ABS – Page 68 – Digital Finance Analytics (DFA) Blog

Household Income Trends Show Strongest Growth At The Top

The ABS today released their Distribution of Household Income, Consumption and Wealth data for the years from 2003 to 2012. According to the ABS, the average gross disposable income of Australian households grew 58 per cent in the period 2003-04 to 2011-12. However, the highest income quintile grew at a rate above average, at 62 per cent. All other income quintiles grew above 50 per cent , but below the average rate of 58 per cent. We see that older Australian’s income has been growing faster than younger ones.

The relative share of gross income is gravitating towards older households. This is a function of the growing number of older households, thanks to the demographic shifts, and the fact they hold the lions share of investments yielding income.

We can also look across the income quintiles (20% bands). We see stronger income growth in the higher income groups. This is stated in perecentage terms, but in doller terms the relative amounts are significant.

We can see that growth in incomes for the richest quintile is stronger than the lower ones.

The ABS says growth in wages and salaries was by far the largest contributor to this increase, except for the lowest income quintile, where social assistance benefits were the largest contributor to their income growth.

This is an important data-set and is the first time data for household groups has been released under the framework of the national accounts. We can look at which household groups are driving the growth in income, consumption, savings and wealth in the national accounts.

For example, households with two adults and dependent children were responsible for about one-third of the growth in household gross disposable income.

Households where the reference person was aged 35 to 44 years had an increase in income tax of $9,000 – with their payments going from $17, 000 in 2003-04 to $26,000 in 2011-12 – which was above the average increase of $4,500.

Of course this data stops in 2012, so we cannot yet see the impact of falling incomes in real terms, which we have discussed previously.

Australian Population Now 23.4m And Ageing

The ABS just released their preliminary demographic statistics to end March 2014. Australia’s total population increased by 388,400 people to reach 23.4 million by the end of March 2014, with a growth rate of 1.7 per cent, a continuation of the average annual growth rate for the past three years. Natural increase contributed 156,900 people to Australia’s population in the year to 31 March 2014, consisting of 306,500 births and 149,600 deaths. Net overseas migration contributed 231,500 to the population over the same period, accounting for 60 per cent of Australia’s total growth.

All states and territories recorded positive population growth in the year ended 31 March 2014. Western Australia continued to record the fastest growth rate of all states and territories at 2.5%. Tasmania recorded the slowest growth rate at 0.3%. New South Wales and Victoria continued to experience high population growth going against the trend of slowing annual growth around Australia – the population of New South Wales and Victoria grew by 114,500 and 108,800 respectively. Net overseas migration (NOM) was the main contributor to both New South Wales and Victoria’s population growth, accounting for 67 and 57 per cent of the states’ growth respectively. The NOM contribution to Victoria’s growth is below the Australian rate of 60 per cent, which highlights the recent increase in net interstate migration to the state. We’re also seeing fewer people moving to Queensland and Western Australia. Queensland recorded one of its lowest annual gains on record, slowing by 65 per cent in five years. Meanwhile, New South Wales recorded its lowest annual interstate loss in nearly 30 years and Victoria recorded its highest annual gain on record.
There is a significant skew towards older Australians, as can be seen by the relative movement from 1971, by age bands. In fact in absolute numbers, those under 20 years grew the slowest whilst those aged 40-69 grew the fastest. This has a profound impact on the community, with those planning to retire well ahead of new workers ready to join the workforce – yet youth unemployment is very high, as we discussed recently.

We can also look at the splits in percentage terms, which shows again these trends. In 1971, the fiftieth point was 27 years, today it is 38 years, and rising.

Strong Investment Lending In Latest Finance Data

In the final element of the monthly series, the ABS today released their lending data for July. The total value of owner occupied housing commitments excluding alterations and additions rose 0.3% in trend terms and the seasonally adjusted series was flat. The trend series for the value of total personal finance commitments rose 0.4%. Revolving credit commitments rose 0.8% and fixed lending commitments rose 0.1%. The seasonally adjusted series for the value of total personal finance commitments fell 1.3%.

Revolving credit commitments fell 4.7%, while fixed lending commitments rose 1.5%. The trend series for the value of total commercial finance commitments rose 2.7%. Revolving credit commitments rose 5.1% and fixed lending commitments rose 1.6%. The seasonally adjusted series for the value of total commercial finance commitments rose 3.7% in July 2014, following a rise of 11.8% in June 2014. Fixed lending commitments rose 20.7%, following a rise of 0.8% in the previous month. Revolving credit commitments fell 25.9%, after a rise of 37.7% in the previous month. Looking at the data in more detail, we see the concentration of lending by the banks (and mainly the big four).

Within the commercial category, lending for housing investment by individuals was a significant element. Here is the absolute dollar amount by states, with a trend line, showing the relative strength in lending for investment purposes in NSW in particular, then VIC. The investment lending boom is not uniformly spread across the country. Another way to look at the data is on a per capita basis across each state. This chart shows the average amount per capita between January 2011 and July 2014. The movement is NSW in particular since May 2013 highlights both the volume and size of the average loans for investment purposes in NSW, compared with the other states. It is also worth noting the differences between NSW and some of the other states, especially TAS and SA, and we see WA, NT and VIC roughly marching together, behind the rabid pace set by NSW.

Building Approvals To July 2014

The ABS published their Building Approvals Data to July 2014 today. Statistics of building work approved are compiled from, permits issued by local government authorities and other principal certifying authorities; contracts let or day labour work authorised by commonwealth, state, semi-government and local government authorities; and major building approvals in areas not subject to normal administrative approval e.g. building on remote mine sites. The scope of the collection comprises construction of new buildings; alterations and additions to existing buildings; approved non-structural renovation and refurbishment work; and approved installation of integral building fixtures.

The trend estimate for total dwellings approved fell 0.5% in July and has fallen for seven months. The seasonally adjusted estimate for total dwellings approved rose 2.5% in July following a fall of 3.8% in the previous month. The trend estimate for private sector houses approved fell 0.2% in July after being flat in the previous month. The seasonally adjusted estimate for private sector houses rose 1.4% in July following a fall of 1.0% in the previous month. NSW appears to be underrepresented given the relative population by states.

The trend estimate of the value of total building approved fell 0.2% in July and has fallen for seven months. The value of residential building rose 0.2% and has risen for two months. The value of non-residential building fell 0.8% and has fallen for eight months. The seasonally adjusted estimate of the value of total building approved fell 10.4% in July after rising for two months. The value of residential building rose 0.8% following a fall of 3.2% in the previous month. The value of non-residential building fell 26.5% after rising for two months.

The Chain Measures series, which reflect changes in the volume of building work approved after the direct effects of price changes have been eliminated. The ABS tell us that the chain volume measures are annually reweighted chain Laspeyres indexes referenced to current price values in a chosen reference year. We see a swing up in value for both houses and other residential buildings since July 2012, impacted by lower interest rates and higher demand. However, the absolute value, was relatively similar in March 2004, to July 2014 after correcting for inflation.

Depending of whether you go with the original data or seasonally adjusted data, you can argue that residential building approvals are either up, or down.

Managed Funds Industry Now At A Record $2.4 Trillion

The ABS released their data for the managed funds industry to June 2014 today. At 30 June 2014, the managed funds industry had $2,405.3b funds under management, an increase of $46.1b (2%) on the March quarter 2014 figure of $2,359.2b. The main valuation effects that occurred during the June quarter 2014 were as follows: the S&P/ASX 200 was flat; the price of foreign shares, as represented by the MSCI World Index excluding Australia, increased 4.2%; and the A$ appreciated 2.2% against the US$.
At 30 June 2014, the consolidated assets of managed funds institutions were $1,895.3b, an increase of $31.3b (2%) on the March quarter 2014 figure of $1,864.0b. The asset types that increased were units in trusts, $12.5b (6%); shares, $9.2b (2%); overseas assets, $9.0b (3%); loans and placements, $4.8b (11%); bonds, etc., $3.3b (3%); short term securities, $2.1b (3%); and derivatives, $0.2b (16%). These were partially offset by decreases in other financial assets, $5.0b (12%); deposits, $4.5b (2%); other non-financial assets, $0.3b (2%); and land, buildings and equipment, $0.1b (0%).

A Tale Of Two Cities – Demand and Supply In Action

Last week we reported on the ABS house stock data, which valued property at more than 5.2 trillion in Australia. We have been looking in more detail at this data, and cross relating it to information from our own household surveys. Today we compare the markets in NSW and WA, because there are some interesting observations to note. First, NSW and WA have the highest mean dwelling prices in Australia. NSW stands at more than $650,000 and WA $595,000, ahead of VIC and ACT. TAS has the lowest mean at just over $300,000.

In addition, when we look at the decomposition of the $5.2 trillon by state, NSW has the largest share, WA has a smaller, but significant share, behind VIC and QLD.

But, there are some interesting differences between NSW and WA. Population growth, from all sources (migration, births, and interstate movements), shows that WA is growing faster than NSW. So, from the demand perspective, we would expect prices in WA to be responding to that demand.In fact, dwelling prices in WA have been growing at a significantly lower speed than in NSW. In fact, most recent data suggests prices in WA are going slightly backwards.

So, whats making this happen? We need to look at the supply side of the equation. WA have been building more properties, significantly more, than NSW. So demand and supply in WA are more in balance, even taking the faster population growth into account.

We also checked out the status of property purchase by SMSF’s and the like, and there are similar trends in the two states, so that element can be discounted from the analysis. We have previously highlighted the shrinking average plot size for new developments, and noted that WA has been allowing plot sub-division and new builds on sub-250 sqm plots. So it is interesting to note NSW’s recent announcement to release land in the west for smaller development plots. Supply and demand are clearly in action, and NSW house prices won’t adjust from their stratospheric levels until substantial supply side issues are addressed. The way to address Australia’s housing issues is to release more land, and build more houses.

House Price Momentum Slowing As Value Reaches $5.2 Trillion

The ABS released their latest data on Residential Property Prices today. The total value of residential dwellings in Australia was $5,196,355.9 m at the end of June quarter 2014, rising $112,598.5 m over the quarter. The mean price of residential dwellings rose $9,900 and the number of residential dwellings rose by 37,600 in the June quarter 2014. The price index for residential properties for the weighted average of the eight capital cities rose 1.8% in the June quarter 2014 and rose 10.1% through the year to the June quarter 2014. The capital city residential property price indexes rose in Sydney (+3.1%), Melbourne (+1.3%), Brisbane (+1.8%), Adelaide (+1.0%), Canberra (+0.8%), Darwin (+0.7%) and Hobart (+0.3%) and fell in Perth (-0.2%). Recent data suggest momentum is slowing, a little.

Annually, residential property prices rose in Sydney (+15.6%), Melbourne (+9.3%), Brisbane (+6.8%), Adelaide (+5.6%), Hobart (+4.3%), Perth (+3.6), Darwin (+3.4%), and Canberra (+2.2%).

The median price of established houses exceeds $700,000 in Sydney. Hobart and Adelaide have the lowest values. Looking at the rest of the states, beyond the capital cities, NT has the highest value, and QLD exceeds NSW and VIC. Note this data is to December 2013 only, as the ABS does not yet reprot the latest data for the past 6 months.

Looking at attached dwellings, again Sydney is highest, on average, at over $550,000, whereas away from the capital cities, prices are higher in NT and QLD.

Looking at the number of transfers, momentum is clearly in Sydney and Melbourne. Brisbane is showing signs of upward movement. Note again this data is to December 2013.

Property is too highly priced, compared with income measures, and international comparisons. The long term chronic problem of poor supply, easy loans and high demand continues to be a brake on the broader economy. Household confidence is not buttressed by rising prices. Many continue be be excluded from the market.

June Finance Data – ABS

The ABS published their June lending data today, covering commercial, housing and other lending categories. Owner occupied housing rose 1.8% in seasonally adjusted terms, Personal finance fell 1.8% and commercial lending rose by 12.1% in June after a fall of 5.9% in May.

Looking at housing lending, investment lending remains significant (though in percentage terms it fell slightly this month). This is on a seasonally adjusted basis.

Investment lending accounted for 38% of all housing including refinance, and unsecured.

Looking more narrowly, the proportion of investment loans written remains close to record, at 46.3% of loans, the all time record is 46.8% (May 2014). This is calculated by removing refinance and unsecured lending.