Bendigo Hikes Investment Loan Rates

Bendigo Bank has announced it will increase its residential investment standard variable interest rate by 0.20% p.a. to address recent industry-wide concerns regarding residential investment lending.

The residential investment package variable rate will also increase by 0.20% p.a. for new business and most existing investor variable rate loans.

Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Managing Director Mike Hirst said implementing this measure supports the Bank’s prudent management by appropriately pricing for risk and assists restraining investor mortgage book growth to less than 10 percent per month as required by the Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority (APRA).

“When it comes to setting interest rates, our Bank takes into account a wide range of factors and carefully consider its key stakeholders including borrowers, depositors, staff, shareholders, partners and the wider community,” Mr Hirst said.

“We believe this approach considers the needs of our stakeholders while continuing to provide customers with market competitive rates,” he said.

The adjustment is effective 1 September for new business and 1 October 2015 for existing residential investment loans.

As DFA has said previously, APRA has given the banks a convenient excuse to lift rates. It is really more to do with competitive dynamics.

 

Investment Property Loans ARE More Risky – Fitch

Fitch Ratings says that the investment loan reclassification process announced by National Australia Bank Limited will not result in a withdrawal or downgrade of Fitch’s ratings on the National RMBS Trust notes and outstanding issuance under NAB’s mortgage covered bond programme. The reclassification process has been initiated following a review of NAB’s housing loan purpose data which found misclassifications between ‘owner occupied’ and ‘investment’. The full list of ratings follows at the end of this commentary.

Fitch believes that investment-property loans will have a higher probability of default in an economic downturn, as borrowers will fight harder to protect their primary residence. The agency applies a 25% higher base default probability in the case of a mortgage collateralised by an investment property, compared with an owner-occupied property.

However, Fitch has tested the sensitivity of the ratings to an increase in the proportion of loans collateralised by investment properties. The analysis found that the RMBS notes’ and mortgage covered bond ratings are not impacted by an increase in expected foreclosure frequency following the increase of loans classified as investment loans in each of the rated transactions. The levels of credit enhancement (CE) available to each rated note issued under the National RMBS transactions would still be above Fitch’s adjusted break-even CE levels. The transactions are performing within expectations with low levels of arrears and losses.

The change of the proportion of investment loans in the cover pool would not impact Fitch’s ‘AAA’ break-even asset percentage (AP) of 89.5% on NAB’s mortgage covered bond programme. The ‘AAA’ break-even AP calculated by Fitch is mainly driven by the programme’s refinancing needs as a result of significant maturity mismatches and the agency’s refinancing assumptions.

NAB has stated that new procedures are being implemented and that identified gaps in data capturing have been rectified. This work forms part of an ongoing review to improve its statistical reporting process. Fitch has and will adjust its analysis assumptions on the National RMBS transactions and the NAB mortgage covered bond programme to reflect the ongoing work.

The affected RMBS transactions are securitisations of first-ranking Australian residential mortgages originated by Advantedge Financial Services Pty Limited and Challenger Mortgage Management Pty Limited: National 2011-1, National 2012-1 and National 2012-2; and National Australia Bank Limited: National 2011-2 and National 2015-1.

RBNZ – Investor LVR limits to reduce financial system risk

The Reserve Bank New Zealand expects new lending limits for Auckland property investors will reduce heightened financial system risk, and help moderate the Auckland housing market cycle, Deputy Governor Grant Spencer said today.

Speaking to the Northern Club in Auckland, Mr Spencer said that the resurgence in Auckland house prices over the past year has increased the Bank’s concerns about financial stability risks.

Mr Spencer said that Auckland prices have risen a further 24 percent over the past year, compared to 3 percent for the rest of the country.

“This has stretched the price-to-income ratio for the Auckland region to 9, double the ratio for the rest of New Zealand, and places Auckland among the world’s most expensive cities.

“New housing supply has been growing, but nowhere near fast enough to make a dent in the existing housing shortage. In the meantime, net migration is at record levels, and investors continue to expand their influence in the Auckland market.”

Mr Spencer said that investors are now accounting for 41 percent of Auckland house purchases, up 8 percentage points since late 2013. “We have seen a particular increase in purchases by smaller investors and investors reliant on credit. Half of the new lending to investors is being written at loan-to-value ratios of over 70 percent.

“This trend is increasing the risk inherent in the Auckland market. The increasing investor presence is likely to amplify the housing cycle, and worsen the potential damage from a downturn, both to the financial system and the broader economy.”

Mr Spencer said that macro-prudential policy can assist in moderating the risks to the financial sector and broader economy associated with Auckland’s housing market.

“A sharp fall in house prices has the potential to accentuate weakness in the macro-economy, particularly if banks tighten lending conditions excessively, leading to greater declines in asset markets and larger loan losses for the banks. A key goal of macro-prudential policy is to ensure that the banking system maintains sufficient prudential buffers to avoid this sort of contractionary behaviour in a downturn.

“Modifications to the Reserve Bank’s LVR policy, announced in May, are targeted specifically at Auckland residential investors. The speed limit has been eased for the rest of the country where housing markets are not subject to the same pressures.”

Mr Spencer said that the Bank recognises that low interest rates are contributing to housing demand pressures, and this is a factor the Bank takes into consideration when setting monetary policy. “However, the current weakness in export prices, economic activity and CPI inflation means that interest rate increases are likely to be off the table for some time,” he said.

He noted that the Bank’s macro-prudential policy is one of many measures aimed at reducing the imbalances in the Auckland housing market.

“Much more rapid progress in producing new housing is needed in order to get on top of this issue. Tax policy is also an important driver, and we welcome the changes announced in the 2015 Budget, including the two year bright-line test, the proposed non-resident withholding tax and the requirement for tax numbers to be provided by house purchasers.”

Reserve Bank NZ Confirms Tighter Investment Loans Policy

The Reserve Bank today published a summary of submissions and final policy positions in regards to changes in the Loan to Value Ratio restriction rules (LVRs), and the asset classification of residential property investment loans in the Capital Adequacy Framework.

As announced in May, the Reserve Bank is altering existing LVR rules to focus on rental property investors in the Auckland region. The alterations mean that borrowers will generally need a 30 percent deposit for a mortgage loan secured against Auckland rental property.

The new rules will become effective on 1 November 2015. This is one month later than initially proposed, to enable banks to adapt their systems for the new rules.

Restrictions on loans to owner occupiers in Auckland will continue to apply, with banks allowed to make up to 10 percent of their new mortgage lending to such borrowers with LVRs exceeding 80 percent.

Restrictions outside Auckland are being eased after 1 November. Banks will be able to make up to 15 percent of their new mortgage lending to borrowers with LVRs exceeding 80 percent, regardless of whether the borrowers are owner occupiers or residential property investors.

The Reserve Bank received feedback via written submissions, and through meetings and workshops with affected banks. The Reserve Bank has modified its proposals in response to feedback about compliance challenges and special cases. The Reserve Bank’s final policy position adopts a 5 percent speed limit for high-LVR loans to Auckland investors, instead of 2 percent as originally proposed. The Reserve Bank is also introducing an exemption for high LVR lending to finance leaky building remediation and similar cases.

Mortgage price hikes tipped to continue

From Mortgage Business.

A leading market analyst says rising house prices will force the banks to continue raising capital and keep passing on higher home loan rates.

Following last week’s $5 billion capital raising by CBA, Digital Finance Analytics principal Martin North says there is no doubt in his mind that capital will continue to be required.

“We will see more capital raisings,” Mr North told Mortgage Business.

“That means the prices of mortgages will continue to rise irrespective of what happens to interest rates.

“We are in a circle where bigger house prices allow bigger loans to be made, which allows the banks to make more loans and require more capital, like a black hole sucking everything in.”

Earlier this month, ANZ raised $3 billion to meet its CET1 capital ratio requirements. NAB announced a $5.5 billion capital raising in May and Westpac raised $2 billion the same month through its dividend reinvestment plan.

Speaking with Mortgage Business last week, HSBC chief economist Paul Bloxham said more capital raisings are likely as Australia’s banking sector seeks to meet the new, tougher requirements set out by the authorities.

Interest rate hikes on investor home loans came into effect last week with three of the four major banks charging higher rates. NAB raised its interest-only loans by 29 basis points while CBA and ANZ both added 0.27 per cent to their investor loans.

The repricing has been viewed as a response to APRA’s crackdown on credit growth in the investor segment and the need for increased capital.

However, analysts are sceptical whether higher home loan rates actually will cool investor demand.

“Given the momentum in the housing market, it is not clear that the lift in lending rates to investors that has occurred so far will have a significant impact on investor interest in the market,” Mr Bloxham said.

“Further increases in lending rates or a genuine change in direction by the central bank may be required to take the exuberance out of the Sydney and Melbourne housing markets.”

Mr North notes that interest rates are still extremely low and demand for home loans remains “extremely strong”.

“The only thing that will dampen demand is a one or two per cent rise in the official cash rate. Or some other external shock,” he said.

Lending Finance Still About Housing – Record $35bn in June

The latest ABS data for June 2015, covering all lending, continues to portray the momentum in home finance. In June overall $35bn was lent across all the property sectors, out of an overall $94bn lent across the board. $12.bn was for owner occupied loans, $6bn for refinance (an all time record) and $13.7bn for investment loans. Regulatory intervention is too little too late. The 10% speed limit on investment loans was too high, and its implementation too slow to curb the excesses. Property lending is also concentrated in the eastern states.  The risks are mounting.

Housing-Finance-June-2015-GrossThe total value of owner occupied housing commitments excluding alterations and additions rose 0.1% in trend terms (our preferred measure). Within the housing data, we see that 53% of lending for housing, excluding refinance and unsecured was for investment purposes, a record. Moreover, even if you add in unsecured finance, and refinance, it is still a peak, of 43% of all lending.

FinainceJune2012Looking across all finance categories, the trend series for the value of total personal finance commitments rose 0.5%. Fixed lending commitments rose 1.5%, while revolving credit commitments fell 1.2%. The trend series for the value of total commercial finance commitments fell 0.2%. Fixed lending commitments fell 0.4%, while revolving credit commitments rose 0.5%. The trend series for the value of total lease finance commitments rose 1.0% in June 2015. In this picture, commercial lending includes both fixed and revolving loans. We also show the proportion of fixed loans which are for investment property purposes – its sitting at 37%.

Interestingly, the ABS also notes that

statistics in this publication are currently derived from returns submitted to the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) under the Financial Sector (Collection of Data) Act 2001, primarily for use by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). The ABS anticipates that in the coming months some lenders will revise residential mortgage data reported to APRA. These revisions are expected to result in changes in the proportion of the investment housing statistics relative to owner occupation statistics. It is not expected that aggregate data on lending statistics for housing will change significantly. The ABS is working closely with APRA and affected lenders as they remediate their data and processes.

We may get more “ANZ” type restatements between loan categories.

Investment Lending Highest Ever At 52.8%

The latest housing finance data from the ABS to June 2015 shows continued growth, especially in refinancing and investment lending. Excluding refinance, 52.8% of all loans written in the month were for investment purposes – another record. No sign of any impact of tighter regulation showing yet. Total lending in the month (trend) was $32.2 billion (up 0.16% from last month), of which owner occupied loans were $12.2 billion (down 0.18%), refinance $6.1 billion (up 0.21%) and investment lending $13.7 billion (up 0.75%).  The ABS rolls in refinance into the owner occupied numbers, which overall went up 0.1%.

Housing-Finance-June-2015Within owner occupied loans, the trend changes clearly show that the purchase of new dwellings continues to grow the strongest,  Refinancing was up as a percentage of all lending to 33.2%. Another record.

OO-Housing-June-2015The rate of change of owner occupied refinancing is slowing, along with construction lending and purchased of established dwellings.

OOPCHousngJune2015The number of first home buyer commitments as a percentage of total owner occupied housing finance commitments rose to 15.9% in June 2015 from 15.6% in May 2015. First time buyers were active, with the original number of first time owner occupied borrowers up 6.8%, to 8,737. In addition, we overlay the DFA household survey data of investor first time buyers, which rose by 3.5% in the month to 4,453. Whilst the bulk were in Sydney we are continue to see a rise in investors in other states. As a result the total number of first time buyer transactions was 13,191, up 5.65%.

FTB-Adjusted-June-2015

CBA Follows The Mortgage Pricing Crowd

CBA has announced changes to its investment loan pricing.  Like ANZ, which we covered yesterday, the price rise applies to existing as well as new investment loans, which means that the move, whilst ostensibly connected with APRA’s 10% growth hurdle actually has more to do with the changing capital requirements which were announced this week and the ability to offer keen rates to attract new owner occupied loans (which are not caught by the 10% cap).

Commonwealth Bank has today taken further steps to moderate investor home loan growth and to manage its portfolio to address the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority’s concerns regarding investment home lending growth. The interest rate on investor home loans will increase by 27 basis points to 5.72% per annum. Fixed rates for 1,2,3,4 and 5 year new investor home loans will also increase by between 10 and 40 basis points. There are no increases to the SVR on owner occupied loans and fixed rates for some owner occupied loans have been reduced.

Demand for investor home loans across Australia has reached historic highs, with recent data noting that over 50% of new home loan approvals are for investment purposes. Last December, APRA introduced new regulatory measures to reinforce sound residential lending practices, including actions to restrict investor lending growth to no more than 10% p.a.

Matt Comyn, Group Executive for Retail Banking Services said: “As Australia’s largest home lender, we support the prudential regulator’s actions to ensure lending practices remain sustainable and we have been actively managing our investment home loan portfolio to remain below the 10% growth limit.

“Despite making a range of changes to our investor lending policies in the past few months we have witnessed ongoing investor lending growth, and at an industry level, investor lending approvals remain 22% higher than 12 months ago.”

Commonwealth Bank has moved to ensure it remains competitive for owner occupied loans and we have reduced rates on our 1,2,3, and 4 year fixed rate loans by up to 30 basis points. These fixed rate changes came into effect this week (22 July 2015).

“In the current market conditions, we believe these changes strike an appropriate balance in our portfolio between owner occupied home loans and those seeking investment loans,” Mr Comyn said.

Fixed rate loans for investors will increase by between 0.10% and 0.40% . This will apply to new loans only and will come into effect from 31 July 2015.

The new investment home loan rate of 5.72% remains one of the lowest rates offered by CBA and is 0.18% lower than the rate six months ago. It will apply to new and existing customers and will come into effect from 10 August 2015.

We expect the other majors to topple into line, so moving pricing of investment loans higher. Some fixed owner occupied rates are cut, so CBA is re-balancing its portfolio. Now of course the question will be, does this translate into dampening demand for investment property, as the RBA hopes, or does it simply lift the interest costs which can be set against tax, (remember many investment loans are interest only). Given the significant capital appreciation we have been seeing lately, and that fact that rates are low (as low as ever) we suspect demand will still be there. It is conceivable as this works through the RBA may have more wriggle room for another rate cut, but we are not so sure.

ANZ Re-balances Mortgage Pricing

As we foreshadowed, the banks are beginning to tweak their mortgage strategies in response to the 10% cap in investment loans, and in a drive to re-balance towards owner-occupied borrowers.

ANZ today announced interest rates for residential investment property loans will increase to manage investor lending growth targets and in response to changing market conditions. There is no change to other variable lending rates including the Standard Variable Rate for owner-occupied home loans or for business lending. Fixed rates for new owner-occupied home lending will be reduced by up to 0.40%.

Effective Monday, 10 August 2015, ANZ’s variable Residential Investment Property Loan (RIPL) Index Rate will rise by 0.27% to 5.65%pa (5.76%pa comparison rate). Fixed rates for new Residential Investment Lending will also increase by up to 0.30%.

ANZ CEO Australia Mark Whelan said: “Although interest rates for residential property investors are at very low levels historically, the decision to raise interest rates for residential investment lending has been difficult but necessary in the current environment. “It allows us to balance the mix of our lending between owner-occupied and investment lending as well as the impact of changing market conditions. This includes a decision to cut fixed rates for new owner-occupied home lending. “This is a considered decision that takes into account our customers’ position and the criteria we look at when setting rates including our competitive position, our regulatory obligations and the state of the residential property market,” Mr Whelan said. ANZ has also introduced a series of other measures recently to improve the mix between investor and owner occupied lending. For residential investment lending, these include reducing interest rate discounts, increasing the deposit required to at least 10% and increasing interest rate sensitivity buffers.

Those who are above APRA’s 10% guidance will be dialing investment loans down and turning to owner occupied loans to bolster their mortgage portfolio growth. On the other hand, those below the 10% threshold seem to be seeing an opportunity to grow their investment portfolio as others pull back. Non-banks are also joining in. Banks who are well above the 10% annual target will of course have to write smaller numbers of loans in the second half to balance out the full year.

MBS-May-2015--Loans-YOY-InvThe other factor in play are the capital changes APRA announced this week, from 16% to 25% for IRB banks by July 2016. ANZ’s approach of applying the lift in investment loan rates to its entire variable portfolio indicates their strategy is designed to take account of the capital allocation changes ahead. It will be interesting to see if other banks follow suit and we see investment loans repriced across the market. We think this is a likely outcome.

RBA Minutes Says Impact Of Investment Lending Scrutiny Not Showing Yet

The RBA released their minutes today for July. Little new really, though they comment that housing credit growth had been steady and remained relatively strong for investors in housing, although it had not accelerated. Any effects of regulators’ greater scrutiny of investor lending were probably not yet evident in the data. We expect to see the impact of the brakes being applied by the banks in the next quarter but our surveys continue to show strong demand from the investment sector.

The Board’s discussion about economic conditions opened with the observation that economic growth in Australia’s major trading partners appeared to have been around average in the June quarter. Consumption growth had been little changed for most trading partners in recent months, although it was perhaps a bit stronger in the United States and somewhat weaker in China. The level of consumption in Japan remained well below that seen prior to the increase in the consumption tax in 2014. Core inflation rates had been stable in year-ended terms over recent months and remained below the targets of most central banks. Members also observed that trade volumes, particularly within the Asian region, appeared to have fallen recently. Consistent with this observation, growth in industrial production across a number of east Asian economies had slowed a little.

In China, there had been little change in the monthly indicators of economic activity, although conditions had been a bit more positive in some sectors than early in 2015. The Chinese property market had improved somewhat; residential property prices overall had risen for the first time in a year and floor space sold had increased in the past few months. Members reflected that the recent easing in monetary conditions would provide additional support to the property market and growth more broadly, although it could be some time before a significant pick-up in construction activity began. Recent efforts by central government authorities to increase infrastructure investment further and reform local government financing arrangements were also expected to support investment.

Commodity prices overall had fallen since the previous meeting, driven by iron ore and oil prices. Growth in crude steel production had been modest and steel prices had fallen noticeably over the past month. Iron ore production in China had continued to decline. Shipments of iron ore from Australia and Brazil appeared to have increased in June, which contributed to lower iron ore prices over the past month.

Following quite strong output growth in Japan in the March quarter, more timely indicators pointed to modest growth in the June quarter. Labour market conditions had continued to improve, resulting in the unemployment rate falling further and the ratio of jobs to applicants continuing to rise. Wage growth and financial market measures of inflation expectations were higher than a year earlier and were expected to feed into higher core inflation over time. Members considered the importance for Japan of policy reforms designed to address some longer-term structural challenges, such as the ageing of the population.

In the United States, recent data pointed to moderate growth in economic activity in the June quarter following weakness in the March quarter. The labour market had strengthened further, with growth in non-farm payrolls employment rebounding in April and May and the unemployment rate falling. While there had been some increase in measures of wage growth, core measures of inflation remained below the Federal Reserve’s inflation target.

In the euro area, the available indicators pointed to modest economic growth and above-average sentiment in the June quarter, continuing the recent trend of improved conditions in the euro area as a whole. Members noted that exports had made a significant contribution to the pick-up in growth in the region but investment was still well below the levels seen prior to the global financial crisis. The unemployment rate had continued to fall modestly since its peak two years earlier, but varied sharply across the euro area; the unemployment rate was highest in Greece, where output was more than 25 per cent below its level prior to the financial crisis.

Domestic Economic Conditions

Members noted that output had increased by 0.9 per cent in the March quarter and by 2.3 per cent over the year. Resource exports had made a significant contribution to growth, reflecting better-than-usual weather conditions in the quarter. Dwelling investment had remained strong and while consumption growth had picked up over the past year or so, it had remained below average. Business investment had contracted in the quarter and there had been little growth in public demand. More recent economic indicators suggested that domestic demand had continued to grow at a below-average pace over recent months, but that labour market conditions had continued to improve.

Members observed that consumption grew faster than household income over the year to the March quarter. As a result, the saving ratio had declined further, although it remained well above the level it had been over much of the past 25 years. Year-ended growth in retail sales had been little changed over recent months and liaison suggested that this was likely to have continued into June. Retail sales growth had been relatively strong in New South Wales and Victoria but weaker in Queensland and Western Australia, in line with observed differences in economic conditions across the country. At the same time, surveys indicated that consumers had viewed their financial situation as being above average over the past year, notwithstanding the relatively weak growth in labour incomes. Members observed that this was likely to reflect the very low level of interest rates and strong growth in net household wealth.

Dwelling investment increased by 9 per cent over the year to the March quarter. An increase in the construction of new dwellings accounted for most of this growth, but the alterations and additions component had also contributed more recently, recording the first increase in a year in the March quarter. Forward-looking indicators pointed to further strong growth in dwelling investment in the period ahead. Members noted that there had been ongoing divergence in conditions in established housing markets across the country, as well as between houses and apartments. Housing prices had continued to rise rapidly in Sydney and to a lesser extent in Melbourne. Elsewhere, there had been little change in housing prices over the past six months or so. Prices of apartments had been growing less rapidly than those of houses, which members considered to be consistent with the relatively strong growth in the supply of higher-density housing in many capital cities.

Growth in housing credit overall had been stable over recent months at around 7 per cent on an annualised basis, while growth in lending to investors had been steady at a bit above 10 per cent. Members observed that the household debt-to-income ratio, calculated by netting funds held in mortgage offset accounts from total household debt to the financial sector, had increased over the year to March but had not exceeded previous peaks. Members discussed the fact that high housing prices had different implications for existing home owners, who benefited from increased wealth, and potential new home owners, who were finding it more difficult to finance a home purchase.

Investment in both the mining and non-mining sectors appeared to have fallen in the March quarter, although the split between the two components remained subject to some uncertainty. Profits for non-mining firms had increased by 6 per cent over the past year. More recent survey measures of business conditions, confidence and capacity utilisation had picked up to be around, or even above, their long-run averages. In contrast, private non-residential building approvals had remained weak.

The monthly trade data suggested that resource exports, including iron ore and coal, had declined in the June quarter. Coal exports had been affected by the severe storms in the Hunter region of New South Wales in late April. Members noted that there had been further signs of growth in service exports, in part a response to the depreciation of the exchange rate. Over the past year, net service exports had made a similar contribution to output growth as exports of iron ore, even though total import volumes had increased in the March quarter.

Labour force data indicated further signs of improvement in May. Employment growth had picked up over the year to exceed the rate of population growth. As a result, the unemployment rate had been relatively stable since the latter part of 2014 and had fallen slightly in May to 6 per cent. Members observed that employment growth had been strongest in household services and that employment and vacancies had been growing for business services but had remained little changed in the goods sector. As with other state-based indicators, employment growth and job vacancies had been strongest in New South Wales and Victoria. Forward-looking labour market indicators had been somewhat mixed over recent months. The ABS measure of firms’ job vacancies overall suggested that demand for labour could be sufficient to maintain a stable or even falling unemployment rate in the near term, while other forward-looking indicators suggested only modest growth in employment in coming months.

Members noted that the latest estimates indicated that the population had increased by 1.4 per cent over the year to the December quarter, down from a peak rate of growth of 1.8 per cent over 2012. The slower growth was primarily accounted for by a decline in net immigration, which was particularly pronounced in Western Australia and Queensland, consistent with weaker economic conditions in those states. Members observed that the lower-than-expected growth in the population helped to reconcile the below-average growth in output over the past year with a broadly steady unemployment rate.

Despite recent improvements in labour market indicators, members reflected that there was still evidence of spare capacity in the labour market. Consistent with this, the latest national accounts data indicated that non-farm average earnings per hour had recorded the lowest year-ended outcomes since the early 1990s and that unit labour costs had been little changed for around four years.

Financial Markets

International financial markets were mainly focused on developments in Greece and the fall in Chinese equity markets over the past month.

Members were briefed on recent developments in Greece. The ‘no’ vote in the referendum on the creditors’ latest proposals raised several issues, first among which was how the Greek authorities could reopen the banks. A critical vulnerability in the near term was related to whether the European Central Bank would provide additional emergency liquidity assistance. A second issue was how Greece would be able to service its external debt and a third was the challenges faced by the Greek authorities in improving the competitive position of the economy. Although these issues were of great concern to the Greek populace, the direct economic implications for the global economy and Australia were assessed by members to be relatively limited. They noted that the reaction of financial markets to these developments had been fairly muted. This was consistent with the economic and financial exposures to Greece – apart from the official sector’s financial exposure – being quite low.

Members noted that spreads to 10-year German Bunds on comparable bonds issued by Italy, Spain and Portugal had not risen much, with the limited contagion from developments in Greece likely to have reflected a general view of markets that previous adjustment policies in those countries had been relatively successful.

Members then turned their discussion to developments in bond markets more generally. Yields on longer-maturity German Bunds and US Treasuries had risen sharply over the first half of June, with German 10-year yields reaching 1 per cent, compared with a historic low of 8 basis points in mid April. German yields declined somewhat following the announcement of the Greek referendum. Longer-term sovereign yields of most other developed countries, including Australia, tended to move in line with US Treasuries.

Expectations about the timing of the US Federal Reserve’s first increase in the federal funds rate were little changed over the past month. Market pricing continued to suggest that the first increase would occur around the end of 2015. Although commentary by Federal Reserve officials suggested that it could be a little sooner than that, they continued to emphasise that the exact timing of the first increase would be less important than the pace of subsequent increases, which were expected to be gradual.

The People’s Bank of China (PBC) eased monetary policy further in June by cutting benchmark deposit and lending rates by 25 basis points, citing low inflation and a consequent increase in real interest rates. In addition, the PBC announced cuts to the reserve requirement ratio for selected financial institutions. The Chinese authorities had also announced a proposal to allow banks more flexibility in their choice of funding mix and asset allocation, which could lead to an increase in the supply of credit over time.

The Reserve Bank of New Zealand lowered its policy rate by 25 basis points, to 3.25 per cent, citing the decline in New Zealand’s terms of trade and the disinflationary effect of stronger-than-expected labour force growth.

Global equity markets fell by 3 per cent over the course of June, with broad-based falls and price movements generally tending to reflect fluctuations in sentiment about Greece. The Chinese equity market also fell sharply in June, partly in response to what was only a modest tightening of restrictions on margin lending. Mainland share prices were still well above their levels of a year earlier but the sharpness of the recent fall prompted the Chinese authorities to announce a number of measures, including an indefinite suspension of initial public offerings, an equity stabilisation fund and a funding facility for brokers. The Australian equity market underperformed several other advanced economy markets in June, mainly reflecting falls in resources and consumer sector share prices.

Global foreign exchange markets were relatively subdued in June. The euro recorded only a modest and short-lived fall when markets opened after the announcement of the Greek referendum result. The Australian dollar was 3 per cent lower against the US dollar and on a trade-weighted basis.

Corporate bond issuance in Australia had been strong over the course of 2015 to date, particularly by resource companies, although much of the increase reflected refinancing.

Pricing of Australian money market instruments suggested that the cash rate target was expected to remain unchanged at the present meeting.

Considerations for Monetary Policy

Members noted that global economic conditions remained consistent with growth in Australia’s major trading partners being around average over the period ahead. Global financial conditions were very accommodative and would remain so even in the event that the Federal Reserve started to raise its policy interest rate later in the year. Recent data suggested that conditions in Chinese property markets had improved and the authorities had acted to support activity by easing a range of policies further. Members noted that the recent volatility in Chinese equity markets and potential spillovers from developments in Greece would require close monitoring.

Domestically, the key forces shaping the economy over the past year were much as they had been for some time. Very low interest rates were working to support strong growth in dwelling investment and, together with strong housing prices, had supported consumption growth. Resource exports had made a substantial contribution to growth and mining investment had declined significantly, while public demand had been flat over the past year. Although output growth in the March quarter had been stronger than expected, growth over the year remained below average and early indications were that the strength in the March quarter had not carried through to the June quarter. Non-mining business investment had been subdued and surveys of businesses’ investment intentions suggested that it would remain so over the coming year. Nevertheless, non-mining business profits had increased over the past year and surveys suggested that business conditions had generally improved over recent months to be a bit above average.

Conditions in the housing market had been little changed in the most recent months, with notable strength in Sydney. Housing credit growth had been steady and remained relatively strong for investors in housing, although it had not accelerated. Any effects of regulators’ greater scrutiny of investor lending were probably not yet evident in the data.

Recent data indicated that employment had grown more rapidly than the population and the unemployment rate had been relatively stable since the latter part of the previous year. The easing in population growth over the past year helped to reconcile below-average growth in output with the relatively steady unemployment rate. Nevertheless, spare capacity remained, as evidenced by the level of the unemployment rate, historically low wage growth and unit labour costs that had been stable for a number of years. On this basis, members assessed that inflationary pressures were well contained and likely to remain so in the period ahead.

Commodity prices had fallen further and the Australian dollar had depreciated over the past month. Although the exchange rate against the US dollar was close to levels last seen in 2009, the decline in the Australian dollar had been more modest in terms of a basket of currencies. Members noted that the exchange rate had thus far offered less assistance than would normally be expected in achieving balanced growth in the economy and that further depreciation seemed both likely and necessary.

In light of current and prospective economic circumstances and financial conditions, the Board judged that leaving the cash rate unchanged was appropriate. Information to be received over the period ahead on economic and financial conditions would continue to inform the Board’s assessment of the outlook and hence whether the current stance of policy remained appropriate to foster sustainable growth and inflation consistent with the target.