Even CBA’s Gareth Aird, their Senior Economist, in a fairly bullish piece, admitted that for many households, the number one headwind that they face with respect to consumption is debt repayment.  Australia has one of the most indebted household sectors globally.  Debt to income ratios have risen from around 148% in mid-2012 to a record high of 190% in Q 2018.  This measure includes all households regardless of whether they actually have a mortgage. For households that have a mortgage, that figure is significantly higher. It has increased steadily as interest rates have come down despite lower rates making it easier to repay debt. Basically growth in the net flow of credit (i.e. new credit less repayments) has been higher than growth in income. He says a high debt burden relative to income acts as a constraint on future household consumption growth.  It means that interest payments as a share of income are higher than otherwise.  And of course the principal must be paid too.  This leaves households with less income that can be spent on goods and services. And it means that households have a much greater sensitivity to interest rate changes.  From a demographic perspective, it is younger households feeling the debt burden most acutely.  There are also about $120bn of interest only loans in aggregate that are scheduled to roll over to principle and interest (P&I) loans annually over the next three years.  Borrowers shifting to P&I loans will face higher monthly loan repayments. Could not have put it better myself.

The plight of households in the current environment even reached New York in an excellent piece in the New Your Times. “Australian Housing Costs Rival New York’s, but Boom May Be Ending“. I was quoted extensively:     “We are on the edge of a precipice,” said Martin North, principal analyst for Digital Finance Analytics, an independent research and advisory firm. “All of the forces that have driven the home sector and the debt sector higher in the last 20 years are all coming to a critical inflection point.”    “Almost everywhere you look, you can see icebergs,” Mr. North said. Signs of stress are showing. Mr. North, the analyst from Digital Financial Analytics, estimates that of 3.5 million mortgages where the owner lives in the home, almost a third of the households have incomes close to or less than their expenditures. He predicts that at least 50,000 homeowners may default in the next 12 months.

If you want to get deep and dirty into our analysis, and the potential consequences for Australian Households, and mitigation strategies, then you might want to watch the recording of our Live Stream from last Tuesday. It’s just over the hour in length, and we have some excellent interactions in the chat room. In fact there are two versions available, the live edition, including real-time chat, and the odd technical glitch (helps to turn the sound on), or the slightly shorter version, at higher quality and tidied up, but without the chat. You can choose. We plan more live events down the track.  The links are below.

The apparent bright spot this week was the latest employment data which was above market expectations. The number of people employed rose 50,900 from May to June in seasonally adjusted terms, which was well ahead of forecasts of around 16,500. And that wasn’t just a lot of new part-time jobs. Full-time employment rose by 41,200. On a year-on-year basis that represents an increase in employment of 2.8%. But even then, the number of people unemployed fell from 715,200 in May to 714,100 in June. This is explained by the participation rate – the proportion of people participating or trying to participate in the paid labour market. The participation rate rose from 65.5% in May to 65.7% in June, leaving the unemployment rate unchanged at 5.4%. The Australian labour force participation rate is actually pretty high. A useful comparison is the United States – probably the world’s most robust labour market – where the current rate is 62.9%. The key point is that if more people are going to come into the labour market when it looks better – as they have been consistently – then a continued reduction in the unemployment rate is going to require creating a whole lot more jobs. And in any case the basis for counting employed people is suspect. We discussed this in our post “And Now for The Good News”.  Little sign of wages growth at the moment.

The local stock markets had a pretty good week, again, with the ASX All Ords up 0.35% on Friday to 6,377. The S&P ASX 100 was up 0.38% to 5,168, encouraged by the employment data, and the economic news from China.  Westpac, the largest investment mortgage lender was up 0.67% to 29.90, but well below its 12 month highs, and CBA rose 0.68% to 75.90, but again well below prices from a year ago. The overhang from the Royal Commission, tighter funding, and higher risks explain why they are priced down.

Looking across to the US markets, the earnings season was in full flight for the week and the majority hit or beat Wall Street expectations. The Down Jones Industrial was down 0.3% to 25,058 on Friday and the S&P 500 fell a little to 2,801. The Volatility Index, the VIX was also a little lower, but remains above its level last year. The financial sector continued to perform well. Morgan Stanley led the broker-dealer reports and Goldman Sachs also topped estimates, although concerns about its succession plan hit the stock later in the day. But even so, these stocks are off their 12 month highs, and Macquarie Bank, in comparison, has been performing more strongly in our local market up 0.84% on Friday to 125.40.

On the tech-heavy NASDAQ, which fell just a little on Friday, down 0.07% to 7,820, it was a tale of two techs as a momentum stock fell short of what investors wanted and an old stalwart came through. Netflix tumbled at the start of the week after the company missed expectations on new subscribers, a key metric for the streaming company. Netflix added 5.14 million subscribers in the latest quarter, shy of analysts’ expectations for more than 6.2 million. But after the bell on Thursday, Microsoft reported second-quarter earnings that beat consensus thanks to cloud services revenue.

The prospect for the path of U.S. interest rates took an interesting turn at the end of the week. At first things seemed to jibe with market expectations that the Federal Reserve will raise rates once and possibly twice before the year is out. At his Humphey-Hawkins testimony before the Senate Banking Committee and the House Financial Services Committee, Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell reiterated the central bank should gradually increase interest rates.

But President Donald Trump shook some of the market’s confidence, saying on Thursday he’s “not thrilled” about the Fed hiking rates and going into more specifics on Twitter on Friday.

The tweets had little overall impact on the market forecasts for upcoming rate hikes. But they did take the legs from the dollar on Friday. The U.S. Treasury Department has long had a policy of simply stating that a strong dollar is in America’s best interest.

The yield curve continues to converge across the long and short term, and this has often been seen as an early warning of trouble ahead. This from Bloomberg.

The 30-year bond is sitting at 3.03% and the 3 Month at 1.98%. The 3 Month LIBOR rates remained above 2.3% and the 10 year benchmark is at 2.9%, just a little off its highs, and this also reflected in a lower BBSW rate in Australia, suggesting a small fall in margin pressure for the banks locally compared with a few weeks ago.

Trade-war concerns took a back seat through most of the week, but were revived on Friday and could weigh more heavily next week, despite another full earnings calendar. President Trump said in an interview on CNBC that he is ready to impose tariffs on $500 billion worth of Chinese goods to the U.S. if China does not back down on its trade policies. “I’m not doing this for politics, I’m doing this to do the right thing for our country” he said on CNBC’s “Squawk Box.” “We have been ripped off by China for a long time.”

In fact, Moody’s highlighted that already the trade-wars is hitting base metal prices, yet is hardly mentioned. Since worries surrounding a trade war came to the fore, the base metals price index has sunk by 13.0%. The copper futures are well down from their highs a couple of months back, as is steel. This could crimp Australian GDP in the months ahead. And both Gold and Silver were weaker, suggesting that at the moment “risk” investors are preferring the US Dollar.

It’s also worth noting the Chinese Yuan slide against the US dollar and the Australian Dollar and some are suggesting that this is a sign of the Chinese Government answering the Trade wars by taking their currency lower (so reducing the cost of their goods in the local economies). The Aussie Dollar continues to drift lower against the US Dollar, and we expect this to continue, indeed one economist suggested it could end up around 60c in the months ahead.

Crude oil prices posted a second-straight weekly decline and may continue to weigh on energy stocks, as they have of late. On the New York Mercantile Exchange crude futures for September delivery rose $1.30 to settle at $70.46 a barrel Friday. Investors continue to weigh up the prospect of a global shortage in supplies, despite Saudi Arabia’s pledge to hold off flooding the market with more output. That said, crude oil prices were supported on Friday by the plunge in the dollar following Trump’s remark about the greenback and other currencies.

Bitcoin lifted a little, and continues in a less volatile mode, though well below earlier highs.

Finally, for today, another lens on the debt bomb, as featured in my recent discussions with Economist John Adams, including those on the debt bomb itself, the international debt bubble and more recently the meaning of money. We have more planned, so watch out for those, and there is also dedicated web page on the DFA blog. Again the link is below.

The McKinsey Global Institute says that since the GFCs, many large corporations around the world have shifted toward bond financing as commercial bank lending has been subdued. Today, 19 percent of total global corporate debt is in the form of bonds, nearly double the share in 2007. Annual nonfinancial corporate bond issuance has increased 2.5 times, from $800 billion in 2007 to $2 trillion in 2017. The global value of corporate bonds outstanding has increased 2.7 times since 2007 to $11.7 trillion, doubling as a share of GDP.

The average quality of blue-chip borrowers has declined. In the United States, almost 40 percent of nonfinancial corporate bonds are now rated BBB, just one notch above speculative-grade “junk bonds.” Growth in speculative-grade bonds has been particularly strong. Globally, the value of corporate high-yield bonds outstanding increased from $500 billion in 2007 to $1.9 trillion in 2017. In the coming five years, and unprecedented amount of these bonds will come due. Bond issuance by companies in China and other developing countries has soared. The value of China’s nonfinancial corporate bonds outstanding rose from $69 billion in 2007 to $2 trillion at the end of 2017, making China one of the largest bond markets in the world. Outside China, growth has been strongest in Brazil, Chile, Mexico, and Russia.

From 2018 to 2022, a record amount of bonds—between $1.6 trillion and $2.1 trillion annually—will mature. Globally, a total of $7.9 trillion of bonds will come due during those five years, based on bonds already issued. However, some bonds have maturities of less than five years and may still be issued and come due during that period. If current issuance trends continue, then as much as $10 trillion of bonds will come due over the next five years. At least $3 trillion of this total will be from US corporations, $1.7 trillion from Chinese companies, and $1.7 trillion from Western European companies.

Now overlay the rising interest rate environment, and you can see the problem. Such high leverage will cost the global economy dear, and sooner rather than later.

The $1 Trillion “Debt Berg” – What Lies Beneath?

Economist John Adams and I discuss the problem of foreign debt in the latest edition of our interview series.

With a net $1 trillion of foreign debt owed by the country, in  arising rate environment, things could get, well, tricky… Like an iceberg, what lies beneath?

You can also listen to the podcast version.

And if your missed our earlier edition, it is still available.

 

 

ASIC consults on proposed changes to the capital requirements for market participants

ASIC has released a consultation paper proposing changes to the capital requirements for market participants, which prescribe the minimum amount of capital a participant must hold. The proposed changes will better protect investors and market integrity by strengthening the risk profile of market participants and reducing the risk of a disorderly or non-compliant wind-up.

Consultation Paper 302 (CP 302) sets out the proposals to improve and simplify the capital requirements, including further consolidating the two market integrity capital rulebooks into a single capital rulebook (the ASIC Market Integrity Rules (Capital) 2018).

ASIC proposes that market participants of futures markets will be required to comply with a risk-based capital regime instead of a net tangible asset requirement, and must hold core capital of at least $1,000,000 at all times.

Another proposal would increase the minimum core capital requirement for securities market participants to $500,000, as well as introducing new rules such as an underwriting risk requirement. At the same time, ASIC proposes to remove redundant rules and forms and more closely align the capital requirements with the financial requirements of the Australian financial services licensing regime.

These proposals follow ASIC’s review of the adequacy of its capital regime. The review identified elements of the capital requirements that were outdated and not able to adequately address the risks of operating a market participant business today.

It is important that market participants maintain a financial buffer of liquid and core capital to decrease the risk of market disruption from a disorderly wind-up. Well-capitalised market participants are also better able to absorb losses and more likely to be able to meet their financial obligations to clients.

ASIC invites submissions on CP 302 by 15 August 2018.

Download

Background

Part 7.2A of the Corporations Act 2001 gives ASIC the power to make market integrity rules dealing with activities and conduct in relation to licensed financial markets, including market participants on the relevant market.

In 2011, we made capital market integrity rules for market participants of the ASX, ASX 24 and Chi-X markets, followed by the SSX and FEX markets in 2013 and 2014 respectively. In 2017, these rules were consolidated into the ASIC Market Integrity Rules (Securities Markets – Capital) 2017 and the ASIC Market Integrity Rules (Futures Markets – Capital) 2017.

Market participants (other than principal traders or clearing participants) of the ASX, ASX 24, Chi-X, SSX, NSXA and FEX markets are subject to the financial requirements of the ASIC capital market integrity rules.

Denmark introduces state-backed public housing covered bonds, a credit positive

On 1 July, legislation in Denmark took effect that will trigger the inaugural issuance of Danish public housing covered bonds (almene realkreditobligationer) as a new asset class, says Moody’s.

These new covered bonds will be issued out of newly established capital centres with the sole purpose of funding mortgage loans granted to public housing companies (almen boligforening). As is the practice in the Danish covered bond market, assets serving as security for covered bonds must be segregated into independent cover pools, referred to as capital centres in mortgage banks. The Danish government guarantees in full the mortgage loans as well as the public housing covered bonds.

The law is credit positive for potential investors in public housing covered bonds because their credit risk will be lower than in existing mortgage covered bonds. Although investors in both types of covered bonds benefit from recourse to the issuing mortgage bank and a pool of good quality mortgage assets, only public housing covered bonds benefit from a state guarantee in case the issuer fails to fulfil its obligations.

Today, public housing loans benefit from a municipality’s partial guarantee of the loan, but under the new framework such loans will benefit from the federal government’s guarantee covering the full loan amount. In 2017, Danish municipalities guaranteed on average the most risky 62% of mortgage loans. Under the new model, the government will charge a guarantee commission from the mortgage banks. The mortgage banks, owing to the government’s full guarantee, will have lower capital requirements and lower over- collateralisation requirements for the covered bonds that are set in Denmark at 8% of risk-weighted assets.

Denmark’s public housing covered bonds will be issued by mortgage banks via frequently held auctions and tap sales. For the issuance of public housing covered bonds, banks shall obtain bids for purchases from Denmark’s central bank on behalf of the Danish government before the bonds are sold to others, which reduces funding execution risk for the public housing companies and the mortgage banks. According to the Danish central bank, the government will purchase DKK42.5 billion of public-sector covered bonds in 2018, corresponding to the total of new loans and refinancings of existing loans. The government will bid at a rate corresponding to the yield on government bonds.

We expect a quick migration of public housing loans to the newly established capital centres in order to benefit from the government guarantees. This will lead to an increased level of prepayments and refinancings in the existing capital centres. The public housing sector has subsidised loans totalling around DKK180 billion that are largely financed by existing capital centres that issue mortgage covered bonds.

Nykredit Realkredit A/S, Realkredit Danmark A/S (part of Danske Bank) and BRFkredit A/S (part of Jyske Bank) are active lenders in this sector, each currently lending DKK50-DKK60 billion to the public housing sector. Despite the public housing loans being refinanced into the new capital centres, the risk characteristics of the capital centres will not change materially because the share of public housing loans is often small and in active capital centres does not exceed 15% as shown in the exhibit.

ASIC accepts variation to NAB enforceable undertaking to address inadequacies in its wholesale spot FX business

ASIC has accepted a variation to an enforceable undertaking provided by National Australia Bank Limited (NAB) relating to its wholesale spot foreign exchange (FX) business.

The variation imposes additional undertakings after an independent expert’s report identified significant deficiencies in NAB’s remediation program developed as part of the original EU, accepted in December 2016 (refer: 16-455MR).

Under the original EU, NAB was required to develop a program of changes to its existing systems, controls, monitoring, training and supervision of employees within its spot foreign exchange business to prevent, detect and respond to certain types of conduct. The program and its implementation was to be assessed by an independent expert.

In accordance with the EU, NAB provided its program of changes on 28 November 2017. On 29 March 2018, the independent expert reported on NAB’s spot foreign exchange program noting significant deficiencies regarding its:

  • Governance, Risk Management and Compliance Framework
  • Policies and Procedures
  • Risk Management Practices
  • Human Resource Management.

The independent expert also concluded that it was unable to complete the expert assessment of the program’s effectiveness required by the EU because NAB has made incomplete progress in designing items to be included in the program.

The expert’s report states ‘progress in developing the program has been slow’ and that the program ‘appears to have evolved iteratively during 2017, rather than through a well-defined process. For instance, there appears to have been no comprehensive risk assessment across NAB’s Spot FX business against the EU requirements and relevant regulatory standards and guidance.’

The variation of the EU imposes an additional undertaking on NAB to prepare an updated program that adequately addresses all required components. This updated program will then be subjected to further assessment by the independent expert. After these new undertakings are satisfied, NAB will be able to progress with the undertakings in the original EU.

Commissioner Cathie Armour said, ‘ASIC is disappointed with the delay in the development and assessment of a remediation program to address the conduct outlined in the EU. However, we are pleased that the process has been sufficiently robust to ensure any ongoing deficiencies have been identified and are being addressed, with oversight by an independent expert. ASIC’s ultimate objective is to ensure NAB has effective mechanisms in place to adequately train, monitor and supervise its employees to provide financial services efficiently, honestly and fairly’.

Background

The wholesale spot FX market is an important financial market for Australia. It facilitates the exchange of one currency for another and thus allows market participants to buy and sell foreign currencies. As part of its spot FX businesses, NAB entered into different types of spot FX agreements with its clients, including Australian clients.

Spot foreign exchange refers to foreign exchange contracts involving the exchange of two currencies at a price (exchange rate) agreed on a date (the trade data), and which are usually settled two business days from the trade date.

NAB Group Chief Risk Officer, David Gall, said NAB is firmly committed to working with ASIC to strengthen its Spot FX business.

“We welcome the feedback received from the independent expert in its initial report, which has helped us identify areas where we can do better to implement the program of changes,” Mr Gall said.

ASIC calls on retail OTC derivatives sector to improve practices

ASIC has called on participants in the retail over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives sector to improve their practices after recent ASIC activities showed their conduct fell short of expectations.

The products offered by retail OTC derivatives issuers in Australia include binary options, margin foreign exchange and contracts for difference.

A recent review of 57 retail derivative issuers identified a number of risks associated with the products offered to retail investors by OTC derivatives issuers.

Our review found that client losses in retail OTC derivatives trades seemed high, with the percentage of unprofitable traders being up to 80% for binary options, 72% for CFD traders and 63% for Margin FX traders. ASIC will examine this area further as part of its ongoing focus on the sector.

ASIC’s recent supervisory activities have also revealed sector-wide concerns about certain practices.

The most concerning practices ASIC has identified during in its supervision of the sector and highlighted in our recent reviews include:

  • actual client profits being inconsistent with marketing materials
  • a lack of transparency around pricing
  • risk management practices that relied on the use of client money were outdated and needed to be reviewed
  • some referral arrangements that may be in breach of conflicted remuneration requirements and referral selling prohibitions
  • some issuers that were providing wholesale services or allowing third parties to ‘white label’ their products did not have adequate risk management practices and operational capital to supervise counterparties and support their exposures.

Binary options may be the least transparent in terms of underlying pricing, strike prices and payout structures.

To address these risks, ASIC has called on issuers to:

  • review and update their risk management and client money practices; and
  • assess whether their arrangements with counterparties and referrers meet their AFS licence obligations.

ASIC Commissioner Cathie Armour said, ‘The retail OTC derivatives sector in Australia is an active and growing market, with an annual turnover of $11 trillion and over 450,000 investors. The integrity of the retail OTC derivatives sector is a key focus for ASIC. ASIC expects licensed issuers to conduct themselves appropriately and ensure consumers trade in retail OTC derivatives with a clear understanding of the products and the risks to which they’re exposed. We will be working with issuers to raise industry standards and improve compliance with their Australia financial services licence obligations.’

Read Report 579

Australia’s Debt Bomb

I discuss the state of the Australian economy with economist John Adams.

Links to his series of articles:

Ten signs we’re heading for ‘economic armageddon’ (Feb 2018)

Ten myths making Australians complacent about looming ‘economic armageddon’ (May 2018)

Six pathways to Australia’s ‘economic armageddon’ (June 2018)

How to prepare for economic Armageddon (June 2018)

BBSW “Elastic” Stretches Again

The benchmark BBSW rate has moved higher again, with the 3 month series now at a high of 2.1185; up ~36 basis points from February.

We know that around 20% of bank funding is from short term sources, according to the RBA.

Of that, more is sourced offshore than onshore. Both overseas rates – as typified by the US LIBOR …

… and the local BBSW rates as we looked at before, suggest a hike in mortgage rates is coming. In fact more smaller lenders quietly lifted their rates last week, following Suncorp, ME Bank and others.

IMB Bank said  from 22 June, its standard variable interest rate will increase by 0.08 per cent for new and existing home loan customers and Auswide has also lifted with increases of five basis points (0.05%) for owner occupied home loans and thirteen basis points (0.13%) for investment home loans and residential lines of credit, effective 27th June.

Unless the majors follow suite, expect their profits to drop, and returns of bank deposit to fall further.

US Mortgage Rates continue higher too…

Global Growth Robust, But US Inflation Risks Rising

Near-term global growth prospects remain robust despite rising trade tensions and political risks, but US inflation risks are rising, says Fitch Ratings in its new Global Economic Outlook (GEO).

Accelerating private investment, tightening labour markets, pro-cyclical US fiscal easing and accommodative monetary policy are all supporting above-trend growth in advanced economies. In emerging markets (EMs), China’s growth rate is holding up better than expected so far this year in the face of slowing credit growth; Russia and Brazil continue to recover, albeit slowly; and the rise in commodity prices is supporting incomes in EM commodity producers.

“Global trade tensions have risen significantly this year, but at this stage the scale of tariffs imposed remains too small to materially affect the global growth outlook. A major escalation that entailed blanket across-the-board geographical tariffs on all trade flows between several major countries would be much more damaging,” says Brian Coulton, Fitch’s Chief Economist.

Populist political forces continue to create policy risk and increase the threat of rising tensions within the eurozone that could adversely affect the outlook for investment, a key driver of growth last year. At this stage, we have made only a modest downward revision to our eurozone investment forecast for this year (to 3.3% from 3.9% in March), but a further escalation in uncertainty represents an important downside risk.

A much sharper-than-anticipated pick-up in US inflation remains a key risk to the global outlook. The decline in US unemployment – to 3.8% in May – is becoming more important to watch, and we forecast the rate to hit a 66-year low of 3.4% in 2019. A wide array of indicators of US labour market tightness suggest it is now only a matter of time before sharper upward pressures on US wage growth start to be seen.

“An inflation shock in the US could bring forward adjustments in US and global bond yields and sharply increase volatility, harming risk appetite. In particular, it could lead to a rapid decompression of the term premium, which remains negative for US 10-year bond yields. In combination with a likely aggressive Fed response, this would be disruptive for global growth,” adds Coulton.

Global growth forecasts remain unchanged since our March GEO, at 3.3% for 2018 and 3.2% for 2019. Nevertheless, 2018 growth forecasts have been revised down for 10 of the 20 economies that make up the GEO, with the eurozone seeing a 0.2pp downward revision, the UK a 0.1pp downward revision and Japan a 0.3pp downward revision. Brazil and South Africa have seen sizeable markdowns, and our Russia and Indonesia forecasts have also been lowered. These have been offset by 0.1pp upward revisions to the US and China and a stronger outlook for Poland and India in 2018.

For 2019, there have been fewer forecast changes, with the notable exception of Turkey, where recent currency turmoil and interest rate hikes are set to take a heavy toll on domestic demand. The US 2019 growth forecast has been raised by 0.1pp, and China’s 2019 outlook has been upgraded by 0.2pp following better-than-expected recent momentum.

Fitch still forecasts a total of four Fed rate hikes in 2018, followed by three more next year. Recent pronouncements from ECB officials suggest that the Asset Purchase Programme (APP) will be phased out in 2018, but also appear to imply that purchases will be scaled down between September and the end of the year rather than stopping abruptly after September. This is significant for the likely timing of the first ECB rate hike in 2019. ECB forward guidance has stated that rate hikes will not take place until “well after” the end of asset purchases, which the bank has clarified to mean quarters rather than years. A December 2018 end-date for the APP would imply rate hikes in 3Q19 or 4Q19. On this basis, we have revised our forecast of ECB rate hikes to just one increase in 2019, from two hikes before.

Global monetary policy normalisation and upward pressures on the US dollar have likely been contributing to the rise in financial market volatility witnessed so far this year. Both these global trends look set to stay.

ECB To Unwind QE

The European Central Bank said it plans to remove accommodative policy but the euro zone monetary authority had yet to discuss when interest rates would be raised.

The ECB decided to cut its monthly asset purchase program in half to €15 billion at the beginning of October and noted that it was expected to end in December – although reinvestment of proceeds will be maintained. They indicated that interest rates were likely to be on hold for an extended period of time.

“The Governing Council expects the key ECB interest rates to remain at their present levels at least through the summer of 2019 and in any case for as long as necessary to ensure that the evolution of inflation remains aligned with the current expectations of a sustained adjustment path,” the ECB said in its policy decision.

Reiterating that point in the press conference’s question and answer period, president Mario Draghi stressed the “at least through the summer of 2019” and added that “we did not discuss if and when to raise rates.”

The euro, which turned negative against the dollar when the decision was published, extended losses after those remarks.

Weaker short-term growth, stronger inflation

The ECB also updated its economic projections and predicted weaker growth along with stronger inflation for this year.

“June 2018 Eurosystem staff macroeconomic projections for the euro area foresee annual real GDP increasing by 2.1% in 2018, 1.9% in 2019 and 1.7% in 2020,” Draghi announced. The 2018 growth forecast was cut from the 2.4% expansion predicted in March.

“The latest economic indicators and survey results are weaker,” Draghi explained, “but remain consistent with ongoing solid and broad-based economic growth.”

Overall, Draghi stated that the risks surrounding the euro area growth outlook remain broadly balanced.

However, he admitted that “uncertainties related to global factors, including the threat of increased protectionism, have become more prominent (and) the risk of persistent heightened financial market volatility warrants monitoring.”

With regard to price stability, the ECB now forecasts annual inflation of 1.7% through 2020, compared to the March projections of 1.4% for this year and next. The estimate for 2020 remained unchanged.

Draghi explained that the changes were made because the ECB felt that progress towards a sustained adjustment in inflation “has been substantial so far”.

“With longer-term inflation expectations well anchored, the underlying strength of the euro area economy and the continuing ample degree of monetary accommodation provide grounds to be confident that the sustained convergence of inflation towards our aim will continue in the period ahead, and will be maintained even after a gradual winding-down of our net asset purchases,” he added.