So now we know the Government has parked the quest for a surplus, at least in the short term, with a $17.6 billion economic stimulus package announced today – this is less than 1% of annual GDP. It is much higher than the back-grounding at $10 billion – indicating the seriousness of our economic predicament.
But it is 2.3% of quarterly GDP and with the additional funding of around $5 billion running across the next two financial years, the total is closer to $23 billion.
The Government will pump $11 billion into the economy between now and July, which is more than the $10 billion Rudd used in the GFC stimulus, with more to come beyond. It is designed to be temporary.
The package includes one-off cash payments for welfare recipients, money to help keep apprentices in work and tax relief for small businesses.
More than 6 million welfare recipients, including pensioners, carers, veterans, families, young people and job-seekers will get a one-off cash payment of $750 from March 31. The biggest beneficiaries will be pensioners. These one-off payments will cost the Government $4.8 billion.
They are hoping these recipients will rush out and spend, so while the March quarter is a write-off they are hoping to avoid two negative quarters. But of course the passage of the virus is unknown.
Casual workers who contract the virus, or had to isolate themselves would be eligible for a Newstart welfare payment, while out of work. People will face an assets test before receiving the money, and the typical wait time to access the payment will be waived.
Nearly 700,000 small and medium businesses will receive cash payments of between $2,000 and $25,000 to help pay wages or hire extra staff at an estimated to cost $6.7 billion. The stimulus package also includes $1.3 billion in support payments to keep apprentices in their jobs amid fears the spread of the coronavirus could have a crippling effect on employment.
Medium and big businesses will be encouraged to buy equipment and other investments through an extension of the instant asset write-off. This is currently restricted to companies with turnovers of up to $50 million, for maximum investments of $30,000. But this will be significantly lifted, allowing companies with turnovers of up to $500 million to make assets write-offs of up to $150,000. Now they can claim a tax break for what they spend, though the question is whether they will, due to confidence, and available supply.
The Government yesterday had allocated $2.4 billion for a health package, including 100 pop-up coronavirus fever clinics and a new Medicare item to deliver health advice remotely.
The stimulus games begin – just remember it has to be paid for as the debt is ratcheted up…
CME Group announced on Wednesday night it will close its Chicago trading floor in a precautionary move due to the coronavirus outbreak.
CME Group says its exchanges offer the widest range of global benchmark products across all major asset classes based on interest rates, equity indexes, foreign exchange, energy, agricultural products and metals. The company offers futures and options on futures trading through the CME Globex® platform, fixed income trading via BrokerTec and foreign exchange trading on the EBS platform.
The closing will take effect on Friday “at the close of business,” CME said noting that no coronavirus cases have been reported at the Chicago Board of Trade trading floor.
CME said floor traders in Chicago will receive an “additional q&a” on Thursday “related to the execution of certain floor products, procedures and protocols and other floor-related practices.”
Presumably trading will continue via electronic platforms despite the shut down of the physical floor, but speculation has been running about this.
CME’s announcement comes after several companies advised employees to work from home in an effort to prevent contagion from the virus.
This
would make CME the first major U.S. exchange to close a trading floor
due to concerns over the coronavirus. The New York Stock Exchange is
taking precautionary measures as well, working to separate traders and
other employees, according to a Reuters report citing an internal memo.
The budget released overnight reads more like a Labor than Conservative strategy, with big spending on infrastructure – including in the UK’s north, as well as a significant spend on combating the virus.
Rishi Sunak delivered his first budget with both the tactical and strategic in mind. He focused first on the public health challenges of coronavirus but went on to “levelling up” across the country.
His virus emergency package totaled £30bn, included welfare and business support, sick-pay changes and local assistance. This includes £7bn for businesses and families and £5bn for the NHS. Statutory sick pay will be available to individuals self-isolating and self-employed or gig workers will be able to access support from Government more easily. The requirement to physically attend a job centre will be removed – everything can be done on the phone and online.
The chancellor announced £1bn of lending via a government-backed loan scheme, with government backing 80% of losses on bank lending and £2bn of sick-pay rebates for up to 2m small businesses with fewer than 250 employees.
He will also abolish business rates altogether for this year for retailers, in a tax cut worth more than £1bn. Any company eligible for small business rates relief will be allowed a £3,000 cash grant – a £2bn injection for 700,000 small businesses.
Beyond the virus, Sunak said the government is tripling its investment in transport and infrastructure spending to the highest levels since 1955. The government will provide additional funding worth £640m for Scotland, £360m for Wales and £210m for Northern Ireland.
The government will spend £27bn on more than 4,000 miles of roads. £5bn of funding will be invested in gigabit-capable broadband. An additional £1.5bn will be made available for further education funding.
Sunak said almost £1.1bn of allocations from the housing infrastructure fund will be made to build almost 70,000 homes in high-demand areas.
The chancellor announced a Grenfell building safety fund worth £1bn. The funds will help to remove cladding from tall residential buildings.
He said almost £650m of funding will be made available to help rough sleepers into accommodation.
Sunak said the government will increase NHS funding by £6bn during this parliament. Reiterating campaign pledges, he said the package will help to hire 50,000 nurses and build 40 hospitals. The chancellor announced the NHS surcharge for people from overseas will increase to £624.
As a result, the chancellor forecasted growth before the coronavirus hit of 1.1% in 2020, then 1.8%, 1.5%, then 1.3% and 1.4% in the following years. Already lower than expected in earlier forecasts. So growth has been downgraded BEFORE the virus impact.
UK Government borrowing as a percentage of GDP will be 2.1% this year then will rise to 2.4% in 2020-2021, 2.8% in 2021-22, then falls to 2.5%, 2.4% and 2.2% in the following years. Debt as a share of GDP is forecast to fall from 79.5% this year to 75.2% in 2024-25. UK Austerity is over.
Overnight the Bank of England cuts the UK cash rate by 0.5% to 0.25%, cut the banks’ liquidity buffer to zero, and announced extra funding for banks to lend to businesses, all in response to the virus. The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) said that banks should not increase dividends or other distributions, such as bonuses, in response to these policy actions.
The Bank is coordinating its actions with those of HM Treasury in order to ensure that initiatives are complementary and that they will, collectively, have maximum impact. The Bank continues to co-ordinate closely with international counterparts. We will discuss the budget spend, also announced today in a separate post.
The bank said that although the magnitude of the economic shock from Covid-19 is highly uncertain, activity is likely to weaken materially in the United Kingdom over the coming months. Temporary, but significant, disruptions to supply chains and weaker activity could challenge cash flows and increase demand for short-term credit from households and for working capital from companies. Such issues are likely to be most acute for smaller businesses. This economic shock will affect both demand and supply in the economy.
At its special meeting ending on 10 March
2020, the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) voted unanimously to reduce
Bank Rate by 50 basis points to 0.25%. The MPC voted unanimously for
the Bank of England to introduce a new Term Funding scheme with
additional incentives for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (TFSME),
financed by the issuance of central bank reserves. The MPC voted
unanimously to maintain the stock of sterling non-financial
investment-grade corporate bond purchases, financed by the issuance of
central bank reserves, at £10 billion. The Committee also voted
unanimously to maintain the stock of UK government bond purchases,
financed by the issuance of central bank reserves, at £435 billion.
The reduction in Bank Rate will help to
support business and consumer confidence at a difficult time, to bolster
the cash flows of businesses and households, and to reduce the cost,
and to improve the availability, of finance.
When interest rates are low, it is likely
to be difficult for some banks and building societies to reduce deposit
rates much further, which in turn could limit their ability to cut their
lending rates. In order to mitigate these pressures and maximise the
effectiveness of monetary policy, the TFSME will, over the next 12
months, offer four-year funding of at least 5% of participants’ stock of
real economy lending at interest rates at, or very close to, Bank Rate.
Additional funding will be available for banks that increase lending,
especially to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Experience from
the Term Funding Scheme launched in 2016 suggests that the TFSME could
provide in excess of £100 billion in term funding.
The TFSME will:
help reinforce the transmission of
the reduction in Bank Rate to the real economy to ensure that businesses
and households benefit from the MPC’s actions;
provide participants with a
cost-effective source of funding to support additional lending to the
real economy, providing insurance against adverse conditions in bank
funding markets;
incentivise banks to provide credit to businesses and households to bridge through a period of economic disruption; and
provide additional incentives for
banks to support lending to SMEs that typically bear the brunt of
contractions in the supply of credit during periods of heightened risk
aversion and economic downturns.
To support further the ability of banks to supply the credit needed to bridge a potentially challenging period, the Financial Policy Committee (FPC) has reduced the UK countercyclical capital buffer rate to 0% of banks’ exposures to UK borrowers with immediate effect. The rate had been 1% and had been due to reach 2% by December 2020.
The FPC expects to maintain the 0% rate
for at least 12 months, so that any subsequent increase would not take
effect until March 2022 at the earliest.
Although the disruption arising from Covid-19 could be sharp and large, it should be temporary. Such economic disruption should have less of an impact on the core banking system than recent stress tests run by the Bank have shown the system can withstand. Those stress tests demonstrated that banks would be able to continue to lend to businesses and households even while absorbing the effects of substantial, prolonged economic downturns in both the UK and the global economies, as well as falls in asset prices much larger than experienced in recent weeks.
Given the resilience of the core banking
system, businesses and households should be able to rely on banks to
meet their need for credit to bridge through a period of economic
disruption.
The release of the countercyclical capital buffer will support up to £190 billion of bank lending to businesses. That is equivalent to 13 times banks’ net lending to businesses in 2019. Together with the TFSME, this means that banks should not face obstacles to supplying credit to the UK economy and to meeting the needs of businesses and households through temporary disruption.
The FPC and the Prudential Regulation
Committee (PRC) will monitor closely the response of banks to these
measures as well as the credit conditions faced by UK businesses and
households more generally.
The release of the countercyclical capital
buffer reinforces the expectations of the FPC and the PRC that all
elements of banks’ capital and liquidity buffers can be drawn down as
necessary to support the economy through this temporary shock. In
addition, the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has today set out
its supervisory expectation that banks should not increase dividends or
other distributions, such as bonuses, in response to these policy
actions.
Major UK banks are well able to withstand
severe market disruption. They hold £1 trillion of high-quality liquid
assets, enabling them to meet their maturing obligations for many
months.
In response to the material fall in
government bond yields in recent weeks, the PRC invites requests from
insurance companies to use the flexibility in Solvency II regulations to
recalculate the transitional measures that smooth the impact of market
movements. This will support market functioning.
The Bank of England has operations in place to make loans to banks in all major currencies on a weekly basis. Banks have pre-positioned collateral with the Bank of England enabling them to borrow around £300 billion through these facilities.
The actions announced today by the three
policy committees of the Bank of England comprise a comprehensive and
timely package to allow UK businesses and households to bridge a
temporarily difficult period and thereby to mitigate any longer-lasting
effects of Covid-19 on jobs, growth and the UK economy.
The Open Market Trading Desk (the Desk) at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York has released the repurchase agreement (repo) operational schedule for the upcoming period.
Beginning Thursday, March 12, 2020 and
continuing through Monday, April 13, 2020, the Desk will offer at least
$175 billion in daily overnight repo operations and at least $45
billion in two-week term repo operations twice per week over this
period. In addition, the Desk will also offer three one-month term
repo operations, with the first operation occurring on Thursday, March
12, 2020. The amount offered for each of these three operations will
be at least $50 billion.
Consistent with the FOMC directive
to the Desk, these operations are intended to ensure that the supply of
reserves remains ample and to mitigate the risk of money market
pressures that could adversely affect policy implementation. They
should help support smooth functioning of funding markets as market
participants implement business resiliency plans in response to the
coronavirus. The Desk will continue to adjust repo operations as
needed to foster efficient and effective policy implementation
consistent with the FOMC directive.
Detailed information on the schedule and parameters of term and overnight repo operations are provided on the Repurchase Agreement Operational Details page.
We are headed to $800 billion extra liquidity, which clearly is more than a temporary problem in the banking system. John Adams and I discussed this in a recent post.
Given the current market gyrations, we are going to examine the latest critical data each day, because a week is a long time in politics but a lifetime on the markets at the moment…
RBA Deputy Governor Guy Debelle gave a keynote Address at the Australian Financial Review Business Summit. It was a summary of how the Bank is seeing developments in the economy at the moment. As normal, the story was the economy was doing quite well, until the onset of the coronavirus. And once it passes things will revert to this trend.
They admit that the global economy will be materially weaker in the first quarter of 2020 and in the period ahead. Australia will see at least a 0.5% fall in growth in the current quarter, but it is just too uncertain to assess the impact of the virus beyond the March quarter, he said. Despite the fact that spreads on Australian bank bonds have widened, yields remain at levels that are still very low historically, and banks are strongly capitalised.
Weirdly, he fails to discuss the Fed’s ongoing repo operations and growing balance sheet. John Adams and I released a show on this just today:
Here is the speech in full:
The December quarter national accounts confirmed our assessment that the Australian economy ended 2019
with a gradual pick-up in growth. Growth over the year was 2¼ per cent, up from a low of
1½ per cent. Consumption growth was a little stronger in the quarter, although still
subdued. We had estimated that the bushfires will subtract around 0.2 percentage points from growth
across the December and March quarters, but besides that, economic growth was set to continue to pick up
supported by low interest rates, the lower exchange rate, a rise in mining investment, high levels of
spending on infrastructure and an expected recovery in residential construction.
On the global side, around the turn of the year there were indications that the global economy was
coming out of a soft patch of growth. The trade tensions between China and the US had abated, surveys of
business conditions were picking up and industrial production was improving. Financial conditions were
very stimulatory and supporting the pick-up in global growth.
Since then, there is no doubt that the outbreak of the virus has significantly disrupted this momentum,
initially in China and now more broadly. We do not have a clear picture yet on the disruption to the
Chinese economy caused by the virus and the measures put in place to contain the virus. But the
following two graphs provide some sense of the significant disruption to the Chinese people and
economy.
The coal consumption graph (Graph 1) shows the regular significant decline in production around
Chinese New Year. But this year, the return to normal production has been significantly delayed. There
was no ramp up in production after the holiday period, and we are now more than four weeks past the
point where the Chinese economy is normally back to full-scale production. The straight arithmetic of
losing a substantial amount of output over a period of several weeks implies a significant hit to
economic activity. The road congestion graph (Graph 2) tells a similar story of a protracted period
of low output.
Both show that the Chinese economy is now only gradually returning to normal. Even as this occurs, it
is very uncertain how long it will take to repair the severe disruption to supply chains.
In the meantime, the virus has spread to other countries. They too are beginning to suffer significant
disruptions, the extent and duration of which is unknown at this time.
The conclusion is that the global economy will be materially weaker in the first quarter of 2020 and in
the period ahead.
In terms of the effect on the Australian economy, we have estimated the direct impact on the education
and tourism sectors in the March quarter. Graph 3 shows the normal profile of visitor arrivals into
Australia. Since January, inbound airline capacity from China has declined by 90 per cent,
which gives a guide to the size of the decline in arrivals from China. Up until recently, tourist
arrivals from other countries had held up reasonably well but that may no longer be true. From our
liaison with the education sector, including the universities, as well as student visa numbers, we have
information on the number of foreign students who have been unable to resume their studies. Graph 4
shows the country of origin of foreign students in Australia.
We have used this information to estimate the impact of the virus in these two sectors of the economy.
The estimate is approximate, but at this stage we think the decline in services exports in the March
quarter will amount to at least 10 per cent, roughly evenly split between lower tourism and
education exports. As service exports account for 5 per cent of GDP, this translates into a
subtraction from growth of ½ per cent of GDP in the March quarter from these two
sources.
Through our business liaison program we are gathering information on supply chain disruptions which are
affecting the construction and retail sectors in particular. Clearly we are still only in the early
weeks of March, so the picture can change from here.
It is just too uncertain to assess the impact of the virus beyond the March quarter.
Our liaison with the resources sector does not indicate any material disruption to exports of iron ore
and coal at this stage. Indeed, iron ore and coal prices have been resilient. Disruptions to Chinese
domestic production of iron ore and coal have been a factor in this, which has resulted in more use of
imported resources. Another is the expectation that the Chinese policy response will involve a
significant amount of infrastructure spending which will benefit bulk commodities. The movements in
these commodity prices stand in contrast to the large decline in the oil price, which will flow through
to LNG prices (Graph 5).
I will now summarise recent developments in financial markets. There has been a large increase in risk
aversion and uncertainty. The virus is going to have a material economic impact but it is not clear how
large that will be. That makes it difficult for the market to reprice financial assets.
Policy interest rates have been reduced in some countries, including Australia, and further reductions
are expected where that is possible. Currently market pricing implies a reduction of between 75 and
100 basis points in the Fed’s policy rate at their meeting next week.
Government bond yields have declined to historic lows, because of the shift downwards in actual and
expected policy rates, reduced expectations for growth and a flight to safety (Graph 6). The
25 per cent fall in oil prices on Monday morning has also led to lower expectations of
inflation. The 10 year US treasury yield reached a low below 35 basis points on Monday,
including a 25 basis point decline at the opening of trade in Asia. It has since risen to be around
65 basis points at the time of writing.
Australian government bond yields have been driven by the global developments. They haven’t
declined as much as US Treasuries, such that the spread between the 10 year yields is now slightly
positive, having been negative over the past two years. At the time of writing, the Australian
government can borrow for 10 years at 75 basis points.
Equity prices have fallen by as much as 20 per cent since their all-time peak of less than a
month ago, although the Australian market rebounded on Tuesday (Graph 7). The falls have been
particularly large for companies in the oil sector, as well as tourism.
Corporate bond spreads have widened. Through the first part of this move, the widening in large part
reflected the rapid shift downwards in the risk free (government bond) curve. Investment grade bond
spreads widened but investment grade yields actually fell (Graph 8). In the last few days though,
we have seen yields rise along with the spreads. The high yield sector has seen a marked rise in yields
and spreads, particularly in the US reflecting the prevalence of energy companies in that market. Bond
issuance has been extremely low, in part because issuers do not want to appear to be in desperate need
of funds in a dislocated market. It is also worth noting that just as equities prices have fallen from
historic highs, so too have corporate bond prices fallen from historic highs.
Liquidity in fixed income markets has been poor at times, including in US Treasuries. The liquidity
environment has changed considerably in the past decade in response to changed regulations. The banking
sector is much less willing and able to warehouse risk and provide liquidity than in the past.[2]
The Australian banking system is well capitalised and is in a strong liquidity position. The Australian
banks had raised a significant amount of wholesale funding before the disruption to markets and deposit
inflows are robust. They are resilient to a period of market disruption. Spreads on Australian bank
bonds have widened, although yields remain at levels that are still very low historically. We have not
seen any particular sign of pressure in our daily market operations to date. The spread between the bank
bill swap rate and the expected policy rate (OIS) has risen in recent days but remains low, nothing at
all like what occurred in GFC.
Exchange rate volatility has been very low for a considerable period of time, but has picked up in the
past few days. However it still remains considerably lower than volatility in other financial markets.
The yen has appreciated by as much as 10 per cent against the US dollar, as Japanese
investors repatriate funds, as normally occurs in these type of situations (Graph 9). More
surprisingly, the euro has also appreciated against the US dollar. Market intelligence indicates
that part of the reason for this is the liquidation of trades that were funded in euros and invested in
higher yielding assets such as emerging market bonds. The sharp narrowing in the interest differential
with the US has also contributed.
The Australian dollar has depreciated by 6 per cent since the beginning of the year to decade
lows against the US dollar and on a trade-weighted basis (Graph 10). This will provide a
helpful boost to the Australian economy and has occurred despite the prices of the bulk commodities,
iron ore and coal, remaining resilient.
Turning to monetary policy, the Board met last week and decided to lower the cash rate by 25 basis
points to 0.5 per cent. This decision was taken to support the economy by boosting demand and
to offset the tightening in financial conditions that otherwise was occurring.
The reduction in the cash rate at the March meeting was passed in full through to mortgage rates. The
cash rate has been reduced by 100 basis points since June. This has translated into a reduction in
mortgage rates of 95 basis points. This has occurred through the combination of a reduction in the
standard variable rate of 85 basis points, larger discounts to new borrowers and existing borrowers
refinancing to take advantage of larger discounts. While a lower and flatter interest rate structure
puts pressure on bank margins, it is important to remember that the easing in monetary policy will help
support the Australian economy which in turn supports the credit quality of the banks’ portfolios
of loans.
The virus is a shock to both demand and supply. Monetary policy does not have an effect on the supply
side, but can work to ensure demand is stronger than it otherwise would be. Lower interest rates will
provide more disposable income to the household sector and those businesses with debt. They may not
spend it straight away, but it brings forward the day when they will be comfortable with their balance
sheets and resume a normal pattern of spending. Monetary policy also works through the exchange rate
which will help mitigate the effect of the virus’ impact on external demand.
The effect of the virus will come to an end at some point. Once we get beyond the effect of the virus,
the Australian economy will be supported by the low level of interest rates, the lower exchange rate, a
pick-up in mining investment, sustained spending on infrastructure and an expected recovery in
residential construction.
The Government has announced its intention to support jobs, incomes, small business and investment
which will provide welcome support to the economy. The combined effect of fiscal and monetary policy
will help us navigate a difficult period for the Australian economy. They will also help ensure the
Australian economy is well placed to bounce back quickly once the virus is contained.
Reuters is reporting that payments on mortgages will be suspended across the whole of Italy after the coronavirus outbreak, Italy’s deputy economy minister said on Tuesday.
“Yes,
that will be the case, for individuals and households,” Laura Castelli
said in an interview with Radio Anch’io, when asked about the
possibility.
Italy’s banking lobby ABI
said on Monday lenders representing 90% of total banking assets would
offer debt moratoriums to small firms and households grappling with the
economic fallout from Italy’s coronavirus outbreak.
The Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Te Pūtea Matua, is taking
proactive steps to ensure it is well positioned to effectively and efficiently
manage New Zealand’s monetary policy in an environment of very low interest
rates.
In a speech launching its Principles on Using Unconventional Monetary Policy,
Reserve Bank Governor Adrian Orr said as kaitiaki (caretakers) of Te Pūtea
Matua, the Bank’s activities involve continuous assessment of our monetary
policy framework, including the most effective tools and their best
application.
Mr Orr said the Reserve Bank
has not, and still does not, need to use alternative monetary policy
instruments to the OCR, but it is best to be prepared.
“An inability to predict
what might happen next is no excuse for not preparing for what could happen.
That’s true for businesses, governments and central banks. It is in light of
both economic theory and recent global experience that we have been assessing
what alternative monetary policy tools may be available to the Reserve Bank of
New Zealand – and their relative desirability. We are fortunate, unlike many
other OECD economies, to have the time to prepare for such possible needs.”
The Reserve Bank typically implements monetary policy by controlling the Official Cash Rate but as interest rates fall, this tool could be pushed to its limit in the future. Given this, in recent years, the Reserve Bank has been considering the unconventional monetary policy tools and policy framework that it would use to meet its policy targets.
The work to develop the
Reserve Bank’s preparation for unconventional monetary policies has involved:
Identifying the suite of possible ‘unconventional monetary policy tools’ available to the Reserve Bank;
Defining and making explicit the criteria the Reserve Bank would use to assess these tools, against both each other and also alternative policies all together (e.g., fiscal policy options);
Considering the relative benefits and costs of the tools, so as to operate on a ‘least surprise’ basis, and to ensure the Reserve Bank works in collaboration and with the agreement of fiscal authorities;
Considering not just the monetary policy efficacy of the tools, but also broader considerations related to our financial stability and efficiency mandate; and
Ensuring the tools are actually able to be utilised, including working with the important financial institutions that make up our system.
“We are confident of our
success in assessment and implementation, but we are also aware that these
tools work best when supported by wider stabilisation policies and additional
macroprudential considerations. In the event we ever had to use these
unconventional tools, our goal would be to ensure a strong and sustained
increase in economic activity, with inflation expectations remaining
well-anchored on our target mid-point.”
In the coming weeks the
Reserve Bank will release a series of technical papers explaining the tools in
more detail, examining their pros and cons, and outlining how they would
potentially be used.
Note:
The principles and speech do
not discuss current economic conditions or the Reserve Bank’s outlook for the
Official Cash Rate (OCR). The Reserve Bank’s next OCR decision is scheduled for March 25.
The Bank remains prepared in
its business continuity role to ensure a well-functioning financial system,
including ongoing consumer and business access to credit and cash, liquidity to
the banking system and a stable payments and settlements system.